Hans von Storch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hans von Storch
Hans von Storch.jpg
Hans von Storch in February 2011
Born (1949-08-13) 13 August 1949 (age 64)
Wyk auf Föhr, Germany
Alma mater University of Hamburg
Occupation Climate scientist
Years active 1976–present
Notable work(s) See below
Board member of
Advisory boards: Journal of Climate, Annals of Geophysics
Awards

Hans von Storch (born 13 August 1949 in Wyk auf Föhr, Schleswig-Holstein) is a German climate scientist. He is a Professor at the Meteorological Institute of the University of Hamburg, and (since 2001) Director of the Institute for Coastal Research at the Helmholtz Research Centre (previously: GKSS Research Center) in Geesthacht, Germany. He is a member of the advisory boards of the journals Journal of Climate and Annals of Geophysics.

Opinion on global warming[edit]

He said that global warming exists:

"Based on the scientific evidence, I am convinced that we are facing anthropogenic climate change brought about by the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere."[2]

He is also known for an article in Der Spiegel he co-wrote with Nico Stehr, which states that:

"Scientific research faces a crisis because its public figures are overselling the issues to gain attention in a hotly contested market for newsworthy information."[3]
"The alarmists think that climate change is something extremely dangerous, extremely bad and that overselling a little bit, if it serves a good purpose, is not that bad."[4]

In December 2009, he expressed concern about the credibility of science and criticized some publicly visible scientists for simplifying and dramatizing their communications. He pointed to the German Waldsterben (Forest dieback) hype of the 1980s:[5]

Research about the forest die back in Germany may serve as an example at the other end of the spectrum. The science of forest damages was in the 1980s heavily politicized, and used as support for a specific preconceived "good" policy of environmental protection. The resulting overselling and dramatization broke down in the 1990s, and news about adverse developments in German forests is now a hard sell in Germany. An observer wrote in 2004: "The damage for the scientists is enormous. Nobody believes them any longer." Of course, the damage was not only limited to the forest researchers, but also to other environmental scientists and politicians as well.

In January 2011, Storch was counted among the 100 most influential Germans by the Focus magazine for being a "climate realist".[6]

On 20 June 2013 Storch stated "So far, no one has been able to provide a compelling answer to why climate change seems to be taking a break. We're facing a puzzle. Recent CO2 emissions have actually risen even more steeply than we feared. As a result, according to most climate models, we should have seen temperatures rise by around 0.25 degrees Celsius (0.45 degrees Fahrenheit) over the past 10 years. That hasn't happened. In fact, the increase over the last 15 years was just 0.06 degrees Celsius (0.11 degrees Fahrenheit) -- a value very close to zero. This is a serious scientific problem that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will have to confront when it presents its next Assessment Report late next year."[7]

Climategate Controversy[edit]

Hans von Storch, who also concurs with the mainstream view on global warming,[8] said that the University of East Anglia (UEA) had "violated a fundamental principle of science" by refusing to share data with other researchers. "They play science as a power game," he said.[9]

Climate Research controversy[edit]

In 2003 von Storch was appointed as editor-in-chief of the journal Climate Research (having been on the editorial board since 1994), with effect from 1 August 2003, after a controversial article (Soon and Baliunas 2003[10]) had raised questions about the decentralised review process (with no editor-in-chief), and the editorial policy of one editor, Chris de Freitas.[11] Von Storch drafted and circulated an editorial on the new regime, reserving the right to reject as editor in chief manuscripts proposed for acceptance by one of the editors. Following the publisher's refusal to publish it unless all editors serving on the board endorsed the new policy, von Storch resigned four days before he was due to start his new position.[12] Four other editors later followed. Von Storch later told the Chronicle of Higher Education that climate science skeptics “had identified Climate Research as a journal where some editors were not as rigorous in the review process as is otherwise common.”[13]

From Marc Morano's piece at Climatedepot.com:

The Earth has warmed considerably less than expected over the past 15 years days, says Hans von Storch. That may be due to an unforeseeable climate variability, or that CO2′s effect as a greenhouse gas was over-estimated, so says the meteorologist of the Coastal Research Institute.

On whether global warming has stopped, Hans von Storch says: “No. We don’t expect that. But it is indeed true that we have seen a considerably reduced warming trend compared to what our climate model scenarios showed over the last 15 years. [...] We definitely have seen less warming than we expected.”

Publications and awards[edit]

In late 2004 his team published an article in Science that tested multiproxy methods such as those used by Mann, Bradley and Hughes, 1998, often called MBH98,[14] or Mann and Jones[15] to obtain the global temperature variations in the past 1000 years. The test showed that the method used in MBH98 would inherently underestimate large variations had they occurred; but has subsequently been challenged: see hockey stick controversy for more detail.

To reach this conclusion, von Storch et al. used a climate model to generate a series of annual temperature maps for the world over the past several centuries. They then added white noise to the proxy data and applied the methods used in MBH98, a variation of principal component analysis, to the computed temperature maps and found that the amount of variation was considerably reduced.[citation needed]

In April 2006, Science published a comment, authored by Wahl and collaborators, asserting errors in the 2004 paper, stating that "their conclusion was based on incorrect implementation of the reconstruction procedure" a mistake with Repercussions;[16] and a disputing VS Reply. In this reply, VS and his team demonstrated that caveats raised in the Wahl comment did not invalidate their original conclusion. The inadequacy of the MBH98 methodology for climate reconstructions was later independently confirmed in other publications, for instance by Lee, Zwiers and Tsao, 2008[17] or by Christiansen et al., 2009.[18]

Von Storch received the IMSC achievement award at the International Meetings on Statistical Climatology in Edinburgh in 2010, to "recognize his key contributions to statistical downscaling, reconstruction of temperature series, analyses of climatic variability, and detection and attribution of climate change".[19]

Donald Duck[edit]

In 1977, Hans von Storch co-founded a 100-member Donald Duck Club, defending Donald Duck against the accusations of indecent behavior. Between 1976 and 1985 he was publisher of a magazine on Donald Duck, Der Hamburger Donaldist.[20]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Official website
  2. ^ von Storch, Hans. "Statement to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce, July 19, 2006 Hearing "Questions Surrounding the ‘Hockey Stick’ Temperature Studies: Implications for Climate Change Assessments"". Retrieved 6 August 2010. 
  3. ^ Hans von Storch; Nico Stehr (24 January 2005). "How Global Warming Research is Creating a Climate of Fear". Der Spiegel. 
  4. ^ Simon Cox, Richard Vadon (20 April 2006). "A load of hot air?". BBC. "Even government agencies have been criticised for overselling climate change." 
  5. ^ "The Sustainability of Climate Science" Guest post by Hans Von Storch at Roger A. Pielke, Jr.'s Blog, 5 December 2009
  6. ^ "Die 100 einflussreichsten Deutschen". Focus (in German) (2). 2011. 
  7. ^ Olaf Stampf and Gerald Traufetter (20 June 2013). "Climate Expert von Storch: Why Is Global Warming Stagnating?". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  8. ^ "Hans von Storch". coast.gkss.de. Archived from the original on 5 December 2009. Retrieved 28 November 2009. 
  9. ^ Johnson, Keith (24 November 2009). "Lawmakers Probe Climate Emails". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 26 July 2010. 
  10. ^ Soon, Willie; Sallie Baliunas (January 31, 2003). "Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years" (PDF). Climate Research 23: 89–110. doi:10.3354/cr023089. 
  11. ^ "Stormy Times for Climate Research". Scientists for Global Responsibility. 28 November 2003. 
  12. ^ Hans von Storch (23 November 2009). "The CR Problem". 
  13. ^ "Some Like It Hot". Mother Jones. May 2005. 
  14. ^ Mann M.E., Bradley R.S., Hughes M.K. (1998). "Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries". Nature 392 (6678): 779–787. Bibcode:1998Natur.392..779M. doi:10.1038/33859. 
  15. ^ Jones P.D., Mann M.E. (6 May 2004). "Climate Over Past Millennia". Reviews of Geophysics 42 (2): RG2002. Bibcode:2004RvGeo..42.2002J. doi:10.1029/2003RG000143. 
  16. ^ "A Mistake with Repercussions". RealClimate. 27 April 2006. 
  17. ^ Lee, Terry C. K.; Francis W. Zwiers and Min Tsao (August 2008). "Evaluation of proxy-based millennial reconstruction methods". Climate Dynamics 31 (2-3): 263–281. Bibcode:2008ClDy...31..263L. doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0351-9. 
  18. ^ Christiansen, B.; Schmith, T. and Thejll, P. (2009). "A surrogate ensemble study of climate reconstruction methods: stochasticity and robustness" (Postscript). Journal of Climate 22 (4): 951–976. Bibcode:2009JCli...22..951C. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2301.1. 
  19. ^ "Hans von Storch was awarded the IMSC achievement award [...]". International Meetings on Statistical Climatology. Retrieved 24 September 2011. 
  20. ^ "Der Hamburger Donaldist". Retrieved 8 August 2010. 

Selected publications[edit]

External links[edit]