History of ecology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Ecology is generally spoken of as a new science, having only become prominent in the second half of the 20th century.[1] Its history stems all the way back to the 4th century. One of the first ecologists whose writings survive may have been Aristotle or perhaps his student, Theophrastus, both of whom had interest in many species of animals. Theophrastus described interrelationships between animals and their environment as early as the 4th century BC.[2] Ecology developed substantially in the 18th and 19th century. It began with Carl Linnaeus and his work with the economy of nature.[3] Soon after came Alexander von Humboldt and his work with botanical geography.[4] Alfred Russel Wallace and Karl Mobius then contributed with the notion of biocoenosis. Eugenis Warming’s work with ecological plant geography led to the founding of ecology as a discipline.[5] Charles Darwin’s work also contributed to the science of ecology, and Darwin is often attributed with progressing the discipline more than anyone else in its young history. Ecological thought expanded even more in the early 20th century.[6] Major contributions included: Suess’ and Verndasky’s work with the biosphere, Arthur Tansley’s ecosystem, Charles Elton's Animal Ecology, and Henry Cowles ecological succession.[7] Ecology influenced the social sciences and humanities. Human ecology began in the early 20th century and it recognized humans as an ecological factor. Later Lovelock advanced views on earth as a macro-organism with the Gaia hypothesis.[8][9] Conservation stemmed from the science of ecology. Important figures and movements include Shelford and the ESA, National Environmental Policy act, George Perkins Marsh, Theodore Roosevelt, Stephen A. Forbes, and post-dustbowl conservation. Later in the 20th century world governments collaborated on man’s effect on the biosphere and earth’s environment.

The history of ecology is intertwined with the history of conservation efforts, in particular the founding of the Nature Conservancy.[10]

18th and 19th century ~ Ecological murmurs[edit]

Arcadian and Imperial Ecology[edit]

In the early Eighteenth century, preceding Carl Linnaeus, two rivaling schools of thought dominated the growing scientific discipline of ecology. First, Gilbert White a “parson-naturalist” is attributed with developing and endorsing the view of Arcadian ecology. Arcadian ecology advocates for a “simple, humble life for man” and a harmonious relationship with humans and nature.[11] Opposing the Arcadian view is Francis Bacon’s ideology, “imperial ecology”. Imperialists work “to establish through the exercise of reason and by hard work, man’s dominance over nature”.[11] Imperial ecologists also believe that man should become a dominant figure over nature and all other organisms as “once enjoyed in the Garden of Eden”.[11] Both views continued their rivalry through the early eighteenth century until Carl Linnaeus’s support of imperialism; and in short time due to Linnaeus’s popularity, imperial ecology became the dominant view within the discipline.

Carl Linnaeus and Systema Naturae[edit]

Carl Linnaeus, a Swedish naturalist, is well known for his work with Taxonomy but his ideas helped to lay the groundwork for modern ecology. He developed a two part naming system for classifying plants and animals. Binomial Nomenclature was used to classify, describe, and name different genera and species. The compiled editions of Systema Naturae developed and popularized the naming system for plants and animals in modern zoology. Reid suggests "Linnaeus can fairly be regarded as the originator of systematic and ecological studies in biodiversity," due to his naming and classifying of thousands of plant and animal species. Linnaeus also influenced the foundations of darwinian evolution, he believed that could be change in or between different species within fixed genera. Linnaeus was also one of the first naturalists to place men in the same category as primates.[3]

The botanical geography and Alexander von Humboldt[edit]

Throughout the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century, the great maritime powers such as Britain, Spain, and Portugal launched many world exploratory expeditions to develop maritime commerce with other countries, and to discover new natural resources, as well as to catalog them. At the beginning of the 18th century, about twenty thousand plant species were known, versus forty thousand at the beginning of the 19th century, and about 300,000 today.

These expeditions were joined by many scientists, including botanists, such as the German explorer Alexander von Humboldt. Humboldt is often considered a father of ecology. He was the first to take on the study of the relationship between organisms and their environment. He exposed the existing relationships between observed plant species and climate, and described vegetation zones using latitude and altitude, a discipline now known as geobotany. Von Humboldt was accompanied on his expedition by the botanist Aimé Bonpland.

In 1856, the Park Grass Experiment was established at the Rothamsted Experimental Station to test the effect of fertilizers and manures on hay yields. This is the longest-running field experiment in the world.[4]

The notion of biocoenosis: Wallace and Möbius[edit]

Alfred Russel Wallace, contemporary and colleague of Darwin, was first to propose a "geography" of animal species. Several authors recognized at the time that species were not independent of each other, and grouped them into plant species, animal species, and later into communities of living beings or biocoenosis. The first use of this term is usually attributed to Karl Möbius in 1877, but already in 1825, the French naturalist Adolphe Dureau de la Malle used the term societé about an assemblage of plant individuals of different species.

Warming and the foundation of ecology as discipline[edit]

While Darwin focused exclusively on competition as a selective force, Eugen Warming devised a new discipline that took abiotic factors, that is drought, fire, salt, cold etc., as seriously as biotic factors in the assembly of biotic communities. Biogeography before Warming was largely of descriptive nature – faunistic or floristic. Warming’s aim was, through the study of organism (plant) morphology and anatomy, i.e. adaptation, to explain why a species occurred under a certain set of environmental conditions. Moreover, the goal of the new discipline was to explain why species occupying similar habitats, experiencing similar hazards, would solve problems in similar ways, despite often being of widely different phylogenetic descent. Based on his personal observations in Brazilian cerrado, in Denmark, Norwegian Finnmark and Greenland, Warming gave the first university course in ecological plant geography. Based on his lectures, he wrote the book ‘Plantesamfund’, which was immediate translated to German, Polish and Russian, later to English as ‘Oecology of Plants’. Through its German edition, the book had immense effect on British and North American scientist like Arthur Tansley, Henry Chandler Cowles and Frederic Clements.[5]

Malthusian influence[edit]

Thomas Robert Malthus was an influential writer on the subject of population and population limits in the early 19th century. His works were very important in shaping the ways in which Darwin saw the world worked. Malthus wrote:

That the increase of population is necessarily limited by the means of subsistence,

That population does invariably increase when the means of subsistence increase, and,

That the superior power of population is repressed, and the actual population kept equal to the means of subsistence, by misery and vice.[12]

The struggle proposed by Malthusian thought influenced the ecological work of Charles Darwin and brought an economic theory into the world of ecology.[13]

Darwinism and the science of ecology[edit]

Julia Margaret Cameron’s portrait of Darwin

It is often held that the roots of scientific ecology may be traced back to Darwin.[14] This contention may look convincing at first glance inasmuch as On the Origin of Species is full of observations and proposed mechanisms that clearly fit within the boundaries of modern ecology (e.g. the cat-to-clover chain – an ecological cascade) and because the term ecology was coined in 1866 by a strong proponent of Darwinism, Ernst Haeckel. However, Darwin never used the word in his writings after this year, not even in his most "ecological" writings such as the foreword to the English edition of Hermann Müller’s The Fertilization of Flowers (1883) or in his own treatise of earthworms and mull formation in forest soils (The formation of vegetable mould through the action of worms, 1881). Moreover, the pioneers founding ecology as a scientific discipline, such as Eugen Warming, A. F. W. Schimper, Gaston Bonnier, F.A. Forel, S.A. Forbes and Karl Möbius, made almost no reference to Darwin’s ideas in their works.[6] This was clearly not out of ignorance or because the works of Darwin were not widespread. Some such as S.A.Forbes studying intricate food webs asked questions as yet unanswered about the instability of food chains that might persist if dominant competitors were not adapted to have self-constraint.[15] Others focused on the dominant themes at the beginning, concern with the relationship between organism morphology and physiology on one side and environment on the other, mainly abiotic environment, hence environmental selection. Darwin’s concept of natural selection on the other hand focused primarily on competition.[16] The mechanisms other than competition that he described, primarily the divergence of character which can reduce competition and his statement that "struggle" as he used it was metaphorical and thus included environmental selection, were given less emphasis in the Origin than competition.[11] Despite most portrayals of Darwin conveying him as a non-aggressive recluse who let others fight his battles, Darwin remained all his life a man nearly obsessed with the ideas of competition, struggle and conquest – with all forms of human contact as confrontation.[11][17]

Early 20th century ~ Expansion of ecological thought[edit]

The biosphere – Eduard Suess and Vladimir Vernadsky[edit]

By the 19th century, ecology blossomed due to new discoveries in chemistry by Lavoisier and de Saussure, notably the nitrogen cycle. After observing the fact that life developed only within strict limits of each compartment that makes up the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere, the Austrian geologist Eduard Suess proposed the term biosphere in 1875. Suess proposed the name biosphere for the conditions promoting life, such as those found on Earth, which includes flora, fauna, minerals, matter cycles, et cetera.

In the 1920s Vladimir I. Vernadsky, a Russian geologist who had defected to France, detailed the idea of the biosphere in his work "The biosphere" (1926), and described the fundamental principles of the biogeochemical cycles. He thus redefined the biosphere as the sum of all ecosystems.

First ecological damages were reported in the 18th century, as the multiplication of colonies caused deforestation. Since the 19th century, with the industrial revolution, more and more pressing concerns have grown about the impact of human activity on the environment. The term ecologist has been in use since the end of the 19th century.

The ecosystem: Arthur Tansley[edit]

Over the 19th century, botanical geography and zoogeography combined to form the basis of biogeography. This science, which deals with habitats of species, seeks to explain the reasons for the presence of certain species in a given location.

It was in 1935 that Arthur Tansley, the British ecologist, coined the term ecosystem, the interactive system established between the biocoenosis (the group of living creatures), and their biotope, the environment in which they live. Ecology thus became the science of ecosystems.

Tansley's concept of the ecosystem was adopted by the energetic and influential biology educator Eugene Odum. Along with his brother, Howard T. Odum, Eugene P. Odum wrote a textbook which (starting in 1953) educated more than one generation of biologists and ecologists in North America.

Ecological Succession – Henry Chandler Cowles[edit]

The Indiana Dunes on Lake Michigan, which Cowles referred to in his development of his theories of ecological succession.

At the turn of the 20th century, Henry Chandler Cowles was one of the founders of the emerging study of "dynamic ecology", through his study of ecological succession at the Indiana Dunes, sand dunes at the southern end of Lake Michigan. Here Cowles found evidence of ecological succession in the vegetation and the soil with relation to age. Cowles was very much aware of the roots of the concept and of his (primordial) predecessors.[7] Thus, he attributes the first use of the word to the French naturalist Adolphe Dureau de la Malle, who had described the vegetation development after forest clear-felling, and the first comprehensive study of successional processes to the Finnish botanist Ragnar Hult (1881).

Animal Ecology - Charles Elton[edit]

20th century English zoologist and ecologist, Charles Elton, is commonly credited as “the father of animal ecology”.[18] Elton influenced by Victor Shelford’s Animal Communities in Temperate America began his research on animal ecology as an assistant to his colleague, Julian Huxley, on an ecological survey of the fauna in Spitsbergen in 1921. Elton’s most famous studies were conducted during his time as a biological consultant to the Hudson Bay Company to help understand the fluctuations in the company’s fur harvests. Elton studied the population fluctuations and dynamics of snowshoe hare, Canadian lynx, and other mammals of the region. Elton is also considered the first to coin the terms, food chain and food cycle in his famous book Animal Ecology.[19] Elton is also attributed with contributing to disciplines of: invasion ecology, community ecology, and wildlife disease ecology.[20]

Timeline of ecologists[edit]

A list of founders, innovators and their significant contributions to ecology, from Romanticism onward.
Notable figure Lifespan Major contribution & citation
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1632–1723 First to develop concept of food chains
Carl Linnaeus 1707–1778 Influential naturalist, inventor of science on the economy of nature[17][21]
Alexander Humboldt 1769–1859 First to describe ecological gradient of latitudinal biodiversity increase toward the tropics [22] in 1807
Charles Darwin 1809–1882 Founder of the hypothesis of evolution by means of natural selection, founder of ecological studies of soils[23]
Elizabeth Catherine Thomas Carne 1817-1873 Geologist, mineralogist and philosopher who observed rural vs urban living, spatially and culturally, finding in country living the best attack on suffocating class divides, healthier living, and best access to natural education.[24][25]
Herbert Spencer 1820–1903 Early founder of social ecology, coined the phrase 'survival of the fittest'[17][26]
Karl Möbius 1825–1908 First to develop concept of ecological community, biocenosis, or living community[27][28][29]
Ernst Haeckel 1834–1919 Invented the term ecology, popularized research links between ecology and evolution
Victor Hensen 1835–1924 Invented term plankton, developed quantitative and statistical measures of productivity in the seas
Eugenius Warming 1841–1924 Early founder of Ecological Plant Geography[5]
Ellen Swallow Richards 1842–1911 Pioneer and educator who linked urban ecology to human health[30]
Stephen Forbes 1844–1930 Early founder of entomology and ecological concepts in 1887 [15][31][32]
Vito Volterra 1860–1940 Independently pioneered mathematical populations models around the same time as Alfred J. Lotka.[33][34]
Vladimir Vernadsky 1869–1939 Founded the biosphere concept
Henry C. Cowles 1869–1939 Pioneering studies and conceptual development in studies of ecological succession[35]
Jan Christiaan Smuts 1870–1950 Coined the term holism in a 1926 book Holism and Evolution.[36]
Arthur G. Tansley 1871–1955 First to coin the term ecosystem in 1936 and notable researcher[28][37][38]
Charles Christopher Adams 1873–1955 Animal ecologist, biogeographer, author of first American book on animal ecology in 1913, founded ecological energetics[39][40]
Friedrich Ratzel 1844–1904 German geographer who first coined the term biogeography in 1891.
Frederic Clements 1874–1945 Authored the first influential American ecology book in 1905[41]
Victor Ernest Shelford 1877–1968 Founded physiological ecology, pioneered food-web and biome concepts, founded The Nature Conservancy[42][43]
Alfred J. Lotka 1880–1949 First to pioneer mathematical populations models explaining trophic (predator-prey) interactions using logistic equation[44]
Henry Gleason 1882–1975 Early ecology pioneer, quantitative theorist, author, and founder of the individualistic concept of ecology[41][45]
Charles S. Elton 1900–1991 'Father' of animal ecology, pioneered food-web & niche concepts and authored influential Animal Ecology text[42][46]
G. Evelyn Hutchinson 1903–1991 Limnologist and conceptually advanced the niche concept[47][48][49]
Eugene P. Odum 1913–2002 Co-founder of ecosystem ecology and ecological thermodynamic concepts[38][42][50][51]
Howard T. Odum 1924–2002 Co-founder of ecosystem ecology and ecological thermodynamic concepts[38][42][50][51][52][53]
Robert MacArthur 1930–1972 Co-founder on Theory of Island Biogeography and innovator of ecological statistical methods[54]

Ecological Influence on the Social Sciences and Humanities[edit]

Human ecology[edit]

Human ecology began in the 1920s, through the study of changes in vegetation succession in the city of Chicago. It became a distinct field of study in the 1970s. This marked the first recognition that humans, who had colonized all of the Earth's continents, were a major ecological factor. Humans greatly modify the environment through the development of the habitat (in particular urban planning), by intensive exploitation activities such as logging and fishing, and as side effects of agriculture, mining, and industry. Besides ecology and biology, this discipline involved many other natural and social sciences, such as anthropology and ethnology, economics, demography, architecture and urban planning, medicine and psychology, and many more. The development of human ecology led to the increasing role of ecological science in the design and management of cities.

In recent years human ecology has been a topic that has interested organizational researchers. Hannan and Freeman (Population Ecology of Organizations (1977), American Journal of Sociology) argue that organizations do not only adapt to an environment. Instead it is also the environment that selects or rejects populations of organizations. In any given environment (in equilibrium) there will only be one form of organization (isomorphism). Organizational ecology has been a prominent theory in accounting for diversities of organizations and their changing composition over time.

James Lovelock and the Gaia hypothesis[edit]

The Gaia theory, proposed by James Lovelock, in his work Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, advanced the view that the Earth should be regarded as a single living macro-organism. In particular, it argued that the ensemble of living organisms has jointly evolved an ability to control the global environment — by influencing major physical parameters as the composition of the atmosphere, the evaporation rate, the chemistry of soils and oceans — so as to maintain conditions favorable to life. The idea has been supported by Lynn Margulis who extended her endosymbiotic theory which suggests that cell organelles originated from free living organisms to the idea that individual organisms of many species could be considered as symbionts within a larger metaphorical "super-organism".[55]

This vision was largely a sign of the times, in particular the growing perception after the Second World War that human activities such as nuclear energy, industrialization, pollution, and overexploitation of natural resources, fueled by exponential population growth, were threatening to create catastrophes on a planetary scale, and has influenced many in the environmental movement since then.

History and Relationship between Ecology and Conservation and Environmental movements[edit]

Environmentalists and other conservationists have used ecology and other sciences (e.g., climatology) to support their advocacy positions. Environmentalist views are often controversial for political or economic reasons. As a result, some scientific work in ecology directly influences policy and political debate; these in turn often direct ecological research.

The history of ecology, however, should not be conflated with that of environmental thought. Ecology as a modern science traces only from Darwin’s publication of Origin of Species and Haeckel’s subsequent naming of the science needed to study Darwin’s theory. Awareness of humankind’s effect on its environment has been traced to Gilbert White in 18th-century Selborne, England.[11] Awareness of nature and its interactions can be traced back even farther in time.[8][9] Ecology before Darwin, however, is analogous to medicine prior to Pasteur’s discovery of the infectious nature of disease. The history is there, but it is only partly relevant.

Neither Darwin nor Haeckel, it is true, did self-avowed ecological studies. The same can be said for researchers in a number of fields who contributed to ecological thought well into the 1940s without avowedly being ecologists.[1][56] Raymond Pearl’s population studies are a case in point.[57] Ecology in subject matter and techniques grew out of studies by botanists and plant geographers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that paradoxically lacked Darwinian evolutionary perspectives. Until Mendel’s studies with peas were rediscovered and melded into the Modern Synthesis,[58] Darwinism suffered in credibility. Many early plant ecologists had a Lamarckian view of inheritance, as did Darwin, at times. Ecological studies of animals and plants, preferably live and in the field, continued apace however.[59]

Conservation and Environmental Movements - 20th Century[edit]

When the Ecological Society of America (ESA) was chartered in 1915, it already had a conservation perspective.[60] Victor E. Shelford, a leader in the society’s formation, had as one of its goals the preservation of the natural areas that were then the objects of study by ecologists, but were in danger of being degraded by human incursion.[61] Human ecology had also been a visible part of the ESA at its inception, as evident by publications such as: "The Control of Pneumonia and Influenza by the Weather," "An Overlook of the Relations of Dust to Humanity," "The Ecological Relations of the Polar Eskimo," and "City Street Dust and Infectious Diseases," in early pages of Ecology and Ecological Monographs. The ESA’s second president, Ellsworth Huntington, was a human ecologist. Stephen Forbes, another early president, called for "humanizing" ecology in 1921, since man was clearly the dominant species on the Earth.[62]

This auspicious start actually was the first of a series of fitful progressions and reversions by the new science with regard to conservation. Human ecology necessarily focused on man-influenced environments and their practical problems. Ecologists in general, however, were trying to establish ecology as a basic science, one with enough prestige to make inroads into Ivy League faculties. Disturbed environments, it was thought, would not reveal nature’s secrets.

Interest in the environment created by the American Dust Bowl produced a flurry of calls in 1935 for ecology to take a look at practical issues. Pioneering ecologist C. C. Adams wanted to return human ecology to the science.[63] Frederic E. Clements, the dominant plant ecologist of the day, reviewed land use issues leading to the Dust Bowl in terms of his ideas on plant succession and climax.[64] Paul Sears reached a wide audience with his book, Deserts on the March.[65] World War II, perhaps, caused the issue to be put aside.

The tension between pure ecology, seeking to understand and explain, and applied ecology, seeking to describe and repair, came to a head after World War II. Adams again tried to push the ESA into applied areas by having it raise an endowment to promote ecology. He predicted that "a great expansion of ecology" was imminent "because of its integrating tendency."[66] Ecologists, however, were sensitive to the perception that ecology was still not considered a rigorous, quantitative science. Those who pushed for applied studies and active involvement in conservation were once more discretely rebuffed. Human ecology became subsumed by sociology. It was sociologist Lewis Mumford who brought the ideas of George Perkins Marsh to modern attention in the 1955 conference, "Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth." That prestigious conclave was dominated by social scientists. At it, ecology was accused of "lacking experimental methods" and neglecting "man as an ecological agent." One participant dismissed ecology as "archaic and sterile."[67] Within the ESA, a frustrated Shelford started the Ecologists’ Union when his Committee on Preservation of Natural Conditions ceased to function due to the political infighting over the ESA stance on conservation.[60] In 1950, the fledgling organization was renamed and incorporated as the Nature Conservancy, a name borrowed from the British government agency for the same purpose.

Two events, however, brought ecology’s course back to applied problems. One was the Manhattan Project. It had become the Nuclear Energy Commission after the war. It is now the Department of Energy (DOE). Its ample budget included studies of the impacts of nuclear weapon use and production. That brought ecology to the issue, and it made a "Big Science" of it.[11][68] Ecosystem science, both basic and applied, began to compete with theoretical ecology (then called evolutionary ecology and also mathematical ecology). Eugene Odum, who published a very popular ecology textbook in 1953, became the champion of the ecosystem. In his publications, Odum called for ecology to have an ecosystem and applied focus.[69]

The second event was the publication of Silent Spring. Rachel Carson’s book brought ecology as a word and concept to the public. Her influence was instant. A study committee, prodded by the publication of the book, reported to the ESA that their science was not ready to take on the responsibility being given to it.[70]

Carson’s concept of ecology was very much that of Gene Odum.[71] As a result, ecosystem science dominated the International Biological Program of the 1960s and 1970s, bringing both money and prestige to ecology.[72][73] Silent Spring was also the impetus for the environmental protection programs that were started in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations and passed into law just before the first Earth Day. Ecologists’ input was welcomed. Former ESA President Stanley Cain, for example, was appointed an Assistant Secretary in the Department of the Interior.

The environmental assessment requirement of the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), "legitimized ecology," in the words of one environmental lawyer.[74] An ESA President called it "an ecological ‘Magna Carta.’"[75] A prominent Canadian ecologist declared it a "boondoggle."[76] NEPA and similar state statutes, if nothing else, provided much employment for ecologists. Therein was the issue. Neither ecology nor ecologists were ready for the task. Not enough ecologists were available to work on impact assessment, outside of the DOE laboratories, leading to the rise of "instant ecologists,"[77] having dubious credentials and capabilities. Calls began to arise for the professionalization of ecology. Maverick scientist Frank Egler, in particular, devoted his sharp prose to the task.[78] Again, a schism arose between basic and applied scientists in the ESA, this time exacerbated by the question of environmental advocacy. The controversy, whose history has yet to receive adequate treatment, lasted through the 1970s and 1980s, ending with a voluntary certification process by the ESA, along with lobbying arm in Washington.[79]

Post-Earth Day, besides questions of advocacy and professionalism, ecology also had to deal with questions having to do with its basic principles. Many of the theoretical principles and methods of both ecosystem science and evolutionary ecology began to show little value in environmental analysis and assessment.[80] Ecologist, in general, started to question the methods and logic of their science under the pressure of its new notoriety.[41][81][82] Meanwhile, personnel with government agencies and environmental advocacy groups were accused of religiously applying dubious principles in their conservation work.[83] Management of endangered Spotted Owl populations brought the controversy to a head.[84]

Conservation for ecologists created travails paralleling those nuclear power gave former Manhattan Project scientists. In each case, science had to be reconciled with individual politics, religious beliefs, and worldviews, a difficult process. Some ecologists managed to keep their science separate from their advocacy; others unrepentantly became avowed environmentalists.[85]

Roosevelt & American Conservation[edit]

Theodore Roosevelt was interested in nature from a young age. He carried his passion for nature into his political policies. Roosevelt felt it was necessary to preserve the resources of the nation and it's environment. In 1902 he created the federal reclamation service, which reclaimed land for agriculture. He also created the Bureau of Forestry. This organization, headed by Gifford Pinchot, was formed to manage and maintain the nations timberlands.[86] Roosevelt signed the Act for the Preservation of American Antiquities in 1906. This act allowed for him to "declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic and scientific interest that are situated upon lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be National Monuments." Under this act he created up to 18 national monuments. During his presidency, Roosevelt established 51 Federal Bird Reservations, 4 National Game Preserves, 150 National Forests, and 5 National Parks. Overall he protected over 200 million acres of land.[87]

Ecology and global policy[edit]

Ecology became a central part of the World's politics as early as 1971, UNESCO launched a research program called Man and Biosphere, with the objective of increasing knowledge about the mutual relationship between humans and nature. A few years later it defined the concept of Biosphere Reserve.

In 1972, the United Nations held the first international Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm, prepared by Rene Dubos and other experts. This conference was the origin of the phrase "Think Globally, Act Locally". The next major events in ecology were the development of the concept of biosphere and the appearance of terms "biological diversity"—or now more commonly biodiversity—in the 1980s. These terms were developed during the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, where the concept of the biosphere was recognized by the major international organizations, and risks associated with reductions in biodiversity were publicly acknowledged.

Then, in 1997, the dangers the biosphere was facing were recognized all over the world at the conference leading to the Kyoto Protocol. In particular, this conference highlighted the increasing dangers of the greenhouse effect – related to the increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to global changes in climate. In Kyoto, most of the world's nations recognized the importance of looking at ecology from a global point of view, on a worldwide scale, and to take into account the impact of humans on the Earth's environment.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b McIntosh, R. P. (1985). The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. 
  2. ^ Ramalay, F. (1940). "The growth of a science". University of Colorado Studies 26: 3–14. 
  3. ^ a b Reid, Gordon Mcgregor (February 2009). "Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778): His Life, Philosophy and Science and Its Relationship to Modern Biology and Medicine". Taxon 58 (1): 18–31. 
  4. ^ a b Silvertown, J.; Poulton, P.; Johnston, E.; Edwards, G.; Heard, M.; Biss, P. M. (2006). "The Park Grass Experiment 1856–2006: its contribution to ecology". Journal of Ecology 94 (4): 801–814. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01145.x. 
  5. ^ a b c Coleman, W. (1986). "Evolution into ecology? The strategy of Warming's ecological plant geography". Journal of the History of Biology 19 (2): 181–196. doi:10.1007/BF00138875. PMID 11611989. 
  6. ^ a b Acot, P. (1997). "The Lamarckian Cradle of Scientific Ecology". Acta Biotheoretica 45 (3/4): 185–193. doi:10.1023/A:1000631103244. 
  7. ^ a b Cowles, H. C. (1911). "The causes of vegetational cycles". Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1 (1): 3–20. doi:10.2307/2560843. 
  8. ^ a b Egerton, F. N. (1973). "Changing Concepts of the Balance of Nature". Quarterly Review of Biology 48 (2): 322–50. doi:10.1086/407594. 
  9. ^ a b Egerton, F. N. (2001). "A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 1: Early Greek Origins". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 82: 93–97. 
  10. ^ Smith, S. HI; Mark, S. (2009). "The Historical Roots of the Nature Conservancy in the Northwest Indiana/Chicagoland Region: From Science to Preservation". The South Shore Journal 3: 1–10. 
  11. ^ a b c d e f g Worster, D. (1994). Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-46834-5. 
  12. ^ Malthus T.R. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population, in Oxford World's Classics reprint. p 61, end of Chapter VII
  13. ^ Darwin's Malthusian Metaphor and Russian Evolutionary Thought, 1859-1917Author, Daniel P. Todes, p. 537-540
  14. ^ Stauffer, R. C. (1957). "Haeckel, Darwin and Ecology". Quarterly Review of Biology 32 (2): 138–144. doi:10.1086/401754. 
  15. ^ a b Forbes, S. A. (1887). "The Lake as Microcosm". Bulletin of the Scientific Association: 77–87. 
  16. ^ Paterson, H. (2005). "The Competitive Darwin". Paleobiology 31 (2): 56–76. doi:10.1666/0094-8373. 
  17. ^ a b c Kormandy, E. J. (1978). "Ecology/Economy of Nature—Synonyms?". Ecology 59 (6): 1292–1294. doi:10.2307/1938247. JSTOR 1938247. 
  18. ^ Southwood, R.; Clarke, J. R. (1999). "Charles Sutherland Elton. 29 March 1900 -- 1 May: Elected F.R.S. 1953".
  19. ^ Elton, C.S. 1968 reprint. Animal ecology. Great Britain: William Clowes and Sons Ltd.
  20. ^ Wilson, Ken. 2011. Animal Ecology - Legacy of Charles S Elton.http://www.journalofanimalecology.org/view/0/virtualissuelegacyofcharlesselton.html ed.Journal of Animal Ecology.
  21. ^ Egerton, F. N. (2007). "A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 23: Linnaeus and the Economy of Nature". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 88 (1): 72–88. doi:10.1890/0012-9623(2007)88[72:AHOTES]2.0.CO;2. 
  22. ^ [1][dead link]
  23. ^ Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species (1st ed.). London: John Murray. ISBN 0-8014-1319-2. 
  24. ^ Country Towns, and the Place They Fill in Modern Civilization. Covent Garden: Bell & Daldy. 1868. 
  25. ^ Hardie-Budden, M. (2014). "Elizabeth Catherine Thomas Carne: A 19th century Hypatia and her circle". Transactions of the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall (Royal Geological Society of Cornwall) 23 (1): 16–39. ISSN 0372-1108. 
  26. ^ Futuyma, D. J. (2005). "The Nature of Natural Selection". In Cracraft, J.; Bybee, R. W. Evolutionary Science and Society: Educating a New Generation. American Institute of Biological Sciences. pp. 93–98. 
  27. ^ Glaubrecht, M. (2008). "Homage to Karl August Möbius (1825–1908) and his contributions to biology: zoologist, ecologist, and director at the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin". Zoosystematics and Evolution 84 (1): 9–30. doi:10.1002/zoos.200700010. 
  28. ^ a b Baker, H. G. (1966). "Reasoning about adaptations in ecosystems". BioScience 16 (1): 35–37. doi:10.2307/1293551. JSTOR 1293551. 
  29. ^ Nyhart, L. K. (1998). "Civic and Economic Zoology in Nineteenth-Century Germany: The "Living Communities" of Karl Mobius". Isis 89 (4): 605–630. doi:10.1086/384157. JSTOR 236735. 
  30. ^ Palamar, C. R. (2008). "The Justice of Ecological Restoration: Environmental History, Health, Ecology, and Justice in the United States". Human Ecology Review 15 (1): 82–94. 
  31. ^ http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/scasado/documentos/Forbes.PDF
  32. ^ Forbes, S. A. (1915). "The ecological foundations of applied entomology". Annals of the Entomological Society of America 8 (1): 1–19. 
  33. ^ Cohen, J. E. (1987). "Lotka, Alfred James (1880–1949)". In Eatwell, J.; Newman, P. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. New York: Stockton Press. pp. 245–247. 
  34. ^ Volterra, V. (1926). "Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically". Nature 118 (2972): 558–560. Bibcode:1926Natur.118..558V. doi:10.1038/118558a0. 
  35. ^ Adams, C. C.; Fuller, G. D. (1940). "Henry Chandler Cowles, Physiographic Plant Ecologist". Annals of the Association of American Geographers 31 (1): 39–43. doi:10.1080/00045604009357195. JSTOR 2561130. 
  36. ^ Smuts, Jan Christiaan (1926). "Holism and Evolution". Nature 119 (2991): 307. Bibcode:1927Natur.119..307K. doi:10.1038/119307a0. 
  37. ^ Cooper, W. S. (1957). "Sir Arthur Tansley and the Science of Ecology". Ecology 38 (4): 658–659. doi:10.2307/1943136. JSTOR 1943136. 
  38. ^ a b c Kingsland, S. E. (1994). "Review: The History of Ecology". Journal of the History of Biology 27 (2): 349–357. doi:10.1007/BF01062566. 
  39. ^ Ilerbaig, J. (1999). "Allied Sciences and Fundamental Problems: C.C. Adams and the Search for Method in Early American Ecology". Journal of the History of Biology 32 (3): 439–463. doi:10.1023/A:1004737021541. JSTOR 4331545. 
  40. ^ Raup, H. M. (1959). "Charles C. Adams, 1873–1955". Annals of the Association of American Geographers 49 (2): 164–167. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1959.tb01607.x. JSTOR 2561526. 
  41. ^ a b c Simberloff, D. (1980). "A succession of paradigms in ecology: Essentialism to materialism and probalism". Synthese 43: 3–39. doi:10.1007/BF00413854. 
  42. ^ a b c d Ellison, A. M. (2006). "What Makes an Ecological Icon". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 87 (4): 380–386. doi:10.1890/0012-9623(2006)87[380:WMAEI]2.0.CO;2. 
  43. ^ Kendeigh, S. C. (1968). "Victor Ernest Shelford, Eminent Ecologist, 1968". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 49 (3): 97–100. JSTOR 20165761. 
  44. ^ Berryman, A. A. (1992). "The Origins and Evolution of Predator-Prey Theory". Ecology 73 (5): 1530–1535. doi:10.2307/1940005. JSTOR 1940005. 
  45. ^ McIntosh, R. P. (1975). "H. A. Gleason-"Individualistic Ecologist" 1882–1975: His Contributions to Ecological Theory". Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 105 (5): 253–278. doi:10.2307/2484142. JSTOR 2484142. 
  46. ^ Southwood, R.; Clarke, J. R. (1999). "Charles Sutherland Elton. 29 March 1900-1 May 1991". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 45: 131–146. JSTOR 770268. 
  47. ^ Flannery, M. C. (2003). "Evelyn Hutchinson: A Wonderful Mind". The American Biology Teacher 65 (6): 462–467. doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2003)065[0462:EHAWM]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 4451536. 
  48. ^ Edmondson, Y. H. (1991). "In Memoriam: G. Evelyn Hutchinson, 1903–1991". Limnology and Oceanography 36 (3): 617. JSTOR 2837527. 
  49. ^ Patrick, R. (1994). "George Evelyn Hutchinson (30 January 1903–17 May 1991)". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 138 (4): 531–535. JSTOR 986851. 
  50. ^ a b Gunderson, L.; Folke, C.; Lee, M.; Holling, C. S. (2002). "In memory of mavericks". Conservation Ecology 6 (2): 19. 
  51. ^ a b Rotabi, K. S. (2007). "Ecological Theory Origin from Natural to Social Science of Vice Versa? A Brief Conceptual History for Social Work". Advances in Social Work 8 (1): 113–129. 
  52. ^ Patten, B. C. (1993). "Toward a more holistic ecology, and science: the contribution of H.T. Odum". Oecologia 93 (4): 597–602. doi:10.1007/BF00328970. 
  53. ^ Ewel, J. J. (2003). "Howard Thomas Odum (1924–2002)". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 84 (1): 13–15. doi:10.1890/0012-9623(2003)84[13:HTO]2.0.CO;2. 
  54. ^ Brown, J. H. (1999). "The Legacy of Robert Macarthur: From Geographical Ecology to Macroecology". Journal of Mammalogy 80 (2): 333–344. doi:10.2307/1383283. JSTOR 1383283. 
  55. ^ Levin, Simon A. (1998). "Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems". Ecosystems 1 (5): 431–436. doi:10.1007/s100219900037. 
  56. ^ Allee, W. C.; Emerson, A. E.; Park, O.; Park, T.; Schmidt, K. P. (1949). Principles of Animal Ecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company. 
  57. ^ Kingsland, S. E. (1985). Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  58. ^ Huxley, J. S. (1942). Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen & Unwin. 
  59. ^ Kingsland, S. E. (2005). The Evolution of American Ecology: 1890–2000. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 
  60. ^ a b Coker, R. A. (1991). Pioneer Ecologist: The Life and Work of Victor Ernest Shelford, 1877–1968. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 
  61. ^ Shelford, V. E. (1917). "The Ideals and Aims of the Ecological Society of America". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 1: 1–2. 
  62. ^ Forbes, S. A. (1922). "The Humanizing of Ecology". Ecology 3 (2): 89–92. doi:10.2307/1929143. 
  63. ^ Adams, C. C. (1935). "The Relation of General Ecology to Human Ecology". Ecology 16 (3): 316–335. doi:10.2307/1930072. 
  64. ^ Clements, F. E. (1935). "Experimental Ecology in the Public Service". Ecology 16 (3): 342–63. doi:10.2307/1930074. 
  65. ^ Sears, P. B. (1935). Deserts on the March. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. 
  66. ^ Adams, C. C. (1947). First Report of the committee of the Ecological Society of America for an Endowment Policy and Program. Ecological Society of America. 
  67. ^ Thomas, W. L. Jr., ed. (1956). Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  68. ^ Hagen, J. B. (1992). An Entangled Bank, The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 
  69. ^ Dritschilo, W. (2004). Earth Days: Ecology Comes of Age as a Science. iUniverse. 
  70. ^ Miller, R. S. (1965). "Summary Report of the Ecological Study Committee with Recommendations for the Future of Ecology and the Ecological Society of America". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 46: 61–81. 
  71. ^ Dritschilo, W. (2006). "Rachel Carson and Mid-Twentieth Century Ecology". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 87 (4): 357. doi:10.1890/0012-9623(2006)87[357:RCAMCE]2.0.CO;2. 
  72. ^ Blair, W. F. (1977). Big Biology: The US/IBP. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson & Ross. 
  73. ^ Kwa, C. (1987). "Representations of Nature Mediating between Ecology and Science Policy: The Case of the International Biological Programme". Social Studies of Science 17 (3): 413–442. doi:10.1177/030631287017003002. 
  74. ^ Curlin, J. W. (1972). "Courts, Ecology, and Environmental Planning". Ecology 53 (3): 373–374. doi:10.2307/1934222. 
  75. ^ Auerbach, S. I. (1972). "Ecology, Ecologists and the E.S.A". Ecology: 204–207. 
  76. ^ Schindler, D. W. (1976). "The Impact Statement Boondoggle". Science 192 (4239): 506. Bibcode:1976Sci...192..509S. doi:10.1126/science.192.4239.509. 
  77. ^ http://www.atonforest.org/HBtoESA24Mar71.htm
  78. ^ "Eleven". Atonforest.org. 1970-04-22. Retrieved 2013-12-17. 
  79. ^ Dale, V. H.; Barrett, G. W.; Carpenter, A. T.; Hinkle, C. R.; Mitsch, W. J.; Pitelka, L. F. (2000). "ESA's Professional Certification Program: Let's Make It Work". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 81 (4): 255–257. doi:10.1890/0012-9623(2000)081[0255:C]2.0.CO;2. 
  80. ^ Suter, G. W. (1981). "Ecosystem Theory and NEPA Assessment". Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 62: 186–192. 
  81. ^ Peters, R. H. (1976). "Tautology in Evolution and Ecology". The American Naturalist 110 (971): 1–12. doi:10.1086/283045. 
  82. ^ Peters, R. H. (1991). A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
  83. ^ Simberloff, D. S.; Abele, L. G. (1976). "Island Biogeography Theory and Conservation Practice". Science 191 (4224): 285–6. Bibcode:1976Sci...191..285S. doi:10.1126/science.191.4224.285. 
  84. ^ Chase, A. (1995). In a Dark Wood: The Fight Over Forests and the Rising Tyranny of Ecology. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. 
  85. ^ Takacs, D. (1996). The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 
  86. ^ "Theodore Roosevelt and the Environment". PBS. Retrieved April 7, 2014. 
  87. ^ "Theodore Roosevelt and conservation". National Park Service. Retrieved April 7, 2014. 

Further reading[edit]

  • Egerton, F. N. (1977). History of American Ecology. New York: Arno Press. 
  • Simberloff, D. (1980). "A succession of paradigms in ecology: Essentialism to materialism and probabilism". Synthese 43 (1): 3–39. doi:10.1007/BF00413854. 
  • Egerton, F. N. (1983). "The history of ecology: achievements and opportunities; Part one". Journal of the History of Biology 16 (2): 259–310. doi:10.1007/BF00124700. 
  • Hagen, J. B. (1992). An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 
  • Kingsland, S. E. (1995). Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  • McIntosh, R. P. (1985). The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
  • Mitman, G. (1992). The State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950. 
  • Real, L. A.; Brown, J. H., eds. (1991). Foundations of Ecology: Classic Papers with Commentary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  • Tobey, R. C. (1981). Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding School of American Plant Ecology, 1895–1955. Berkeley: University of California Press. 
  • Weiner, D. (2000). Models of Nature: Ecology, Conservation, and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 
  • Worster, D. (1994). Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
  • Acot, P. (1998). The European Origins of Scientific Ecology (1800–1901). Gordon and Breach Publishers. ISBN 9056991035. 
  • Wilkinson, D. M. (2002). "Ecology before ecology: biogeography and ecology in Lyell's 'Principles'". Journal of Biogeography 29 (9): 1109–1115. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00754.x. 
  • von Humboldt, A. (1805). Essai sur la géographie des plantes, accompagné d’un tableau physique des régions équinoxiales, fondé sur les mésures exécutées, depuis le dixième degré de latitude boréale jusqu’au dixième degré de latitude australe, pendant les années 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802, et 1903 par A. De Humboldt et A. Bonpland. Paris: Chez Levrault, Schoelle et Cie. Sherborn Fund Facsimile No.1.
  • von Humboldt, A. (1805). Voyage de Humboldt et Bonpland. Voyage aux régions équinoxiales du nouveau continent. 5e partie. "Essai sur la géographie des plantes". Paris. Facs intégral de l’édition Paris 1905-1834 par Amsterdam: Theatrum orbis terrarum Ltd., 1973.
  • von Humboldt, A. (1807). Essai sur la géographie des plantes. Facs.ed. London 1959. His essay on "On Isothermal Lines" was published serially in English translation in the Edinburgh Philosophical Journal from 1820 to 1822.