Gender inequality in Honduras
|Women in society|
Honduras has experienced economic and social developments since the 1980s. These changes have been positive overall, bringing more gender equality in Honduras and much higher quality of life for everyone, especially for the women of Honduras. Even with the improvements, there is still a long way to go in climbing the ladder and shrinking the gender gap that by the world's standards is gaping. In the 2011 Human Development Report, Honduras placed 121st out of 187 countries.
Many of the inequalities stem from longstanding cultural norms and traditions that have been in place for hundreds of years revolving around the tasks and roles played in the agricultural society of old gender roles in Mesoamerica.
Gender Inequality Index (GII) of Honduras
In 2011, Honduras ranked 105th out of 146 countries on the United Nations Development Program's (UNDP) Gender Inequality Index (GII). This index is a multidimensional index that measures and reports a country's level of gender inequality. This is represented in a single number that any one can see and is invaluable in knowing where countries stand on gender issues. This number is based on the average of statistics represented in three categories: reproductive health, empowerment, and economic activity. These statistics can give a general idea of how a country fares on gender issues relative to all 146 countries in the study but also against other countries from the same region. The overall comparison between the HDI and the gender inequality index would suggest that Honduras is performing better and progressing faster on gender issues than on general welfare. These changes have come as a result of social and even political shifts in opinion on the role of women in society. Since the 1980s the overall value (on the HDI) of Honduras has averaged an increase of 1.6% annually, which is an impressive improvement that has brought them over a 30% positive increase on their HDI ranking.
Reproductive health is usually gauged in terms of the maternal mortality rate, which is the number of mothers per 100,000 who die from pregnancy related causes. In 2011, Honduras had a rate of 110 deaths per 100,000 live births. Many of these deaths come as a result of unregulated and illegally performed abortions which leave the women at great risk for infection. Another indicator is the adolescent fertility rate, which is the number of live births per 1,000 adolescent mothers (ages 13–18). For every 1,000 births in Honduras 93.3 or almost 10 percent were to adolescent mothers. This high number of young mother is a negative indicator not only for the women who are having children at such a young age, but also for the community as a whole. Women who have children as adolescents put their children in a situation where they are much more likely to be raised in poverty due to the fact that the secondary education dropout rate is significantly higher among adolescents that have children . The GII also shows that as of 2011 only 65 percent of women aged 15–49 are using any form of contraception and only 67% of women have a skilled professional present for the birth of their child. This low level of contraception use has not equated to a high prevalence of HIV AIDS. Only 0.2 percent of women and 0.3 percent of men are infected. Having less women than men infected with AIDS is usually a trend found in more developed countries. The bad news on that front is that according to Sister Namibia "the sale of young girls and women into prostitution slavery plays a major role in the transmission of AIDS among heterosexual couples.", this practice is leading to an increase of cases of AIDS. The final contributing factor to reproductive health is the birth rate, which is three, meaning that on average every woman will have three children. This number can be multiplied by the prevalence of pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 to find the overall odds that any given woman will die from pregnancy complications.(MMR)
The UNDP's GII includes two measures as indicators of empowerment. These indicators are the percentage of parliament seats held by women compared to men and the percentage of women with a least secondary education compared to men. In 2011, women in Honduras made up 18 percent of the parliament, which is very low when compared to other countries with similar overall GII rankings. The educational attainment is much closer to even. 31.9 percent of women and 36.3 percent of men have received at least secondary education. This may not look like a big difference, but when you look at the statistics worldwide, it looks quite a bit worse. In the more developed parts of the world, women are significantly more likely to receive a secondary education. In the United States, for example, in 2013 57% of college students were women compared to 43% of men. Greater disparity comes when you look at the transition from education to the workplace. Perhaps the most telling statistic on empowerment, the question "who is the decision maker" was posed to families in Honduras and an amazing 91.3 percent of those people answered the man was the primary decision maker vs. 8.7% female.
This response suggests that the root of the gender problem in Honduras is the idea of patriarchy being the only way to operate and that women should always be the followers and caregivers, but not the decision makers.This insight into the culture of Honduras may be the key to development. Countries cannot simply stop in there tracks and change the way they are. It is only through the merging of old an new in the most seamless way that true and lasting change can be achieved.
A common form of empowerment is through political channels. Women in Honduras find themselves almost entirely cut out of the political system. The constant fight for survival has kept most women out of organized labor parties where their grievances could potentially be heard. The facts are, if you want your plight to be recognized you typically need an organized movement to make the government listen. Honduran mothers who spend countless hours providing unpaid labor while also playing the role of the primary breadwinner, have no time to bring their case to the political stage.
Economic activity in the GII is based on only one statistic: the proportion of females compared to males in the labor force. As of 2009, that rate was reported as being 40.1% of women and 80.2% of men, or exactly twice as many men. In the 2008 Global Gender Gap Index, Honduras was ranked 21st out of 74 countries on their general index value. Pulled from the same data but for the economic participation and opportunity sub-index they were ranked 47th,
That is a change of 26 spots when talking about general well being vs economic inclusion. This is yet another indicator that Gender inequality is lower in economic indicators. On issues of women health, Honduras did better than other countries close to it on the index, but the economic opportunities and participation leave a lot of room for improvement economically. There has been a recent wave of immigration consisting mostly of young women moving from the rural into urban areas in order to find work. This has led to urban centers in Honduras being made up of over 53% women. according to Sister Namibia this has resulted in "Rapid urban growth in recent years has spawned various social problems, including unemployment, lack of adequate housing and basic services, all of which affect women most severely."
Labor force participation
Men are twice as likely to be employed in Honduras as women and there are very strong stereotypes of what men's jobs look like and what a women's jobs look like. Much of this comes from the Mesoamerican ideas of gender. Gender role stereotypes are reinforced from a young age. The young boys are given machetes and the girls are given the meteate (the instrument women use to grind corn into meal).
Rural women carry out very important roles in agricultural life, but are prohibited from stepping out of those boundaries. For example, women cook, clean, plant crops and even tend animals; but only men are allowed to plow the fields. These roles from ancient culture are still evident even today, women are seen as limited on what they can and can't accomplish. The idea of male and female jobs also carries over into the field of unpaid labor, women perform a great deal more unpaid labor than the men.
Although women have seen an increase in labor force participation in the past few decades that is not necessarily an indication of equality in the labor force. This slow transition for women from unpaid to paid labor is a step in the right direction toward equality, but there is still much to be done in the battle for equal pay equal jobs and equal treatment. Women, in addition to having to work twice as hard in order to get a traditionally male job, once they get a job, they are paid less than their male counterparts for doing exactly the same job. Women are seen as a second choice for a breadwinner in the home, they are preferred to stay home and work as homemakers and become dependent on their dominant husbands. This gender role is carried into the workplace, making women secondary priority as employees.
Although women are seen as a second choice for a breadwinner, it is becoming more and more common for women to be the main, and in many cases the sole bread winner. Yoked with this burden of providing for a family while living in a country where your labor is not sought after can be extremely difficult. This circumstance has forced many women to be innovate and flexible when it comes to providing for their families.
Many resort to operating food carts or peddling cheap merchandise on street corners. While it is a way to feed your family, it is also detrimental to the cause for women and plays a part in widening the gender gap ever further. Overall the average women is going to make considerably less than her male counterpart and is usually forced into industries with little to no benefits and almost no job security.
Distribution of wealth by gender
Much can be said about the power any one group has in its respective society, based solely on what share of the wealth that group has. Women in Honduras have a very small share of the overall wealth, and even the parts that they have seem to reinforce their roles as homemakers and caretakers. This is a table showing the ration of ownership.
Home-ownership: Women- 38% Men- 59% joint- %3 Land-ownership: Women- 12.8% Men- 87.2% Cattle: Women- 13% Men- 72% Joint- 15% Work animals- Women- 10% Men- 85% Joint- 5%.
Women have a slight edge in ownership over chickens and pigs, but the real place where women really have the ownership is in consumer durables. They tend to own more sewing machines, blenders, irons, stoves, toasters and fridges, whereas men tend to own the computers, bikes, motorcycles and cars. The assets that are predominantly owned by the women are of relatively small value compared to the high value items that are owned almost exclusively by the men.
The underlying message given here is that women own the chickens and the pigs, because they can then prepare them into a meal. They also own the items necessary to sew, blend, iron, cook, bake, and prepare and serve food. They do not, however, have the assets necessary to gain physical mobility through the means of owning a car or bicycle, check email or to fully cultivate a field.
Educational attainment of women in Honduras
The statistics from the Gender Inequality index on secondary education rates of men and women are fairly similar, with 31.9% of women and 36.3% of men receiving at least a secondary education. The reason for this difference in numbers is the patriarchal nature of Honduras. If the times get tough and only one child is going to be educated any female children will lose their chance at education before the boys. This is due to the fact that it is much harder for a female to find work regardless of educational achievement. That is not to say that women can't find jobs, it is just difficult to find jobs that pay well, these sought after jobs are know to be the jobs that are commonly associated with masculinity in Honduras include, heavy manual labor, technical jobs and anything that requires extensive training or an advanced degree. It is clear that women can find some sort of work since the main reason that they are pulled out of school in the first place is to help provide additional income for the family, which leads to the difference in educational attainment. Womensstats.org places Honduras in the class of 11%-15% difference between male and female secondary education levels, or some legal or cultural educational restrictions for females.
These barriers of entry into education are almost exclusively societal, with families giving educational preference to the children that they think will not only find work, but find the highest paying work available. Honduras does have a fairly high literacy rate of 81% and within that there are even more women than men who are literate 42% of women and 39% of men. As a matter of fact more girls than boys enroll in primary school. But starting at secondary school the number of women starts to diminish becomes worse and worse up until the university level. Even when women do attain a college degree it is typically in nursing or teaching. The social emphasis is placed much more heavily on men to receive education.
Domestic Violence Act in Honduras
The Domestic Violence Act took effect after a long struggle by women's rights activists to get it passed. This act was focused on dealing with violence in the home, an issue which for the most part was overlooked by local authorities. The Act needed not only to get police to crack down, but also the judicial system and social systems needed to be adjusted to deal with the repercussions. In 1998, the bill was passed and the authorities were charged with the difficult task of dealing with such a widespread and controversial issue. In order to deal with new court cases, special domestic violence judges were assigned in order to handle the new case load and to deal with the new issue. The bill was inspired by the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) as well as other international organizations in support of women's rights and had a main goal of reducing violence towards women in Honduras. There was also a network of therapists, charged with providing family counselling to those that were effected by the bill. Men who were sanctioned by the bill were also monitored to reduce the chances of future violence. The bill started off only being enforced around the capital and other major cities, but quickly spread throughout all of Honduras. This was a major step in reducing the commonplace and acceptability of gender violence in Honduras.
- UNDP. Human Development Report 2011: Sustainability and Equality. 2011. Technical Report.
- Glimpse the reality of Honduran women. (1992). Sister Namibia, 4(1), 15-15. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/194834862?accountid=14677
- Deere, Carmen Diana, Gina E. Alvarado, and Jennifer Twyman. Poverty, Hardship, and Gender Inequality in Asset Ownership in Latin America. Center for Gender in Global Context, Michigan State University, 2010.
- Herrmannsdorfer, Claudia. "Case Study: The Inter-Institutional Commission to Follow-up Implementation of the Domestic Violence Act in Honduras." A PARLIAMENTARY RESPONSE TO VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN (2009): 97.
- Ruben, Ruerd. "Nonfarm employment and poverty alleviation of rural farm households in Honduras." World Development 29, no. 3 (2001): 549-560.
- Unterhalter, Elaine. "Fragmented frameworks? Researching women, gender, education and development." Beyond Access (2005): 15.
- Von Grebmer, Klaus, Bella Nestorova, Agnes Quisumbing, Rebecca Fertziger, Heidi Fritschel, Rajul Pandya-Lorch, and Yisehac Yohannes. 2009 Global Hunger Index The Challenge of Hunger: Focus on Financial Crisis and Gender Inequality. Vol. 62. Intl Food Policy Res Inst, 2009.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Women of Honduras.|
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to People of Honduras.|