Hit-and-run tactics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A JGSDF military light truck armed with a heavy machine gun at the rear for anti-personnel harassment operations.
A US Marine Corp. Willys M38A1 on display at the Forney Transportation Museum with a mounted heavy machine gun at the rear.

Hit-and-run tactics is a tactical doctrine where the purpose of the combat involved is not to seize control of territory, but to inflict damage on a target and immediately exit the area to avoid the enemy's defense and/or retaliation. It is meant to have a psychological effect on the enemy's morale.[1] [2]

Hit-and-run tactics are used in guerrilla warfare where militant resistance movements and terrorism where the enemy typically overmatches the attacking force to the point where sustained combat is to be avoided.[3] However, the tactics can also be used as part of more conventional warfare. Examples of the latter include commando or other special forces attacks or sorties from a besieged castle. Hit-and-run tactics were also where the lightly armed and nearly unarmored horse archers typical of the Eurasian steppe peoples excelled. This holds especially true for such troops that were not part of a large army (such as scouting parties), but it was not unusual to see them employed in such a way even as part of a major force.

Historical Use[edit]

The Seljuk victory over the Byzantine Empire at the Battle of Manzikert was preceded by hit-and-run attacks of Seljuk cavalry[4] which threw the Byzantine army into confusion, which proved fatal once it started to retreat. Similarly, the earlier Parthian and Sassanid Persian horse archers paved the way for their cataphracts' attack that achieved the decisive victories at the Battle of Carrhae and Battle of Edessa. The use of hit-and-run tactics dates back even earlier to the nomadic Scythians of Central Asia, who employed them against Darius the Great's Persian Achaemenid Empire and later against Alexander the Great's Macedonian Empire. [5] The Muslim general Baibars also successfully used hit-and-run during the battle of Ain Jalut, the first defeat of the quickly expanding Mongol Empire. In the Turkish War of Independence, Turks fought against the Greek Army by hit-and-run tactics before a regular army was set up.[6]

In the Vietnam War, Viet Cong forces used hit-and-run tactics to great effectiveness against anti-communist military forces.[7] It has also been used in Afghanistan by rebel forces during the Soviet war in Afghanistan.[8] Various Iraqi insurgent groups have also used hit-and-run tactics as part of their tactics against Iraqi security forces and American-led coalition forces in Iraq.[9] Improvised fighting vehicles called "technicals" are often used in such operations.

In Economics[edit]

The term "Hit-and-run" is also used in economics to describe a firm that enters a market to take advantage of abnormal profits and then leave. These tactics can be seen in a contestable market.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ David Brunnstrom (2011-04-12). "NATO expects hit and run tactics by Gaddafi". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-06-15. 
  2. ^ Aweys Cadde (2012-02-09). "Renewed Fighting in Hosingow". Somalia Report. Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-06-15. 
  3. ^ Abdifitah Ibrahim (2011-04-26). "Hit-And-Run Tactics Shows Insurgent Weakness". Somalia Report. Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-06-15. 
  4. ^ Haldon, pp. 565-1204.
  5. ^ Robert Brown Asprey (2008). "guerrilla warfare". "Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved 2008-12-17. 
  6. ^ Belleten, page 1087.
  7. ^ "Guerrilla Wars". Public Broadcasting System. Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-06-15. 
  8. ^ Tony Bridges (2001-11-16). "Better gear and tactics give allied forces an edge". Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-06-15. 
  9. ^ Lieutenant Colonel Tan Giam. "The Evolution of Insurgency and its Impact on Conventional Armed Forces". Singaporean Ministry of Defence. Retrieved 2013-06-15. 

Bibliography[edit]

  • Belleten 65 (244). Türk Tarih Kurumu. 2001. Retrieved 2010-08-18. 
  • Haldon, John (1999). Warfare, State And Society In The Byzantine World 565-1204. New York: Routledge.