Holden v. Hardy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Holden v. Hardy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued October 21, 1897 Decided February 28, 1898 |
||||||
| Full case name | Holden v. Hardy, Sheriff | |||||
| Citations | 169 U.S. 366 (more)
18 S. Ct. 383; 42 L. Ed. 780; 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1501
|
|||||
| Prior history | Writ of habeas corpus denied; Holden remanded to custody of Sheriff Hardy | |||||
| Subsequent history | None | |||||
| Holding | ||||||
| Laws limiting working hours in mines and smelters are a legitimate, constitutional exercise of the state police power, given the inherent danger of such work. | ||||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | Brown, joined by Fuller, Harlan, Gray, Shiras, White, McKenna | |||||
| Dissent | Brewer, Peckham | |||||
| Laws applied | ||||||
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Utah state law | ||||||
Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a Utah state law limiting the number of work hours for miners and smelters as a legitimate exercise of the police power. The majority held that such a law is legitimate, provided that there is indeed a rational basis, supported by facts, for the legislature to believe particular work conditions are dangerous. The court was quick to distinguish this from other cases of the era which imposed universal maximum hour rules, which it held unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
See also[edit]
- Lochner v. New York: Similar case denying limited working hours for bakers
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 169
External links[edit]
Works related to Holden v. Hardy at Wikisource
| This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |