Geometrography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, in geometry, geometrography is the study of geometrical constructions.[1] The concepts and methods of geometrography were first expounded by Émile Lemoine (1840–1912), a French civil engineer and a mathematician, in a meeting of the French Association for the Advancement of the Sciences held at Oran in 1888. [1] Lemoine later expanded his ideas in another memoir read at the Pau meeting of the same Association held in 1892.[2]

It is well known in elementary geometry that certain geometrical constructions are simpler than certain others. But in many case it turns out that the apparent simplicity of a construction does not consist in the practical execution of the construction, but in the brevity of the statement of what has to be done. Can then any objective criterion be laid down by which an estimate may be formed of the relative simplicity of several different constructions for attaining the same end? Lemoine developed the ideas of geometrography to answer this question.[1]

Basic ideas[edit]

In developing the ideas of geometrography, Lemoine restricted himself to Euclidean constructions using rulers and compasses alone. According to the analysis of Lemoine, all such constructions can be executed, as a sequence of operations selected form a fixed set of five elementary operations. The five elementary operations identified by Lemoine are the following:

Elementary operations in a geometrical construction

Sl. No. Operation Notation
for operation
1 To place the edge of the ruler in coincidence with a point R1
2 To draw a straight line R2
3 To put a point of the compasses on a determinate point C1
4 To put a point of the compasses on an indeterminate point of a line    C2
5 To describe a circle C3

In a geometrical construction the fact that an operation X is to be done n times is denoted by the expression nX. The operation of placing a ruler in coincidence with two points is indicated by 2R1. The operation of putting one point of the compasses on a determinate point and the other point of the compasses on another determinate point is 2C2.

Every geometrical construction can be represented by an expression of the following form

l1R1 + l2R2 + m1C1 + m2C2 + m3C3.

Here the coefficients l1, etc. denote the number of times any particular operation is performed.

Coefficient of simplicity[edit]

The number l1 + l2 + m1 +m2 + m3 is called the coefficient of simplicity, or the simplicity of the construction. It denotes the total number of operations.

Coefficient of exactitude[edit]

The number l1 + m1 + m2 is called the coefficient of exactitude, or the exactitude of the construction; it denotes the number of preparatory operations, on which the exactitude of the construction depends.

Examples[edit]

Lemoine applied his scheme to analyze more than sixty problems in elementary geometry.[1]

  • The construction of a triangle given the three vertices can be represented by the expression 4R1 + 3R2.
  • A certain construction of the regular heptadecagon involving the Carlyle circles can be represented by the expression 8R1 + 4R2 + 22C1 + 11C3 and has simplicity 45.[3]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d J. S. Mackay (1893). "The Geometrography of Euclid's Problems". Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society 12: 2–16. doi:10.1017/S0013091500001565. Retrieved 5 November 2011. 
  2. ^ Lemoine, Émile. "Géométrographie ou Art des constructions géométriques". Gallica Bibliotheque Numerique. Retrieved 5 November 2011. 
  3. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Heptadecagon." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Heptadecagon.html

Further reading[edit]

  • Hess, Adrien L (Mar–Apr 1956). "Certain topics related to constructions with straight edge and compasses". Mathematics Magazine 29 (4): 217–221. JSTOR 3029638. 
  • Newton, Guy Thornwel (1926). Geometrography with applications to the instruments of the draftsman. University of Texas. p. 190. 
  • DeTemple, Duane W. (Feb 1991). "Carlyle circles and Lemoine simplicity of polygon constructions". The American Mathematical Monthly 98 (2): 97–208. doi:10.2307/2323939. Retrieved 6 November 2011.