Hot Coffee (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hot Coffee
Hotcoffeemovieposter.jpg
Directed by Susan Saladoff
Produced by Susan Saladoff
Carly Hugo
Alan Oxman;
co-producer: Rebecca Saladoff
Music by Michael Mollura
Joel Goodman
Cinematography Martina Radwan
Edited by Cindy Lee
Distributed by HBO
Release dates
  • June 27, 2011 (2011-06-27)
Running time
86 minutes
Country United States
Language English

Hot Coffee is a 2011 documentary film that analyzes and discusses the impact of tort reform on the United States judicial system. It is directed by Susan Saladoff, who has practiced as a medical malpractice attorney for at least 26 years. The film premiered at the 2011 Sundance Film Festival on January 24, 2011, and later aired on HBO on June 27, 2011, as a part of HBO films documentary summer series. The title is derived from the Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants lawsuit in which the plaintiff Liebeck was severely burned after spilling hot coffee purchased from a McDonald's into her lap.[1][2]

Cases discussed[edit]

Hot Coffee discusses several cases and relates each to tort reform in the United States:

  1. Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants and public relations campaigns (i.e., how the case was publicized to instigate tort reform)
  2. Colin Gourley's malpractice lawsuit and caps on damages
  3. Prosecution of Mississippi Justice Oliver Diaz and judicial elections (i.e., how judges were elected for their positive stance on tort reform, reflecting election campaign contributions)
  4. Jamie Leigh Jones v. Halliburton Co. doing business as KBR and mandatory arbitration

Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants[edit]

This segment features interviews with Liebeck's family and focuses on their perspective of the trial. This included news clips, comments from celebrities and politicians about the case, as well as myths and misconceptions, including how many people thought she was driving when the incident occurred and thought that she suffered only minor superficial burns, while in truth she suffered severe burns and needed extensive surgeries. The concept of accountability is also discussed. The film also discussed in great depth how Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants is often used and misused to describe a frivolous lawsuit and referenced in conjunction with tort reform efforts.[2] It argued that corporations have spent millions distorting certain tort cases in order to promote tort reform.[3]

Jamie Leigh Jones v. Halliburton Co.[edit]

Al Franken features prominently in this segment, as he worked closely with Jones to get her case heard in court after she entered into a mandatory arbitration agreement. Subsequent to the film's release, Jones succeeded in trying her civil case before a federal court in Houston. However, she was unsuccessful in convincing a jury that she had been raped or that KBR had engaged in fraud when inducing her to sign her employment contract after a long list of inconsistencies and contradictions were exposed in her story during the trial.[4]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Tucker, Ken (June 27, 2011). "The must-watch TV show of the night: 'Hot Coffee' on HBO". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 28 June 2011. 
  2. ^ a b Doroshow, Joanne (June 26, 2011). "Watch Hot Coffee, a Powerful New Film on HBO June 27". Huffington Post. Retrieved 28 June 2011. 
  3. ^ Schmerler, Jessica (December 5, 2011). "Frivolous Lawsuits and How We Perceive Them". Yale Journal of Medicine and Law VIII (1). Retrieved 5 June 2013. 
  4. ^ Mencimer, Stephanie (July 7, 2011). "Why Jamie Leigh Jones Lost Her KBR Rape Case". Retrieved 12 July 2013. 

External links[edit]