History of freedom of religion in Canada
- 1 Time Line
- 2 Legal protections for freedom of religion
- 3 1867-1982
- 4 Freedom of Religion and Military Service
- 5 Freedom of Religion and Indigenous Canadians
- 6 See also
- 7 References
- 8 External links
- 1448, The Sunday Fairs Act 1448
- 1627, An Act for the further reformation of sundry abuses committed on the Lord's Day commonly called Sunday (UK) 
- 1851, Freedom of Worship Act
- 1867, The British North America Act. As a federal document, it included special rights granted to Roman Catholic schools in Ontario and Protestant schools in Quebec.
- 1871, The Sunday Observation Prosecution Act 1871 (UK) 
- 1888, Lord's Day Alliance established.
- 1897, Ontario Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the Hamilton Street Railway Company's Sunday operations.
- 1906, An Act Respecting the Lord's Day.
- 1950, The Shops Act (UK) 
- 1952, Lord’s Day Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 171, s. 4.
- 1961, June 26. Lewis E. Gordon, owner of a coin-operated laundry business, held in violation of the Lord's Day Act by the Supreme Court of Canada.
- 1960s, Walter v. A.G. Alberta
- 1985, The Supreme Court of Canada finds the Lord's Day Act unconstitutional in R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd 
Legal protections for freedom of religion
On February 10, 1763, the Treaty of Paris put an end to the Seven Years' War between Britain and France. The Treaty allowed the people of Quebec to practice their Roman Catholic religion. Paragraph IV of the Treaty reads:
...His Britannick Majesty, on his side, agrees to grant the liberty of the Catholic religion to the inhabitants of Canada: he will, in consequence, give the most precise and most effectual orders, that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rites of the Romish church, as far as the laws of Great Britain permit...
In 1851, the Parliament of the Province of Canada enacted the Freedom of Worship Act. The Act gave legal protection to the "free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference" in what is now Ontario and Quebec.
At Confederation in 1867, the Constitution Act, 1867 protected the right to publicly funded denominational and separate schools, as they existed prior to Confederation. This guarantee originally applied primarily in Ontario and Quebec, but subsequently provided similar protections in the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland.
From 1760, therefore, to the present moment religious freedom has, in our legal system, been recognized as a principle of fundamental character; and although we have nothing in the nature of an established church, that the untrammelled affirmations of religious belief and its propagation, personal or institutional, remain as of the greatest constitutional significance throughout the Dominion is unquestionable...
Following World War II, there was a general movement in Canada to provide greater legislative protection for fundamental freedoms, including freedom of religion. The first example was the Saskatchewan Bill of Rights of 1947, the first Bill of Rights enacted in the British Commonwealth since the original English Bill of Rights of 1688. The Saskatchewan Bill of Rights provided express statutory protection for the exercise of freedom of religion, in matters coming within provincial jurisdiction. Other provinces passed similar legislation, such as the Ontario Human Rights Code in 1962. The federal Parliament enacted the Canadian Bill of Rights in 1963, which protected freedom of religion in matters coming within federal jurisdiction. The federal Parliament followed up by enacting the Canadian Human Rights Act in 1977, to prohibit discrimination on a wide range of personal characteristics, including protecting religion.
Finally, in 1982, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted as part of the Constitution of Canada. Section 2 of the Charter protects fundamental freedoms, including "freedom of conscience and religion."
1906, The Lord's Day Act
(See below for photo text of the 1906 Lord's Day Act)
The Lord's Day Act, which since 1906 had prohibited business transactions from taking place on Sundays, was struck down as unconstitutional in the 1985 case R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd. Calgary police officers witnessed several transactions at the Big M Drug Mart, all of which occurred on a Sunday. Big M was charged with a violation of the Lord's Day Act. A provincial court ruled that the Lord's Day Act was unconstitutional, but the Crown proceeded to appeal all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada. In a unanimous 6-0 decision, the Lord's Day Act was ruled an infringement of the freedom of conscience and religion defined in section 2(a) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The Lord's Day Alliance
In 1888, the Lord's Day Alliance came into existence as the result mainly of Presbyterian and Methodist interests. Leading up to 1906, the Lord's Day Alliance advocated the national Lord's Day Bill. They were opposed by Roman Catholics and Anglicans.
Quebec and Roman Catholics
The Quebec government opposed it as well. Under Henri Bourassa’s leadership, Quebec argued for the rights of conscience and provincial autonomy in the Lord’s Day debate of 1906. The Roman Catholic Church supported Sunday as a day to attend the Mass and as a day to enjoy the simple, if not secular, benefits of a day off from work. This contrasted sharply with the strict sabbatarian ideas of the Presbyterian denomination.
Quebec Roman Catholic members of parliament sponsored an amendment that gave the administration of the 1906 Lord’s Day Act to the Attorney-General of each province. Just before the federal Act came into effect in 1907, Quebec passed a provincial law that guaranteed individuals such as Jews and Seventh-Day Adventists the right to work on Sunday if they observed some other day. This support for minority groups did not last. During the 1920s, Roman Catholics renewed their support for Sunday observance.
Ligue du Dimanche
"The bishops had also given the signal that the time for study was over. An ad hoc committee in the city of Quebec then successfully prosecuted Sunday theatres.9 To coordinate the ad hoc prosecutions, on 16 April 1923, Archambault brought fifty people together in the basement of the Gesù, the Jesuit-run parish church in downtown Montreal. Representatives of the main Montreal Catholic societies, many of them former retreatants, attended. For example, the Union Catholique, the Saint-Vincent-de-Paul Society, the Association Catholique des Voyageurs de Commerce, Catholic unions, the Association Catholique de la Jeunesse Canadienne-française, the Ligue d’Action Française, and the Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society were represented. It seemed as if the who’s who of Quebec’s Catholic lay people had come. Aconstitution for the new Ligue du Dimanche, drafted by Archambault, was approved and so the Ligue du Dimanche was born." 
Sunday-closing Laws provided an enforced day of rest for many workers. In English Canada, the Presbyterian Church led the way in advocating laws supporting Sunday as a strict, religious day of rest. They did not seek an alliance with Labour on this, though, labour movements and the Presbyterians shared a common interest. The alliance between religion and labour in Quebec found its reality in the work of Archambault.
Wholesale and Retail Merchants
"Wholesale and retail merchants had little desire to expand their work week to seven days and thereby run the risk of increasing costs by spreading the same volume of sales over a longer period of time. To these men, the guarantee of Sunday as a weekly rest day reduced the threat of competition for the consumer's dollar." 
Transportation and Related Industries
The Bicycle and Sunday Leisure
The electric street car.
Federal or Provincial Jurisdiction
Laurier's deference to the provinces.
Canadian Seventh-day Adventists saw apocalyptic foreshadowing in the efforts to establish a national Sunday law. Seventh-day Adventists teach that the command to worship the image to the beast found in Revelation 13 predicts Sunday observance legislation at the end of the Earth's history:
"13:11 Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb and spoke like a dragon. 12 And he exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence, and causes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. 13 He performs great signs, so that he even makes fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men. 14 And he deceives those who dwell on the earth by those signs which he was granted to do in the sight of the beast, telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who was wounded by the sword and lived. 15 He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed. 16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17 and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." 
One Adventist writer said it this way:
"Incidentally, this Sunday law that is imminent is not anything unusual. It was the same law that was proclaimed by Constantine in the year 321 A.D. And to Constantine can be traced the mating of secular and ecclesiastical interests that culminated in the despotism of the Dark Ages. It is this union that will plunge us into the final
conflict. We cannot say how the final events will come upon us in this part of the world. But it is soon to come. We must be prepared spiritually to face any conflict that the enemy may bring to us.
"How? First, we must proclaim in certain tones the fast-fulfilling signs of the end. We should not invite persecution in any form by unduly stressing our peculiarities and differences, but only show others by our life that we are dedicated to truth—in all areas. We must avoid anti-other-religious and "holier-than-thou" attitudes. Our message proclaims love for God and our fellow men. We must exercise tolerance and kindness among ourselves within our own church and practise religious liberty toward those of different faiths. Above all, we should be ready at all times." 
Seventh-day Adventists vigorously opposed the Lord's Day Act as it was being formulated.
The Canadian Union Messenger, April 1, 1904:
"Do we not recognize in the efforts now being made in the Dominion Parliament to secure enforced Sunday observance as an indication of the days when freedom to worship God according to the dictates of our conscience will be a thing of the past? It means something to some of our brethren when such organized efforts to restrict their liberties respecting their worship is being put forth and they are not all going to sit idly by and see their privileges to worship as they choose and when they choose taken from them." 
In its first issue for 1906, the Canadian Union Messenger reported that the leadership expected all the churches would place large orders for the religious liberty tracts addressing the pending Sunday legislation. The membership seemed stirred over the matter. They showed a lively interest in petitions addressing it.
Freedom of Religion and Military Service
Freedom of Religion and Indigenous Canadians
One of the main goals of the Indian residential schools of Canada was to Christianize the aboriginal people of Canada thereby replacing their indigenous religious beliefs, practices and spiritual leaders.
- Blue law
- Chick-fil-A - distinct among fast-food chains as it does not operate on Sundays.
- Freedom of religion
- Human Rights in Canada
- Keep Sunday Special - a UK campaign against extended Sunday trading.
- List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)
- The Lord's Day Act
- Lord's Day Observance Society
- R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd. (1985)
- R. v. Edwards Books and Art Ltd.(1986)
- Sabbath in Christianity
- Shopping hours
- Sunday Shopping
- Sunday Trading Act 1994 English & Welsh Sunday Trading Act
- United Kingdom Legislation: Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1969
- The battle for the sabbath: the sabbatarian lobby in Canada, 1890-1912 by Sharon Patricia Mean (1979), a doctoral thesis, UBC, p.83
- Gordon v. R.,  S.C.R. 592, June 26, 1961
- Gordon v. R.,  S.C.R. 592, June 26, 1961
- Supreme Court of Canada: R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., (1985) 1 S.C.R. 295
- Government of Canada, National Battlefields Commission, Battles of 1759 and 1760. Treaty of Paris
- "Treaty of Paris 1763." Yale Law School. Lillian Goldman Law Library. The Avalon Project.
- Freedom of Worship Act, S.P.C. 1851,14-15 Vict., c. 175.
- Saumur v. City of Quebec,  2 SCR 299, at 327.
- "CanLII - 1985 CanLII 69 (S.C.C.)". Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII.org). 2009-09-03. Retrieved 2009-09-24.
- La Verdure, P. (1996). Sunday in Quebec,1907-1937. CCHA, Historical Studies, 62 (1996), 47-61.
- The battle for the sabbath: the sabbatarian lobby in Canada, 1890-1912 by Sharon Patricia Mean (1979), a doctoral thesis, UBC, p.51
- Revelation 13:11-17, New King James Version
- Sunday Laws of America and Their Significance by George Thomas, Southern Asia Tidings, December, 1961, p. 8
- Canadian Union Messenger, April 1, 1904, p. 4
- Canadian Union Messenger, January 4, 1906, p. 3
- Shaw, Amy J. (2009). Crisis of conscience: conscientious objection in Canada during the First World War. Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press
- J. R. Miller (1996). Shingwauk's Vision: A History of Canadian Residential Schools. University of Toronto Press
Statutes and Regulations
- Early Canadiana Online. A collection of the acts passed in the Parliament of Great Britain and of other public acts relative to Canada
- Freedom of Worship Act, R.S.Q. c. L-2
Supreme Court Decisions
- Saumur v. City of Quebec,  2 SCR 299
- Lord's Day Alliance v. Attorney-General of British Columbia,  S.C.R. 497
- Robertson and Rosetanni v. R.,  S.C.R. 651
- R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd.,  1 S.C.R. 295
Parliamentary Hansard Reports
- Ontario Hansard Search Engine.
- Ontario Hansard, May 18, 1993, Hon David Christopherson Solicitor General on Bill 38 amending the Retail Business Holidays Act
- The Sabbath Question in the Dominion Parliament. Delivered in the House of Commons, Wednesday, 30th May, 1894, by Hon. G. Amyot, Member from Bellechasse. P. Q.; and printed in the unrevised " Hansard" No. 49, and in the revised edition, columns 3503-3507.
- The battle for the sabbath: the sabbatarian lobby in Canada, 1890-1912 by Sharon Patricia Mean (1979), a doctoral thesis, UBC.
- The Impact of Alternative Constitutional Regimes on Religious Freedom in Canada and England by Ofrit Liviatan, Lecturer Department of Government, Harvard University.
- Religious Freedom in Canada by Denise J. Doyle. Journal of Church and State (1984)
- Canada's Sunday: The Presbyterian Contribution, 1875-1950 by Paul Laverdure. An essay part of the book The Burning Bush and a Few Acres of Snow: the Presbyterian contribution to Canadian life and culture. William Klempa, editor. McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP, 1994, 290 pages, The twelve essays collected here explore the formative influence Presbyterianism has had on Canadian religious heritage and culture, including education, church/state relations, literature and music.
Government Reports on Religious Freedom in Canada
- "International Religious Freedom Report 2007 - Canada". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 2008-01-14.