Google Books screenshot
|Operating system||Any (web-based application)|
|Type||Online book search|
Google Books (previously known as Google Book Search and Google Print) is a service from Google Inc. that searches the full text of books and magazines that Google has scanned, converted to text using optical character recognition, and stored in its digital database. The service was formerly known as Google Print when it was introduced at the Frankfurt Book Fair in October 2004. Google's Library Project, also now known as Google Book Search, was announced in December 2004.
How it works
Results from Google Books show up in both Google Web Search and the dedicated Google Books site (books.google.com). Up to three results from the Google Books index may be displayed, if relevant, above other search results in Google Web Search.
A click on a result from Google Books opens an interface in which the user may view pages from the book, if out of copyright or if the copyright owner has given permission. Books in the public domain are available in "full view" and free for download. For in-print books where permission has been granted, the number of viewable pages is limited to a "preview" set by a variety of access restrictions and security measures, some based on user-tracking. For books where permission for a "preview" has been refused, only permission for "snippets" (two to three lines of text) may be permitted, but the full text of the book is searchable on this limited basis. Where the owner of a book cannot be identified, a "snippet" view may be implemented. For other books that have neither a "full view" nor "preview", the text is not searchable at all, and Google Books provides no identification of content beyond the book title. For this reason, Google Books searches are an unreliable indicator of the prevalence of specific usages or terms, because many authoritative works fall into the unsearchable category.
Most scanned works are no longer in print or commercially available. For those which are, the site provides links to the website of the publisher and booksellers.
Many of the books are scanned using the Elphel 323 camera at a rate of 1,000 pages per hour. The scanning process is subject to errors. For example, some pages are unreadable, or upside down, or in the wrong order. It happens that some pages of one book appear interleaved with those of another, or an entire book may be attributed to the wrong title altogether. Book information such as authors, publishers, dates and so on, may be incorrect or abbreviated incoherently. Very commonly, the list of chapter headings and/or the book index is only partially presented. Although at one time Google provided feedback links to report these problems, the mechanisms for readers to provide this feedback have become more and more curtailed as time goes on.
December 2004 Google signaled an extension to its Google Print initiative known as the Google Print Library Project. Google announced partnerships with several high-profile university and public libraries, including the University of Michigan, Harvard (Harvard University Library), Stanford (Green Library), Oxford (Bodleian Library), and the New York Public Library. According to press releases and university librarians, Google plans to digitize and make available through its Google Books service approximately 15 million volumes within a decade. The announcement soon triggered controversy, as publisher and author associations challenged Google's plans to digitize, not just books in the public domain, but also titles still under copyright.
September–October 2005 Two lawsuits against Google charge that the company has not respected copyrights and has failed to properly compensate authors and publishers. One is a class action suit on behalf of authors (Authors Guild v. Google, Sept. 20 2005) and the other is a civil lawsuit brought by five large publishers and the Association of American Publishers. (McGraw Hill v. Google, Oct. 19 2005)
November 2005: Google changed the name of this service from Google Print to Google Book Search. Its program enabling publishers and authors to include their books in the service was renamed "Google Books Partner Program" and the partnership with libraries became Google Books Library Project.
August 2006: The University of California System announced that it would join the Books digitization project. This includes a portion of the 34 million volumes within the approximately 100 libraries managed by the System.
October 2006: The University of Wisconsin–Madison announced that it would join the Book Search digitization project along with the Wisconsin Historical Society Library. Combined, the libraries have 7.2 million holdings.
January 2007: The University of Texas at Austin announced that it would join the Book Search digitization project. At least one million volumes will be digitized from the University's 13 library locations.
March 2007: The Bavarian State Library announced a partnership with Google to scan more than a million public domain and out-of-print works in German as well as English, French, Italian, Latin, and Spanish.
May 2007: The Boekentoren Library of Ghent University will participate with Google in digitizing and making digitized versions of 19th century books in the French and Dutch languages available online.
August 2007: Google announced that it would digitize up to 500,000 both copyrighted and public domain items from Cornell University Library. Google will also provide a digital copy of all works scanned to be incorporated into the university's own library system.
September 2007: Google added a feature that allows users to share snippets of books that are in the public domain. The snippets may appear exactly as they do in the scan of the book or as plain text.
September 2007: Google debuted a new feature called "My Library" which allows users to create personal customized libraries, selections of books that they can label, review, rate, or full-text search.
October 2008: A settlement was reached between the publishing industry and Google after two years of negotiation. Google agreed to compensate authors and publishers in exchange for the right to make millions of books available to the public.
November 2008: Google reached the 7 million book mark for items scanned by Google and by their publishing partners. 1 million are in full preview mode and 1 million are fully viewable and downloadable public domain works. About five million are currently out of print.
May 2009: At the annual BookExpo convention in New York, Google signaled its intent to introduce a program that would enable publishers to sell digital versions of their newest books direct to consumers through Google.
In December 2009 a French court shut down the scanning of copyrighted books published in France saying it violated copyright laws. It was the first major legal loss for the scanning project.
April 2010: Visual artists were not included in the previous lawsuit and settlement, and are the plaintiff groups in another law suit, and say they intend to bring more than just Google Books under scrutiny. “The new class action,” reads the statement, “goes beyond Google’s Library Project, and includes Google’s other systematic and pervasive infringements of the rights of photographers, illustrators and other visual artists.” 
May 2010 : It is reported that Google will launch a digital book store termed as Google Editions. It will compete with Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Apple and other electronic book retailers with its very own e-book store. Unlike others, Google Editions will be completely online and will not require a specific device (such as kindle, Nook, iPad, etc.).
June 2010: Google passes 12 million books scanned.
August 2010: It was announced that Google intends to scan all known existing 129,864,880 books by the end of the decade, accounting to over 4 billion digital pages and 2 trillion words in total.
December 2010: Google eBooks (Google Editions) is launched in the US.
March 2012 Google passes 20 million books scanned.
April 2013 Google's database encompasses more than 30 million scanned books.
Google Books Library Project participants
The number of participating institutions has grown since the inception of the Google Books Library Project; The University of Mysore has been mentioned in many media reports as being a library partner. They are not, however, listed as a partner by Google.
- Harvard University, Harvard University Library, Harvard + Google
- University of Michigan, University of Michigan Library, Michigan + Google
- New York Public Library, New York Public Library + Google
- University of Oxford, Bodleian Library, Oxford + Google
- Stanford University, Stanford University Libraries (SULAIR), Stanford + Google
Other institutional partners have joined the Project since the partnership was first announced.
- Bavarian State Library, Bavaria + Google, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek + Google (in German)
- Columbia University, Columbia University Library System, Columbia + Google
- Committee on Institutional Cooperation, CIC + Google
- Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid + Google, Complutense Universidad + Google (in Spanish)
- Cornell University, Cornell University Library, Cornell + Google
- Ghent University, Ghent University Library/Boekentoren, Ghent/Gent + Google
- Keio University, Keio Media Centers (Libraries), Keio + Google (in English), Keio + Google (in Japanese)
- La Bibliothèque Municipale de Lyon, Lyon + Google (in French)
- National Library of Catalonia, Biblioteca de Catalunya + Google (in Spanish)
- Princeton University, Princeton University Library, Princeton + Google
- University of California, California Digital Library, California + Google
- University of Lausanne, Cantonal and University Library of Lausanne/Bibliothèque Cantonale et Universitaire (BCU) + Google (in French)
- University of Mysore, Mysore University Library, Mysore + Google
- University of Texas at Austin, University of Texas Libraries, Texas + Google
- University of Virginia, University of Virginia Library, Virginia + Google
- University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Wisconsin Libraries, Wisconsin + Google
Scanning of Books
The Google Books initiative has been hailed for its potential to offer unprecedented access to what may become the largest online body of human knowledge and promoting the democratization of knowledge, but it has also been criticized for potential copyright violations.
As of April 2013, the number of scanned books was over 30 million, but the scanning process has slowed down. Google estimated in 2010 that there were about 130 million unique books in the world, and stated that it intended to scan all of them by the end of the decade.
The Google Books database continues to grow. For users outside the United States, though, Google must be sure that the work in question is indeed out of copyright under local laws. According to a member of the Google Books Support Team, "Since whether a book is in the public domain can often be a tricky legal question, we err on the side of caution and display at most a few snippets until we have determined that the book has entered the public domain." Users outside the United States can however access a large number of public domain books scanned by Google using copies stored on the Internet Archive.
The publishing industry and writers' groups have criticized the project's inclusion of snippets of copyrighted works as infringement. In late 2005 the Authors Guild of America and Association of American Publishers separately sued Google, citing "massive copyright infringement." Google countered that its project represented a fair use and is the digital age equivalent of a card catalog with every word in the publication indexed. Despite Google taking measures to provide full text of only works in public domain, and providing only a searchable summary online for books still under copyright protection, publishers maintain that Google has no right to copy full text of books with copyrights and save them, in large amounts, into its own database.
Other lawsuits followed but in 2006 a German lawsuit was withdrawn. In June 2006, Hervé de la Martinière, a French publisher known as La Martinière and Éditions du Seuil, announced its intention to sue Google France. In 2009, the Paris Civil Court awarded €300,000 (approximately US$430,000) in damages and interest and ordered Google to pay €10,000 a day until it removes the publisher's books from its database. The court wrote, "Google violated author copyright laws by fully reproducing and making accessible" books that Seuil owns without its permission and that Google "committed acts of breach of copyright, which are of harm to the publishers". Google said it will appeal. Syndicat National de l'Edition, which joined the lawsuit, said Google has scanned about 100,000 French works under copyright.
In December 2009, Chinese author Mian Mian filed a civil lawsuit for $8,900 against Google for scanning her novel, Acid Lovers. This is the first such lawsuit to be filed against Google in China. Also, in November that year, the China Written Works Copyright Society (CWWCS) accused Google of scanning 18,000 books by 570 Chinese writers without authorization. Google agreed on Nov 20 to provide a list of Chinese books it had scanned, but the company refused to admit having "infringed" copyright laws.
In March 2007, Thomas Rubin, associate general counsel for copyright, trademark, and trade secrets at Microsoft, accused Google of violating copyright law with their book search service. Rubin specifically criticized Google's policy of freely copying any work until notified by the copyright holder to stop.
Siva Vaidhyanathan, associate professor of Media Studies and Law at the University of Virginia has argued that the project poses a danger for the doctrine of fair use, because the fair use claims are arguably so excessive that it may cause judicial limitation of that right. It can also be said that, because rights are almost always inherently limited in some way, judicial consideration per se, including limitation, of the principle poses no "threat" at all (and might produce benefit through articulated consideration and delineation - that would have not otherwise occurred - of the principle). Because Author's Guild v. Google did not go to court, the fair use dispute is left unresolved.
Google licensing of public domain works is also an area of concern due to using of digital watermarking techniques with the books. Some published works that are in the public domain, such as all works created by the U.S. Federal government, are still treated like other works under copyright, and therefore locked after 1922.
The Authors Guild, the publishing industry and Google entered into a settlement agreement October 28, 2008, with Google agreeing to pay a total of $125 million to rights-holders of books they had scanned, to cover the plaintiffs' court costs, and to create a Book Rights Registry. The settlement was set to be approved by the court sometime after October 2009. Reaction to the settlement was mixed, with Harvard Library, one of the original contributing libraries to Google Library, choosing to withdraw its partnership with Google if "more reasonable terms" could not be found. As part of the $125 million settlement signed in October 2008, Google created a Google Book Settlement web site that went active on February 11, 2009. This site allowed authors and other rights holders of out-of-print (but copyright) books to submit a claim by June 5, 2010. In return they were to receive $60 per full book, or $5 to $15 for partial works. In return, Google was to be able to index the books and display snippets in search results, as well as up to 20% of each book in preview mode. Google was also to be able to show ads on these pages and make available for sale digital versions of each book. Authors and copyright holders were to receive 63 percent of all advertising and e-commerce revenues associated with their works.
In the US, several organizations who took no part of the settlement, like the American Society of Journalists and Authors, criticized the settlement fundamentally. Moreover, the New York book settlement is not restricted to US authors, but relevant to authors of the whole world. This led to objections even on the level of some European governments and critical voices in many European newspapers. American author Ursula K. Le Guin has launched a petition against the settlement, which was signed by almost 300 authors.
In October 2009, Google countered ongoing critics by stating that its scanning of books and putting them online would protect the world's cultural heritage; Google co-founder Sergey Brin stated, "The famous Library of Alexandria burned three times, in 48 BC, AD 273 and AD 640, as did the Library of Congress, where a fire in 1851 destroyed two-thirds of the collection. I hope such destruction never happens again, but history would suggest otherwise." This characterization was rebuked by Pam Samuelson, UC Berkeley Professor of Law saying "Libraries everywhere are terrified that Google will engage in price-gouging when setting prices for institutional subscriptions to GBS contents ... Brin forgot to mention another significant difference between GBS and traditional libraries: their policies on patron privacy. ... Google has been unwilling to make meaningful commitments to protect user privacy. Traditional libraries, by contrast, have been important guardians of patron privacy." Others have denounced the settlement for neglecting to protect reader privacy.
On March 22, 2011, U.S. Circuit Judge Denny Chin issued a ruling on the amended settlement agreement, rejecting it. From the ruling: [I]t is incongruous with the purpose of the copyright laws to place the onus on copyright owners to come forward to protect their rights when Google copied their works without first seeking their permission. [...] While the digitization of books and the creation of a universal digital library would benefit many, the ASA would simply go too far. It would permit this class action - - which was brought against defendant Google Inc. ("Google") to challenge its scanning of books and display of "snippets" for on-line searching - - to implement a forward-looking business arrangement that would grant Google significant rights to exploit entire books, without permission of the copyright owners. Indeed, the ASA would give Google a significant advantage over competitors, rewarding it for engaging in wholesale copying of copyrighted works without permission, while releasing claims well beyond those presented in the case. Accordingly, and for the reasons more fully discussed below, the motion for final approval of the ASA is denied." 
The Wall Street Journal commented on the practical impact of this ruling saying that: "Judge Chin's ruling changes little for Google users. About two million books that are in the public domain, such as works of William Shakespeare, currently can be viewed free on the Google Books site. [...] Google Books users currently can view long previews of another two million books that are in copyright and in print, thanks to agreements between Google and tens of thousands of publishers that were separate from the legal settlement. Millions more books that are in copyright but out of print are currently available in Google Books in a shorter 'snippet view.' Had the settlement been approved, users would have been able to see longer previews and potentially buy those books."
Some European politicians and intellectuals have criticized Google's effort on "language-imperialism" grounds. They argue that because the vast majority of books proposed to be scanned are in English, it will result in disproportionate representation of natural languages in the digital world. German, Russian, French, and Spanish, for instance, are popular languages in scholarship. The disproportionate online emphasis on English, however, could shape access to historical scholarship, and, ultimately, the growth and direction of future scholarship. Among these critics is Jean-Noël Jeanneney, the former president of the Bibliothèque nationale de France.
Google Books versus Google Scholar
While Google Books has digitized large numbers of journal back issues, its scans do not include the metadata required for identifying specific articles in specific issues. This has led the makers of Google Scholar to start their own program to digitize and host older journal articles (in agreement with their publishers).
- Internet Archive is a non-profit which digitizes over 1000 books a day, as well as mirrors books from Google Books and other sources. As of May 2011, it hosted over 2.8 million public domain books, greater than the approximate 1 million public domain books at Google Books. Open Library, a sister project of Internet Archive, lends 80,000 scanned and purchased commercial ebooks to the visitors of 150 libraries.
- HathiTrust maintains HathiTrust Digital Library since 13 October 2008, which preserves and provides access to material scanned by Google, some of the Internet Archive books, and some scanned locally by partner institutions. As of May 2010, it includes about 6 million volumes, over 1 million of which are public domain (at least in the US).
- Microsoft funded the scanning of 300,000 books to create Live Search Books in late 2006. It ran until May 2008, when the project was abandoned and the books were made freely available on the Internet Archive restriction.
- Europeana links to roughly 10 million digital objects as of 2010, including video, photos, paintings, audio, maps, manuscripts, printed books, and newspapers from the past 2,000 years of European history from over 1,000 archives in the European Union.
- Gallica from the French National Library links to about 800,000 digitized books, newspapers, manuscripts, maps and drawings, etc. Created in 1997, the digital library continues to expand at a rate of about 5000 new documents per month. Since the end of 2008, most of the new scanned documents are available in image and text formats. Most of these documents are written in French.
- Google Play
- Digital library
- List of digital library projects
- A9.com, Amazon.com's book search
- Book Rights Registry
- Book scanning
- Universal library
- The basic Google book link is found at http://books.google.com/. The "advanced" interface allowing more specific searches is found at http://books.google.com/advanced_book_search
- Greg Duffy (March 2005). "Google's Cookie and Hacking Google Print". Kuro5hin.
- "In Google Book Settlement, Business Trumps Ideals". PC World. October 28, 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-31. "Of the seven million books Google has scanned, one million are in full preview mode as part of formal publisher agreements. Another one million are public domain works."
- Google currently uses Elphel cameras for book scanning and for capturing street imagery in Google Maps
- "Adapted firmware of Elphel 323 camera to meet needs of Google Book Search"
- Kelly, Kevin (May 14, 2006). "Scan This Book!". New York Times Magazine. Retrieved 2008-03-07. "When Google announced in December 2004 that it would digitally scan the books of five major research libraries to make their contents searchable, the promise of a universal library was resurrected. ... From the days of Sumerian clay tablets till now, humans have "published" at least 32 million books, 750 million articles and essays, 25 million songs, 500 million images, 500,000 movies, 3 million videos, TV shows and short films and 100 billion public Web pages."
- O'Sullivan, Joseph and Adam Smith. "All booked up," Googleblog. December 14, 2004.
- Copyright infringement suits against Google and their settlement: "Copyright Accord Would Make Millions More Books Available Online". Google Press Center. Retrieved November 22, 2008.
- "Authors Guild v. Google Settlement Resources Page". Authors Guild. Retrieved November 22, 2008.
- "A new chapter". The Economist. October 30, 2008. Retrieved November 22, 2008.
- Aiken, Paul (2005-09-20). "Authors Guild Sues Google, Citing "Massive Copyright Infringement"". Authors Guild. Archived from the original on 2007-02-09. Retrieved 2007-04-11.
- Gilbert, Alorie (2005-10-19). "Publishers sue Google over book search project". CNET News. Retrieved 2007-04-11.
- "The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.; Pearson Education, Inc.; Penguin Group (USA) Inc.; Simon and Schuster, Inc.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Plaintiffs, v. Google Inc., Defendant" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-10-05. PDF file of the complaint. SD. N.Y. Case No. 05-CV-8881-JES.
- Jen Grant (November 17, 2005). "Judging Book Search by its cover" (blog). Googleblog.
- "Library partners". Google books. Retrieved 2013-02-27.
- UC libraries partner with Google to digitize books
- University Complutense of Madrid and Google to Make Hundreds of Thousands of Books Available Online
- UW–Madion + WHS + Google digitization project partnership announced
- The University of Virginia Library Joins the Google Books Library Project
- Bavarian State Library + Google digitizing project partnership announced
- Reed, Brock. "La Bibliothèque, C'est Google" (Wired Campus Newsletter), Chronicle of Higher Education. May 17, 2007.
- Ghent/Gent + Google digitizing project partnership announced
- CIC + Google digitizing project partnership announced
- Keio + Google digitizing project partnership announced
- Cornell + Google digitizing project partnership announced
- Google's digitized "snippets" feature announced
- Google's "personal library" feature announced
- Columbia + Google digitizing project partnership announced
- Helft, Miguel (May 24, 2008). "Microsoft Will Shut Down Book Search Program". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-05-24. "Microsoft said it had digitized 750,000 books and indexed 80 million journal articles."
- Cohen, Noam (February 1, 2009). "Some Fear Google's Power in Digital Books". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-02-02. "Today, that project is known as Google Book Search and, aided by a recent class-action settlement, it promises to transform the way information is collected: who controls the most books; who gets access to those books; how access will be sold and attained."
- "Massive EU online library looks to compete with Google". Agence France-Presse. November 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-24. "Google, one of the pioneers in this domain on the other hand, claims to have seven million books available for its "Google Book Search" project, which saw the light of day at the end of 2004."
- Rich, Motoko (January 4, 2009). "Google Hopes to Open a Trove of Little-Seen Books". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-01-05. "The settlement may give new life to copyrighted out-of-print books in a digital form and allow writers to make money from titles that had been out of commercial circulation for years. Of the seven million books Google has scanned so far, about five million are in this category."
- "Google updates search index with old magazines". MSNBC. Associated Press. December 10, 2008. Retrieved June 29, 2009. "As part of its quest to corral more content published on paper, Google Inc. has made digital copies of more than 1 million articles from magazines that hit the newsstands decades ago."
- Rich, Motoko (2009-06-01). "Preparing to Sell E-Books, Google Takes on Amazon". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-05-31.
- Faure, Gaelle (December 19, 2009). "French court shuts down Google Books project". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2009-12-19.
- Google: 129 Million Different Books Have Been Published PC World
- "Google launches eBookstore with more than 3 million titles". MacWorld.
- "Judge rejects Google settlement with authors". Market Watch.
- "Google book scan project slows down". Law Librarian Blog. Retrieved 2012-03.
- "The National Digital Public Library Is Launched!". The New York Review of Books.
- Ars Technica
- Hindustani Times "Google to digitise 800,000 books at Mysore varsity"
- Google Library Partners
- Bergquist, Kevin (2006-02-13). "Google project promotes public good". The University Record (University of Michigan). Retrieved 2007-04-11.
- Pace, Andrew K. (January 2006). "Is This the Renaissance or the Dark Ages?". American Libraries. American Library Association. Retrieved 2007-04-11. "Google made instant e-book believers out of skeptics even though 10 years of e-book evangelism among librarians had barely made progress."
- Malte Herwig, "Google's Total Library", Spiegel Online International, Mar. 28, 2007.
- "Books of the world". Google. August 5, 2010. Retrieved 2010-08-15. "After we exclude serials, we can finally count all the books in the world. There are 129,864,880 of them. At least until Sunday"
- Ryan Sands (November 9, 2006). "From the mail bag: Public domain books and downloads" (blog). Inside Google Book Search.
- People's Daily Online (August 15, 2005). "Google's digital library suspended".
- Danny Sullivan (2006-06-28). "Google Book Search Wins Victory In German Challenge" (blog). Search Engine Watch. Retrieved 2006-11-11.
- Sage, Adam (December 19, 2009). "French publishers toast triumph over Google". The Times of London. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
- Smith, Heather (December 18, 2009). "Google's French Book Scanning Project Halted by Court". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
- John Oates (June 7, 2006). "French publisher sues Google". The Register.
- "Fine for Google over French books". BBC News. December 18, 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
- China Daily. "Writer sues Google for copyright infringement". Retrieved March 20, 2012.
- Thomas Claburn (March 6, 2007). "Microsoft Attorney Accuses Google Of Copyright Violations". InformationWeek.
- Siva Vaidhyanathan. "The Googlization of Everything and the Future of Copyright," University of California Davis Law Review volume 40 (March 2007), pp. 1207–1231, Lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu (pdf)
- First Monday Transcript September 2007.
- Robert B. Townsend, Google Books: Is It Good for History?, Perspectives (September 2007).
- "Google Online Book Deal at Risk".
- "Google Book Settlement Site Is Up; Paying Authors $60 Per Scanned Book", by Erick Schonfeld on February 11, 2009, at TechCrunch
- American Society of Journalists and Authors
- Es wird Zeit, dass die Bundesregierung eingreift
- Flood, Alison (January 22, 2010). "Ursula Le Guin leads revolt against Google digital book settlement". The Guardian (London).
- BBC: Google hits back at book critics
- Google Books Is Not a Library
- "The Case for Book Privacy Parity: Google Books and the Shift from Offline to Online Reading". Harvard Law and Policy Review. May 16, 2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010.
- Full text of Judge Chin's ruling.
- Amir Efrati and Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg (March 23, 2011). "Judge Rejects Google Books Settlement". Wall Street Journal.
- Jean-Noël Jeanneney (2006-10-23). Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from Europe (book abstract; Foreword by Ian Wilson ). ISBN 0-226-39577-4.
- Barbara Quint, "Changes at Google Scholar: A Conversation With Anurag Acharya", Information Today, August 27, 2007.
- The number of Public Domain books at Google Books can be calculated by looking at the number of Public Domain books at HathiTrust, which is the academic mirror of Google Books. As of May 2010 HathiTrust had over 1 million Public Domain books.
- "Internet Archive and Library Partners Develop Joint Collection of 80,000+ eBooks To Extend Traditional In-Library Lending Model". San Francisco. February 22, 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-26. "During a library visit, patrons with an OpenLibrary.org account can borrow any of these lendable eBooks using laptops, reading devices or library computers."
- "Microsoft starts online library in challenge to Google Books". AFP (Melbourne). 2006-12-08. Retrieved 2008-11-24. "Microsoft launched an online library in a move that pits the world's biggest software company against Google's controversial project to digitize the world's books."
- Xio, Christina. "Google Books-An Other Popular Service By Google". Retrieved 4 August 2012. "Few years back the Microsoft abandoned the project and now all the books are freely available at the Internet archive."
- Snyder, Chris (November 20, 2008). "Europe's Answer to Google Book Search Crashes on Day 1". Wired. Retrieved 2008-11-24.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Google Books|
- Google Books homepage
- Google Books Information Page
- Gallica, the digital side of the French National Library
- Europeana, the Eureopean Library
- Archive.org Scanned Books, digital library of books
- The Author's Guild et al. v. Google Inc. Timeline and progression of case
- Jeffrey Toobin; Google's Moon Shot
- Malte Herwig; "Putting The World's Books On The Web" (SPIEGEL International Edition)
- PublicDomainReprints.org – an experiment that prints public domain books from Google Books
- Digital Library Federation
- Dian Schaffhauser: Google Book Search: The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly
- Robert Darnton – Google & the Future of Books
- Jerry A. Hausman and J. Gregory Sidak – Google and the Proper Antitrust Scrutiny of Orphan Books