History of Isan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The history of Isan (Thai: อีสาน, pronounced [ʔiː sǎːn]) has been determined by its geography, situated as it is on the Korat Plateau between Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand.

The term "Isan" is derived from Pali īsāna or Sanskrit īśāna, both meaning "northeast".[1]

Siam's King Rama VI re-invoked the ancient name, designating the northeast sector of the Kingdom of Siam as Isan. Previously, in the reign of Rama V in early 20th century, the sector was generally called Hua Muang Lao (หัวเมืองลาว Lao Townships) for the area north of Nakhon Ratchasima (Korat,) and Khamen Pa Dong (เขมรป่าดง Wilderness Khmer) for the townships to the east. Later, the term Isan came into wide, if unofficial, use as a term for the northeastern region, and khon Isan (คนอีสาน Isan People) as a general term for the peoples of Isan.

Isan has been dominated by each of its neighbors in turn, although its relative infertility meant it was more often a battleground than a prize. Rather than being incorporated into the respective empires of each power, the area was divided into meuang (เมือง city-states) or statelets, each paying tribute to one or more powers under the mandala system.

Throughout the 20th century, the Thai government took steps to cement Isan's status as a part of Thailand and to de-emphasize the Lao, Khmer and Kuy origins of its population, a process known as "Thaification" by some scholars.

The majority of people in present-day Isan are Lao speaking. Many Khmer speakers live in the southern half, and substantial minorities of Katuic (i.e., Kuy, Bru, and So) speakers also exist. Most Isan people are both conversant and to some degree literate in Central Thai.

Part of a series on the
History of Thailand
1686 Map of Siam.
Sukhothai Kingdom
Ayutthaya Kingdom
Thonburi Kingdom
Rattanakosin Kingdom
Military period
Democratic period
Portal icon Thailand portal


Four Homo erectus fossil skull fragments found in northern Thailand's Hat Pudui cave (Ko Kha District, Lampang Province) by Thai paleontologists Somsak Pramankij and Vadhana Subhavanin, were in deposits dating from the mid-Pleistocene era, which was before the Khorat Plateau had uplifted from an extensive plain.[2] Professor Phillip V. Tobias of Johannesburg's University of the Witwatersrand examined the fragments and said: "It seems unavoidable but to conclude that Thailand must have been a highway or crossroads in the movement of hominids — members of the family of man."[3]

Pha Taem cliff paintings alongside the Mekong in Udon Thani Province date to around 1500 BC. They are younger than but similar in composition to the Rock Paintings of Hua Mountain in southern China, which are attributed to the Luoyue people of what is today the lowland plains of northern Vietnam, particularly the marshy, agriculturally rich area of the Red River Delta, and particularly associated with the Bronze Age Đông Sơn culture of mainland Southeast Asia.

Ban Chiang pottery in the Museum für Indische Kunst, Berlin-Dahlem

The Ban Chiang archaeological site, dating from around 3000 BC to 300 AD, attracted attention in 1966 as seemingly the world's oldest site showing traces of a Bronze Age culture, due to errors in dating. In Fine Arts, the site is remarkable for its pottery; further investigation into ancient skeletal remains raised serious questions about transitions to sedentism and intensified agriculture.[4] The question as to why the site was abandoned until resettled by 19th–century Lao émigrés remains to be settled. The Bronze Age site of Ban Non Wat in the southeast of the plateau is also under investigation (2002–present.)

Early history[edit]

Thai-Lao people reciting story

Charles F. Keyes[5][6] in 1974 wrote:

To obtain a fuller and more correct picture of the society and culture of the early urban life on the Khorat Plateau, we must, as Professors Thiva and Srisakra have argued, undertake considerably more archaeological research than has been done thus far. And, I would add, we can further increase our understanding of these societies through systematic research on a number of the indigenous legends of the Thai-Lao people of northeastern Thailand.[7]

The first major civilisation to occupy Isan was considered, by the study of artifacts, under the Dvaravati culture. The remains of walled and moated towns scattered the region, in the valleys of Chi and Mun rivers. The remains often show the Buddhist and Hinduist influence, perhaps expanding from the western part or the coastal and the Chao Phraya river basin.

Khmer Domination[edit]

From the 11th century, the Dvaravati/Mon culture from Chao Phraya River basin was gradually displaced by the Khmer Empire of Angkor. Many principal centers became Angkor's tributary kingdoms. Consequently, a number of temples influenced by ancient Khmer art were found in Isan, most notably in southern part, at Phanom Rung and Phimai, which lie on the so-called Ancient Khmer Highway, the direct link to Angkor. Inscriptions found also told the connections between vassal towns and the court of Angkor.

Sukhothai and Ayutthaya[edit]

The Sukhothai Kingdom broke free from the Angkor Empire around the 13th century. Although Isan is not thought to have been a part of the Sukhothai kingdom due to the lack of clear evidence, the Khmer empire became weaker and retreated to its Cambodian heartlands, leaving Isan in the hands of fragmented muang (เมือง) city-states or statelets. However, many Khmer-speaking people remained and are still a prominent fixture in the southern area, constituting the majority in present-day southern part of the region such as in present day Surin Province, Buriram Province and are also numerous in part of Sisaket Province.

However, the history of Isan from the period of the retreat of Khmer empire to the end of the 18th century largely remained 'silent'. No details about communities in Isan were mentioned in contemporary sources, such as Ayutthaya's Chronicles or Codes. Apparently Ayutthaya limited its influence in Nakhon Ratchasima which was founded in the 17th century, and thought the frontier's stronghold of Ayutthaya Kingdom in the east.

Lan Xang[edit]

When the Lao kingdom of Lan Xang (Lan Chang) was established in Luang Prabang in the 14th century by Fa Ngum, with help from the Khmers. The kingdom's name means Million Elephants, echoing the name of the neighboring northern kingdom of Lanna, Million Fields. Lan Xang was to provide Isan with much of its later population. As the Khmer empire continued to retreat under pressure from the Thai kingdom of Ayutthaya, Lan Xang was able to expand its influence in Isan. Lao settlers might gradually moved across the Mekong into northern Isan between the 14th and 16th centuries. However no clear evidence suggests any significant settlement in hinterland Isan during this period. Ayutthaya which arose as a major power from the late 14th century, limited its border only at Nakhon Ratchasima and Phimai.


This new power vacuum was filled by the newly founded Siamese kingdoms, Thonburi and Bangkok, following the fall of Ayutthaya to the Burmese. Isan area and Laos were divided into a series of muang with varying degrees of autonomy, but each paying tribute to Siam.

With the rise of King Taksin, Siam began, perhaps for the first time, expanding its 'direct' control to the region. Siam forces invaded and took control of Luang Prabang and Vientiane kingdoms. Isan region were brought under more severe control of Siam.

During late 18th century to early 19th century, there was also struggle between the three Lao kingdoms of Luang Prabang, Vientiane and the newly founded Champassak. In 1718, a Lao emigration in the company of an official in the service of King Nokasad of Champasak, founded Muang Suwannaphum as the first recorded population of Lao in the Chi River valley — indeed anywhere in the interior of the plateau.[8] The 'losers' and 'dissidents' began migrating or taking refuge into the area of Isan. Most of them recognized the superior status of Siam, in accord with what 20th century scholars later described as the Mandala (Southeast Asian history) system. Under this system, Muang leaders were granted something equivalent to European 'fiefdom' and Thai feudal titles as 'governor', having full right of ruling over their towns. Thus, they eventually became the subjects of Siamese royal court in Bangkok. New towns were founded such as Chaiyaphum, Udon Thani, Khon Kaen and Ubon Ratchathani, along with many minor towns such as Han Chai Cham Na.

Figure in northeast corner of victory monument in Yasothon facing Bangkok

In 1827, King Anouvong (or Chao Anu) of Vientiane rebelled against Siam. After a successful attack on the stronghold of Korat, he was defeated and died in a cage; the victor then brought his army to rest in Yasothon where he raised a memorial. The defeat of Anu's revolt was followed by forced migrations from defeated Lao kingdoms to Isan, further increasing the dominance of Lao culture in the region but weakening the muang of modern-day Laos. According to traditional rule, the governors of these new towns were semi-autonomous. They had right to rule, to tax their own subject, part of which might be transferred to Bangkok periodically. If time of war, these local rulers had a duty to send troops to defend Siam.

Following defeat in the Franco-Siamese War, Siam ceded Luang Prabang and Champasak to France in 1893 and 1904. Isan became the kingdom's north-east frontier as the 'buffer zone' between French Indochina and Siam, with Siam becoming a 'buffer zone' between Briton and France with the Entente cordiale. Thus began the process of annexation of Isan area into the modern Siamese nation.

Prince Damrong Rajanubhab as the new Minister of Interior (1892,) introduced the Monthon administration system known as thesaphiban (เทศาภิบาล - literally, control over territory) - officially adopted by the 1897 Local Administration Act, which transferred much power from the traditional provincial governors drawn from the local nobility to the newly established monthon commissioners and civil servants (รองอำมาตย์ - court support) appointed by Bangkok. In 1902, local revolts broke out in Isan, often led by charismatic religious leaders called Phu Me Boon ผู้มีบุญ) or Phi Bun ผีบุญ Holy man). One of the most serious of these rebellions (Prakot Kan Pi Bun ปรากฏการณ์ผีบุญ) recalled the resistance toThonburi authority by the monk Chao Phra Faang, 1768–1770. A former monk and Phu Mi Bun in the Ubon Ratchathani area headed a millenarian sect inspired by his predictions of 'apocalyptic' vision. His apocalyptic prophecy created panic among almost all of the Isan people until the Bangkok government eventually crushed it.[9]

From the 20th century onwards, Siam gradually consolidated its control over Isan through a programme of "Thaification". The introduction of a national school system in the 1920s replaced instruction by monks in the Isan Lao language with teaching in the Thai language only. Radio and television, when they began, also broadcast in Thai. They included (and still do) twice daily broadcasts of the national anthem.

Even after the Revolution in 1932, which the democratic rule started, Isan had been ignored from newly 'democratic' Thai government. Most of the region was underdeveloped. Apparently new or necessary infrastructure were hardly built. Albeit the biggest part of Thailand, until now, there are still only two railways in the region and most of modern paved roads were built in the 1960s and 1970s.


In the latter half of the 20th century, Isan was perceived by the Thai government as a potential breeding ground for Communism. The region's poverty, special history, remoteness and inaccessible terrain all contributed to this fear.

Inevitably, the extent to which Communist insurgents were a real threat in Isan is hard to determine. It is known that there were a number of political attacks from the 1960s onwards, and that Communist activists and equipment entered the region from Laos. On the other hand, the number of guerrillas probably never exceeded a few thousand, and the combination of action by the security forces and the offers of amnesties had largely ended the threat by the early 1980s.

US bases[edit]

The fight against Communism persuaded the government to allow the establishment of a number of US bases in Isan, notably in the provinces of Nakhon Ratchasima, Nakhon Phanom, Udon Thani, Nakhon Sawan and Ubon Ratchathani. Although the bases were directed at Communists in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam, they had an indirect effect in promoting development and opposing Communism in Isan. The bases required the creation of improved transport links, facilitating the integration of Isan with the rest of Thailand. The most important of these was Highway 2 named the Mittraphap Road (Friendship Highway,) which links with Bangkok and the eastern seaboard. and other northeast highways that being with the numeral 2, which link the region's major cities with each other. These remain Isan's primary road links, with many later to be incorporated into the 21st-century Asian Highway Network. Complemented by Thai government programs to build minor roads, these projects did much to bind rural Isan more closely to the cities and to Bangkok.

The number of US servicemen reached its peak in 1969 at 50,000.[10] This influx of US personnel also had a direct effect in exposing the region to western culture. This helped to promote the development of the region, but it also created a sizable sex industry in the vicinity of the bases. Finally, the US military presence contributed substantial sums of money to the area's economy, with emigrant-spouses who accompanied American servicemen continuing to send substantial sums home. The bases were closed at the end of the Vietnam War in 1975.


The Thai government promoted development in Isan as one weapon in the fight against Communism. In particular, Field Marshal Sarit Dhanarajata, who took control of the country in 1958, was a native of Isan and promoted a number of development projects there.

From the 1960s onwards, the government launched a string of development programmes aimed wholly or in part at Isan. These began with a five year development plan announced in 1961 and backed by US aid. The program's "top down" approach was satirized in a country song still being sung decades later.[11] An Accelerated Rural Development Programme followed in 1964, again with US support. This was administered by provincial governors in the hope of circumventing the inefficiencies of central government, but it could not evade the problems of bureaucracy, corruption and a conservative mindset which hampered all development efforts.

1960s projects to introduce improved crop strains have been criticised for forcing farmers to take out loans to pay for the seed, fertiliser and equipment required, while reducing genetic diversity. Even in the 1970s, government per capita spending on rural assistance programmes was lower in Isan than anywhere else in Thailand.[12]

Nevertheless, much was achieved: Mobile Rural Development Units focusing on health education trained about 1000 field workers per year in the late 1960s; hydroelectric schemes such as Nam Pong/Ubon Ratana power station in Khon Kaen and Lam Pao in Kalasin provided electricity; modern toilets were distributed; government rice purchase programmes maintained prices.

Education efforts increased the proportion of children attending high school from 4.4% in 1970 to 80% by 2000. Universities were established beginning with Khon Kaen University in 1964, soon followed by Mahasarakham University and Suranee University of Technology.[13]

Recent history[edit]

An important political issue at the end of the 20th century was the construction of the Pak Mun dam in the district of Khong Chiam, in Ubon Ratchathani Province. The project was completed in 1994, flooding 117 square kilometres of land and displacing around 3000 families. The project has been criticised for insufficient compensation payments, adverse effects on the fisheries of the Mun River, and failure to produce the projected power output.

Protesters against the Pak Mun dam joined with other grassroots activists in 1995 to form the Assembly of the Poor, a group seeking to promote the involvement of the poor in decision-making processes, and to have their interests taken into account. The group has organised a number of protests against the project in Bangkok. The now deposed prime minister, Thaksin Shinawatra, responded by claiming that activists NGO Living River Siam are trouble-makers who do not reflect the opinions of ordinary people. The same issue arose with the Rasi Salai Dam in Sisaket Province, which was also completed in 1994 for the generation of electricity; it was abandoned for that purpose in 2000 and converted into a recreation area.

Early 21st century[edit]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Royal Institute - 1982: อีสาน ๑
  2. ^ Bunopas, Sangad; Vella, Paul (17–24 November 1992). "Geotectonics and Geologic Evolution of Thailand". Bangkok: National Conference on Geologic Resources of Thailand. p. 224. ...latest Pleistocene early to the Recent regional uplifting must have occurred. 
  3. ^ "Fossil skull not so old, but important". Ananova.com. November 2, 2001. Retrieved September 30, 2011. A leading expert says an important fossil find in Thailand may not be as old as first reported, but is still significant. 
  4. ^ Pietrusewsky, Michael; Douglas, Michele T. (Michele Toomay) (Fall 2001). "Intensification of Agriculture at Ban Chiang: Is There Evidence from the Skeletons?". Asian Perspectives (Project MUSE: University of Hawai'i Press) 40 (2): 157–178. doi:10.1353/asi.2001.0023. ISSN 0066-8435. e-issn 1535-8283. Retrieved 21 September 2011. Abstract: Human skeletal remains excavated in 1974–1975 at Ban Chiang, a premetal to Bronze/Iron Age site located in northeastern Thailand, are used to examine the health effects of sedentism and agricultural intensification. The archaeological sequence provides evidence for the introduction of iron and water buffalo in the Middle period, suggesting the beginning of intensified agriculture. The effects of this agricultural intensification on the paleodemography, health, and patterns of traumatic injury of Ban Chiang's early inhabitants is examined. The skeletal and dental attributes examined include palaeodemographic parameters, dental caries, dental enamel hypoplasia, cribra orbitalia, stature, skeletal infections, and trauma. The results of this analysis are mixed. There are decreases in life expectancy and mean age-at-death that are consistent with a decline in health over time, but evidence for an increase in fertility, expected with intensified agriculture, is not found. Expected temporal increases in dental enamel hypoplasia and adult cribra orbitalia are documented. However, the expected decline in adult stature and expected increases in dental caries, cribra orbitalia in subadults, skeletal infection, and traumatic injury are not found. Overall, the skeletal indicators support continuity in Ban Chiang health, suggesting continuous reliance on a broadly based subsistence system. These findings do not fit the typical pattern demonstrated for other human groups experiencing the transition to sedentism and intensified agriculture and may support the contention that Southeast Asia's archaeological sequence differs markedly from those studied elsewhere in the world 
  5. ^ Keyes, Charles F. "Faculty". University of Washington. Retrieved September 30, 2011. keyes@u.washington.edu 
  6. ^ Keyes, Charles F. "Thailand bibliography". University of Washington. Retrieved September 30, 2011. 
  7. ^ Keyes, Charles F. (March 1974). "A Note on the Ancient Towns and Cities of Northeastern Thailand" (PDF). Tonan Ajia Kenkyu (Kyoto: Kyoto University) 11 (4): 497–506. Retrieved September 30, 2011. 
  8. ^ Brow, James (1976), "Population, land and structural change in Sri Lanka and Thailand", Contributions to Asian studies (Kogan Page, Limited) (9): 47, ISBN 90-04-04529-5 
  9. ^ บทความ ปรากฏการณ์ผีบุญ. blog (in Thai). @cloud. September 21, 2011. Retrieved September 21, 2011. เป็นกระทงร้อน มากกว่า 2 ปี พจนานุกรมฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน ให้ความหมายของ ผีบุญ ไว้ว่า ผู้อวดคุณวิเศษว่ามีฤทธิ์ทําได้ต่าง ๆ อย่างผีสางเทวดาให้คนหลงเชื่อ 
  10. ^ http://www.aznet.net/~rmyers/Chapt3.htm#_ftn8
  11. ^ พิพัฒน์ บริบูรณ์ (Pipat Boriboon), ศักดิ์ศรี ศรีอักษร (Saksri Sriaksorn); Yuphaphann Hoonchamlong; Yudthaphon Vichianin; Torpong Wannawati (1961). ผู้ใหญ่ลี [Village Chief Lee] (Lyrics, translation, cultural note, audio clip). Thai Language Program (in Thai/English). University of Hawaii at Manoa. About the song. Retrieved October 17, 2011. This is one of the most famous Thai “country” songs that everybody seems to know by heart. 
  12. ^ http://www.aznet.net/~rmyers/Chapt3.htm#_ftn35
  13. ^ http://web.sut.ac.th/sutnew/sut_en/

External links[edit]

Additional reading[edit]

  • Twentieth century impressions of Siam its history, people, commerce, industries, and resources, with which is incorporated an abridged edition of Twentieth century impressions of British Malaya. Editor in chief: Arnold Wright. Assistant editor: Oliver T. Breakspear. Published 1908 by Lloyds Greater Britain Publishing Company, Ltd. in London [etc.] Library of Congress classification: DS565.W7. Survey and map making in Siam. Open Library
  • Talbot, Sarah; Chutima, Janthed (Fall 2001). "Northeast Thailand before Angkor: Evidence from an Archaeological Excavation at the Prasat Hin Phimai" (Journal). Asian Perspectives 40.2. Project MUSE. pp. 179–194. doi:10.1353/asi.2001.0027. Retrieved 29 July 2011. Abstract: Northeast Thailand (Isan) was incorporated into the polity of Angkor around the end of the first millennium a.d. Well before this time, local communities in the Phimai region had adopted important activities such as the use of inscriptions and the construction of religious architecture in permanent materials. In 1998, the Origins of Angkor Project undertook an archaeological excavation at the most important Khmer temple in Thailand, the Prasat Hin Phimai. The excavation recovered late prehistoric ceramics and remains of an early brick structure, probably religious in nature, which had been re-used as part of the foundation of the sandstone Angkorian temple.