||The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for neologisms. (March 2013)|
|This article's listed sources may not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources. (March 2013)|
The Friedman Unit, or simply Friedman, is a tongue-in-cheek neologism. One Friedman Unit is equal to six months, specifically the "next six months", a period repeatedly declared by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman to be the most critical of the then-ongoing Iraq War  even though such pronouncements extended back over two and a half years.
The term is in reference to a May 16, 2006, article by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) detailing the repeated use by columnist Thomas Friedman of "the next six months" as the period in which, according to Friedman, "we're going to find out... whether a decent outcome is possible" in the Iraq War. As documented by FAIR, Friedman had been making such six-month predictions for a period of two and a half years, on at least fourteen different occasions, starting with a column in the November 30, 2003, edition of The New York Times, in which he stated: "The next six months in Iraq—which will determine the prospects for democracy-building there—are the most important six months in U.S. foreign policy in a long, long time."
The unit is also called "one Friedman" or "one F.U." according to SourceWatch, In September, 2007, Thomas Friedman agreed not to call for any more F.U.s: "Stephen Colbert brings on Thomas Friedman, author of The World is Flat.... Colbert offers up the same six months (also known as a Friedman Unit or FU) that Friedman has spent the last four years claiming would be all we need to see "success in Iraq," but Friedman admits we're all out of FUs." However, in July, 2008, he again called for a delay in Barack Obama's plan to withdraw troops from Iraq, in effect adopting John McCain's position. Even after Barack Obama had designated the summer of 2010 as his goal for starting to bring American troops home from Iraq, with the end of 2010 as his deadline, in October, 2008, Friedman was reported as calling for another Friedman unit, giving his opinion that, if elected, President Obama should let troops remain until 2011.
The term has been used in puns, for example, "Commander of the Friedman Unit," an article about the political hopes of Friedman for a third-party candidate in the U.S. presidential race of 2012.
The website SourceWatch notes that the Huffington Post cited it as the "Best New Phrase" of 2006. SourceWatch observes, "More broadly, many political observers measure any date-specific statement by a public figure regarding the future of Iraq or the Iraq War in Friedman Units, thus suggesting that the speaker's predictions of a near-term resolution of the Iraq War amount to that speaker's de facto defense of the status quo." It is used in discussions of whether it's too soon to tell if the U.S. is making progress. It worked its way into commentary on the war and whether an interval was, indeed, critical.
The unit is also used to measure the progress of American goals in other Middle Eastern countries, such as Afghanistan in 2009. "Ah, the Friedman unit, that beloved Internet tradition denoting the six-month increment many pundits believe will prove decisive in any war, only to be subject to an endless addition of … Friedman units." 
Other authors have been inspired by the Friedman unit to invent other Friedman-based terms:
- "Friedman's Choice states that "our real choices in Iraq are 10 months or 10 years. Either we commit the resources to entirely rebuild the place over a decade, for which there is little support, or we tell everyone that we will be out within 10 months, or sooner, and we'll deal with the consequences from afar."
- "Gen. Petreaus is in". ThinkProgress (Center for American Progress). 2007-02-28. Retrieved 2007-05-22. Note: the General's name is Petraeus.
- Klein, Ezra (2006-12-08). "TAPPED". The American Prospect. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
- Mitchell, Greg (2008). So Wrong for So Long: How the Press, the Pundits--and the President--Failed on Iraq. Union Square Press/Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. pp. 177–79. ISBN 9781402756573.
- "Tom Friedman's Flexible Deadlines". Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. 2006-05-16. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
- Friedman, Thomas L (2003-11-30). "The Chant Not Heard". The New York Times. p. WK 9.
- "Friedman (Iraq War time unit)". SourceWatch. 2007-03-19. Retrieved 2013-03-06.
- Belle, Nicole (2007-09-24). "The Colbert Report: Tom Friedman admits we're out of FUs in Iraq". Crooks and Liars. Retrieved 2013-03-07.
- Bartimus Blue (2008-07-23). "BREAKING: Tom Friedman asking for another Friedman Unit.". Daily Kos. Retrieved 2013-03-09.
- Armbruster, Ben (2008-10-19). "Friedman Wants Obama to Add a Friedman Unit to His Iraq Withdrawal Timeline". ThinkProgress. Retrieved 2013-03-07.
- Barrett, Grant (2007-05-24). "Friedman unit". A Way with Words. Retrieved 2013-03-08.
- Friedman, Thomas; Jon Stewart (2006-06-12). "Thomas Friedman talks about solar and wind energy alternatives". Retrieved 2013-03-08. Unknown parameter
- M.S. (2012-04-19). "Third-party fantasies: Commander of the Friedman unit". Democracy in America: American politics. The Economist blogs. Retrieved 2013-03-06.
- Terkel, Amanda (2008-01-22). "Petraeus: I Need Another Six Months To Determine Whether ‘We’ve Reached A Turning Point’". ThinkProgress. Retrieved 2013-03-08.
- Froomkin, Dan (2007-05-08). "Four more months?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2013-03-08.
- Ackerman, Spencer (2009-11-02). "How Many Friedman Units for Afghanistan?". the Washington Independent News Network. Retrieved 2013-03-07.
- Center for American Progress interactive timeline