Godhra train burning
|Godhra train burning|
|Location||Godhra, Gujarat, India|
|Date||27 February 2002;
The Godhra train burning was an incident that occurred on the morning of 27 February 2002, in which 59 people, including 25 women and 15 children, died in a fire inside the Sabarmati Express train near the Godhra railway station in the Indian state of Gujarat. Most of the victims were Hindu pilgrims and activists who were returning from the holy city of Ayodhya after a religious ceremony at the disputed Babri Masjid site. The commission set up by the government of Gujarat to investigate the train burning spent 6 years going over the details of the case, and concluded that the fire was arson committed by a mob of 1000-2000 people. A commission appointed by the central government, whose appointment was later held to be unconstitutional, stated that the fire had been an accident. A court convicted 31 Muslims for the incident and the conspiracy for the crime, although the actual causes of the fire have yet to be proven conclusively.
The event is widely perceived as the trigger for the violence that followed, which resulted in widespread loss of life, destruction of property and homelessness. Estimates of casualties range from the official figures of 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus, to upwards of 2000 Muslims killed. Some commentators, however, hold the view that the riots following the incident were part of a well orchestrated conspiracy, and that the attack on the train was in fact a "staged trigger" for premeditated, targeted violence. 
- 1 27 February 2002 incident
- 2 Inquires
- 3 Trial and court verdict
- 4 Popular culture
- 5 See also
- 6 References
- 7 External links
- 8 Bibliography
27 February 2002 incident
In February 2002, thousands of devotees of Ram (known as "Ramsevaks" or "Kar Sevaks") had gone from Gujarat to Ayodhya at the behest of the Vishva Hindu Parishad to take part in a ceremony called the Purnahuti Maha Yagna. On 25 February 2002, 2000 – 2200 Ramsevaks boarded the Sabarmati Express which was bound for Ahmedabad. On 27 February 2002, the train made its scheduled stop at Godhra about 4 hours late, at 7:43 am. As the train started leaving the platform, someone pulled the emergency brake and the train stopped near the signal point. The driver of the train subsequently stated that the chain had been pulled multiple times, judging by the instruments in his cabin. The train was subsequently attacked by a mob of around 2000 people. After some stone-pelting, four coaches of the train were set alight, trapping many people inside. 59 people including 27 women and 10 children were burnt to death, and 48 others were injured. According to J Mahapatra, additional director general of Gujarat police, "miscreants had kept the petrol-soaked rags ready for use much before the train had arrived at the Godhra". However, academics such as Martha Nussbaum have challenged this narrative, stating that multiple inquiries have found that the conflagration was an accident rather than a planned conspiracy. Other academics such as Madhu Kishwar have blamed the "amazing distortions introduced by Congress and its leftist allies" for why the facts are not widely known and accepted.
Forensic Science Laboratory Report
A study conducted by the Gujarat Forensic Science Laboratory report states that 60 liters of inflammable liquid had been poured into coach S-6 of the train using a wide mouthed container. It had been poured by standing on the passage between the northern side-door of the eastern side of the coach, which had been set on fire immediately thereafter. The report also concluded that there had been heavy stone pelting on the train.
On 6 March 2002 the Gujarat government set up a commission of inquiry to investigate the incident and submit a report, the chairman and sole member of which was retired Gujarat High Court judge K G Shah. However, Shah's alleged closeness to Narendra Modi generated fierce criticism from the victims, Human Rights organisations, and political parties, and led to a demand for the appointment of a Supreme Court judge to the commission. As a result, the government reconstituted the commission into a two member committee, appointing retired Supreme Court judge G T Nanavati to lead the commission, which thus became known as the "Nanavati-Shah Commission." Shah passed away in March 2008, just a few months prior to the committee submitting its first report, and the Gujarat High Court then appointed retired judge Akshay Kumar Mehta to the committee on 6 April 2008. The commission, during its six-year probe, examined more than 40,000 documents and the testimonies of more than 1,000 witnesses. The initial term of the committee was three months long; however, it has received 22 extensions, till June 2014 to submit its final report.
In September 2008, the commission submitted the "Part I" of the report dealing with the Godhra incident, in which it supported the conspiracy theory originally propounded by the Gujarat police. Maulvi Husain Haji Ibrahim Umarji, a cleric in Godhra, and a dismissed Central Reserve Police Force officer named Nanumiyan were presented as the "masterminds" behind the operation. The evidence marshalled by the committee in favour of this conclusion was a statement made by Jabir Binyamin Behra, a criminal in custody at the time, although he later denied giving any such statement. In addition, the alleged acquisition of 140 litres of petrol hours before the arrival of the train and the storage of said petrol at the guest house of Razzak Kurkur, accused of being a key conspirator, as well as forensic evidence showing that fuel was poured on the train coach before it burnt, was presented by the committee. The report concluded that the train was attacked by thousands of Muslims from the Signal Falia area.
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Indian National Congress both objected to the exoneration of the Gujarat government by the commission citing the timing of the report (with general elections months away) as evidence of unfairness. Congress spokesperson Veerappa Moily commented at the strange absolvement of the Gujarat government for complacency for the carnage before the commission's second and final report had been brought out. The CPI(M) said that the report reinforced communal prejudices. The commission has been heavily criticised by academics such as Christophe Jaffrelot for obstructing the course of justice, supporting the conspiracy theory too quickly, and for allegedly ignoring evidence of governmental complicity in the incident.
Appointment and Report
On 17 May 2004, with the victory of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) in the Indian general election, Lalu Prasad Yadav was appointed railway minister. In September 2004, two and half years after the train burning, Yadav appointed former Supreme Court Justice Umesh Chandra Banerjee to investigate the incident. In January 2005 Banerjee presented his interim report, which tentatively ascribed the fire as an "accidental fire," after ruling out other theories. He cited a forensic report stating that the injuries on the victims were only compatible with an "internal fire." The report was also critical of the railways' handling of the evidence relevant to the case.
High Court judgment
Banerjee's findings were challenged in the Gujarat High Court by Neelkanth Tulsidas Bhatia, who was injured in the incident. In October 2006, the court quashed the conclusions of Banerjee and ruled that the investigation was "unconstitutional, illegal and null and void", declared its formation to be a "colourable exercise of power with mala fide intentions", and its argument of accidental fire "opposed to the prima facie accepted facts on record." The High Court also directed that the report should not be tabled in the Parliament.
The BJP, which was then in opposition in the union parliament, dismissed the report as an attempt to gain an advantage in the Bihar elections which were to be held soon. It welcomed the High Court judgement, saying that it was a setback for the Congress. Lalu Prasad Yadav, then the minister for railways, cited the report as proof that the Narendra Modi government had organized the riots that followed, and called it an exposure of the BJP.
Trial and court verdict
By 28 February 2002, 51 people had been arrested for the incident on charges of arson, rioting and looting. One of the alleged organisers of the attack was arrested in West Bengal. West Bengal's Chief Secretary, Sourin Roy, said the detainee was a commander of the Muslim radical group Harkat-ul Jehad-e-Islami. Police in Bengal say the man had been attempting to enter Bangladesh. Later, on 17 March 2002, chief suspect Haji Bilal, a local town councillor and an Indian National Congress supporter, was captured by an anti-terrorist squad in Godhra. The FIR had alleged that a 1540-strong mob attacked the Sabarmati Express on 27 February, minutes after the delayed train left the Godhra station on the day of the incident. The president of Godhra municipality, Mohammed Hussain Kalota, was arrested in March. Others arrested included corporators Abdul Razak and Shiraj Abdul Jamesha. Bilal was also alleged to have a connection with gang leader Latif and was reported to have visited Karachi in Pakistan several times.
The charge-sheet filed by the SIT before first class railway magistrate P. K. Joshi, which ran to more than 500 pages, stated that 59 people were killed in the S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express when a mob of around 1540 unidentified people attacked it near Godhra railway station. The 68 people accused in the charge-sheet included 57 accused of stoning and torching the train. The charge-sheet also stated that a mob attacked the police, prevented the fire brigade from approaching the burning train, and stormed the train for a second time. 11 others were charged with being part of this mob. Initially, 107 people were charged, five of whom died while the case was still pending in court. Eight others were juveniles, who were tried by a separate court. As many as 253 witnesses were examined during the trial and over items of 1500 documentary evidences were presented to the court.
Prevention of Terrorism Act and trial
On 3 March 2002, The Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance was invoked against all the accused which was later suspended due to pressure from the Central government. On 9 March 2002, Police added Criminal Conspiracy to the charges. In May 2003, the first charge sheet was filed against 54 accused, but they were not charged under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA became an Act as it was cleared by Parliament). In February 2003, the POTA was re-invoked against all the accused after the BJP retained control of the Gujarat legislature in the 2002 assembly elections.
In November 2003, the Supreme Court of India put a stay on the trial. In 2004, the POTA was repealed after the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) came to power, prompting it to review the invocation of the POTA against the accused. In May 2005, the POTA review commission decided not to charge the accused under POTA. This was later unsuccessfully challenged by a relative of the victim before the Gujarat High Court and later on appeal before Supreme Court. In September 2008, the Nanavati Commission submitted its report on the incident. In 2009, after accepting the report of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) appointed by it, the court appointed a special fast-track court to try the case along with 5 other fast track courts established to try the post-incident riots. The bench hearing the case also said that public prosecutors should be appointed in consultation with the SIT chairman. It ordered that the SIT would be the nodal agency for deciding about witness protection and also asked that it file supplementary charge sheets and that it may cancel the bail of the accused. More than 100 people were arrested in relation to the incident. The court was set up inside the Sabarmati Central Jail, where almost all of the accused were confined. The hearing began in May 2009. Additional Sessions Judge P R Patel was designated to hear the case.
In May 2010, Supreme Court restrained the trial courts from pronouncing judgement in nine sensitive riot cases, including Godhra train incident. The trial was completed in September 2010; however, the verdict could not be delivered because of the Supreme Court stay. The stay was lifted in January 2011 and the judge announced that he shall pronounce the judgement on 22 February 2011.
On February 2011, the trial court convicted 31 people and acquitted 63 others, saying the incident was a “pre-planned conspiracy". The convictions were based on the murder and conspiracy provisions of Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code respectively and under Sections 149, 307, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 395, 397, and 436 of the Code and some sections of the Railway Act and Police Act. The death penalty was awarded to 11 convicts; those believed to have been present at a meeting held the night before the incident where the conspiracy was formed, and those who,according to the court, had actually entered the coach and poured petrol before setting it afire. Twenty others were sentenced to life imprisonment.
Maulvi Saeed Umarji, who was believed by the SIT to be the prime conspirator, was acquitted along with 62 other accused for lack of evidence. The convicted filed appeals in the Gujarat High Court. The state government also challenged the trial court's decision to acquit 61 persons in the High Court and sought death sentences for 20 convicts awarded life imprisonment in the case.
Reactions to the verdict
BJP spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain stated, "The theory propagated by the (central) government and some NGOs (Non-Governmental Organization) has been proved wrong...." Law Minister Veerappa Moily (a Congress Party member) said it was premature to comment and that the courts will take their own course. R. K. Raghavan, who was the head of the Special Investigating Team, said he was satisfied with the verdict. BJP spokesperson, Ravi Shankar Prasad said the verdict had exposed the nefarious designs of the UPA government which tried to cover up the entire episode.
- Chand Bujh Gaya, a 2005 film, uses the Godhra train burning incident as the background for a love story.
- The 2013 film Kai Po Che had the Gujarat riots as a backdrop for the main narrative. The film was based on the novel The 3 Mistakes of My Life written by Chetan Bhagat.
- The 2003 Documentary Final Solution depicts the train burning and the Gujarat riots that followed.
- Religious violence in India
- 2002 Gujarat Violence
- Dabgarwad Massacre
- Best Bakery case
- Naroda Patiya massacre
- The Times of India 2011.
- BBC 2011.
- NDTV 2011.
- Jaffrelot 2012, p. 80.
- Burke 2011.
- Jeffery 2011, p. 1988.
- Metcalf, Barbara D. (2012). A Concise History of Modern India. Cambridge University Press. p. 280. ISBN 978-1107026490.
- Ghassem-Fachandi 2012, p. 283.
- Jaffrelot 2003, p. 16.
- Kabir, Ananya Jahanara (2010). Sorcha Gunne, Zoe Brigley Thompson, ed. Feminism, Literature and Rape Narratives: Violence and Violation. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-80608-4.
- Brass 2005, p. 388.
- "Fifty-eight killed in attack on Sabarmati Express". Rediff. 27 February 2002. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- "Sabarmati Express drivers appear before panel". The Times of India. 16 July 2002. Retrieved 30 November 2013.
- Singh 2002.
- Nussbaum 2008, p. 81.
- Nussbaum 2007, p. 17-19.
- Kishwar 2014, p. 187.
- "Fuelling the Fire". indiatoday.intoday.in. 22 July 2002. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
- "Report of Forensic Science Laboratory, State of Gujarat". Outlook. Retrieved 19 April 2014.
- "The Hindu : Probe panel appointed". Hinduonnet.com. 7 March 2002. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
- Jaffrelot 2012, p. 79.
- "Newly appointed justice Mehta of Nanavati Commission visits Godhra". IndLaw. UNI. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- "Gujarat: Nanavati Commission submitted its first report on 2002 riots in state". IndLaw. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- "Nanavati panel gets its 20th extension". The Indian Express. 3 July 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- "With 21st extension, Nanavati report after LS polls". Times of India. 1 January 2014. Retrieved 19 April 2014.
- The Godhra conspiracy as Justice Nanavati saw it The Times of India, 28 September 2008. Retrieved 19 February 2012. Archived 21 February 2012.
- "Godhra case: Eventually, Maulvi Umarji comes out unscathed – India – DNA". Dnaindia.com. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
- Uday, Mahurkar (26 September 2008). "Godhra carnage a conspiracy: Nanavati report". India Today. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- "Gujarat may come clean today, say 1,180 died in riots". IBN7. 28 February 2009. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
- "Cong, CPM question Nanavati report's credibility". Times of India. 27 September 2008. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
- cong, cpm slam Nanavati report for reinforcing 'communal bias.' Times of India. 28 September 2008.
- Jaffrelot 2012, pp. 86–87.
- Iyer, SH (May–June 2008). "Babu Bajrangi’s bail and Gujarat riot probe". Combat Law 7 (3): 16–19.
- Jaffrelot 2012, pp. 77–80.
- "Excerpts from the Justice U C Banerjee Committee report". DNA India. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- "Union of India vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia, LPA No. 364 of 2005 in SCA No. 16500 of 2005". Gujarat High Court. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
- Banerjee panel illegal: Gujarat HC The Indian Express – 13 October 2006
- Bannerjee Committee illegal: High Court The Hindu – 14 October 2006
- "HC terms Sabarmati Express panel illegal". The Financial Express. 14 October 2006. Retrieved 4 February 2011.
- "Laloo flaunts Godhra report". The Tribune. 20 January 2005. Retrieved 4 February 2013.
- "India train fire 'not mob attack'". BBC News. 17 January 2005. Retrieved 4 February 2011.
- Press Trust of India (13 October 2006). "Banerjee panel illegal: Gujarat HC". Express India. Retrieved 4 February 2011.
- "BJP cheers as HC slams Godhra panel". IBN Live. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
- "Godhra report attempt to help Laloo: BJP". The Tribune. 17 January 2005. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
- "Gujarat HC nullifies Banerjee Committee". 13 October 2006. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
- "Dozens arrested over India train attack". BBC News. 28 February 2002. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
- "Chargesheet filed against 66 Godhra accused". Indian Express. Press Trust of India. 23 May 2002. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
- "Chief suspect in India train attack arrested". BBC. 19 March 2002. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
- "Special court convicts 31 in Godhra train burning case". Live India. 22 February 2012. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- Dasgupta, Manas (24 May 2002). "Chargesheets filed in Godhra train carnage case". The Hindu (Chennai, India). Retrieved 30 November 2013.
- "Godhra train carnage judgement tomorrow". Live India. 21 February 2011. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- "Chronology of Godhra trial". The Times of India. 22 February 2011. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- "Chronology of Godhra trial". The Times of India. 22 February 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
- Venkatesan, J (2 May 2009). "Court: set up six fast track courts to try Godhra & riot cases". The Hindu (Chennai, India). Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- "Godhra carnage: fast-track court begins proceedings". The Indian Express (Ahmedabad). 27 May 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- Dasgupta, Manas (6 March 2011). "It was not a random attack on S-6 but kar sevaks were targeted, says judge". The Hindu (Chennai, India). Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- Godhra verdict: 31 convicted, 63 acquitted NDTV – 1 March 2011
- "Key accused let off in Godhra case". Mid Day. 23 February 2011. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- "Guj govt challenges acquittals in Godhra verdict before HC". The Indian Express. 25 June 2011. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- Godhra verdict proves Lalu's man wrong, again One India – 23 February 2011
- "Godhra Train Carnage Verdict: Reactions". Outlook India. 22 February 2011. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- Godhra Train Carnage Verdict: Reactions Outlook India – 22 February 2011
- "Gujarat violence film set for Friday release". indiaglitz.com. Indo-Asian News Service. 2 March 2005. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
- Report of the Commission of Inquiry Consisting of Justice Nanavati and Justice Mehta, Part I, Sep 2008
- "Eleven sentenced to death for India Godhra train blaze". BBC News. 1 March 2011.
- Brass, Paul R. (2005). The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-98506-0.
- Burke, Jason (22 February 2011). "Godhra train fire verdict prompts tight security measures". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 April 2014.
- Ghassem-Fachandi, Parvis (2012). Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691151779.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (2003). "Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?". Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (25 February 2012). "Gujarat 2002: What Justice for the Victims?". Economic & Political Weekly. XLVII (8): 77–80.
- Jeffery, Craig (2011). Isabelle Clark-Decès, ed. A Companion to the Anthropology of India. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1405198929.
- Kishwar, Madhu Purnima (2014). Modi, Muslims and Media: Voices from Narendra Modi's Gujarat. Manushi Publications, New Delhi.
- "Godhra verdict: 31 convicted, 63 acquitted". NDTV. 3 January 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2013.
- Nussbaum, Martha C. (2008). "The Clash Within: Democracy and the Hindu Right". In Ibrahim A. Karawan, Ibrāhīm Karawān, Wayne McCormack, Stephen E. Reynolds. Values and Violence: Intangible Aspects of Terrorism. Springer. pp. 81–97. ISBN 978-1402086595.
- Nussbaum, Martha C. (2007). The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence and India's Future. Hardvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-03059-6.
- Singh, Onkar (7 March 2002). "No women kidnapped in Godhra: Police". Rediff. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
- "Death for 11, life sentence for 20 in Godhra train burning case". The Times of India. 1 March 2011.