Hollywood accounting (also known as Hollywood bookkeeping) refers to the opaque accounting methods used by the film, video and television industry to budget and record profits for film projects. Expenditures can be inflated to reduce or eliminate the reported profit of the project thereby reducing the amount which the corporation must pay in royalties or other profit-sharing agreements, as these are based on the net profit.
Creative accountants 
"Darling! This is the Industry! The really creative people are the accountants. A big studio got over half the profit, after setting breakeven at about three times the cost, taking twenty-five percent of income as an overhead charge, and taking thirty percent of income as a distribution charge, plus rental fees, and prime interest on what they advanced."
How it works 
||This section needs additional citations for verification. (June 2010)|
Hollywood accounting can take several forms. In one form, a subsidiary is formed to perform a given activity and the parent entity will extract money out of the subsidiary not in terms of profits but in the form of charges for certain "services". The specific schemes can range from the simple and obvious to the extremely complex.
Three main factors in Hollywood accounting reduce the reported profit of a movie, and all have to do with the calculation of overhead:
- Production overhead – Studios, on average, calculate production overhead by using a figure around 15% of total production costs.
- Distribution overhead – Film distributors typically keep 30% of what they receive from movie theaters ("gross rentals").
- Marketing overhead – To determine this number, studios usually choose about 10% of all advertising costs.
All of the above means of calculating overhead are highly controversial, even within the accounting profession. Namely, these percentages are assigned without much regard to how, in reality, these estimates relate to actual overhead costs. In short, this method does not, by any rational standard, attempt to adequately trace overhead costs.
Due to Hollywood accounting, it has been estimated that only about 5% of movies officially show a net profit, and the "losers" include such blockbuster films as Rain Man, Forrest Gump, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, and Batman, which all took in huge amounts in box office and video sales.
Because of this, net points (a percentage of the net income (i.e. gross income minus expenses), as opposed to a percentage of the gross income) are sometimes referred to as "monkey points," a term attributed to Eddie Murphy, who is said to have also stated that only a fool would accept net points in his or her contract.
All of this shows why so many big-name actors insist on "gross points" (a percentage of some definition of gross revenue) rather than net profit participation. This practice reduces the likelihood of a project showing a profit, as a production company will claim a portion of the reported box-office revenue was diverted directly to gross point participants.
Winston Groom's price for the screenplay rights to his novel Forrest Gump included a share of the profits; however, due to Hollywood accounting, the film's commercial success was converted into a net loss, and Groom received nothing. That being so, he has refused to sell the screenplay rights to the novel's sequel, stating that he "cannot in good conscience allow money to be wasted on a failure".
Art Buchwald received a settlement after his lawsuit Buchwald v. Paramount over Paramount's use of Hollywood accounting. The court found Paramount's actions "unconscionable", noting that it was impossible to believe that a movie (1988's Eddie Murphy comedy Coming to America) which grossed US$350 million failed to make a profit, especially since the actual production costs were less than a tenth of that. Paramount settled for an undisclosed sum, rather than have its accounting methods closely scrutinized.
The film My Big Fat Greek Wedding was considered hugely successful for an independent film, yet according to the studio, the film lost money. Accordingly, the cast (with the exception of Nia Vardalos who had a separate deal) sued the studio for their part of the profits. The original producers of the film have sued Gold Circle Films due to Hollywood accounting practices because the studio has claimed the film, which cost less than $6 million dollars to make and made over $350 million at the box office, lost $20 million.
Hollywood accounting is not limited to movies. An example is the Warner Bros. television series Babylon 5 created by J. Michael Straczynski. Straczynski, who wrote 90% of the episodes in addition to producing the show, would receive a generous cut of profits if not for Hollywood accounting. The series, which was profitable in each of its five seasons from 1993–1998, has garnered more than US$1 billion for Warner Bros., most recently US$500 million in DVD sales alone. But in the last profit statement given to Straczynski, Warner Bros. claimed the property was $80 million in debt. "Basically," says Straczynski, "by the terms of my contract, if a set on a WB movie burns down in Botswana, they can charge it against B5's profits."
Peter Jackson, director of The Lord of the Rings, and his studio Wingnut Films, brought a lawsuit against New Line Cinema after "an audit... on part of the income of The Fellowship of the Ring." Jackson stated this is regarding "certain accounting practices," which may be a reference to Hollywood accounting. In response, New Line stated that their rights to a film of The Hobbit were time-limited, and since Jackson would not work with them again until the suit was settled, he would not be asked to direct The Hobbit, as had been anticipated. Fifteen actors are suing New Line Cinema, claiming that they have never received their 5% of revenue from merchandise sold in relation to the movie, which contains their likeness. Similarly, the Tolkien estate sued New Line, claiming that their contract entitled them to 7.5% of the gross receipts of the $6 billion hit. Overall according to New Lines accounts the trilogy made "horrendous losses" and no profit at all.
Actress Lynda Carter was also upset with some of the marketing of her image that involved Hollywood accounting. Warner Bros. worked out a deal with the toy company Mego to create a Wonder Woman doll while the series was still on the air. In 1987, on The Late Show with Joan Rivers, Carter commented: "I think that you're probably familiar with a problem in Hollywood, and that is that they market you, and they use you. They did a mask of my face and put it on the doll, and they put my name on for the first run of it. And then they took my name off and said they didn't have to pay me anymore. So it's the kind of thing that you can be used so much in this industry. I make nothing. I don't even make anything from the reruns. Don't ever settle for net profits. It's called creative accounting."
Production accounting 
Production accounting is a filmmaking term, used especially in Hollywood, referring to the project accounting of the cost of a film project. As with construction accounting, salient issues are the accurate allocation of workers' time to specific projects (usually requiring each worker to fill out a weekly timesheet), and the correct assessment of indirect costs such as employee benefits.
Specialized software to support production accounting has been developed.
See also 
- Charlie Rose interviews David Picker and David Brown about "Hollywood bookkeeping", at CharlieRose.com
- Judge Must Solve Buchwald-Murphy Whodunit Lawsuits: Final arguments in multimillion-dollar complaint against Paramount are over. Both sides accuse the other of stealing idea for $300-million movie. at the L.A. Times, December 29, 1989, by Dennis McDougal
- After 61 films, Connery remains much in demand at the Virginian-Pilot, February 20, 1995, by Mal Vincent, archived at the Baltimore Sun
- Free Fall in Crimson (New York: Fawcett, December 1981), p. 163 of the paperback edition)
- Murphy Movie Made Millions But Stayed in Red, Studio Ledgers Say at the L.A. Times, February 4, 1990, by Dennis McDougal
- Review of Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. Paramount., page 15, footnote 31 from American Business Law Journal, November 1, 1993, by Jordan H. Leibman, archived at AllBusiness.com; "By the way, you called net profit participation points yesterday 'monkey points.' What's the origin of that, do you know?' I asked Eddie [Murphy] as I started to pick up my papers. "Well, it's like 'stupid' points. Stupid to take the points. "Won't be any net profits?' "You sit there with your points going, 'Eeeh, eeh, eeh, eeh, eeh."' (quoting O'Donnell's deposition of Eddie Murphy).
- Forrest Gump Has Yet to Make a Net Profit[dead link]
- BBC NEWS: Lawsuit filed by Spider-Man creator
- Court TV Legal Documents: Garrison v. Warner Bros.[dead link]
- Tom Hanks sues over 'Greek Wedding' profit
- rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated: Additional from jms
- TheOneRing.net: Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh Talk THE HOBBIT
- 15 actors sue New Line Cinema over 'Lord of the Rings' profits
- The Associated Press: Tolkien Estate Sues New Line Cinema, February 12, 2008.
- New Zealand Herald: The Hollywood shell game, December 13, 2010.
- LucasFilm Tells Darth Vader that Return of the Jedi Hasn’t Made a Profit!?, April 5, 2009.
- 'Hollywood Accounting' Losing In The Courts. Tech Dirt.
- [dead link]
- "sundialbill comments on IAM Bill Nye the Science Guy, AMA". Reddit.com. 2012-07-27. Retrieved 2013-01-14.
- Fox Network. Air date: February 9, 1987