Heterokont

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Heterokonts)
Jump to: navigation, search
Heterokonts
Pacific rockweed, Olympic National Park, USA.jpg
Pacific rockweed, Fucus distichus, in Olympic National Park
Scientific classification
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Chromalveolata
Phylum: Heterokonta
Cavalier-Smith, 1986[1]
Typical classes

Colored groups (alga-like, Ochrophyta)

Colorless groups (fungus-like)

Synonyms
  • Heterokontophyta van den Hoek et al., 1995[2]
  • Stramenopila Alexopoulos et al., 1996[3]
  • Stramenopiles Patterson, 1989[4]
  • Stramenipila Dick, 2001[5][6]
  • Straminipila Dick, 2001[7]
  • Straminopiles Vørs, 1993[8]

The heterokonts or stramenopiles (formally, Heterokonta or Stramenopiles) are a major line of eukaryotes[9] currently containing more than 100,000 known species.[10] Most are algae, ranging from the giant multicellular kelp to the unicellular diatoms, which are a primary component of plankton. Other notable members of the Stramenopiles include the (generally parasitic) oomycetes, including Phytophthora of Irish potato famine infamy and Pythium which causes seed rot and damping off.

The name "heterokont" refers to the motile life cycle stage, in which the flagellate cells possess two differently shaped flagella.

Chloroplasts[edit]

Heterokont algae are chromists with chloroplasts surrounded by four membranes, which are counted from the outermost to the innermost membrane. The first membrane is continuous with the host's chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum, or cER. The second membrane presents a barrier between the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and the primary endosymbiont or chloroplast, which represents the next two membranes, within which the thylakoid membranes are found. This arrangement of membranes suggest that heterokont chloroplasts were obtained from the reduction of a symbiotic red algal eukaryote, which had arisen by evolutionary divergence from the monophyletic primary endosymbiotic ancestor that is thought to have given rise to all eukaryotic photoautotrophs. The chloroplasts characteristically contain chlorophyll a and chlorophyll c, and usually the accessory pigment fucoxanthin, giving them a golden-brown or brownish-green color.

Most basal heterokonts are colorless. This suggests that they diverged before the acquisition of chloroplasts within the group. However, fucoxanthin-containing chloroplasts are also found among the haptophytes. These two groups may have a common ancestry, and possibly also a common phylogenetic history with cryptomonads. This may be interpreted as suggesting that the ancestral heterokont was an alga, and all colorless groups arose through loss of the secondary endosymbiont and its chloroplast.

Motile cells[edit]

Many heterokonts are unicellular flagellates, and most others produce flagellate cells at some point in their life-cycle, for instance as gametes or zoospores. The name heterokont refers to the characteristic form of these cells, which typically have two unequal flagella. The anterior or tinsel flagellum is covered with lateral bristles or mastigonemes, while the other flagellum is whiplike, smooth, and usually shorter, or sometimes reduced to a basal body. The flagella are inserted subapically or laterally, and are usually supported by four microtubule roots in a distinctive pattern.

Mastigonemes are manufactured from glycoproteins in the cell's endoplasmic reticulum before being transported to the anterior flagella's surface. When the tinsel flagellum moves, the mastigonemes create a retrograde current, pulling the cell through the water or bringing in food. The mastigonemes have a peculiar tripartite structure, which may be taken as the defining characteristic of the heterokonts, thereby including a few protists that do not produce cells with the typical heterokont form. Mastigonemes have been lost in a few heterkont lines, most notably the diatoms.

Classification[edit]

As noted above, classification varies considerably. Originally the heterokont algae were treated as two divisions, first within the kingdom Plantae and later the Protista:

Division Chrysophyta

Class Chrysophyceae (golden algae)
Class Bacillariophyceae (diatoms)

Division Phaeophyta (brown algae)

In this scheme, however, the Chrysophyceae are paraphyletic to both other groups. As a result, various members have been given their own classes and often divisions. Recent systems often treat these as classes within a single division, called the Heterokontophyta, Chromophyta, or Ochrophyta. This is not universal, however: Round et al. treat the diatoms as a division.

The discovery that oomycetes and hyphochytrids are related to these algae, rather than fungi, as previously thought, has led many authors to include these two groups among the heterokonts. Should it turn out that they evolved from colored ancestors, the heterokont group would be paraphyletic in their absence. Once again, however, usage varies. David J. Patterson named this extended group the stramenopiles, characterized by the presence of tripartite mastigonemes, mitochondria with tubular cristae, and open mitosis. He used the stramenopiles as a prototype for a classification without Linnaean rank. Their composition has been essentially stable, but their use within ranked systems varies.

Thomas Cavalier-Smith treats the heterokonts as identical in composition with the stramenopiles; this is the definition followed here. He has proposed placing them in a separate kingdom Chromalveolata, together with the haptophytes, cryptomonads and alveolates. This is one of the most common revisions to the five-kingdom system, but has not been generally adopted, partly because some biologists doubt their monophyly. A few treat the Chromalveolata as identical in composition with the heterokonts, or list them as a kingdom Stramenopila.

Some sources divide the heterokonts into the autotrophic Ochrophyta and heterotrophic Bigyra and Pseudofungi.[11] However, some modifications to these classifications have been suggested.

Heterokonta can be confused with the (much older) name Heterokontae, which is generally equivalent to the Xanthophyceae, a limited subset of Heterokonta.[12]

Examples[edit]

Some examples of classification of the heterokonts and related groups.

Lüther (1899)[edit]

According to Lüther, 1899:[13][14]

Copeland (1956)[edit]

According to Copeland, 1956:[15]

van den Hoek et al., 1978[edit]

According to van den Hoek et al., 1978:[16]

Cavalier-Smith, 1981[edit]

Classification according to Cavalier-Smith, 1981:[17]

Cavalier-Smith, 1993[edit]

Classification according to Cavalier-Smith, 1993:[18]

van den Hoek et al., 1995[edit]

Classification according to van den Hoek et al., 1995:

Cavalier-Smith, 1998[edit]

Classification according to Cavalier-Smith, 1998:[19]

Reviers, 2002[edit]

Classification according to Reviers, 2002:[20]

  • Stramenopiles (= Heterokonta)

Hausmann et al., 2003[edit]

Classification according to Hausmann et al., 2003:[22]

Adl et al., 2005[edit]

Classification according to Adl et al., 2005:[23]

Cavalier-Smith, 2006[edit]

Classification according to Cavalier-Smith, 2006:[24]

  • Heterokonta

Adl et al., 2012[edit]

Classification according to Adl et al., 2012:[25]

Rationale for "stramenopile"[edit]

The origin of the name stramenopile is explained by Adl and coauthors:

Regarding the spelling of stramenopile, it was originally spelled stramenopile. The Latin word for ‘‘straw’’ is stramine-us, -a, -um, adj. [stramen], made of straw—thus, it should have been spelled straminopile. However, Patterson (1989)[26] clearly stated that this is a common name (hence, lower case, not capitalized) and, as a common name, it can be spelled as Patterson chooses. If he had stipulated that the name was a formal name, governed by rules of nomenclature, then his spelling would have been an orthogonal mutation and one would simply correct the spelling in subsequent publications (e.g. Straminopiles). But, it was not Patterson’s desire to use the term in a formal sense. Thus, if we use it in a formal sense, it must be formally described (and in addition, in Latin, if it is to be used botanically). However, and here is the strange part of this, many people liked the name, but wanted it to be used formally. So they capitalized the first letter, and made it Stramenopiles; others corrected the Latin spelling to Straminopiles.[27]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (1986). The kingdom Chromista, origin and systematics. In: Round, F.E. and Chapman, D.J. (eds.). Progress in Phycological Research. 4: 309–347.
  2. ^ van den Hoek, C., Mann, D.G. and Jahns, H.M. (1995). Algae An Introduction to Phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0-521-30419-9.
  3. ^ Alexopoulos, C. J., Mims, C. W. and Blackwell, M. (1996). Introductory Mycology, 4th ed. New York: J. Wiley.
  4. ^ Patterson, D. J. (1989). Stramenopiles: Chromophytes from a protistan perspective. in The Chromophyte Algae: Problems and Perspectives. Green, J.C., Leadbeater, B. S. C. and Diver, W. L. (eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
  5. ^ Dick, M. W. (2001). Straminipilous fungi. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 670 p.
  6. ^ http://www.mycobank.org/BioloMICS.aspx?Link=T&TableKey=14682616000000067&Rec=469798&Fields=All
  7. ^ Dick, M. W. (2001). Straminipilous fungi. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 670 p.
  8. ^ http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/constancea/83/david/ht.html
  9. ^ "stramenopiles". Retrieved 2009-03-08. 
  10. ^ Hoek, C. van den; D. G. Mann; H. M. Jahns (1995). Algae: An Introduction to Phycology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 104, 124, 134, 166. ISBN 0-521-31687-1. 
  11. ^ Riisberg I, Orr RJ, Kluge R, et al. (May 2009). "Seven gene phylogeny of heterokonts". Protist 160 (2): 191–204. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2008.11.004. PMID 19213601. 
  12. ^ W. H. Blackwell (2009). Chromista revisited: A dilemma of overlapping putative kingdoms, and the attempted application of the botanical code of nomenclature. Phytologia 91(2).
  13. ^ Lüther, A. (1899). Über Chlorosaccus eine neue Gattung der Süsswasseralgen. Bihang til Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 24: 1-22.
  14. ^ Copeland, H. F. (1956). The Classification of Lower Organisms. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, p. 63, [1].
  15. ^ Copeland, H. F. (1956). The Classification of Lower Organisms. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, p. 55, [2].
  16. ^ van den Hoek, C. & Jahns, H.M. (1978). Algen. Einführung in die Phykologie. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.
  17. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T (1981). "Eukaryote kingdoms: Seven or nine?". Bio Systems 14 (3–4): 461–81.
  18. ^ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC372943/?page=9
  19. ^ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9809012
  20. ^ Reviers, B. de. (2006). Biologia e Filogenia das Algas. Editora Artmed, Porto Alegre, p. 18.
  21. ^ Reviers, B. de. (2006). Biologia e Filogenia das Algas. Editora Artmed, Porto Alegre, pp. 15-16.
  22. ^ Hausmann, K., N. Hulsmann, R. Radek. Protistology. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchshandlung, Stuttgart, 2003.
  23. ^ http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x/pdf
  24. ^ Thomas Cavalier-Smith & Ema E-Y. Chao: Phylogeny and megasystematics of phagotrophic heterokonts (kingdom Chromista) [3]. Supplementary material [4].
  25. ^ http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x/pdf
  26. ^ Patterson DJ (October 1999). "The Diversity of Eukaryotes". Am. Nat. 154 (S4): S96–S124. doi:10.1086/303287. PMID 10527921. 
  27. ^ Adl SM, Simpson AG, Farmer MA, et al. (2005). "The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists". J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 52 (5): 399–451. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x. PMID 16248873. 

External links[edit]