German armored fighting vehicle production during World War II
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2014)|
Where figures for production in 1939 are given, they refer to September 1939 onwards; that is, they only count wartime production.
- 1 Total production
- 2 Panzer I
- 3 Panzer II
- 4 Panzer 38(t)
- 5 Panzer III
- 6 Panzer IV
- 7 Panzer V (Panther)
- 8 Panzer VI (Tiger)
- 9 Ferdinand/Elefant
- 10 Development of tank manufacturing
- 11 Manufacturing Control
- 12 Location of German tank manufacturing industry
- 13 German tank problem
- 14 See also
- 15 References
- 16 External links
|Panzer V Panther||-||-||-||-||-||1,849||4,003||705||6,557||6,557|
|Panzer VI H Tiger I||-||-||-||-||78||649||641||-||1,368||1,368|
|Panzer VI B Tiger II||-||-||-||-||-||1||428||140||569||569|
- Figures include tank production and chassis production used for other variants (for example, Panzer III figures include StuG III production, etc.).
- Panzer III figures for 1942 and 1943 excludes 700 Panzer III N models converted from older variants.
Panzer I Pre-war: 1,893 hulls had been produced. 1,867 were fitted with turrets, and the rest used as command vehicles. These lightly armed and armoured tanks were intended as training vehicles, but were used in combat as the war came sooner than the military men had anticipated.
Panzer II Pre-war: 1,223.
|Pz II (f)||-||90||42||23||-||-||-||155|
- Panzer II (f) - flamethrower tank (converted from older types)
- Marder II - 75 mm PaK 40 L/46 or captured Soviet 76.2 mm gun on Panzer II chassis (Sd.Kfz. 131/132) (some converted from older types)
- Wespe - 105 mm light field howitzer on Panzer II chassis (Sd.Kfz. 124)
- Sturmpanzer II - 150 mm heavy infantry gun on Panzer II chassis
Panzer 38(t) Pre-war: 78.
- Marder 138 (Marder III) - 75 mm PaK 40 L/46 gun on Panzer 38(t) chassis (Sd.Kfz. 138)
- Marder 139 (Marder III) - captured Soviet 76.2 mm gun on Panzer 38(t) chassis (Sd.Kfz. 139)
- Grille - 150 mm heavy infantry gun on Panzer 38(t) chassis (figures include munition-carrying versions of the Grille) (Sd.Kfz. 138/1)
- Hetzer (Jagdpanzer 38(t)) - 75 mm PaK 39 L/48 gun on a widened Pz 38(t) chassis (Sd.Kfz. 138/2)
Panzer III Pre-war: 98.
|Pz III A-F||157||396||-||-||-||-||-||553|
|Pz III G-J||-||466||1,673||251||-||-||-||2,390|
|Pz III J/1-M||-||-||-||1,907||64||-||-||1,971|
|Pz III N||-||-||-||450||250||-||-||700|
|Pz III (f)||-||-||-||-||100||-||-||100|
|StuG III A-E||-||192||540||93||-||-||-||825|
|StuG III F-G||-||-||-||695||3,011||3,849*||1,038||8,593|
* not including 173 converted Panzer III.
Totals do not include any Panzer III N models as these were converted from 3 (J), 447 (L), 213 (M) and 37 other Panzer III variants.
- Panzer III A-F - armed with 37 mm gun
- Panzer III G-J - armed with 50 mm L/42 gun
- Panzer III J/1-M - armed with 50 mm L/60 gun
- Panzer III N - armed with 75 mm L/24 gun (converted older types)
- Panzer III (f) - armed with flamethrower
- StuG III A-E - Sturmgeschütz III. Assault Gun armed with 75 mm L/24 on Panzer III chassis (Sd.Kfz. 142)
- StuG III F-G - Sturmgeschütz 40. Assault Gun armed with 75 mm L/43 or L/48 on Panzer III chassis (Sd.Kfz. 142/1)
- StuH 42 - Sturmhaubitze 42. StuG III with 105 mm light field howitzer (Sd. Kfz. 142/2)
Panzer IV Pre-war: 211.
|Pz IV A-F1||45||268||467||124||-||-||-||904|
|Pz IV F2-J||-||-||-||870||3,013||3,126||385||7,394|
- Panzer IV A-F1 - Panzer IV with short 75 mm L/24 gun
- Panzer IV F2-J - Panzer IV with long 75 mm L/43 or L/48 gun
- StuG IV - Assault Gun. Modified superstructure of Sturmgeschütz III Ausf. G on Panzer IV chassis; armed with 75 mm L/48 gun (Sd.Kfz. 167)
- Jagdpanzer IV - Tank Destroyer with 75 mm L/48 gun on Panzer IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 162)
- Jagdpanzer IV/70 - Tank Destroyer with 75 mm L/70 gun on Panzer IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 162/1)
- Sturmpanzer IV (Brummbär) - with 150 mm field howitzer on Panzer IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 166)
- Hornisse - 88 mm PaK43/1 auf Geschützwagen III/IV, later known as Nashorn (Sd. Kfz. 164)
- Hummel - 150 mm field howitzer on Geschützwagen III/IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 165)
- Möbelwagen - Anti Aircraft. 37mm FlaK 43 L/89 on Panzer IV chassis (Flakpanzer IV Sd.Kfz.161/3)
- Wirbelwind - Anti Aircraft. quadruple 20mm FlaK 38 L/112.5 guns on Panzer IV chassis, with armored turret (Flakpanzer IV)
- Ostwind - Anti Aircraft. 37mm FlaK 43 L/89 on Panzer IV chassis, with armored turret (Flakpanzer IV)
The Panzer IV was originally armed with a low-velocity 75 mm L/24 gun. In 1942 this was upgraded to a 75 mm L/43 gun, and in 1943 to a 75 mm L/48 gun. For the purposes of the above table, both these guns are classed as "long" and displayed on the same row (Ausf. F2-J).
Panzer V (Panther)
- Panther (Panzer V) was armed with a 75 mm KwK 42 L/70 gun (Sd.Kfz. 171)
- Jagdpanther - Tank Destroyer with an 88 mm L/71 PaK43 gun on Panzer V chassis (Sd.Kfz. 173)
Panzer VI (Tiger)
- Tiger I (Panzer VI E/H) was armed with an 88 mm L/56 gun (Sd.Kfz. 181)
- Sturmtiger - Based on Tiger I chassis. 380 mm rocket mortar on Tiger I chassis (converted from battle damaged tanks)
- Tiger II (Panzer VI B, also known as Königstiger) was armed with an 88 mm L/71 gun (Sd.Kfz. 182)
- Jagdtiger - Based on Tiger II chassis. Tank Destroyer armed with a 128 mm L/55 PaK44 gun (Sd.Kfz. 186)
- The Ferdinand/Elefant (Sd.Kfz. 184) used the chassis of Porsche's losing entry for the Tiger competition (see the Tiger I's design history). On top of this chassis, a forward-facing 88 mm L/71 gun was mounted.
Development of tank manufacturing
German manufacturing of tanks began in 1934 when Adolf Hitler untethered Germany from the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles. German industry had not produced arms in many years, and time was required to develop the necessary techniques for hardening steel and for the development of tooling to produce arms. The first tank type produced was the two-man, air-cooled Pz I light tank, which mounted two machine guns in a rotating turret. Designed and produced by the Krupp works, it was developed as a training vehicle and was the first tank the panzer formations were given to complete exercises and develop their methods. It was not expected to be used in combat. The main battle tank of the German army was to be the Panzer III, with the Panzer IV as a supplemental vehicle to aid in overcoming strong points. Delays in its development and manufacture led to the production of an interim vehicle, the liquid-cooled Panzer II. This unit mounted a 20 mm gun and began production the following year. It was not clear yet how tanks would be used in the next war, nor was it apparent that tank-versus-tank combat would be a major operation that tanks would have to perform. Some military theorists envisioned tanks operating in support of infantry. The cavalry arm of the Heer saw the major function of tanks to be that of reconnaissance. This viewpoint was in marked conflict with the ideas of the armoured warfare proponents of Germany, chiefly Heinz Guderian, Wilhelm Ritter von Thoma, and Walther von Reichenau. It was not until 1937–38 that the first Panzer III and Panzer IV medium tanks began to appear. It was projected that the panzer forces would be equipped with their intended vehicles by some time after 1940.
Assessing the industrial nations' ability to replace combat losses, Guderian compared nations based on the world wide automobile production for 1936 as follows:
- United States 77.2%
- Britain 7.8%
- Germany 4.8%
- France 3.5%
- Canada 3.4%
- Italy 0.9%
- All others 2.4%
Noting that Germany was the third largest producer of automobiles in the world, Guderian projected that Germany would be competitive with its major adversaries and would have the capacity to replace her wartime losses. This turned out to be a rather optimistic projection, for Germany had great difficulty replacing vehicle losses throughout the war. Furthermore, the assessment of relative strength assumes that the United States is a non-combatant. The industrial capacity of the United States dwarfed the industrial nations of Europe, and this fact became obvious toward the end of the campaign in North Africa in late 1942. Lastly, the chart ignores Soviet production capacity, which Guderian knew would be quite extensive.
Early in development the Heer settled on the concept of the tank having a commander who was in radio communication with his superiors. Thus the basic design of the main battle tanks called for a larger turret that would house the tank commander, gunner and loader, while a driver and a machine gunner were down in the hull. Guderian insisted on the tank commander being in radio communication with both his platoon and with the members of his own tank crew. Thus the tanks had both a high frequency radio and an intercom system to allow communication over the din of battle. Though the Panzer III was conceived as the main battle tank of the Wehrmacht, the Wehrmacht did not anticipate being at war with Europe's major powers in 1939, and few were available at the start of the war. Excluding Czech built tanks, on 1 September 1939 the invasion of Poland was undertaken with the German armoured force of 3,195 tanks evenly split between the Pz I training tank and the Pz II light tank, with 1,145 Pz Is, 1,226 Pz IIs. Of the main battle tanks, only 98 Pz IIIs were in service during the invasion of Poland, along with 211 Pz IVs, with 215 tanks of various models also available as command tanks after being modified by having their main armament removed and extra communications equipment installed.
The production of tanks in Germany began in 1934. Due to the insertion of the Nazi Party into the procurement process and political considerations that had nothing to do with the goal of providing arms for the military, the companies that ended up gaining the contracts for tank production had limited actual experience in mass production. Ford and Opel, two manufacturers with considerable knowledge and ability in assembly line techniques, were not allowed to participate in the bidding process. Germany in general and the German tank production industry in particular was not prepared for the total war that Germany was entering in 1939. In contrast to the Messerschmitt 109 fighter aircraft, which was designed by Willy Messerschmitt with the production of large numbers of the aircraft in mind, tank design and production in Germany in 1939 was the work of a craftsman. German industry anticipated supporting the military in brief conflicts. A full commitment to war production was not made until the midpoint in the conflict. Surprisingly, civilian vehicle production was not set aside till 1943.
In the run up to the outbreak of war, the large companies engaged in tank production did not have space set aside for expanding their production lines. In consequence, unlike allied manufacturers, German tank manufacturers never came to a point where they were stock piling and storing excess finished products. Though these companies did expand with the increased demand of the ongoing war, it was not until the assignment of Albert Speer as Minister of Armaments that true efforts were made to bring mass production techniques to the German tank production industry.
During the period before the war, all companies with the exception of Alkett (which was under the control of Rhine-Metal Borsig, a subsidiary of the government-controlled Hermann Göring Works) were privately owned stock companies with the stock available for purchase by the public. All these companies, with the exception again of Alkett, produced tanks in addition to their normal peacetime manufacture of trucks, locomotives, and other heavy equipment. From 1935 onward, the government progressively increased its control over industries engaged in rearmament. The Nazi Party's Four Year Plan introduced in 1936 placed Hermann Göring in leadership of the state's efforts to bring industry into state control. Through threat and coercion Göring was able to expand the Nazi Party's control of private industry involved in steel and armament production. By 1938, this control included the rationing of essential raw materials, factory inventories, labor hours, rates of pay, working conditions, building and machine tool expansion, plant locations and stock dividends. All companies were forced to join the Economic Board of the tank industry which handled all questions affecting the industry.
Location of German tank manufacturing industry
The tank manufacturing industry in Germany was not concentrated in any one geographic location. Major plants were located in Nurnberg, Kassel, Brunswick, Magdeburg, and Berlin. There was, however, some geographical concentration of tank component manufacturers, such as engines and gears in Friedrichshafen, hulls, turrets, and guns in the Ruhr, rubber treads in Hanover, and instruments in Berlin. These locations, if interdicted, represented a potential choke point to German tank manufacturing.
German tank problem
During the course of the war the Allies made sustained efforts to determine the extent of German productivity, and approached this in two major ways: conventional intelligence gathering and statistical estimation. In many cases statistical analysis substantially improved on conventional intelligence. In some cases conventional intelligence was used in conjunction with statistical methods, as was the case in estimation of Panther tank production just prior to D-Day.
The allied command structure had thought the Panther tanks seen in Italy were an unusual heavy tank, and would only be seen in northern France in small numbers, much the same way as the Tiger I was seen in Tunisia. The US Army was confident that the Sherman tank would perform well against the German Panzer Mk III and IV tanks which they expected to meet.[N 1] Shortly before D-Day, rumors indicated that large numbers of Panther tanks were being used in the panzer divisions.
To ascertain if this were true the Allies attempted to estimate the number of Panther tanks being produced. To do this they made use of the serial numbers printed on captured or destroyed German tanks. The principal numbers used were gearbox numbers, as these fell in two unbroken sequences. Chassis and engine numbers were also used, though their use was more complicated. Various other components were used to cross-check the analysis. Similar analyses were done on tires, which were known to be sequentially numbered. The analysis of Panther tank wheels yielded an estimate for the number of wheel molds that were in use. A discussion with British road wheel makers then allowed the estimation of the number of wheels that could be produced from this many molds. This in turn yielded the total number of Panthers that were being produced each month. Analysis of road wheels from the two tanks obtained yielded an estimate of 270 Panthers produced in February 1944 alone, substantially more than had previously been suspected.
German records after the war showed production for the month of February 1944 was 276. The statistical approach proved to be far more accurate than conventional intelligence methods, and the phrase German tank problem became accepted as a descriptor for the statistical analysis used.
- German AFVs of World War II
- German tanks in World War II
- German aircraft production during WW2
- Comparison of early World War II tanks
- Military production during World War II
- Other countries' production figures
- An Armored Ground Forces policy statement of November 1943 concluded the following: "The recommendation of a limited proportion of tanks carrying a 90mm gun is not concurred in for the following reasons: The M4 tank has been hailed widely as the best tank of the battlefield today....There appears to be no fear on the part of our forces of the German Mark VI (Tiger) tank. There can be no basis for the T26 tank other than the conception of a tank-vs.-tank duel-which is believed to be unsound and unnecessary."
- Liddell Hart p. 91
- Guderian 1952, p. 31.
- Guderian 1952, p. 28.
- Lucas p. 114
- Liddell Hart p. 23
- Guderian 1937, p. 208.
- Guderian 1937, p. 154, Russia has ample raw materials, and a mighty armaments industry has been set up in the depths of that vast empire. The time has passed when the Russians had no instinct for technology; we will have to reckon on the Russians being able to master and build their own machines, and with the fact that such a transformation in the Russians fundamental mentality confronts us with the Eastern Question in a form more serious than ever before in history.
- Guderian 1952, p. 27.
- Bond p. 225
- Ogorkiewicz p. 212
- Lucas p. 104
- Lucas p. 105
- AGF policy statement. Chief of staff AGF. November 1943. MHI
- Ruggles & Brodie 1947, pp. 82–83.
- Bond, Brian, Liddell Hart: A Study of his Military Thought. London: Cassell, 1977.
- Chamberlain, Peter and Hilary L Doyle Encyclopedia Of German Tanks Of World War Two London: Arms & Armour, 1999.
- Doyle, Hilary L; Thomas L Jentz; Tony Bryan Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf.G, H and J 1942-45 Oxford: Osprey, 2001.
- Guderian, Heinz Achtung-Panzer! London, Wellington House, 1937. (Reissue edition, 1999).
- Guderian, Heinz (1952). Panzer Leader. New York: Da Capo. ISBN 0-306-81101-4.
- Hahn, Fritz Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933 – 1945 Koblenz: Bernard & Graefe, 1987.(German)
- Liddell Hart, B.H., The German Generals Talk. New York, NY: Morrow, 1948.
- Lucas, James World War Two through German Eyes. New York, NY: Sterling, 1987. ISBN 0-85368-831-1
- Ogorkiewicz, Richard Armour : the development of mechanized forces and their equipment. London : Stevens & Sons, 1960. ISBN
- Ruggles, Richard, and Henry Brodie, An empirical approach to economic intelligence in World War II. Publication: Journal of the American Statistical Association. vol. 42, March, 1947, p. 72-91
- Panzertruppen Berlin: Militärverlag der DDR, 1974.(German)
- Production statistics and chassis numbers by month for the Tiger I at the Tiger I Information Center
- A tour of the Henschel factory that produced Tiger I tanks