Functional leadership model

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
John Adair's Action Centred Leadership Model

Functional leadership theory (Hackman & Walton, 1986; McGrath, 1962) is a particularly useful theory for addressing specific leader behaviours expected to contribute to organizational or unit effectiveness. This theory argues that the leader's main job is to see that whatever is necessary to group needs is taken care of; thus, a leader can be said to have done their job well when they have contributed to group effectiveness and cohesion

Functional theories of leadership are developed by studying successful leaders and identifying the actions and behaviours they show. Large studies with lots of data make it possible to correlate what leaders actually do, i.e. their actions or functions with their successful results.

In the Functional Leadership model, leadership does not rest with one person but rests on a set of behaviours by the group that gets things done. Any member of the group can perform these behaviours, so any member can participate in leadership. The Functional theory of leadership, places greater emphasis on how an organisation or task is being led rather than who has been formally assigned a leadership role.

One of the best known and most influential of functional theories of leadership, used in many leadership development programmes, is John Adair's "Action-Centred Leadership".

John Adair developed a model of Action-Centred Leadership has connecting circles that overlap because:

  • the task can only be performed by the team and not by one person
  • the team can only achieve excellent task performance if all the individuals are fully developed
  • the individuals need the task to be challenged and motivated

Adair’s model challenged trait theory by focusing on what leaders do. He showed that leadership could be taught and did not depend on the traits a person had.

The 8 Functions of Leadership

Adair noted the following 8 key functions for which team leaders are responsible. (Examples are given in brackets)

  1. Defining the task, (by setting clear objectives through SMART goals)
  2. Planning, (by looking at alternative ways to achieve the task and having contingency plans in case of problems)
  3. Briefing the team, by ( creating the right team climate, fostering synergy, and making the most of each individual through knowing them well)
  4. Controlling what happens, (by being efficient in terms of getting maximum results from minimum resources)
  5. Evaluating results, (by assessing consequences and identifying how to improve performance)
  6. Motivating individuals, (by using both external motivators such as rewards and incentives as well as eliciting internal motivators on the part of each team player)
  7. Organising people, (by organising self and others through good time management, personal development, and delegation)
  8. Setting an example, (by the recognition that people observe their leaders and copy what they do).

Criticism of the Model

Some people consider Adair's Three Circles Model too simplistic and to be outdated as it was developed in the 1970s

Implications for the nature versus nurture debate

This question of whether leaders are born or made is part of the whole question of whether human behaviour is due to nature or nurture. It is a short leap from functional leadership theory, to the belief that if one person can do something, then others can also learn to do it. The implication that leaders are made and not necessarily born with the necessary traits for leadership, opened up the possibility of leadership development.

References

  • http://www.johnadair.co.uk/profiles.html
  • Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman, & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups
  • (pp. 72–119). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1962). Leadership behavior: Requirements for leadership training. Prepared for U.S. Civil Service Commission Office of Career
  • Development, Washington, D.C.. ⁎
  • Adair, J. (1973) Action-Centred Leadership. New York, : McGraw-Hill.
  • AstraZeneca (1999) Leadership in AstaZeneca. AstraZeneca HR, Dec 1999.
  • Bass, B. (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
  • Bergmann, H., Hurson, K. and Russ-Eft, D. (1999) everyone a Leader: A grassroots model for the new workplace. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Blackler, F. and Kennedy, A. (2003) The Design of a Development Programme for Experienced Top Managers from the Public Sector. Working Paper, Lancaster University.
  • Department for Education and Skills (2003) Management andLeadership Attributes Framework. DfES Leadership and Personnel Division, April 2003.
  • Deutsche Lufthansa AG (1998) Leading With Goals: Lufthansa Leadership Compass. FRA PU/D, July 1998.
  • Katzenbach, J. and Smith, D. (1994) the Wisdom of Teams. New York: Harper business.
  • Lewin, K. (1935) A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York, McGraw Hill.
  • Tichy, N. and Devanna, M. (1986) Transformational Leadership. New York: Wiley.