|Founded||April 14, 1944|
|Headquarters||Hydro-Québec Building, Montreal, Quebec, Canada|
President & CEO
|Products||Electricity generation, transmission and distribution|
|Revenue||C$12.23 billion (2012)
|C$5.18 billion (2012)
|C$0.86 billion (2012)
67% from 2011
|Total assets||C$70.52 billion (2012)|
|Total equity||C$18.98 billion (2012)|
|Owner||Government of Quebec|
Number of employees
Hydro-Québec is a government-owned public utility established in 1944 by the Government of Quebec. Based in Montreal, the company oversees generation, transmission and distribution of electricity for all of Quebec.
Relying almost exclusively on its sixty hydroelectric generating stations, Hydro-Québec is the largest electricity generator in Canada and the world's largest hydroelectric producer. As of 2011, the combined capacity of its power stations was 35,829 megawatt (MW) and its distribution network served 4.11 million customers.
The development of several large-scale hydroelectric projects which took place non-stop from the late 1940s to the mid-1990s — the Bersimis, Carillon, Manic-Outardes, Churchill Falls and the two phases of the James Bay Project — allowed Quebec to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels. In 2009, primary electricity accounted for 40.05% of all energy used in the province. However, the construction and operation of these projects has led to conflicts with aboriginal populations living in Quebec's North.
Hydro-Québec has played a "nearly mythical role" in Quebec's economic development since its establishment, with its sustained capital investments, by fostering local engineering expertise and by its capacity to generate large quantities of renewable electricity at low prices.
The increasing demand for competitively priced renewable electricity fostered by the fight against climate change had a positive impact on Hydro-Québec's balance sheet in the last decade. Between 2008 and 2012, the company paid C$8.9 billion in dividends to its sole shareholder, the Government of Québec,  while keeping Quebec retail power rates among the lowest in North America.
- 1 History
- 1.1 The two-step takeover
- 1.2 The 1960s and 1970s
- 1.3 The 1980s and 1990s
- 1.4 The 2000s
- 2 Corporate structure and financial results
- 3 Activities
- 4 Environment
- 5 Rates and customers
- 6 See also
- 7 Footnotes
- 8 Notes
- 9 References
- 10 External links
In the years after the Great Depression, voices were raised in Quebec asking for a government takeover in the electricity business. Many of the criticisms leveled at the so-called "electricity trust" focused on high rates and excessive profits. Inspired by the example of Adam Beck, who had nationalized much of the electric sector in Ontario 30 years earlier and by the creation of the Tennessee Valley Authority by the Roosevelt administration in the United States, local politicians, such as Philippe Hamel and Télesphore-Damien Bouchard, strongly advocated moving Quebec towards a similar system.
Soon after being elected Premier of Quebec in 1939, Adélard Godbout warmed to the concept of a state-owned utility. Godbout was outraged by the inefficient power system dominated by Anglo-Canadian economic interests and the collusion between the Montreal Light, Heat & Power (MLH&P) and the Shawinigan Water & Power Company, the two main companies involved. At one point, he even called the duopoly an "economic dictatorship, crooked and vicious".
The two-step takeover
Montreal and the North Shore
In the fall of 1943, the Godbout government tabled a bill to take control of MLH&P, the company running the gas and electric distribution in and around Montreal, Quebec's largest city. On April 14, 1944, the Quebec Legislative Assembly passed Bill 17, creating a publicly owned commercial venture, the Quebec Hydroelectric Commission, commonly referred to as Hydro-Québec. The act granted the new Crown corporation an electric and gas distribution monopoly in the Montreal area and mandated Hydro-Québec to serve its customers "at the lowest rates consistent with a sound financial management", to restore the substandard electric grid and to speed up rural electrification in areas with no or limited electric service.
MLH&P was taken over the next day, April 15, 1944. The new management quickly realized that it would need to rapidly increase the company's 600-MW generation capacity in the next few years in order to meet growing demand. By 1948, Hydro-Québec added a fourteenth unit and undertook the construction of the first of two upgrades at the Beauharnois generating station. It then set its eyes on the Bersimis river, near Forestville, on the North Shore of the Saint Lawrence River. Located 700 kilometres (430 mi) east of Montreal, the Bersimis-1 and Bersimis-2 generating stations were built between 1953 and 1959 and were widely considered to be a bench trial for the fledgling company. They also offered a preview of the large developments that occurred over the next three decades in Northern Quebec.
Other construction projects started in the Maurice Duplessis era included a second upgrade of the Beauharnois project and the construction of the Carillon generating station on the Ottawa River. Between 1944 and 1962, Hydro-Québec's installed capacity increased sixfold, from 616 to 3,661 MW while lowering residential power rates by half in the Montreal area.
The onset of the Quiet Revolution in 1960 did not stop the construction of new dams. On the contrary, it brought a new momentum to the company's development under the tutelage of a young and energetic Hydraulic Resources minister. René Lévesque, a 38-year-old former television reporter and a bona fide star of the new Lesage government, was appointed to the Hydro-Québec portfolio as part of the Liberal Premier's "Dream Team" (French: "équipe du tonnerre"). Lévesque quickly approved continuation of the ongoing construction work and put together a team to nationalize the 11 remaining private companies that still controlled a substantial share of the electricity generation and distribution business in Quebec.
On February 12, 1962, Lévesque started his public campaign for nationalization. In a speech to the Quebec Electric Industry Association he bluntly called the whole electric business an "unbelievably costly mess". The minister then toured the province in order to reassure the population and refute the arguments of the Shawinigan Water & Power Company, the main opponent of the proposed takeover. On September 4 and 5, 1962, Lévesque finally convinced his liberal cabinet colleagues to go ahead with the plan during a working retreat at a fishing camp north of Quebec City. The issue topped the liberal agenda during a snap election called two years early, and their chosen theme, "Maîtres chez nous" (in English: "Masters of our domain"), had a strong nationalist undertone.
The Lesage government was re-elected on November 14, 1962 and Lévesque went ahead with the plan. On Friday, December 28, 1962 at 6 pm, Hydro-Québec launched an hostile takeover, offering to buy all of the stock in 11 companies at a set price, slightly above market value. After hedging their bets for a few weeks, management of the firms advised their shareholders to accept the C$604 million government offer. In addition to buying the 11 companies, most electric co-operatives and municipally owned utilities were also taken over and merged with the existing Hydro-Québec operations, which became the largest electric company in Quebec on May 1, 1963.
The 1960s and 1970s
Following the 1963 takeover, Hydro-Québec had to deal with three problems simultaneously. It first had to reorganize in order to seamlessly merge the new subsidiaries into the existing structure, while standardizing dozens of networks in various state of disrepair and upgrading large parts of the Abitibi system from 25 to 60 hertz. All of this had to be done while the construction of a massive hydroelectric complex was underway on the North Shore.
The current company logo of Hydro-Québec was designed by Montreal-based design agency Gagnon/Valkus, Inc. in 1960.
By 1959, thousands of workers were building the Manic-Outardes project, a 7-dam hydroelectric complex, including the 1,314-metre (4,311 ft) wide Daniel-Johnson Dam, the largest of its kind in the world. Construction on the Manicouagan and Outardes rivers was completed in 1978 with the inauguration of the Outardes-2 generating station.
These large projects raised a new problem that occupied company engineers for a few years: the transmission of the large amounts of power produced by generating stations located 700 kilometres away from the urban centers in southern Quebec in an economical fashion. A young engineer named Jean-Jacques Archambault drafted a plan to build 735 kV power lines, a much higher voltage than what was used at the time. Archambault persisted and managed to convince his colleagues and major equipment suppliers of the viability of his plan. The first 735 kV power line was put into commercial service on November 29, 1965.
When it bought the Shawinigan Water & Power Company and some of its subsidiaries in 1963, Hydro-Québec acquired a 20% share of a planned hydroelectric facility at Hamilton Falls[note 1] in Labrador, a project led by a consortium of banks and industrialists, the British Newfoundland Corporation Limited (Brinco). After years of hard bargaining, the parties reached a deal on May 12, 1969, to finance the construction of the power plant.
The agreement committed Hydro-Québec to buy most of the plant's output on a take-or-pay basis at one-quarter of a cent per kWh — the exact rate is 0.25425 cents per kWh until 2016 and 0.20 cents for the last 25 years of the contract —, and to enter into a risk-sharing agreement. Hydro-Québec would cover part of the interest risk and buy some of Brinco's debt, in exchange for a 34.2% share in the company owning the plant, the Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited. The 5,428-MW Churchill Falls generating station delivered its first kilowatts on December 6, 1971. Its 11 turbines were fully operational by June 1974.
In Newfoundland, Joey Smallwood's liberals were replaced in 1972 by a conservative administration led by Frank Moores. Unhappy with the terms of the agreement in the aftermath of the 1973 oil crisis, the Newfoundland government bought all of the shares in the Churchill Falls company that were not held by Hydro-Québec for C$160 million in June 1974.
Newfoundland then asked to reopen the contract, a demand refused by Hydro-Québec. After a protracted legal battle between the two neighboring provinces, the contract's validity was twice affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada, in 1984 and 1988.
James Bay Project
Almost a year to the day after his April 1970 election, Quebec Premier Robert Bourassa launched a project which he hoped would help him fulfill a campaign promise to create 100,000 new jobs. On April 30, 1971, in front of a gathering of loyal liberal supporters, he announced plans for the construction of a 10,000-MW hydroelectric complex in the James Bay area. After assessing three possible options, Hydro-Québec and the government chose to build three new dams on La Grande River, named LG-2, LG-3 and LG-4.
On top of the technical and logistical challenges posed by a public works project of this scope in a harsh and remote setting, the man in charge, Société d'énergie de la Baie James president Robert A. Boyd, had to face the opposition of the 5,000 native Cree residents living in the area, who had grave concerns about the project's impact on their traditional lifestyle. In November 1973, the Crees got an injunction that temporarily stopped the construction of the basic infrastructure needed to build the dams, forcing the Bourassa government to negotiate with them.
After two years of difficult negotiations, the Quebec and Canadian governments, Hydro-Québec, the Société d'énergie de la Baie James and the Grand Council of the Crees signed the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement on November 11, 1975. The agreement granted the Crees financial compensation and the management of health and education services in their communities in exchange for the continuation of the project.
Between 14,000 and 18,000 tradesmen were employed on various James Bay construction sites in the period stretching from 1977 to 1981. Inaugurated on October 27, 1979, the LG-2 generating station, an underground powerhouse with a peak capacity of 5,616 MW is the most powerful of its kind in the world. The station, the dam and the associated reservoir were renamed in honor of Premier Bourassa two weeks after his death in October 1996. The construction of the first phase of the project was completed with the commissioning of LG-3 in 1982 and of LG-4 on May 27, 1984. A second phase of the project was built between 1987 and 1996, adding five more power plants — the LG-1 (1,436 MW), LG-2-A (2,106 MW), Laforge-1 (878 MW), Laforge-2 (319 MW) and Brisay (469 MW) generating stations — to the complex.
The 1980s and 1990s
After two consecutive decades of sustained growth, the late 1980s and the 1990s were much more difficult for Hydro-Québec. With the new James Bay capacity coming on stream at a time of slower growth, the company had to move from a "builder" to a "seller" of electricity. In the early 1980s, a new management team led by Guy Coulombe was brought in to implement a tough restructuring and rationalizing agenda, lowering morale and raising tensions in the ranks.
Things were not much better on the environmental front. A new hydroelectric development and the construction of a direct current high voltage line built to export power to New England faced strong opposition from the Crees as well as environmental groups from the United States and Canada. In order to export power from the James Bay Project to New England, Hydro-Québec planned the construction of a 1,200-kilometre (750 mi) long direct current power line, with a capacity of 2,000 MW, the so-called "Réseau multiterminal à courant continu" (English: Direct Current Multiterminal Network). Construction work on the line went without a problem with the exception of where the power line had to cross the Saint Lawrence River, between Grondines and Lotbinière.
Facing strong opposition from local residents to other options, Hydro-Québec built a 4 km (2.5 mi) tunnel under the river, at a cost of C$144 million, which delayed the project completion by two and a half years. The line was finally commissioned on October 15, 1992.
Great Whale Project
Hydro-Québec and the Bourassa government had a much harder time circumventing the next hurdle in northern Quebec. Robert Bourassa was re-elected in late 1985 after a 9-year hiatus. Shortly after taking office he announced yet another hydro development in the James Bay area. The C$12.6 billion Great Whale Project involved the construction of three new generating stations with a combined capacity of 3,160 MW. It was to produce 16.3 TWh of energy each year by the time it was completed in 1998–1999.
The plan immediately proved controversial. As they had in 1973, the Cree people opposed the project and filed lawsuits against Hydro-Québec in Quebec and Canada to prevent its construction, and also took action in many U.S. states to prevent sales of the electricity there.
Two months after the 1994 general election, the new Premier, Jacques Parizeau, announced the suspension of the Great Whale Project, declaring it unnecessary in order to meet Quebec's energy needs.
Fire and ice
During the same period, Hydro-Québec had to deal with three major disruptions to its electric transmission system that were primarily caused by natural disasters. The incidents highlighted a major weakness of Hydro's system: the great distances between the generation facilities and the main markets of southern Quebec.
On April 18, 1988 at 2:05 am, all of Quebec and parts of New England and New Brunswick lost power because of an equipment failure at a critical substation on the North Shore, between Churchill Falls and the Manicouagan area. The blackout, which lasted for up to 8 hours in some areas, was caused by ice deposits on transformation equipment at the Arnaud substation.
Less than a year later, on March 13, 1989 at 2:44 am, a large geomagnetic storm caused variations in the earth's magnetic field, tripping circuit breakers on the transmission network. The James Bay network went offline in less than 90 seconds, giving Quebec its second blackout in 11 months. The power failure lasted 9 hours, and forced Hydro-Québec to implement a program to reduce the risks associated with geomagnetically induced currents.
1998 ice storm
In January 1998, five consecutive days of heavy freezing rain caused the largest power failure in Hydro-Québec's history. The weight of the ice collapsed 600 kilometres (370 mi) of high voltage power lines and over 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi) of medium and low voltage distribution lines in southern Quebec. Up to 1.4 million Hydro-Québec customers were forced to live without power for up to five weeks.
While Montreal was plunged in darkness, the Hydro-Quebec symbol was still lit up. Part of the Montérégie region, south of Montreal, was the worst hit area and became known as the Triangle of Darkness (French: Triangle noir) by the media and the local population. Ice accumulation exceeded 100 mm (4 in) in some locations. Customers on the Island of Montreal and in the Outaouais region were also hit by the power outage, causing significant concerns since many Quebec households use electricity for heating. Hydro-Québec immediately mobilized more than 10,000 workers to rebuild a significant portion of the southern Quebec grid. At the height of the crisis, on January 9, 1998, the island of Montreal was fed by a single power line. The situation was so dire the Quebec government temporarily resorted to rolling blackouts in downtown Montreal in order to maintain the city's drinking water supply.
Electric service was fully restored on February 7, 1998. The storm cost Hydro-Québec C$725 million in 1998 and over C$1 billion was invested in the following decade to strengthen the power grid against similar events. However, part of the operation needed to close the 735 kV loop around Montreal that was approved at the height of the crisis without a prior environmental impact assessment quickly ran into opposition. Eastern Townships residents went to court to quash the order in council authorizing the power line. Construction work resumed after the National Assembly passed a law retroactively approving the work done in the immediate aftermath of the ice storm, but it also required public hearings on the remaining projects. Construction of the Hertel-Des Cantons high voltage line was properly approved in July 2002 and commissioned a year later.
The moratorium on new hydro projects in northern Quebec after the Great Whale cancellation forced the company's management to develop new sources of electricity to meet increasing demand. In September 2001, Hydro-Québec announced its intention to build a new combined cycle gas turbine plant — the Centrale du Suroît plant — in Beauharnois, southwest of Montreal, stressing the pressing need to secure additional electricity supply to mitigate the effects of any shortfall in the water cycle of its reservoirs. Hydro's rationale also stressed the cost-effectiveness of the plant and the fact that it could be built within a two-year period.
The announcement came at a bad time since attention was drawn to the ratification by Canada of the Kyoto Protocol. With estimated emissions levels of 2.25 Mt of carbon dioxide per year, the Suroît plant would have increased the provincial CO2 emissions by nearly 3%. Faced with a public uproar—a poll conducted in January 2004 found that ca. 65% Quebecers were opposed to it—the Jean Charest government abandoned the project in November 2004.
New hydroelectric developments
After a pause in the 1990s, Hydro-Québec restarted its construction activities in the early 2000s. Recent projects include the Sainte-Marguerite-3 (SM-3) station in 2004 (884 MW); Toulnustouc in 2005 (526 MW); Eastmain-1 in 2007 (480 MW); Peribonka (385 MW) and Mercier in 2008 (50.5 MW), Rapides-des-Cœurs (76 MW) and Chute-Allard (62 MW) in 2009.
On February 7, 2002, Premier Bernard Landry and Ted Moses, the head of the Grand Council of the Crees, signed an agreement allowing the construction of new hydroelectric projects in northern Quebec. The Paix des Braves agreement clarified some provisions of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, granted a C$4.5 billion compensation to the Cree Nation to be paid over a 50-year period, established a special wildlife and forestry regime, and gave assurances that Cree businesses and workers would get a share of the economic spin offs of future construction projects in the area.
In return, the Cree nation agreed not to challenge new construction projects in the area, such as the Eastmain-1 generating station—authorized by the government in March 1993—and the partial diversion of the Rupert River to the Robert-Bourassa Reservoir, subject to a number of provisions regarding the protection of the natural and social environment.
Construction on the first 480-MW plant started in the spring of 2002 with a road linking the project site to the Nemiscau substation 80 kilometres (50 mi) away. In addition to the plant, built on the left bank of the Eastmain River, the project required the construction of a 890-metre (2,920 ft) wide and 70-metre (230 ft) tall dam, 33 smaller dams and a spillway. The three generating units of Eastmain-1 entered into service in the spring of 2007. The plant has an annual output of 2.7 TWh. Two new plants, Eastmain-1-A (768 MW) and Sarcelle (125 MW), and the partial diversion of the Rupert River to the Robert-Bourassa Reservoir, were built between 2007 and 2011 and should be completed in 2012.
These projects are part of Quebec's 2006–2015 energy strategy. The document calls for the development of 4,500 MW of new hydroelectric generation, including the development of the 1,550 MW Romaine River complex, under construction since May 2009, the integration 4,000 MW of wind power, increased electricity exports and the implementation of new energy efficiency programs.
2004 hydro tower bombing
In 2004, shortly before U.S. President George W. Bush's visit to Canada, a tower along the Quebec – New England Transmission circuit in the Eastern Townships near the Canada-U.S. border was damaged by explosive charges detonated at its base. The CBC reported that a message, purportedly from the Résistance internationaliste and issued to the La Presse and Le Journal de Montréal newspapers and the CKAC radio station, stated that the attack had been carried out to "denounce the 'pillaging' of Quebec's resources by the United States."
Failed expansion in the Maritime provinces
On October 29, 2009, the premiers of New Brunswick, Shawn Graham, and Quebec, Jean Charest, signed a controversial memorandum of understanding to transfer most assets of NB Power to Hydro-Québec. The C$4.75 billion agreement would have transferred most generation, transmission and distribution assets of the New Brunswick Crown corporation to a subsidiary of the Quebec utility. The deal also included provisions to reduce industrial power rates to the levels offered by Hydro-Québec for similar customers and a 5-year rate freeze on residential and commercial rates.
The deal proved hugely unpopular in New Brunswick and the two provinces revised the scope of the sale to the hydroelectric and nuclear power plants. Under the second agreement, transmission and distribution assets would have been kept under New Brunswick control and a long-term power purchase agreement with Hydro-Québec would have allowed NB Power to freeze residential and general customers rates for 5 years. However, the industrial rates rollback would have been smaller than under the original MOU. The second deal failed to quell the growing opposition to the plan and on March 24, 2010, Premier Graham announced the deal had fallen through, due to Hydro-Québec's concern over unanticipated risks and costs of some aspects such as dam security and water levels.
Shutdown of the Gentilly-2 Nuclear Power Plant
In August 2008, the company announced its intent to refurbish the Gentilly-2 Nuclear Generating Station, Quebec's sole nuclear generation unit. Originally priced at $1.9 billion, the midlife refit was supposed to extend the CANDU-6 plant life until 2040 and increase its capacity to 700 MW. However, significant delays and cost overruns at the similar Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station in New Brunswick forced the company to reassess the project's schedule and budget.
At the same time, the market price of electricity in the northeastern United States declined steeply due to the major development of shale gas production in the United States. Early in 2012, the company informed the government that the refurbishment was no longer "one that could be financially justified by Hydro-Québec", but was asked to keep the project alive by the outgoing government of Jean Charest. A few weeks after the election of Pauline Marois as premier of Quebec on September 4, 2012, Hydro-Québec cancelled the refurbishment and announced the permanent shutdown of the plant on 28 December 2012. The company estimated that it would have lost $215 million a year by going ahead with the refit. The decommissioning process will proceed over a period of 50 years and is expected to cost $1.8 billion.
Corporate structure and financial results
Like its counterparts in the North American utility industry, Hydro-Québec was reorganized in the late 1990s to comply with electricity deregulation in the United States. While still a vertically integrated company, Hydro-Québec has created separate business units dealing with the generation, transmission and distribution aspects of the business.
The transmission division, TransÉnergie, was the first to be spun off in 1997, in response to the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's publication of Order 888. The restructuring was completed in the year 2000 with the adoption of Bill 116, which amended the Act respecting the Régie de l'énergie, to enact the functional separation of Hydro-Québec's various business units.
This functional separation and the creation of a so-called "heritage pool" (French: volume patrimonial) of electricity echoed a recommendation of a Merrill Lynch study commissioned by the Lucien Bouchard government. The January 2000 report was aimed at finding a way to deregulate the electricity market in a way that was consistent with continental trends while maintaining the "Quebec social pact"; namely low, uniform and stable rates across the province, "particularly in the residential sector".
Legislation passed in 2000 commits the generation division, Hydro-Québec Production, to provide the distribution division, Hydro-Québec Distribution, a yearly heritage pool of up to 165 TWh of energy plus ancillary services—including an extra 13.9 TWh for losses and a guaranteed peak capacity of 34,342 MW—at a set price of 2.79¢ per kWh. Order in council 1277-2001 specifies quantities to be delivered for each of the 8,760 hourly intervals, which vary from 11,420 to 34,342 MW.
Hydro-Québec Distribution has to buy the remainder of the power and energy it needs—approximately 8.2 TWh in 2007 — by calling for tenders for long-term contracts open to all suppliers, including Hydro-Québec Production, or targeted towards suppliers of a particular energy source, like wind, gas power, biomass or small hydro. For instance, Hydro-Québec Distribution launched calls for tenders in 2003 and 2005, for 1,000 and 2,000 MW of wind power respectively. Early deliveries started in 2006 and the 23 wind farms under contract should be completely on-line by December 2015.
The TransÉnergie and distribution divisions remain regulated by the Régie de l'énergie du Québec (Quebec Energy Board), an administrative tribunal established to set retail rates for electricity and natural gas for residential, commercial and industrial service in the province based on a cost-of-service approach. The Régie also has extended powers, including approval authority over every transmission and distribution-related capital expenditure project exceeding C$10 million; approval of the terms of service and of long-term supply contracts; dealing with customer complaints; and the setting and enforcement of safety and reliability standards for the electric grid.
The Generation division, Hydro-Québec Production is not subject to regulation by the Régie. However, it must still submit every new construction project to a full environmental impact process, including the release of extensive environmental studies. The release of the studies are followed by a public hearing process conducted by the Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement.
|Net income[note 2]||2,611||2,515||2,871||3,015||2,798||3,637||2,252||2,435||1,938||1,526|
|Total assets[note 2]||69,637||65,809||64,918||62,850||61,107||59,698||60,431||58,072||57,823||59,078|
For the year ending on December 31, 2011, Hydro-Québec posted net earnings of C$2.611 billion, up 3.8% from 2010 despite lower electricity prices on export markets and the high value of the Canadian dollar. Revenue were down 3.8% in 2011 at C$12.392 billion, while expenditures amounted to C$7.284 billion, down by C$159 million from 2010, mainly due to lower short-term electricity and fuel purchases and the repeal of Quebec's capital tax.
The company has assets of C$69.637 billion, C$56.901 billion of which are tangible assets. Its long-term debt stood at C$42.05 billion, and the company reported a capitalization rate of 31.0% in 2011. Bonds issued by Hydro-Québec are backed by the Quebec government. On December 31, 2011, long-term securities of Hydro-Québec were rated Aa2 stable by Moody's, AA- positive by Fitch Ratings and A+ by Standard & Poor's.
In 1981, the Parti Québécois government redefined Hydro-Québec's mission by modifying the terms of the social pact of 1944. The government issued itself 43,741,090 shares worth C$100 each, and the amended statute stated that Hydro-Québec would now pay up to 75% of its net earnings in dividends. This amendment to the Hydro-Québec Act started an episodic debate on whether Hydro-Québec should be fully or partially privatized. In recent years, economist Marcel Boyer and businessman Claude Garcia—both associated with the conservative think tank The Montreal Economic Institute—have often raised the issue, claiming that the company could be better managed by the private sector and that the proceeds from a sale would lower public debt.
Without going as far as Boyer and Garcia, Mario Dumont, the head of the Action démocratique du Québec, briefly discussed the possibility of selling a minority stake of Hydro-Québec during the 2008 election campaign. A Léger Marketing poll conducted in November 2008 found that a majority of Quebec respondents (53%) were opposed to his proposal to sell 7.5% of the company's equity to Quebec citizens and businesses, while 38% were in favor.
Commenting on the issue on Guy A. Lepage's talk show, former PQ Premier Jacques Parizeau estimated that such an idea would be quite unpopular in public opinion, adding that Hydro-Québec is often seen by Quebecers as a national success story and a source of pride. This could explain why various privatization proposals in the past have received little public attention. The liberal government has repeatedly stated that Hydro-Québec is not for sale.
Like many other economists, Yvan Allaire, from Montreal's Hautes études commerciales business school, advocate increased electricity rates as a way to increase the government's annual dividend without resorting to privatization. Others, like columnist Bertrand Tremblay of Saguenay's Le Quotidien, claim that privatization would signal a drift to the days when Quebec's natural resources were sold in bulk to foreigners at ridiculously low prices. "For too long, Tremblay writes, Quebec was somewhat of a banana republic, almost giving away its forestry and water resources. In turn, those foreign interests were exporting our jobs associated with the development of our natural resources with the complicity of local vultures".
Left-wing academics, such as UQAM's Léo-Paul Lauzon and Gabriel Sainte-Marie, have claimed that privatization would be done at the expense of residential customers, who would pay much higher rates. They say that privatization would also be a betrayal of the social pact between the people and its government, and that the province would be short-selling itself by divesting of a choice asset for a minimal short term gain.
On December 31, 2013, Hydro-Québec Production owned and operated 61 hydro plants—including 12 of over a 1,000 MW capacity— 26 major reservoirs. These facilities are located in 13 of Quebec's 430 watersheds, including the Saint Lawrence, Betsiamites, La Grande, Manicouagan, Ottawa, Outardes, and Saint-Maurice rivers. These plants provide the bulk of electricity generated and sold by the company.
Non-hydro plants included the baseload 675-MW gross Gentilly nuclear generating station, a CANDU-design reactor which was permanently shut down on December 28, 2012 the 660-MW Tracy Thermal Generating Station, a heavy fuel oil-fired plant shutdown in March 2011 and two gas turbine peaker plants, for a total installed capacity of 36,971 MW in 2011. Hydro-Québec's average generation cost was 2.11 cents per kWh in 2011.
The company also purchases the bulk of the output of the 5,428-MW Churchill Falls generating station in Labrador, under a long term contract expiring in 2041. In 2009, Hydro-Québec bought the 60% stake owned by AbitibiBowater in the McCormick plant (335 MW), located at the mouth of the Manicouagan River near Baie-Comeau, for C$616 million.
|La Grande-4||La Grande||2,779|
|La Grande-3||La Grande||2,417|
|La Grande-2-A||La Grande||2,106|
|La Grande-1||La Grande||1,436|
|Others (47 hydro, 1 nuclear, 3 thermal)||13,302|
In 2013, the energy sold by Hydro-Québec to its grid-connected customers in Quebec and exported to neighboring markets came almost exclusively from renewable sources. Hydro (96.78%) is by far the largest source, followed by wind (2.16%) and biomass, biogas and waste (0.75%). The remainder came from nuclear (0.19%) and thermal (0.12%) generation. Emissions of carbon dioxide (1,130 tonnes/TWh), sulfur dioxide (4 tonnes/TWh) and nitrogen oxides (10 tonnes/TWh) were between 49 and 238 times lower than the industry average in northeastern North America. Imported electricity bought on the markets account for most of these emissions.
Hydro-Québec's expertise at building and operating a very high voltage electrical grid spreading over long distances has long been recognized in the electrical industry. TransÉnergie, Hydro-Québec's transmission division, operates the largest electricity transmission network in North America. It acts as the independent system operator and reliability coordinator for the Québec interconnection of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation system, and is part of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC). TransÉnergie manages the flow of energy on the Quebec network and ensures non-discriminatory access to all participants involved in the wholesale market. The non-discriminatory access policy allows a company such as Nalcor to sell some of its share of power from Churchill Falls on the open market in the State of New York using TransÉnergie's network, upon payment of a transmission fee.
In recent years, TransÉnergie's Contrôle des mouvements d'énergie (CMÉ) unit has been acting as the reliability coordinator of the bulk electricity network for Quebec as a whole, under a bilateral agreement between the Régie de l'énergie du Québec and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the United States.
TransÉnergie's high voltage network stretches over 33,630 km (20,900 mi), including 11,422 km (7,097 mi) of 765 and 735 kV lines, and a network of 514 substations. It is connected to neighboring Canadian provinces and the United States by 17 ties, with a maximum reception capacity of 10,850 MW[note 4] and a maximum transmission capacity of 7,994 MW.
The TransÉnergie's network operates asynchronously from that of its neighbors on the Eastern Interconnection. Although Quebec uses the same 60 hertz frequency as the rest of North America, its grid does not use the same phase as surrounding networks. TransÉnergie mainly relies on back to back HVDC converters to export or import electricity from other jurisdictions.
This feature of the Quebec network allowed Hydro-Québec to remain unscathed during the Northeast Blackout of August 14, 2003, with the exception of 5 hydro plants on the Ottawa River radially connected to the Ontario grid at the time. A new 1250-MW back to back HVDC tie has been commissioned at the Outaouais substation, in L'Ange-Gardien, near the Ontario border. The new interconnection has been online since 2009 and the 315 kV line is fully operational since 2010.
One drawback of the TransÉnergie network involves the long distances separating the generation sites and the main consumer markets. For instance, the Radisson substation links the James Bay project plants to the Nicolet station near Sainte-Eulalie, south of the Saint Lawrence, over 1,200 kilometres (750 mi) away.
In 2011, TransÉnergie invested C$1.3 billion in capital expenditures, including C$460 million to expand its network.
In addition to the new tie with Ontario, the company plans to build a new 1200-MW direct current link between the Des Cantons substation at Windsor, Quebec in Quebec's Eastern Townships and Deerfield, New Hampshire, with an HVDC converter terminal built at Franklin, New Hampshire. The US segment of the US$1.1 billion line, would be built by Northern Pass Transmission LLC, a partnership between Northeast Utilities (75%) and NSTAR (25%). In order to go ahead, the project must receive regulatory approval in Quebec and the United States. The proposed transmission line could be in operation in 2015. According to Jim Robb, a senior executive from Northeast Utilities, New England could meet one third of its Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative commitments with the hydropower coming through this new power line alone.
Hydro-Québec Distribution is in charge of retail sales to most customers in Quebec. It operates a network of 112,089 kilometres (69,649 mi) of medium and low voltage lines. The division is the sole electric distributor across the province, with the exception of 9 municipal distribution networks — in Alma, Amos, Baie-Comeau, Coaticook, Joliette, Magog, Saguenay, Sherbrooke and Westmount—and the electric cooperative of Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Rouville.
Hydro-Québec Distribution buys most of its power from the 165-TWh heritage pool provided by Hydro-Québec Production at 2.79¢/kWh. The division usually purchases additional power by entering into long-term contracts after a public call for tenders. For shorter term needs, it also buys power from the neighboring systems at market prices. As a last resort, Hydro-Québec Production can also provide short-term relief. Supply contracts above and beyond the heritage pool must be approved by the Régie de l'énergie du Québec and their costs are passed on to customers.
The division signed one natural gas cogeneration agreement for 507 MW in 2003, three forest biomass deals (47.5 MW) in 2004 and 2005, and ten contracts for wind power (2,994 MW) in 2005 and 2008, all with private sector producers. It also signed two flexible contracts with Hydro-Québec Production (600 MW) in 2002.
Hydro-Québec Distribution is also responsible for the production of power in remote communities not connected to the main power grid. The division operates an off-grid hydroelectric dam serving communities on the Lower North Shore and 23 small diesel power plants in the Magdalen Islands, in Haute-Mauricie and in Nunavik.
Research and development
Hydro-Québec has made significant investments in research and development over the past 40 years. In addition to funding university research, the company is the only electric utility in North America to operate its own large-scale research institute, L'Institut de recherche d'Hydro-Québec (IREQ). Established by Lionel Boulet in 1967, the research center is located in Varennes, a suburb on the South Shore of Montreal. IREQ operates on an annual research budget of approximately C$100 million and specializes in the areas of high voltage, mechanics and thermomechanics, network simulations and calibration.
Research conducted by scientists and engineers at IREQ has helped to extend the life of dams, improve water turbine performance, automate network management and increase the transmission capacity of high voltage power lines.
Another research center, the Laboratoire des technologies de l'énergie (LTE) in Shawinigan, was opened in 1988 to adapt and develop new products while helping industrial customers improve their energy efficiency.
In the last 20 years, the institute has also conducted research and development work towards the electrification of ground transportation. Current projects include battery materials, including innovative work on lithium iron phosphate and nano-titanate, improved electric drive trains and the impacts of the large-scale deployment of electric vehicles on the power grid. Projects focus on technologies to increase range, improve performance in cold weather and reduce charging time.
Hydro-Québec has been criticized for not having taken advantage of some of its innovations. An electric wheel motor concept that struck a chord with Quebecers, first prototyped in 1994 by Pierre Couture, an engineer and physicist working at IREQ, is one of these. The heir to the Couture wheel motor is now marketed by TM4 Electrodynamic Systems, a spin-off established in 1998 that has made deals with France's Dassault and Heuliez to develop an electric car, the Cleanova, of which prototypes were built in 2006. Hydro-Québec announced in early 2009 at the Montreal International Auto Show that its engine had been chosen by Tata Motors to equip a demonstration version of its Indica model, which will be road tested in Norway.
The Hydro-Québec Équipement division acts as the company's main contractor on major construction sites, with the exception of work conducted on the territory covered by the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, which are assigned to the Société d'énergie de la Baie James subsidiary.
The construction of a complex of four hydroelectric generating stations on the Romaine River (1,550 MW) began on May 13, 2009. The plants are scheduled to be built and commissioned between 2014 and 2020.
In his March 2009 inaugural speech, Quebec Premier Jean Charest announced that his government intends to further develop the province's hydroelectric potential. The call for further development of hydroelectric and other renewable generating capacity has been implemented in the company's 2009-2013 strategic plan, released on July 30, 2009. Hydro-Québec plans capacity upgrades at the Jean-Lesage (120 MW) and René-Lévesque (210 MW) stations and a third unit at the SM-3 plant (440 MW). The company will also conduct technical and environmental studies and undertake consultations with local communities to build new facilities on the Petit-Mécatina (1,200 MW) and Magpie (850 MW) rivers on the North Shore, and revive the Tabaret project (132 MW) in the Abitibi-Témiscamingue region, in western Quebec.
Hydro-Québec first forays outside its borders began in 1978. A new subsidiary, Hydro-Québec International, was created to market the company's know-how abroad in the fields of distribution, generation and transmission of electricity. The new venture leveraged the existing pool of expertise in the parent company.
During the next 25 years, Hydro-Québec was particularly active abroad with investments in electricity transmission networks and generation: Transelec in Chile, the Cross Sound Cable in the United States, the Consorcio Transmantaro in Peru, Hidroelectrica Rio Lajas in Costa Rica, Murraylink in Australia and the Fortuna generating station in Panama.
It briefly held a 17% share in SENELEC, Senegal's electric utility, when the Senegalese government decided to sell part of the company to a consortium led by the French company Elyo, a subsidiary of Group Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux, in 1999. The transaction was canceled in 2000 following the election of president Abdoulaye Wade.
Also in 1999, Hydro-Québec International acquired a 20% stake in the Meiya Power Company in China for C$83 million. The company held this participation until July 2004. The company's expertise was sought by several hydroelectric developers throughout the world, including the Three Gorges Dam, where Hydro's employees trained Chinese engineers in the fields of management, finance and dams.
Hydro-Québec gradually withdrew from the international business between 2003 and 2006, and sold off all of its foreign investments for a profit. Proceeds from these sales were paid to the government's Generations Fund, a trust fund set up by the province to alleviate the impact of public debt on future generations.
The construction and operation of electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities has environmental impacts and Hydro-Québec's activities are no exception. Hydroelectric development has an impact on the natural environment where facilities are built and on the people living in the area. For instance, the development of new reservoirs increases the level of mercury in lakes and rivers, which works up the food chain. It temporarily increases the emission of greenhouse gases from reservoirs and contributes to shoreline erosion.
In addition, hydroelectric facilities transform the human environment. They create new obstacles to navigation, flood traditional hunting and trapping grounds, force people to change their eating habits due to the elevated mercury content of some species of fish, destroy invaluable artifacts that would help trace the human presence on the territory, and disrupt the society and culture of Aboriginal people living near the facilities.
Since the early 1970s, Hydro-Québec has been aware of the environmental externalities of its operations. The adoption of a Quebec statute on environmental quality in 1972, the cancellation of Champigny Project, a planned pumped storage plant in the Jacques-Cartier River valley in 1973, and the James Bay negotiations leading to the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement in 1975, forced the company to reconsider its practices.
To address environmental concerns, Hydro-Québec established an environmental protection committee in 1970 and an Environmental Management unit in September 1973. Its mandate is to study and measure the environmental impacts of the company, prepare impact assessment, and develop mitigation strategies for new and existing facilities, while conducting research projects in these areas, in cooperation with the scientific community.
Impacts on the natural environment
In the late 1970s, the company set up a network of 27 monitoring stations to measure the impacts of the James Bay Project which provide a wealth of data on northern environments. The first 30 years of studies in the James Bay area have confirmed that mercury levels in fish increase by 3 to 6 times over the first 5 to 10 years after the flooding of a reservoir, but then gradually revert to their initial values after 20 to 30 years. These results confirm similar studies conducted elsewhere in Canada, the United States and Finland. Research also found that it is possible to reduce human exposure to mercury even when fish constitutes a significant part of a population's diet. Exposure risks can be mitigated without overly reducing the consumption of fish, simply by avoiding certain species and fishing spots.
Despite the fact that the transformation of a terrestrial environment into an aquatic environment constitutes a major change and that flooding leads to the displacement or death of nonmigratory animals, the riparian environments lost through flooding are partially replaced by new ones on the exposed banks of reduced-flow rivers. The biological diversity of reservoir islands is comparable to other islands in the area and the reservoir drawdown zone is used by a variety of wildlife. The population of migratory species of interest such as the caribou have even increased to the point where the hunt has been expanded.
Emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) rise significantly for a few years after reservoir impoundment, and then stabilize after 10 years to a level similar to that of surrounding lakes. Gross GHG emissions of reservoirs in the James Bay area fluctuate around 30,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per TWh of generated power. Hydro-Québec claims its hydroelectric plants release 35 times less GHG than comparable gas-fired plants and 70 times less than coal-fired ones and that they constitute the "option with the best performance" overall.
Social impacts and sustainable development
Another major environmental concern relates to the population of areas affected by hydroelectric development, specifically the Innu of the North Shore and the Cree and Inuit in Northern Quebec. The hydroelectric developments of the last quarter of the 20th century have accelerated the settling process among Aboriginal populations that started in the 1950s. Among the reasons cited for the increased adoption of a sedentary lifestyle among these peoples are the establishment of Aboriginal businesses, the introduction of paid labor, and the flooding of traditional trapping and fishing lands by the new reservoirs, along with the operation of social and education services run by the communities themselves under the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement.
Some native communities, particularly the Crees, have come to a point "where they increasingly resemble the industrialized society of the South", notes an Hydro-Québec report summarizing the research conducted in the area between 1970 and 2000. The report adds that a similar phenomenon was observed after the construction of roads and hydroelectric plants near isolated communities in northern Canada and Scandinavia. However, growing social problems and rising unemployment have followed the end of the large construction projects in the 1990s. The report concludes that future economic and social development in the area "will largely depend on the desire for cooperation among the various players".
After the strong rejection of the Suroît project and its subsequent cancellation in November 2004, Hydro-Québec, under the leadership of its new CEO Thierry Vandal, reaffirmed Hydro-Québec's commitment towards energy efficiency, hydropower and development of alternative energy. Since then, Hydro-Québec regularly stresses three criteria for any new hydroelectric development undertaken by the company: projects must be cost effective, environmentally acceptable and well received by the communities. Hydro-Québec has also taken part in a series of sustainable development initiatives since the late 1980s. Its approach is based on three principles: economic development, social development and environmental protection. Since 2007 the company adheres to the Global Reporting Initiative, which governs the collection and publication of sustainability performance information. The company employs 250 professionals and managers in the environmental field and has implemented an ISO 14001-certified environmental management system.
Rates and customers
|Number of customers||Sales in Quebec (GWh)||Revenue (C$M)||Average annual consumption (kWh)|
|Residential and farm||3,746,397||3,698,169||62,748||59,534||4,536||4,302||16,857||16,205|
|General and institutional||291,212||300,163||33,569||33,865||2,599||2,648||113,529||113,347|
At the end of 2010, Hydro-Québec served 4,060,195 customers grouped into three broad categories: residential and farm (D Rate), commercial and institutional (G Rate) and industrial (M and L rates). The Other category includes public lighting systems and municipal distribution systems.
About a dozen distribution rates are set annually by the Régie de l'énergie after public hearings. Pricing is based on the cost of delivery, which includes the cost of supply and transmission, depreciation on fixed assets and provisions for the maintenance of facilities, customer growth and a profit margin.
Rates are uniform throughout Quebec and are based on consumer type and volume of consumption. All rates vary in block to mitigate any cross-subsidization effect between residential, commercial and industrial customers.
Hydro-Québec retail rates are among the lowest in North America. After a five-year rate freeze, between May 1, 1998 and January 1, 2004, the Régie granted rate increases on 8 occasions between 2004 and 2010 for a total of 18.4%. More recently, the regulator ordered two successive rate rollbacks in 2011 (0.4%) and 2012 (0.5%). However, rates are expected to go up by 3.7% a year from 2014 to 2018 to reflect a gradual increase of heritage pool electricity announced in the 2010 Quebec budget.
The average consumption of residential and agricultural customers is relatively high, at 16,857 kWh per year in 2011, because of the widespread use of electricity as the main source of space (77%) and water heating (90%). Hydro-Québec estimates that heating accounts for more than one half of the electricity demand in the residential sector.
This preference for electric heating makes electricity demand more unpredictable, but offers some environmental benefits. Despite Quebec's very cold climate in winter, greenhouse gases emissions in the residential sector accounted for only 5.5% (4.65 Mt CO
2 eq.) of all emissions in Quebec in 2006. Emissions from the residential sector in Quebec fell by 30% between 1990 and 2006.
Residential use of electricity fluctuates from one year to another, and is strongly correlated with the weather. Contrary to the trend in neighboring networks, Hydro-Québec's system is winter-peaking. A new all-time consumption record was set on January 23, 2013 with a load of 38,910 MW. Previous records were established on January 24, 2011 with 37,717 MW, on January 16, 2009, with a load of 37,230 MW, and on January 15, 2004 when peak reached 36,268 MW.
The price of electricity for residences and farms includes a 40.64¢ daily subscription fee, and two price levels depending on consumption. The rates are all-included: power, transmission and distribution costs, but are subject to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the Quebec Sales Tax (QST). As of April 1, 2012, customers pay 5.32¢/kWh for the first 30 daily kWh, while the remainder is sold at 7.51¢/kWh. The average monthly bill for a residential customer was approximately C$100 in 2008.
Electric meter readings are usually conducted every two months and bills are bimonthly. However, the company offers an optional Equalized Payment Plan allowing residential customers to pay their annual electricity costs in 12 monthly installments, based on past consumption patterns of the current customer address and the average temperature in that location.
In 2007, Hydro-Québec pulled out of a Canadian government initiative to install smart meters across the province, stating that it would be "too costly to deliver real savings". Since then, Hydro-Québec organized a 2-year pilot project, involving 2,000 customers in 4 cities, with time of use metering. A report, filed with the Régie de l'énergie, in the summer of 2010 concluded that the impact of marginal cost pricing with three levels of pricing in the winter would lead to minimal load and energy savings. The company intends to gradually phase-in Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) between 2011 and 2017. Early efforts will focus on meter data transfer, connect-disconnect, outage detection and theft reduction.
For more than a century, industrial development in Quebec has been stimulated by the abundance of hydroelectric resources. Energy represents a significant expenditure in the pulp and paper and aluminum sectors. two industries with long-standing traditions in Quebec. In 2010, industrial customers purchased 68.4 TWh from Hydro-Québec, representing 40.4% of all electricity sold by the company on the domestic market.
The Quebec government uses low electricity rates to attract new business and consolidate existing jobs. Despite its statutory obligation to sell electric power to every person who so requests, the province has reserved the right to grant large load allocations to companies on a case by case basis since 1974. The threshold was set at 175 MW from 1987 to 2006 and was reduced to 50 MW in the government's 2006–2015 energy strategy.
Large industrial users pay a lower rate than the domestic and commercial customers, because of lower distribution costs. In 2010, the largest industrial users, the Rate L customers, were paying an average of 4.66¢/kWh whereas companies with special contracts paid 3.07¢/kWh.
In 1987, Hydro-Québec and the Quebec government agreed to a series of controversial deals with aluminum giants Alcan and Alcoa. These risk sharing contracts set the price of electricity based on a series of factors, including aluminum world prices and the value of the Canadian dollar Those agreements are gradually being replaced by one based on published rates.
On May 10, 2007, the Quebec government signed an agreement with Alcan. The agreement, which is still in force despite the company's merger with Rio Tinto Group, renews the water rights concession on the Saguenay and Peribonka rivers. In exchange, Alcan has agreed to invest in its Quebec facilities and to maintain jobs and its corporate headquarters in Montreal.
On December 19, 2008, Hydro-Québec and Alcoa signed a similar agreement. This agreement, which expires in 2040, maintains the provision of electricity to Alcoa's three aluminum smelters in the province, located in Baie-Comeau, Bécancour and Deschambault-Grondines. In addition, the deal will allow Alcoa to modernize the Baie-Comeau plant which will increase its production capacity by 110,000 tonnes a year, to a total of 548,000 tonnes.
Several economists, including Université Laval's Jean-Thomas Bernard and Gérard Bélanger, have challenged the government's strategy and argue that sales to large industrial customers are very costly to the Quebec economy. In an article published in 2008, the researchers estimate that, under the current regime, a job in a new aluminum smelter or an expansion project costs the province between C$255,357 and C$729,653 a year, when taking into consideration the money that could be made by selling the excess electricity on the New York market.
This argument is disputed by large industrial customers, who point out that data from 2000 to 2006 indicate that electricity exports prices get lower when quantities increase, and vice versa. "We find that the more we export, the less lucrative it gets", said Luc Boulanger, the head of the association representing Quebec's large industrial customers. In his opinion, the high volatility of electricity markets and the transmission infrastructure physical limitations reduce the quantities of electricity that can be exported when prices are higher.
|Exports (GWh)[note 5]||26,763||23,270||23,357||21,299||19,624||14,458||15,342||14,392||15,786||54,199|
|Average revenue ($/MWh)||52.27||65.02||63.93||90.10||82.40||79.47||95.42||75.32||85.20||63.97|
Hydro-Québec sells part of its surplus electricity to neighboring systems in Canada and the United States under long term contracts and transactions on the New England, New York and Ontario bulk energy markets. Two subsidiaries, HQ Energy Marketing and HQ Energy Services (U.S.) are engaged in the electricity trade on behalf of the company. In 2010, export sales of electricity brought in $1,513 million for a transaction volume of 23.3 TWh, despite "exceptionally low runoff", according to the company. Net exports accounted for a net income of $1,034 million and a net reservoir drawdown of 12.5 TWh.
Although most export sales are now short-term transactions, Hydro-Québec has entered into long-term export contracts in the past. In 1990, the company signed a 328-MW deal with a group of 13 electric distributors in Vermont. Exports from Hydro-Québec account for 28% of all power used in the state. On March 11, 2010, Vermont's two largest utilities, Green Mountain Power and Central Vermont Public Service, entered into a tentative 26-year deal with Hydro-Québec to purchase up to 225 MW of hydro power from 2012 to 2038. The memorandum of understanding provides for a price smoothing mechanism shielding Vermont customers from market price spikes. The deal is contingent upon the enactment designating large hydro as "renewable energy".
A second contract has been signed with Cornwall Electric, a subsidiary of Fortis Inc., a utility serving 23,000 customers in the Cornwall, Ontario area. The contract was renewed in 2008 and will be in force until 2019.
The company has several advantages in its dealings in export markets. First, its costs are not affected by the fluctuations of fossil fuel prices, since hydropower requires no fuel. Also, Hydro-Québec has a lot of flexibility in matching supply and demand, so it can sell electricity at higher prices during the day and replenish its reservoirs at night, when wholesale prices are lower. Third, the Quebec power grid peaks in winter because of heating, unlike most neighboring systems, where peak demand occur on very warm days in the summer, due to the air conditioning needs of homes and offices.
The election of Barack Obama—a supporter of renewable energy, greenhouse gas emissions trading and the development of electric cars—as president of the United States in 2008 was seen as a positive development for the company's outlook. Despite the success of the previous policy of short-term sales on neighboring energy markets, the Quebec government asked Hydro-Québec management to write a new strategic plan, focusing on long-term sale agreements with US distributors, as was the case after the commissioning of the James Bay Project. The new plan was released in July 2009.
- Édifice Hydro-Québec
- James Bay Project
- Hydro-Québec's electricity transmission system
- Timeline of Quebec history
- The falls were renamed to honor the late British Prime Minister, Sir Winston Churchill, soon after his death, in 1965.
- Net income, total assets and equity for the years 2006-2010 were restated in the 2010 annual report due to changes in accounting policies regarding the depreciation of property, plant and equipment.
- This table excludes 24 thermal and 1 hydroelectric plant owned and operated by Hydro-Québec Distribution.
- This number includes the 5,200-MW Churchill Falls lines, which have no export capability.
- Numbers include energy brokerage on the markets. This energy has not necessarily been produced by Hydro-Québec's plants.
- Hydro-Québec (5 January 2010). "Senior Management". Retrieved 2010-10-09.
- Hydro-Québec 2013a, p. 2.
- Hydro-Québec 2013a, p. 3.
- By law, the name of the company is spelled Hydro-Québec in English as well as in French. See Hydro-Québec Act, R.S.Q. 2013, c. H-5, s. 3
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 5.
- Ed Crooks (6 July 2009). "Using Russian hydro to power China". Financial Times. Retrieved 2009-07-07.
- PennWell (29 October 2009). "Hydro-Quebec agrees to buy NB Power for C$4.75 billion". HydroWorld. Retrieved 2009-10-29.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 3.
- Government of Québec. "Consommation d'énergie par forme" (in French). Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune. Retrieved 2012-03-11.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, p. 193.
- Langford & Debresson 1992.
- Norrie, Owram & Emery 2008, p. 247.
- The Canadian Press (November 14, 2006). "Hydro-Québec investit 684 M$ pour doubler ses exportations en Ontario". La Presse (in French). Retrieved May 15, 2012.
- Yakabuski, Konrad (December 30, 2008). "New England lusts for Quebec's power". The Globe and Mail (Toronto). Retrieved May 16, 2012.
- Vermont Department of Public Service 2011, p. 104.
- Hydro-Québec (2011). "Hydro for the future: Developing outside markets". Retrieved May 16, 2012.
- Hydro-Québec 2013a, p. 98.
- Hydro-Québec 2011d, p. 9.
- Bellavance 1995, p. 74.
- Gallichan 1995, p. 66-68.
- Gallichan 1995, p. 68.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, p. 126.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, p. 133.
- McNaughton 1960, p. 135.
- Productions Vic Pelletier. "Les barrages de la rivière Bersimis" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, p. 144.
- Jobin 1978, p. 29.
- Boyd 1995, p. 98.
- Brassard, Jacques (11 February 2000). "Pacte social et modernité réglementaire : des enjeux réconciliables - Allocution de monsieur Jacques Brassard, ministre des Ressources naturelles, à l'occasion du déjeuner conférence de l'Association de l'industrie électrique du Québec" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, p. 156.
- Bélanger 1995.
- Tremblay, Joël; Gaudreau, Serge. "Bilan du siècle : 28 décembre 1962 - Nationalisation de onze compagnies d'électricité par la Commission hydroélectrique du Québec" (in French). Université de Sherbrooke. Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, pp. 178–181.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, pp. 181–182.
- Linteau, Paul-André (Winter 1994). "Hydro-Québec and Québec society: Fifty years of shared history". Forces (104). pp. 14–17. ISSN 0015-6957.
- "Hydro-Québec Logo: Design and History". FamousLogos.us. Retrieved 2011-10-12.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, pp. 201–207.
- Archambault 1984.
- Sood 2006.
- Bolduc, André (1982). "Churchill Falls, the dream... and the reality". Forces (57–58) (Montreal). pp. 40–42.
- Quebec Hydroelectric Commission & Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited 1969.
- Nalcor Energy 2009, p. 76.
- Hydro-Québec 2010a, p. 52
- Green, Peter. "The History of Churchill Falls". IEEE Canada. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
- Smith 1975, p. 372.
- Reference re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act, 1 S.C.R. 297 (Supreme Court of Canada 1984).
- Hydro-Québec v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp., 1 S.C.R. 1087 (Supreme Court of Canada 1988).
- Turgeon 1992, p. 110.
- Gravel & Vennat 1979, pp. 5–6.
- Société d'énergie de la Baie James 1987, p. 8.
- Godin, Pierre (12 March 1994). "Robert Bourassa : les mégaprojets. À mille kilomètres de Montréal, arracher des milliards de kilowatts à une région nordique fabuleuse et hostile..". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). p. E7.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, pp. 274–279.
- Société d'énergie de la Baie James 1987, p. 416.
- Bolduc 2000, p. 233.
- Commission de toponymie du Québec (7 June 2010). "Centrale Robert-Bourassa". Topos sur le web (in French). Retrieved 2010-10-09.
- Bolduc, Hogue & Larouche 1989, pp. 290–293.
- Radio-Canada (6 March 2007). "La grande aventure de la baie James : Détourner les eaux". Radio-Canada Archives (in French). Retrieved 2008-08-03.
- Radio-Canada (6 March 2007). "La grande aventure de la baie James : Lancement des premières turbines". Radio-Canada Archives (in French). Retrieved 2008-08-03.
- Hydro-Québec Production (2011). "Hydroelectric Generating Stations (as of December 31, 2010)". Hydro-Québec. Retrieved 2012-03-18.
- Hafsi 2001, pp. 563–565.
- Fleury 1999, p. 376–395.
- Gingras, Pierre (1 December 1990). "Sans être spectaculaire, la ligne de Grondines n'en est pas moins unique au monde". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). p. G2.
- Fleury 1999, p. 393.
- Presse canadienne (17 October 1992). "Grondines : la ligne électrique sous-fluviale est terminée". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). p. H1.
- Bernard, Genest-Laplante & Laplante 1992, p. 155.
- Parent, Rollande (22 February 1990). "Ventes d'électricité : la contestation des Cris tourne court". La Presse (in French). Canadian Press. p. D9.
- Tremblay, Frédéric (3 October 1992). "Les Cris perdent la bataille du Vermont". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Canadian Press. p. A5.
- Francoeur, Louis-Gilles (19 November 1994). "Parizeau gèle le projet Grande-Baleine". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). p. A1.
- Munich Re 2003, p. 6–7.
- Bisson, Bruno (19 April 1988). "Panne d'électricité majeure : le Québec dans le noir". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). p. A1.
- Lamon, Georges (20 April 1988). "Hydro-Québec : retour à la normale après la panne d'électricité qui aura duré jusqu'à huit heures". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). p. A1.
- Morin, Michel; Sirois, Gilles; Derome, Bernard (13 March 1989). "Le Québec dans le noir" (in French). Radio-Canada. Retrieved 2009-03-21.
- Hydro-Québec. "Electricity in nature - March 1989". Archived from the original on 2007-08-23. Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Bonhomme, Jean-Pierre (13 June 1991). "La tempête géomagnétique n'a pas perturbé le réseau d'Hydro-Québec". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). p. A18.
- Hydro-Québec (1999). Annual Report 1998 : for today and tomorrow. Montreal: Hydro-Québec. p. 96. ISBN 2-550-34166-X. Archived from the original on 2004-04-07. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- Environment Canada (23 December 2009). "Canada's Top Ten Weather Stories of 1998". Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Lévesque, Kathleen (5 January 2008). "Autopsie d'un cauchemar de glace". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Turcotte, Claude (5 January 2008). "L'après-crise aura coûté deux milliards". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement 2000.
- National Assembly of Quebec (1999). "Loi concernant la construction par Hydro-Québec d’infrastructures et d’équipements par suite de la tempête de verglas survenue du 5 au 9 janvier 1998". Projet de loi no 42 (1999, chapitre 27) (in French). Quebec City: Éditeur officiel du Québec. p. 6.
- Radio-Canada (23 May 1998). "Non à la ligne Hertel Des Cantons". Radio-Canada Archives (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-23.
- Hydro-Québec Production (19 March 2004). "Réponses d'Hydro-Québec Production à la demande de renseignements N° 1 de la Régie au Producteur en date du 5 mars 2004 (HQP-3, document 1) |série=Demande d'avis sur la sécurité énergétique des Québécois à l'égard des approvisionnements électriques et la contribution du projet du Suroît (R-3526-2004)" (in French). Régie de l'énergie du Québec. p. 51. Retrieved 2009-03-29.
- Boutin 2004, p. 554.
- Boutin 2004, p. 555.
- "Centrale du Suroît : le gouvernement du Québec retire son autorisation de réaliser le projet" (Press release) (in French). Quebec Department of Natural Resources and Wildlife. 17 November 2004. Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Hydro-Québec. "Eastmain-1 Hydroelectric Development. Read a Summary". Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Hydro-Québec. "Aménagement hydroélectrique de la Péribonka. En bref" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Hydro-Québec. "Aménagements hydroélectriques de la Chute-Allard et des Rapides-des-Cœurs. En bref" (in French). Archived from the original on 2008-05-06. Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Radio-Canada (7 February 2002). "La paix des braves est signée" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Hydro-Québec. "Eastmain-1 Hydroelectric Development - See the Schedule" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Hydro-Québec. "A project for sustainable development: Social Acceptability". Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Hydro-Québec. "Eastmain-1 Hydroelectric Project. Read a Summary". Retrieved 2009-03-17.
- Hydro-Québec. "Eastmain-1-A-Sarcelle-Rupert Project. Project Description". Retrieved 2012-05-09.
- "Ground broken for $6.5B hydro project on Quebec's Lower North Shore". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 13 May 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-10.
- Government of Quebec 2006.
- CBC News (6 December 2004). "Group claims responsibility for hydro tower bomb". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
- Earth Liberation: "Bomb Attack On a Hydro-Quebec Tower", December 6, 2004 (from Google cache).
- Baril, Hélène (12 November 2009). "Vente d'Énergie NB à Hydro: l'opposition s'accroît". La Presse (Montréal). Retrieved 2009-11-13.
- MOU between Quebec and New Brunswick. 2009. Archived from the original on 2010-01-07. Retrieved 2009-10-31.
- "Quebec, N.B. strike $4.8B deal for NB Power". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 29 October 2009. Retrieved 2009-10-29.
- CBC News (2010-06-25). "NB Power deal unpopular from start: documents". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2010-06-25.
- CBC News (19 January 2010). "Province retains control of NB Power in revised deal". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2010-10-06.
- Morris, Chris (19 January 2010). "Power deal reworked". Telegraph-Journal (Saint John, NB). p. A1. Retrieved 2010-01-19.
- CBC News (24 March 2010). "Quebec balked at NB Power sale costs". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2010-03-25.
- Hydro-Québec 2009a, p. 29.
- CBC News (5 October 2012). "Hydro-Québec learned from Point Lepreau's mistakes". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 13 December 2013.
- Séguin, Rhéal (29 January 2013). "Hydro-Quebec told former Liberal government before election to shut down costly Gentilly II project". The Globe and Mail (Toronto). Retrieved 13 December 2013.
- CBC News (3 October 2012). "Quebec nuclear reactor shutdown will cost $1.8 billion". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 4 October 2012.
- International Energy Agency 2004, p. 127.
- National Assembly of Quebec. "An Act respecting the Régie de l'énergie, R.S.Q. c. R-6.01". Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Trabandt 2000.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution (16 December 2008). "Respect du critère de fiabilité en puissance - bilan du Distributeur pour l'année 2008-2009". Régie de l'énergie du Québec. p. 12. Retrieved 2009-03-27.
- Government of Quebec (14 November 2001). "Décret 1277-2001 du 24 octobre 2001 concernant les caractéristiques de l'approvisionnement des marchés québécois en électricité patrimoniale". Gazette officielle du Québec (in French) 133 (46) (Quebec City: Government of Quebec). pp. 7705–7725. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution (1 August 2008). "Approvisionnements — Demande R-3677-2008 à la Régie de l'énergie du Québec, document HQD-2, document 2" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-19.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution. "Electricity Supply Contracts by Technology". Retrieved 2009-11-14.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution. "Wind farms under contract with Hydro-Québec Distribution". Retrieved 2009-11-14.
- Régie de l'énergie du Québec 2008, p. 4.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 3.
- Morazain, Jeanne (January–February 2008). "Top 45 - Hydro-Québec". Plan - La revue de l'Ordre des Ingénieurs du Québec (in French). p. 14. ISSN 0032-0536.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 95.
- Hydro-Québec (April 2008). 2007 Annual Report : Green Energy. Montreal. p. 124. ISBN 978-2-550-52014-6.
- Hydro-Québec (2003). Annual Report 2002 : Energy is Our Business. Montreal: Hydro-Québec. p. 115. ISBN 2-550-40534-X. Archived from the original on 2004-04-07. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 48.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 50.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 52.
- Hydro-Québec 2012c, p. 16.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 90.
- Bolduc 2000, p. 245.
- Boyer, Marcel; Garcia, Claude (August 2007). "Privatising Hydro-Québec : An idea worth exploring". Montreal Economic Institute. Retrieved 2009-05-05.
- Garcia 2009.
- Radio-Canada (8 November 2008). "Faut-il privatiser Hydro ?". Québec 2008 (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- Léger Marketing (10 November 2008). "Léger Marketing / Journal de Montréal / TVA / The Gazette Poll- Analysis Report". Retrieved 2009-11-23.
- Lepage, Guy A. (16 November 2008). "Tout le monde en parle (interview)". Radio-Canada. Retrieved 2009-04-11.
- Lessard, Denis (4 February 2009). "Privatisation d'Hydro : " pas dans les cartons du gouvernement "". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2009-03-19.
- Fortin, Pierre (15 September 2008). "Vive l'électricité plus chère !". L'actualité (in French). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Bernard, Jean-Thomas (April 2005). "Le marché québécois de l'électricité : à la croisée des chemins". Groupe de recherche en économie de l'énergie, de l'environnement et des ressources naturelles (GREEN). Université Laval. p. 17. Retrieved 2009-04-11.
- Allaire, Yvan (10 September 2007). "Privatiser Hydro-Québec ?". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Tremblay, Bertrand (10 March 2009). "Non à la privatisation". Le Quotidien (in French). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Lauzon, Léo Paul (1994). "Continuer à privatiser Hydro-Québec, ou consolider ses opérations". Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- Sainte-Marie, Gabriel (27 February 2009). "Vendre Hydro ne règle rien". Le Soleil (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- Hydro-Qubébec (2014). "Hydro-Québec’s electricity facts: Energy Supplies and Air Emissions". Retrieved May 18, 2014.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 8.
- Government of Quebec 2002, p. ?.
- Hydro-Québec. "Discover our Hydroelectric Facilities". Archived from the original on 2008-03-17. Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- CBC News (3 October 2012). "Quebec nuclear reactor shutdown will cost $1.8 billion". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 4 October 2012.
- Grégoire-Racicot, Louise (November 4, 2011). "Sorel-Tracy: Hydro-Québec ferme la centrale thermique". La Voix (in French) (Sorel-Tracy, Quebec). Retrieved January 15, 2013.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 114.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 12.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 92.
- Hydro-Québec 2010a, p. 10.
- Hafsi 2001, pp. 561–562.
- Fairley, Peter (April 2005). "TransÉnergie : Playing Two Power Games". Technology Review. Retrieved 2009-03-21.
- Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie. "Discover Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie and its system - Profile". Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Dutrisac, Robert (3 April 2009). "Nouvelle entente avec Hydro-Québec - Terre-Neuve vendra son électricité directement aux Américains". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2009-04-03.
- Lessard, Denis (3 April 2009). "Fragile entente avec Terre-Neuve sur Churchill Falls". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2009-04-03.
- Reliability Coordinator for Québec. "Reliability Functional Model for North America". Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie. Retrieved 2009-03-20.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 14.
- Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie. "Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie". Retrieved 2012-03-29.
- Hydro-Québec (June 2007). "315/230-kV Outaouais Substation - Start of Work". Retrieved 2009-03-20.
- U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force (April 2004). "6. The Cascade Stage of the Blackout". Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada : Causes and Recommendations. Washington, DC & Ottawa. p. 93. Retrieved 2009-03-20.
- Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie. "Discover Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie and its system - Features of Our Transmission System". Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 15.
- Northern Pass Transmission (2010). "Route Information". Northern Pass Transmission LLC. Retrieved 2010-10-13.
- Dillon, John (8 October 2010). "New Transmission Line Reaches Milestone". Vermont Public Radio. Retrieved 2010-10-12.
- Alspach, Kyle (5 October 2010). "NStar to build hydro power line". Boston Business Journal. Retrieved 2010-10-12.
- Constant, Kenny (13 October 2010). "Energy project unveiled; impact called 'staggering'". The Citizen of Laconia (Laconia, NH). Retrieved 2010-10-13.
- Penty, Rebecca (14 November 2009). "U.S. calls power line a landmark investment". Telegraph-Journal (Saint John, NB). p. C1. Retrieved 2009-11-14.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 20.
- Association des redistributeurs d'électricité du Québec. "Membres de l'AREQ" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution. "Electricity Supply Contracts by Technology". Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Gauthier, Johanne (October 2007). "L'IREQ : leader de l'innovation technologique à Hydro-Québec". Choc (in French) 25 (2). pp. 26–29. Retrieved 2009-03-20.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 32.
- Hydro-Québec Technologie. "Hydro-Québec Research Institute". Retrieved 2009-05-16.
- Hydro-Québec Technologie. "Our Innovation Avenues". Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Ouellet, Danielle; Fortier, Alain (Winter 1993–1994). "Hydro-Québec and its partners in research and development". Forces (104). pp. 31–33. ISSN 0015-6957.
- Hydro-Québec Technologie. "Energy Technology Laboratory (LTE)". Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- Templier, Sébastien (16 October 2009). "Moteur électrique: percée majeure chez Hydro-Québec". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2009-11-18.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 36–37.
- Cardinal, François (19 November 2008). "Une batterie dans les cartons d'Hydro-Québec". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2009-03-28.
- Lavallée, Pierre (15 April 2003). "Pourrait-on construire une voiture électrique au Québec?". 5 sur 5 (in French). Radio-Canada. Event occurs at 0:09:30.
- Francoeur, Louis-Gilles (15 January 2008). "Volvo sur les traces d'Hydro". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Provost, Gilles; Gélinas, Pascal (9 March 1997). "La Voiture électrique d'Hydro". Découverte (in French). Radio-Canada. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
- TM4 Electrodynamic Systems. "History". Retrieved 2010-10-09.
- Radio-Canada (22 September 2006). "Voiture électrique: Moteur québécois, fabrication étrangère ?" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- Hydro-Québec (15 January 2009). "TM4 partners with Tata Motors and Miljø in electric vehicle demonstration project". Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Francoeur, Louis-Gilles (16 January 2009). "Hydro-Québec est en voiture". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2009-01-07.
- Hydro-Québec (13 May 2009). "The Romaine Hydroelectric Complex - Premier Charest launches largest construction project in Canada". CNW Group. Retrieved 2009-05-13.
- Hydro-Québec. "Projet du complexe de la Romaine. En bref" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Francoeur, Louis-Gilles (11 March 2009). "Une autre rivière à harnacher dans la mire de Jean Charest". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Hydro-Québec 2009a, p. 19.
- Cloutier 1984, pp. 172–174.
- Hydro-Québec (16 June 2006). "Transelec Chile: Hydro-Québec sells its stake for C$1.7 billion" (Press release). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- "Enel acquires joint stake in Fortuna". Business News America. 4 August 2006. Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Hydro-Québec (2000). Annual Report 1999 : All our energy for you. Montreal: Hydro-Québec. p. 102. ISBN 2-550-35575-X. Archived from the original on 2004-04-07. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- Société nationale d'électricité du Sénégal. "Histoire" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Hydro-Québec (30 July 2004). "Hydro-Québec International Sells its Stake in Meiya Power Company Limited of China for US$84.6 Million". Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Presse canadienne (19 May 2006). "Il y a un peu d'Hydro-Québec dans le barrage des Trois Gorges". Le Soleil (in French).
- Dutrisac, Robert (24 October 2006). "Un milliard au Fonds des générations". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Hydro-Québec (2003). "8- Fish Communities". La Grande Hydroelectric Complex. Hydro-Québec. Retrieved 2009-03-23.
- Hydro-Québec. "The Issue of Mercury for Hydro-Québec". Retrieved 2009-03-22.
- Hydro-Québec. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Hydroelectric Reservoirs". Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Dubeau 1995, p. 242.
- Dubeau 1995, p. 241.
- Hayeur 2001, p. 110.
- Dubeau 1995, p. 243.
- Hayeur 2001, p. 89.
- Gagnon, Luc (January 2003). "Comparing Power Generation Options". Hydro-Québec. p. 8. Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Vandal 2005, p. 236.
- Hydro-Québec. "Our Integrated Approach: Defining Sustainable Development". Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Hydro-Québec. "Adhering to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines: Summary". Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Hydro-Québec (2008). Sustainability Report 2007: Sustainable Energy. Montreal. p. 44. ISBN 978-2-550-52018-4.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 96.
- "Fitch Rates Hydro-Quebec's US$3B Medium-Term Note Program 'AA-'; Outlook Stable" (Press release). Fitch Ratings. 31 January 2012. Retrieved 2012-03-11.
- Hydro-Québec (2003). Strategic Plan 2004-2008. Montreal: Hydro-Québec. p. 220. ISBN 2-550-41592-2.
- Bourque, Olivier (3 August 2010). "Pas de hausse de tarifs pour Hydro l'an prochain". Argent (in French). Retrieved 2012-03-11.
- Moore, Lynn (9 March 2012). "Hydro-Québec ordered to roll back its rates". Global Montreal. Retrieved 2012-03-11.
- Hydro-Québec 2012b, p. 14.
- Hydro-Québec. "Factors that Influence your Consumption". Hydro-Québec. Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Government of Quebec (November 2008). "Inventaire québécois des émissions de gaz à effet de serre en 2006 et évolution depuis 1990" (in French). Quebec Department of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks. Retrieved 2009-03-19.
- CBC News (January 23, 2013). "Quebec hits all-time high for power consumption during cold snap". CBC.ca. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- Hydro-Québec 2010a, p. 20.
- "Vague de froid: Hydro prévoit une pointe de consommation historique". Le Soleil (in French) (Quebec City). 23 January 2011. Retrieved 2011-01-23.
- Bélair-Cirino, Marco (16 January 2009). "Froid sibérien - Le réseau d'Hydro poussé à son extrême limite". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Hydro-Québec. "Regular bill". Retrieved 2010-09-04.
- Hydro-Québec (April 2012). "Rate D – Domestic rate (residential and farms)". Retrieved 2012-05-09.
- Régie de l'énergie du Québec (6 March 2009). "La Régie de l'énergie rend sa décision relative à la demande de modifier les tarifs d'Hydro-Québec dans ses activités de distribution, en appliquant une hausse tarifaire de 1,2 % à compter du 1er avril 2009" (in French). Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution. "Equalized Payments Plan and Authorized Payment". Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- CBC News (10 December 2007). "Hydro Quebec shelves smart meters". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2009-05-06.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution (2 August 2010). "HQD-12, Document 6 – Rapport final du Projet Tarifaire Heure Juste" (in French). Régie de l'énergie du Québec. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- Wright, Kristen (December 2010). "Electric Light & Power 2010 Utility of the Year: Hydro-Quebec". Electric Light & Power 88 (6). Retrieved 2011-01-17.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 97.
- Régie de l'énergie du Québec (30 May 2005). Avis de la Régie de l'énergie sur la distribution d’électricité aux grands consommateurs industriels (A-2005-01) (in French). Montreal. p. 96.
- Government of Quebec 2006, p. 24.
- Hydro-Québec Distribution (May 20, 2011). "Rapport annuel 2010: HQD-10, document 2 - Historique des ventes, des produits des ventes, des abonnements et de la consommation" (in French). p. 10. Retrieved March 9, 2012.
- Couture, Pierre (28 August 2008). "Les alumineries coûtent cher à Hydro-Québec : plus de 3 milliards $". Le Soleil (in French) (Quebec City). Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- Gouvernement du Québec (7 August 2007). "Le projet d'acquisition d'Alcan par Rio Tinto respecte les accords qui lient Alcan et le gouvernement du Québec". Quebec Department of Economic Development, Innovation and Exports. Retrieved 2009-03-19.
- Presse canadienne (20 December 2008). "Alcoa et Hydro-Québec ont renouvelé des ententes jusqu'en 2040". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Bélanger & Bernard 2008.
- Boulanger 2008.
- Hydro-Québec 2012a, p. 97.
- Hydro-Québec (2004-04-08). Annual Report 2003 : The Power of Change. Montreal: Hydro-Québec. p. 124. ISBN 2-550-42159-0. Archived from the original on 2004-04-09. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- Hydro-Québec 2011a, p. 9.
- Baril, Hélène (25 April 2007). "Hydro et le Vermont négocient un contrat". La Presse (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- "Governor, Premier announce preliminary Vermont-Hydro-Québec agreement" (Press release). Hydro-Québec. 11 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-10-06.
- State of Vermont (4 June 2010). "An Act Relating to Renewable Energy". Vermont Legislature. Retrieved 2010-07-04.
- Carlson, Kristin (4 June 2010). "Gov. Douglas signs final bill". WCAX News. Retrieved 2010-10-06.
- Cornwall Electric (26 May 2008). "Cornwall Electric Rates Decreasing July 1, 2008 Due to New Long Term Power Contract with Hydro Quebec" (Press release). Cornwall, ON. Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- North American Reliability Corporation 2008, p. 138.
- Presse canadienne (4 February 2009). "Exportations d'électricité - Retour des contrats à long terme avec les États-Unis". Le Devoir (in French) (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-01-07.
- Archambault, Jean-Jacques (1984). "Une technologie maîtrisée". In Couture, Marcel. Hydro-Québec: Des premiers défis à l'aube de l'an 2000 (in French). Montreal: Forces/Libre expression. pp. 125–137. ISBN 2-89111-191-5.
- Bélanger, Michel (1995). "Les actions d'Hydo-Québec à vendre ?". In Bélanger, Yves; Comeau, Robert. Hydro-Québec : Autres temps, autres défis. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec. pp. 89–95. ISBN 2-7605-0809-9.
- Bellavance, Claude (1995). "Un long mouvement d'appropriation de la première à la seconde nationalisation". In Bélanger, Yves; Comeau, Robert. Hydro-Québec : Autres temps, autres défis (in French). Sainte-Foy, Quebec: Presses de l'Université du Québec. pp. 71–78. ISBN 2-7605-0809-9.
- Bolduc, André (2000). Du génie au pouvoir : Robert A. Boyd, à la gouverne d'Hydro-Québec aux years glorieuses (in French). Montreal: Libre-Expression. ISBN 2-89111-829-4..
- Government of Quebec (2006). Using energy to build the Québec of tomorrow. Quebec City: Quebec Department of Natural Ressources and Wildlife. ISBN 2-550-46952-6.
- Bolduc, André; Hogue, Clarence; Larouche, Daniel (1989). Hydro-Québec After 100 Years of Electricity (in French). Montreal: Libre-Expression.
- Boutin, Vicky (2004). "La saga du Suroît". In Venne, Michel. L'annuaire du Québec 2005 (in French). Montreal: Fides. pp. 554–557. ISBN 2-7621-2568-5.
- Boyd, Robert A. (1995). "Cinquante ans au service du consommateur". In Bélanger, Yves; Comeau, Robert. Hydro-Québec : Autres temps, autres défis (in French). Sainte-Foy, Quebec: Presses de l'Université du Québec. pp. 97–103. ISBN 2-7605-0809-9.
- Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (2000). Rapport 144. Ligne à 735 kV Saint-Césaire–Hertel et poste de la Montérégie (in French). Quebec City: Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement. p. 111. ISBN 2-550-36846-0.
- Cloutier, Gilles-G. (1984). "Le rayonnement d'Hydro-Québec". In Couture, Marcel. Hydro-Québec: Des premiers défis à l'aube de l'an 2000 (in French). Montreal: Forces/Libre expression. pp. 166–175. ISBN 2-89111-191-5.
- Dubeau, Daniel (1995). "Le souci constant de l'environnement chez Hydro-Québec". In Bélanger, Yves; Comeau, Robert. Hydro-Québec : Autres temps, autres défis. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec. pp. 241–254. ISBN 2-7605-0809-9.
- Fleury, Jean Louis (1999). Les coureurs de lignes : l'histoire du transport de l'électricité au Québec (in French). Montreal: Stanké. ISBN 2-7604-0552-4..
- Gallichan, Gilles (1995). "De la Montreal Light, Heat and Power à Hydro-Québec". In Bélanger, Yves; Comeau, Robert. Hydro-Québec : Autres temps, autres défis (in French). Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec. pp. 63–70. ISBN 2-7605-0809-9.
- Garcia, Claude (February 2009). How would the privatisation of Hydro-Québec would make Quebecers richer ?. Montreal Economic Institute. ISBN 2-922687-25-2. Retrieved 2009-05-05.
- Government of Quebec (2002). Water. Our Life. Our Future. Quebec Water Policy. Quebec City: Quebec Department of Sustainable Development, the Environment and Parks. ISBN 2-550-40076-3.
- Gravel, Pierre; Vennat, Pierre (1979). "Robert Bourassa : « Il ne sera pas dit que nous vivrons pauvrement sur une terre aussi riche »". In Leroux, Roger. La Baie James : projet du siècle (in French). Montreal: La Presse. pp. 5–6.
- International Energy Agency (2004). Canada : 2004 Review. Energy Policies of IEA Countries. Paris: International Energy Agency. p. 127. ISBN 92-64-10801-7.
- Jobin, Carol (1978). Les enjeux économiques de la nationalisation de l'électricité (1962–1963) (in French). Montreal: Éditions coopératives Albert Saint-Martin.
- Munich Re (2003). Failure of Public Utilities : Risk Management and Insurance. Munich. pp. 6–7.
- Nalcor Energy (2009). Annual Report 2008. St. John's, NL. ISBN 978-2-550-55046-4.
- Norrie, Kenneth; Owram, Douglas; Emery, J.C. Herbert (2008). A History of the Canadian Economy (4th ed.). Toronto: Nelson. ISBN 978-0-17-625250-2.
- North American Reliability Corporation (November 2008). 2008/2009 Winter Reliability Assessment. Princeton, NJ.
- Quebec Hydroelectric Commission; Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited (1969). "Power Contract Between the Quebec Hydroelectric Commission and the Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation". Montreal: archive.org. Retrieved 2009-12-02.
- Régie de l'énergie du Québec (2008). 2007-2008 Annual Report. Montréal. p. 4. ISBN 978-2-550-53010-7.
- Savard, Stéphane (2013). Hydro-Québec et l'état québécois: 1944-2005 (in French). Quebec City: Septentrion. ISBN 978-2-89448-756-3.
- Smith, Philip (1975). Brinco: The story of Churchill Falls. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart. p. 372. ISBN 0-7710-8184-7.
- Société d'énergie de la Baie James (1987). Complexe hydroélectrique de la Grande-Rivière. Réalisation de la première phase (in French). Montreal: Société d'énergie de la Baie James/Éditions de la Chenelière. ISBN 2-89310-010-4.
- Trabandt, Charles A. (14 January 2000). Le tarif de fourniture d'électricité au Québec et les options possibles pour introduire la concurrence dans la production d'électricité (in French). New York: Merrill Lynch.
- Turgeon, Pierre (1992). La Radissonie, le pays de la baie James (in French). Montreal: Libre-Expression. ISBN 2-89111-502-3.
- Vandal, Thierry (2005). "Le défi du développement durable". In Venne, Michel; Robitaille, Antoine. L'annuaire du Québec 2006 (in French). Montreal: Fides. pp. 236–240. ISBN 2-7621-2646-0.
- Vermont Department of Public Service (December 2011). Comprehensive Energy Plan 2011: Facts, Analysis and Recommendations 2. Montpellier, VT. p. 104. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
- Williams, Susan (1993). Hydro-Québec and the Great Whale Project Hydroelectric Development in Northern Québec. Washington, D.C.: Investor Responsibility Research Center. ISBN 1-879775-15-8.
- Bélanger, Gérard; Bernard, Jean-Thomas (April 2008). "Coût économique de l'électricité vendue aux nouvelles alumineries". Policy Options (in French) 29 (4): 56–58. ISSN 0226-5893. Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Bernard, Jean-Thomas; Genest-Laplante, Éric; Laplante, Benoit (1992). "Le coût d'abandonner le projet Grande-Baleine". Canadian Public Policy (in French) 18 (2): 153–167. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
- Boulanger, André (April 2008). "Politique hydro-électrique et développement régional". Policy Options (in French) 29 (4): 59–62. ISSN 0226-5893. Retrieved 2009-03-15.
- Hafsi, Taieb (2001). "Fundamental Dynamics in Complex Organizational Change: A Longitudinal Inquiry into Hydro-Québec's Management". Long Range Planning 34 (5): 557–583. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00082-6.
- Langford, Martha Whitney; Debresson, Chris (1992). "The Role of Hydro Quebec in the Rise of Consulting Engineering in Montreal 1944-1992: An essay in oral history and company genealogy". Scientia Canadensis: Canadian Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine 16 (1, (42)): 76–108. Retrieved 2010-01-04.
- McNaughton, W.J.W. (April 1960). "Bersimis: The Development of a River". Canadian Geographical Journal (Ottawa: Royal Canadian Geographical Society) 60 (4): 114–135.
- Powers, John M. (2007). "Profile - Thierry Vandal, President and CEO of Hydro-Québec". Electric Light and Power 85 (4). p. 28.
- Sood, Vijay K. (Spring 2006). "IEEE Milestone : 40th Anniversary of 735 kV Transmission System". IEEE Canadian Review: 6–7. Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Tremblay, Alain; Bastien, Julie; Bonneville, Marie-Claude et al. (12–16 September 2010). "Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions at Eastmain 1 Reservoir, Quebec, Canada". World Energy Congress (Montreal). Retrieved 2010-10-31.
- Hydro-Québec (2012a). Annual Report 2011. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-63872-8. ISSN 0702-6706. Retrieved 2011-03-28.
- Hydro-Québec (2011a). Annual Report 2010. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-60869-1. ISSN 0702-6706. Retrieved 2011-03-23.
- Hydro-Québec (2010a). Shaping The Future : Annual Report 2009. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-58101-7. ISSN 0702-6706. Retrieved 2010-04-08.
- Hydro-Québec (2012b). Sustainability Report 2011. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-63876-6. Retrieved 2012-05-07.
- Hydro-Québec (March 2012c). Financial Profile 2011-2012. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-63884-1. ISSN 0821-1760. Retrieved 2012-03-29.
- Hydro-Québec (October 2011d). Comparison of Electricity Prices in Major North American Cities: Rates effective April 1, 2011. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-62677-0. Retrieved 2012-03-11.
- Hydro-Québec (July 2009a). Strategic Plan 2009–2013: Energy efficiency, renewable energies and technological innovation. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-56207-8. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- Hydro-Québec (July 2009b). Sustainable Development Action Plan 2009–2013. Montreal. ISBN 978-2-550-55279-6. Retrieved 2010-01-10.
- Hydro-Québec (in French). Installations de transport d’énergie au Québec (Map). 1:1,500,000 (August 2006 ed.). http://www.bape.gouv.qc.ca/sections/mandats/La%20Romaine_raccordement/documents/DA5.pdf. Retrieved 2010-08-14.
- Hayeur, Gaëtan (2001). Summary of Knowledge Acquired in Northern Environments from 1970 to 2000. Montreal: Hydro-Québec. ISBN 2-550-36964-5. Retrieved 2011-06-25.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Hydro-Québec.|