Greek Homosexuality (book)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Greek Homosexuality
The front cover of the book's first edition is adorned with a photo of a well-known ancient red-figure pot (called a krater). The pot features a red-figure illustration of a young Ganymede walking nude as he looks down happily at a large toy hoop he holds with his right hand. On his left hand perches a pet rooster.
On the front cover of this first edition is an Attic red-figure bell krater (ca. 525–475 BCE) decorated with an image of a young, nude Ganymede plays with toy hoop and holding a pet rooster. The image illustrates a scene from a Greek myth. As Ganymede plays, Zeus (not pictured) pursues him.
Author Kenneth Dover
Country United States
Language English
Subject Homosexuality in Ancient Greece
Publisher Harvard University Press
Publication date
1978
Media type Print
Pages 244
ISBN 0674362616
OCLC 3088711
LC Class HQ76.3.G8 D68 1978 Overflow

Greek Homosexuality is a 1978 book about homosexuality in ancient Greece by Kenneth Dover, the first modern scholarly work on the subject.[1] Dover uses archaic and classical archaeological and literary sources to discuss ancient Greek sexual behavior and attitudes. The book's major sections address the iconography of vase paintings, the speeches in the law courts, and the comedies of Aristophanes. Dover also devotes smaller sections to the content of other literary and philosophical source texts.

Content[edit]

In this detail from an Attic black-figure cup (ca. 530–520 BCE), a man makes an "up-and-down" gesture.

In the preface of his book professor Kenneth Dover wrote that the aim of the work was: To describe those phenomena of homosexual begaviour and sentiment which are to be found in Greek art and literature between the eight and second centuries B.C., and so to provide a basis for more detailed and specialised exploration (which I leave to others) of the sexual aspects of Greek art, society and morality.[2] In the Preface he furthermore argued that ‘heterosexual’ and ‘homosexual’ were not antithetical terms, but that homosexuality was a sub-division of the ‘quasi-sexual’ or ‘pseudo-sexual’.[2]

The conclusions drawn are that the Greeks regarded homosexuality in general to be natural, normal, and salutary, and their actual practices were circumscribed by cultural norms. In the case of the ancient Greeks – specifically the Athenians – the book claims that the sexual roles of the lovers were sharply polarized.

Dover concludes that the Greeks conceived of same-sex relations primarily as boy love and identifies the terms for the roles of the two male lovers, erastes, "the lover," that is, the older active partner, and eromenos, "the beloved", indicating the adolescent male beloved. Basing himself on the work of Sir John Beazley, Dover divides the evidence of surviving vase painting depicting these type of relationships into three types. Some show the erastes offering a gift to the eromenos. Others depict the "up and down" gesture – the erastes attempting to fondle the eromenos while, with the other hand, he is turning his head to look into his eyes. The third group, usually older black-figure vases, show the couple engaging in interfemoral intercourse or, in a couple of instances, anal intercourse. Traditionally, the young beloved, when he reached the age of manhood – indicated in the iconography by his growth of a beard – would switch roles and become a lover himself, seeking out a younger male for a love relationship. Later in life he was expected to marry and produce new citizens for the state.

To fail to switch roles was considered unmanly and irresponsible, and Dover points out the mockery that Aristophanes (a very popular and successful Athenian comic playwright) inflicted in passing, in several plays, on a certain Athenian citizen who was notorious for his persistence in the role of beloved long after reaching his maturity.

With regard to the record of cases in the law courts, Dover concentrates primarily on a certain case initiated by the orator Demosthenes. Demosthenes had been in an embassy sent to the neighboring state of Macedonia which had not only failed to achieve its mission, but was widely suspected of having accepted bribes from king Phillip to abandon their mission. Upon the return to Athens, Demosthenes initiated a prosecution of his fellow ambassadors for bribery in an attempt to avoid being indicted himself. The defendants successfully had the charges dismissed on the grounds that that one of Demosthenes' co-plaintiffs, Timarchos, had been a boy prostitute and had thereby lost his rights as an Athenian citizen, becoming ineligible to bring suit in Athenian courts.

Dover extensively quotes from the records of the trial to demonstrate, among other things, that while the Athenians attached no stigma to same sex relations per se, they did adhere to certain conventions; in this case, that no citizen could be permitted to sell his sexual favors, which they regarded as the proper function of a slave, not a free man.

Scholarly reception[edit]

Greek Homosexuality had an enormous influence on the study of homosexuality in ancient Greece.[1][3] Scholars influenced by Dover's work include classicists David M. Halperin, John J. Winkler, Eva Cantarella, and philosopher Michel Foucault.[3] The work was influential partly because of its author's credentials as an historian and a philologist. Halperin called Dover's work "a triumph of empirical research", and listed it as one of the key intellectual influences on his book One Hundred Years of Homosexuality. Halperin believes that the publication of Greek Homosexuality in 1978, together with the appearance of the English translation of Foucault's The History of Sexuality, marked the beginning of a new era in the study of the history of sexuality.[1] Literary scholar Camille Paglia disputed Halperin's characterization of Greek Homosexuality, observing that while it was a valuable book on Greek pederasty, it was not an "intellectual" work and aside from its discussion of intercrural copulation contained relatively little that was surprising.[4]

Cantarella has criticized some of Dover's conclusions, concluding that there was no restriction on anal intercourse in pederastic relationships, a claim rejected by classicist Bruce Thornton. David Cohen has critically discussed Dover's work in Law, Sexuality and Society, as has Thornton in Eros: The Myth of Ancient Greek Sexuality.[3]

Philosopher Roger Scruton was dismissive of Greek Homosexuality, calling it "trivialising".[5] Dover commented in his memoir that he understood what Scruton meant, but was not abashed, since he attached importance to phenomena Scruton ignores.[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Halperin, David M. (1990). One Hundred Years of Homosexuality: And Other Essays on Greek Love. New York: Routledge. pp. x, 4. ISBN 0-415-90097-2. 
  2. ^ a b http://books.google.com/books?id=fstPVlTPBRQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Greek+Homosexuality+kenneth+dover&hl=fi&sa=X&ei=gnVFVPmWO8G9ygO8xICAAw&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Greek%20Homosexuality%20kenneth%20dover&f=false
  3. ^ a b c Thornton, Bruce S. (1997). Eros: The Myth of Ancient Greek Sexuality. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. pp. 256–258, 264. ISBN 0-8133-3226-5. 
  4. ^ Paglia, Camille (1992). Sex, Art, and American Culture: Essays. New York: Penguin Books. pp. 172–173. ISBN 0-14-017209-2. 
  5. ^ Scruton, Roger (1994). Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation. London: Phoenix. p. 308. ISBN 1-85799-100-1. 
  6. ^ Dover, Kenneth (1995). Marginal Comment: A Memoir. London: Duckworth. p. 115. ISBN 0-7156-2630-2. 

Bibliography[edit]

  • Dover, K. J. (1989). Greek Homosexuality. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674362703.