1982 Hama Massacre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Hama massacre)
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with 2012 Hama massacre or 1981 Hama massacre.
Hama massacre
Part of the Islamist uprising in Syria
After Hama Massacre.jpg
A section of Hama, after the government attack
Location Syria Hama, Syria
Date 2 February 1982 – 28 February 1982
Target Muslim Brotherhood
Attack type
Siege
Deaths 10,000–40,000 Syrian citizens (estimates vary)
Perpetrators Hafez al-Assad
Rifaat al-Assad
Hikmat al-Shihabi
 • Shafiq Fayadh
 • Ali Haydar
 • Ali Douba
Hama Massacre
Part of Islamist uprising in Syria
Date 2 February 1982 – 28 February 1982
Location Hama, Syrian Arab Republic
Result Islamist insurgency in Syria suppressed, decisive Syrian Army victory
Belligerents
Syria Defense Companies
Syria Syrian Arab Army
 • 3rd Armoured Division
 • 10th Armoured Division
 • 14th Special Forces Division
 • Military Intelligence
 • General Intelligence Directorate
 • Air Force Intelligence
Flag of the Muslim Brotherhood.gif Muslim Brotherhood in Syria
Commanders and leaders
Hafez al-Assad
Rifaat al-Assad
Hikmat al-Shihabi
Shafiq Fayadh
Ali Haydar
Ali Douba
Mohammed al-Khouli
`Adnan `Uqla
Strength
Defense Companies: 3 Brigades (12,000 soldiers)
Syrian Arab Army : 4 Brigades (15,000 soldiers)
Total : About 30,000 soldiers
Less than 2000 armed volunteers
Casualties and losses
Less than 500 in initial fighting All insurgents killed, between 10,000 to 30,000 civilians killed

The Hama massacre (Arabic: مجزرة حماة‎) occurred in February 1982, when the Syrian Arab Army and the Defense Companies, under the orders of the country's then-president, Hafez al-Assad, besieged the town of Hama for 27 days in order to quell an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood against al-Assad's government.[1][2] The massacre, carried out by the Syrian Army under commanding General Rifaat al-Assad, effectively ended the campaign begun in 1976 by Sunni Muslim groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood, against the government.

Initial diplomatic reports from Western countries stated that 1,000 were killed.[3][4] Subsequent estimates vary, with the lower estimates claiming that at least 10,000 Syrian citizens were killed,[5] while others put the number at 20,000 (Robert Fisk),[1] or 40,000 (Syrian Human Rights Committee).[2][6] About 1,000 Syrian soldiers were killed during the operation and large parts of the old city were destroyed. Alongside such events as Black September in Jordan,[7] the attack has been described as one of "the single deadliest acts by any Arab government against its own people in the modern Middle East".[8] The vast majority of the victims were civilians.[9]

According to Syrian media, anti-government rebels initiated the fighting, who "pounced on our comrades while sleeping in their homes and killed whomever they could kill of women and children, mutilating the bodies of the martyrs in the streets, driven, like mad dogs, by their black hatred." Security forces then "rose to confront these crimes" and "taught the murderers a lesson that has snuffed out their breath".[10]

Background[edit]

The Ba'ath Party of Syria, which advocated the ideologies of Arab nationalism and Arab socialism had clashed with the Muslim Brotherhood, a group with a conservative ideology, since 1940.[11] The two groups were opposed in important ways. The Ba'ath party was nominally secular, nationalist and dominated by the minority Alawites. The Muslim Brotherhood, like other Islamist groups, saw nationalism as un-Islamic and religion as inseparable from politics and government. Most Ba'ath party members were from humble, obscure backgrounds and favored radical economic policies, while Sunni Muslims had dominated the souqs and landed power of Syria, and tended to view government intervention in the economy as threatening.[12] Not all Sunni notables believed in fundamentalism, but even those who did not often saw the Brotherhood as a useful tool against the Ba'ath.[13]

Section of Hama before the government attack

The town of Hama in particular was a "stronghold of landed conservatism and of the Muslim Brothers," and "had long been a redoubtable opponent of the Ba'athist state."[11] The first full-scale clash between the two occurred shortly after the 1963 coup, in which the Ba'ath party first gained power in Syria. In April 1964 riots broke out in Hama, where Muslim insurgents put up "roadblocks, stockpiled food and weapons, ransacked wine shops." After an Ismaili Ba'ath militia man was killed, riots intensified and rebels attacked "every vestige" of the Ba'ath party in Hama. Tanks were brought in to crush the rebellion and 70 members of the Muslim Brotherhood died, with many others wounded or captured, and still more disappearing underground.

After the clashes in Hama, the situation periodically erupted into clashes between the government and various Islamic sections. However a more serious challenge occurred after the Syrian invasion of Lebanon in 1976. From 1976 to 1982, Sunni Islamists fought the Ba'ath Party-controlled government of Syria in what has been called a "long campaign of terror".[13] In 1979 the Brotherhood undertook guerrilla activities in multiple cities within the country targeting military officers and government officials. The resulting government repression included abusive tactics, torture, mass arrests, and a number of massacres. In July 1980, the ratification of Law No. 49 made membership in the Muslim Brotherhood a capital offense.[14]

Throughout the first years of the 1980s the Muslim Brotherhood and various other Islamist factions staged hit-and-run and bomb attacks against the government and its officials, including a nearly successful attempt to assassinate president Hafez al-Assad on 26 June 1980, during an official state reception for the president of Mali. When a machine-gun salvo missed him, al-Assad allegedly ran to kick a hand grenade aside, and his bodyguard (who survived and was later promoted to a much higher position) smothered the explosion of another one. Surviving with only light injuries, al-Assad's revenge was swift and merciless: only hours later a large number of imprisoned Islamists (reports more than 1200) were executed in their cells in Tadmor Prison (near Palmyra), by units loyal to the president's brother Rifaat al-Assad.

Attack by insurgents in Hama[edit]

The events of the Hama massacre began at 2 am on 3 February 1982. An army unit searching the old city "stumbled on the hideout of the local guerilla commander, `Umar Jawwad," (aka Abu Bakr) and were ambushed. Other insurgent cells were alerted by radio and "roof-top snipers killed perhaps a score" of Syrian soldiers. Reinforcements were rushed to besiege Abu Bakr who then "gave the order for a general uprising" in Hama. Mosque loudspeakers used for the call to prayer called for jihad against the Ba'ath, and hundreds of Islamic insurgents rose to attack the homes of government officials and Baath Party leaders, overrun police posts and ransack armories. By daybreak of the morning of 3 February some 70 leading Ba'athists had been killed and the Islamist insurgents and other opposition activists proclaimed Hama a "liberated city", urging Syrians to rise up against the "infidel".[15]

Attack by government forces[edit]

Hafez al-Assad (right), president of Syria. His brother Rifaat al-Assad (left) supposedly supervised the operation

According to author Patrick Seale, "every party worker, every paratrooper sent to Hama knew that this time Islamic militancy had to be torn out of the city, whatever the cost..." The military was mobilized, and president Hafez al-Assad sent Rifaat's special forces (the Defense companies), elite army units and Mukhabarat agents to the city. Before the attack, the Syrian government called for the city's surrender and warned that anyone remaining in the city would be considered a rebel. Besieged by 12,000 troops, the fighting in Hama lasted for three weeks – the first week "in regaining control of the town," and the last two "in hunting down the insurgents."[15] Robert Fisk, in his book Pity the Nation, described how civilians were fleeing Hama while tanks and troops were moving towards the city's outskirts to start the siege. He cites reports of high numbers of deaths and shortages of food and water from fleeing civilians and from soldiers.[16]

According to Amnesty International, the Syrian military bombed the old city center from the air to facilitate the entry of infantry and tanks through the narrow streets; buildings were demolished by tanks during the first four days of fighting. Large parts of the old city were destroyed. There are also unsubstantiated reports of use of hydrogen cyanide by the government forces.[17] After encountering fierce resistance, Rifaat's forces ringed the city with artillery and shelled it for three weeks.

After the initial attacks, military and internal security personnel were dispatched to comb through the rubble for surviving members of the Muslim Brotherhood and their sympathizers.[18] Torture and mass executions of suspected rebel sympathizers ensued, killing many thousands over several weeks.[citation needed] Rifaat, suspecting that rebels were still hiding in tunnels under the old city, had diesel fuel pumped into them and set ablaze and stationed T-72 tanks at the tunnel entrances to shell people trying to escape from the tunnels.[19]

Fatality estimates[edit]

Initial diplomatic reports from western governments in 1982 had believed that 1000 were killed in the fighting.[3][4] Subsequent estimates of casualties vary from 7,000 to 40,000 people killed, including about 1,000 soldiers.[citation needed] Robert Fisk, who was in Hama shortly after the massacre, originally estimated fatalities at 10,000, but has since doubled the estimate to 20,000.[1][20][21] The president's brother Rifaat reportedly boasted of killing 38,000 people.[22] Amnesty International initially estimated the death toll was between 10,000 and 25,000, the vast majority civilians.[8]

Reports by the Syrian Human Rights Committee estimate "over 25,000"[23] or between 30,000 to 40,000 people were killed.[6] The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood also suggests a figure of approximately 40,000 victims.

Twenty years later, Syrian journalist Subhi Hadidi, wrote that "under the command of General Ali Haydar, besieged the city for 27 days, bombarding it with heavy artillery and tank [fire], before invading it and killing 30,000 or 40,000 of the city's citizens – in addition to the 15,000 missing who have not been found to this day, and the 100,000 expelled."[2]

After the massacre[edit]

After the Hama uprising, the Islamist insurrection was broken, and the Brotherhood has since operated in exile while other factions surrendered or slipped into hiding. Government attitudes in Syria hardened considerably during the uprising, and Assad would rely more on repressive than on political tactics for the remainder of his rule, although an economic liberalization began in the 1990s.[24]

After the massacre, the already evident disarray in the insurgents' ranks increased, and the rebel factions experienced acrimonious internal splits. Particularly damaging to their cause was the deterrent effect of the massacre, as well as the realization that no Sunni uprisings had occurred in the rest of the country in support of the Hama rebels. Most members of the rebel groups fled the country or remained in exile, mainly in Jordan and Iraq, while others would make their way to the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany.[25] The Muslim Brotherhood—the largest opposition group—split into two factions, after giving up on armed struggle. One, more moderate and recognized by the international Muslim Brotherhood, eventually headquartered itself in the UK where it remains, while another for several years retained a military structure in Iraq, with backing from the government, before rejoining the London-based mainstream.

The Hama massacre is often raised in indictment of the Assad government's poor human rights record.[14][26] Within Syria, mention of the massacre has been strictly suppressed, although the general contours of the events—and various partisan versions, on all sides—are well known throughout the country. When the massacre is publicly referenced, it is only as the "events" or "incident" at Hama.

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini offered only mild condemnation of the massacre, out of a desire to maintain the Islamic Republic's alliance with Syria.[27]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Fisk 2010
  2. ^ a b c MEMRI 2002
  3. ^ a b "Syria: Bloody Challenge to Assad". Time. 8 March 1982. 
  4. ^ a b By JOHN KIFNER, Special to the New York Times (12 February 1982). "Syrian Troops Are Said To Battle Rebels Encircled In Central City". The New York Times (Hama (Syria); Syria). Retrieved 20 January 2012. 
  5. ^ New York Times 2011 March 26
  6. ^ a b Syrian Human Rights Committee, 2005
  7. ^ The Media; Freedom or Responsibility: The War in Lebanon, 1982: A Case Study, Julian J. Landau, (NY 1984), page 67
  8. ^ a b Wright 2008: 243-244
  9. ^ Fisk, Robert. 1990. Pity the Nation. London: Touchstone, ISBN 0-671-74770-3.
  10. ^ [The New York Times. 24 Feb 1982. Syria Offers Picture of Hama Revolt]
  11. ^ a b Seale 1989: 93
  12. ^ Seale 1989: 37, 93, 148, 171
  13. ^ a b Seale 1989: 335-337
  14. ^ a b Human Rights Watch 1996
  15. ^ a b Seale 1989: 332-333
  16. ^ Fisk 1990: 185–86
  17. ^ Reports of cyanide gas being used, SHRC [dead link]
  18. ^ Benjamin and Simon 2002: 86
  19. ^ Melman, Yosi (19 May 2011). "Tanks finally get their thanks". Haaretz. Retrieved 7 June 2012. 
  20. ^ Fisk 1990: 186
  21. ^ Fisk 2007
  22. ^ From Beirut to Jerusalem, pp. 76–105
  23. ^ Syrian Human Rights Committee, 2006.
  24. ^ US Dept. of State, country profile
  25. ^ http://www.globalpolitician.com/
  26. ^ Human Rights Watch, 2010
  27. ^ Milani, Mohsen (Fall 2013). "Why Tehran Won't Abandon Assad(ism)". The Washington Quarterly 36 (4): 80. doi:10.1080/0163660x.2013.861715. 

Bibliography[edit]

Further reading[edit]

  • Kathrin Nina Wiedl: The Hama Massacre – reasons, supporters of the rebellion, consequences. München 2007, ISBN 978-3-638-71034-3.
  • The Economist (16 November 2000) Is Syria really changing?, London: 'Syria’s Islamist movement has recently shown signs of coming back to life, nearly 20 years after 30,000 people were brutally massacred in Hama in 1982' The Economist
  • Routledge (10 January 2000) Summary of the 10 January 2002, Roundtable on Militant Islamic Fundamentalism in the Twenty-First Century, Volume 24, Number 3 / 1 June 2002: Pages:187 – 205
  • Jack Donnelly (1988) Human Rights at the United Nations 1955–85: The Question of Bias, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3 (Sep., 1988), pp. 275–303
  • More Detailed Account of the actual Hama Massacre and Killings[dead link]
  • NSArchive
  • Fisk, Robert. 1997 January 19. A LAND IN THE SHADOW OF DEATH. The Independent (UK) (paragraph recollecting insurgency and reaction).