Lord Guildford Dudley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Guildford Dudley)
Jump to: navigation, search
"Guilford Dudley" redirects here. For the U.S. ambassador, see Guilford Dudley (ambassador).
Lord Guildford Dudley
Born c. 1535
Died 12 February 1554
Tower Hill, London
Cause of death
Decapitation
Resting place
St Peter ad Vincula, London
Spouse(s) Lady Jane Grey
Parents John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland
Jane Guildford

Lord Guildford Dudley (also spelt Guilford) (c. 1535[1] – 12 February 1554) was the husband of Lady Jane Grey who, declared as his heir by King Edward VI, occupied the English throne from 10 July until 19 July 1553. Guildford Dudley enjoyed a humanist education and was married to Jane in a magnificent celebration about six weeks before the King's death. After Guildford's father, the Duke of Northumberland, had engineered Jane's accession, Jane and Guildford spent her brief rule residing in the Tower of London. They were still in the Tower when their regime collapsed and remained there, in different quarters, as prisoners. They were condemned to death for high treason in November 1553. Queen Mary I was inclined to spare their lives, but Thomas Wyatt's rebellion against her plans to marry Philip of Spain led to the young couple's execution, a measure that was widely seen as unduly harsh.

Family and marriage[edit]

Guildford Dudley was the second youngest surviving son of John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland and his wife Jane, daughter of Sir Edward Guildford.[2] The Dudley lineage goes back to a family called Sutton. In the early 14th century they became the lords of Dudley Castle,[3] from whom Guildford descended through his paternal grandfather. This was Edmund Dudley, a councillor to Henry VII, who was executed after his royal master's death. Through his father's mother, Elizabeth Grey, Viscountess Lisle, Guildford descended from the Hundred Years War heroes, Richard Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick, and John Talbot, 1st Earl of Shrewsbury.[4]

The Dudley children—there were thirteen born in all—grew up in a Protestant household and enjoyed a humanist education.[5] Under the young King Edward VI, Guildford's father became Lord President of the Privy Council and de facto ruled England from 1550–1553.[6] The cronicler Richard Grafton, who knew him,[7] described Guildford as "a comely, virtuous and goodly gentleman".[8] In 1552 Northumberland unsuccessfully tried to marry Guildford to Margaret Clifford, a cousin of Jane Grey.[9] Instead, in the spring of 1553, Guildford was engaged to the sixteen-year-old Jane Grey herself.[10] Jane Grey figured higher in the line of succession than Margaret Clifford.[2][note 1] On 25 May 1553, three weddings were celebrated at Durham Place, the Duke of Northumberland's town mansion. Guildford married Jane, his sister Katherine was matched with Henry Hastings, the Earl of Huntingdon's heir, and another Catherine, Jane's sister, married Lord Herbert, the heir of the Earl of Pembroke.[11][note 2] It was a magnificent festival, with jousts, games, and masques. For the latter, two different companies had been booked, one male, one female. The Venetian and French ambassadors were guests, and there were "large numbers of the common people ... and of the most principal of the realm".[8] Guildford and some others suffered an attack of food poisoning, because of "a mistake made by a cook, who plucked one leaf for another."[12]

De facto consort[edit]

The Crown Offered to Lady Jane Grey, as imagined in the 1820s: Guildford and Jane are in the centre

Mortally ill, King Edward, in his "Device of the Succession", settled the Crown on his cousin once removed, Jane Grey, bypassing his half-sisters, Mary and Elizabeth. After Edward's death on 6 July 1553 the Duke of Northumberland undertook the enforcement of the King's will.[13] The envoys of the Holy Roman Empire and France were sure of the plan's success.[14] Jane was reluctant to accept the Crown: She gave in after remonstrances by an assembly of nobles, including her parents and in-laws; Guildford chimed in with a lovelier approach, with "prayers and caresses".[15] On 10 July Jane and Guildford made their ceremonial entry into the Tower of London.[16] Residing in there, Guildford wanted to be made king; according to her own later account, Jane had a long discussion about this with Guildford, who "assented that if he were to be made king, he would be so by me, by Act of Parliament".[17] But then, Jane would agree only to make him Duke of Clarence; Guildford replied that he did not want to be a duke, but king.[18] When the Duchess of Northumberland heard of the argument she became furious and forbade Guildford to sleep any longer with his wife. She also commanded him to leave the Tower and go home, but Jane insisted that he remain at court, at her side.[19]

According to later remarks by the Imperial ambassadors the daily Council meetings were presided by Guildford, who allegedly also dined in state alone and had himself addressed in regal style.[20] Antoine de Noailles, the French ambassador, described Guildford as "the new King".[21] The Imperial court in Brussels also believed in the existence of King Guildford.[17]

Imprisonment[edit]

On 10 July, the same day as Jane's proclamation, a letter from Mary Tudor arrived in London, saying that she was now queen and demanding the obedience of the Council.[22] Mary was assembling her supporters in East Anglia; it was decided to take the field against her after some discussion over who should go, in which Jane made sure that her father should not.[23] The Duke of Northumberland marched to Cambridge with his troops and passed a week that saw no action, until he heard on 20 July that the Council in London had declared for Mary. Northumberland now proclaimed Mary Tudor himself at the market-place and was arrested the next morning.[24] On 19 July, a few hours before Queen Mary I's proclamation in London, the baptism of one of the Gentlemen Pensioners' children took place. Jane had agreed to be the godmother and wished the child's name to be Guildford.[25] The Bishop of Winchester, Stephen Gardiner, who had been imprisoned in the Tower for five years, took great offence at this fact as he heard of it.[26]

"JANE" carving in the Tower of London, traditionally believed to have been made by Guildford Dudley[27]

A majority of the Privy Council moved out of the Tower before switching their allegiance.[28] Becoming aware of his colleagues' change of mind, Jane's father, the Duke of Suffolk, abandoned his command over the fortress and proclaimed Mary I on nearby Tower Hill. After he had left, his wife was told she could also go home,[25] while Jane, Guildford, and the Duchess of Northumberland were not allowed to.[29] Jane was later moved from the royal apartments to the Gentleman Gaoler's lodgings and Guildford was imprisoned in the Bell Tower. There he was soon joined by his brother, Robert.[30] His remaining brothers were imprisoned in other towers, as was his father, who was for the moment the only prominent person to go to the scaffold; Mary was prepared to spare Jane's and Guildford's lives.[31]

Jane and Guildford were indicted on 12 August,[32] and Jane submitted a letter of explanation to the Queen, "asking forgiveness ... for the sin she was accused of, informing her majesty about the truth of events."[33] In this account she spoke of herself as "a wife who loves her husband".[34] On 13 November 1553 Jane and Guildford were tried at Guildhall, together with Archbishop Cranmer and Guildford's brothers Ambrose and Henry. They were all convicted of high treason after pleading guilty.[35] Guildford was convicted of compassing to depose Queen Mary I by sending troops to the Duke of Northumberland and by proclaiming and honouring Jane as queen.[36]

In December, Jane was allowed to walk freely in the Queen's Garden.[37] "Lord Robert and Lord Guildford" had to be content with taking the air on the leads of the Bell Tower.[38] Jane and Guildford may have had some contact with each other,[39] and at some point Guildford wrote a message to his father-in-law in Jane's prayer book:

Your loving and obedient son wishes unto your grace long life in this world with as much joy and comfort as ever I wish to myself, and in the world to come joy everlasting. Your humble son to his death, G. Dudley[8]

Execution[edit]

Queen Mary I's plan to marry Philip II of Spain was greeted with widespread opposition, not just among the populace but also among Members of Parliament and privy councillors. Thomas Wyatt's Rebellion in early 1554, in which the Duke of Suffolk took part, was a result of this dislike.[40] It was not the intention of the conspirators to bring Jane Grey on the throne again. Nevertheless the government, at the height of the military crisis around 7 February, decided to execute Jane and her husband, possibly out of panic. It was also an opportunity for removing possible inspirations for future unrest and unwelcome reminders of the past.[41] It troubled Mary to let her cousin die, but she accepted the Privy Council's advice.[42] Bishop Gardiner pressed for the young couple's execution in a court sermon,[43] and the Imperial ambassador Simon Renard was happy to report that "Jane of Suffolk and her husband are to lose their heads."[44]

The day before their executions Guildford asked Jane for a last meeting, which she refused, explaining it "would only ... increase their misery and pain, it was better to put it off ... as they would meet shortly elsewhere, and live bound by indissoluble ties."[45] Around ten o'clock in the morning of 12 February Guildford was led towards Tower Hill, where "many ... gentlemen" waited to shake hands with him.[46] Guildford made a short speech to the assembled crowd, as was customary.[47] "Having no ghostly father with him",[48][note 3] he knelt, prayed, and asked the people to pray for him, "holding up his eyes and hands to God many times".[7] He was killed with one stroke of the axe, after which his body was conveyed on a cart to the Tower chapel of St Peter ad Vincula. Watching the scene from her window, Jane exclaimed: "Oh, Guildford, Guildford!"[7] He was buried in the chapel with Jane who was dead within an hour after him.[49]

The executions did not contribute to the government's popularity.[7] Five months after the couple's death, John Knox, the future Scottish reformer, wrote of them as "innocents ... such as by just laws and faithful witnesses can never be proved to have offended by themselves".[43] Of Guildford, the chronicler Grafton wrote ten years later: "even those that never before the time of his execution saw him, did with lamentable tears bewail his death".[7]

Ancestry[edit]

See also[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ Jane Grey was the daughter of Frances Grey, Duchess of Suffolk, a niece of Henry VIII by his younger sister Mary.
  2. ^ Traditionally these matches came to be seen as part of a conspiracy by the Duke of Northumberland to bring his family to the throne. Some historians, though, like David Loades, W.K. Jordan (Jordan and Gleason 1975 pp. 10–11) and Eric Ives (Ives 2009 p. 153) have interpreted them as "routine actions of dynastic politics" (Loades 1996 p. 239).
  3. ^ Guildford had probably refused to be attended by a Catholic priest and been denied a Protestant divine (Nichols p. 55).

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Richardson 2008
  2. ^ a b Loades 1996 p. 238
  3. ^ Wilson 1981 pp. 1–4
  4. ^ Wilson 1981 pp. 1, 3; Adams 2002 pp. 312–313
  5. ^ Adams 2008; Chapman 1962 p. 65
  6. ^ Loades 1996 pp. 147, 285
  7. ^ a b c d e Ives 2009 p. 275
  8. ^ a b c Ives 2009 p. 185
  9. ^ Loades 1996 pp. 226, 238
  10. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 185, 36
  11. ^ de Lisle 2008 pp. 93, 304; Ives 2009 p. 321
  12. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 82
  13. ^ Alford 2002 pp. 171–172
  14. ^ Loades 1996 p. 256–257
  15. ^ Ives 2009 p. 187
  16. ^ Ives 2009 p. 188
  17. ^ a b Ives 2009 p. 189
  18. ^ Ives 2009 p. 189
  19. ^ Chapman 1962 pp. 117–118; Ives 2009 p. 189
  20. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 189, 241
  21. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 121
  22. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 122
  23. ^ Ives 2009 p. 198
  24. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 246, 241–242, 243–244
  25. ^ a b Ives 2009 p. 215
  26. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 184, 241
  27. ^ Wilson 1981 p. 61
  28. ^ Ives 2009 p. 214
  29. ^ Ives 2009 p. 241
  30. ^ Ives 2009 p. 249; Wilson 1981 p. 59
  31. ^ Wilson 1981 pp. 59, 62, 63
  32. ^ Ives 2009 p. 247
  33. ^ Ives 2009 p. 18
  34. ^ Ives 2009 p. 186
  35. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 32; Ives 2009 pp. 251–252
  36. ^ Bellamy 1979 p. 54
  37. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 252, 355
  38. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 33
  39. ^ Ives 2009 p. 252; Wilson 1981 p. 59
  40. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 261–262
  41. ^ Ives 2009 pp. 265–268
  42. ^ Porter 2007 p. 302
  43. ^ a b Ives 2009 p. 268
  44. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 190
  45. ^ Ives 2009 p. 274
  46. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 55; Ives 2009 p. 274–275
  47. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 204
  48. ^ Nichols 1850 p. 55
  49. ^ Chapman 1962 p. 203

References[edit]

External links[edit]