ITER

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the type of medieval circuit court, see Eyre (legal term).

Coordinates: 43°42′17.84″N 5°46′9.1″E / 43.7049556°N 5.769194°E / 43.7049556; 5.769194

International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor
ITER Logo NoonYellow.svg
ITER participants.svg
Thirty-five participating nations
Motto The way to new energy
Formation 24 October 2007
Headquarters 13115 St. Paul Lez Durance, France
Director-General Osamu Motojima
Website iter.org

ITER (originally an acronym of International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor and Latin for "the way" or "the road") is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject, which is currently building the world's largest experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor adjacent to the Cadarache facility in the south of France.[1] The ITER project aims to make the long-awaited transition from experimental studies of plasma physics to full-scale electricity-producing fusion power plants.

The project is funded and run by seven member entities — the European Union, India, Japan, People's Republic of China, Russia, South Korea and the United States. The EU, as host party for the ITER complex, is contributing about 45 percent of the cost, with the other six parties contributing approximately 9 percent each.[2][3][4]

The ITER fusion reactor itself has been designed to produce 500 megawatts of output power.[5] The machine aims to demonstrate the principle of producing more energy from the fusion process than is used to initiate it, something that has not yet been achieved in any fusion reactor. Construction of the ITER facility began in 2007, but the project has run into many delays and budget overruns. The building costs are now US$50 billion, roughly 10 times the original figure.[6] The facility is now expected to finish its construction phase in 2019. It will start commissioning the reactor that same year and initiate plasma experiments in 2020, but there is no plan to begin full deuterium-tritium fusion until 2027—if the ITER team can solve the technical challenges involved.[6][7][8] If ITER becomes operational, it will become the largest magnetic confinement plasma physics experiment in use, surpassing the Joint European Torus. The first commercial demonstration fusion power plant, named DEMO, is proposed to follow on from the ITER project.[9]

Background[edit]

Fusion power has the potential to provide sufficient energy to satisfy mounting demand, and to do so sustainably, with a relatively small impact on the environment.

Nuclear fusion has many potential attractions. Firstly, its hydrogen isotope fuels are relatively abundant – one of the necessary isotopes, deuterium, can be extracted from seawater, while the other fuel, tritium, would be bred from a lithium blanket using neutrons produced in the fusion reaction itself.[10] Furthermore, a fusion reactor would produce virtually no CO2 or atmospheric pollutants, and its other radioactive waste products would be very short-lived compared to those produced by conventional nuclear reactors.

On 21 November 2006, the seven participants formally agreed to fund the creation of a nuclear fusion reactor.[11] The program is anticipated to last for 30 years – 10 for construction, and 20 of operation. ITER was originally expected to cost approximately 5billion, but the rising price of raw materials and changes to the initial design have seen that amount more than triple to €16billion.[12] The reactor is expected to take 10 years to build with completion scheduled for 2019.[13] Site preparation has begun in Cadarache, France, and procurement of large components has started.[14]

ITER is designed to produce approximately 500 MW of fusion power sustained for up to 1,000 seconds[15] (compared to JET's peak of 16 MW for less than a second) by the fusion of about 0.5 g of deuterium/tritium mixture in its approximately 840 m3 reactor chamber. Although ITER is expected to produce (in the form of heat) 10 times more energy than the amount consumed to heat up the plasma to fusion temperatures, the generated heat will not be used to generate any electricity.[16]

ITER was originally an acronym for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, but that title was eventually dropped due to the negative popular connotations of the word "thermonuclear", especially when used in conjunction with "experimental". "Iter" also means "journey", "direction" or "way" in Latin,[17] reflecting ITER's potential role in harnessing nuclear fusion as a peaceful power source.

Organization history[edit]

ITER began in 1985 as a Reagan–Gorbachev[18][19] initiative[19][20] with the equal participation of the Soviet Union, European Union (through EURATOM), the United States, and Japan through the 1988–1998 initial design phases. Preparations for the first Gorbachev-Reagan Summit showed that there were no tangible agreements in the works for the summit. One energy research project, however, was being considered quietly by Alvin Trivelpiece and Evgeny Velikhov. The project involved collaboration on the next phase of magnetic fusion research—the construction of a demonstration model. At the time, magnetic fusion research was ongoing in Japan, Europe, the Soviet Union and the US. Velikhov and Trivelpiece believed that taking the next step in fusion research would be beyond the budget of any of the key nations and that collaboration would be useful internationally. A major bureaucratic fight erupted in the US government over the project. One argument against collaboration was that the Soviets would use it to steal US technology and know-how. A second was symbolic—the Soviet physicist Andrei Sakharov remained in prison and the US was pushing the Soviet Union on its human rights record. The United States National Security Council convened a meeting under the direction of William Flynn Martin that resulted in a consensus that the US should go forward with the project. Martin and Velikhov concluded the agreement that was agreed at the summit and announced in the last paragraph of this historic summit meeting "The two leaders emphasized the potential importance of the work aimed at utilizing controlled thermonuclear fusion for peaceful purposes and, in this connection, advocated the widest practicable development of international cooperation in obtaining this source of energy, which is essentially inexhaustible, for the benefit for all mankind."[21]

Conceptual and engineering design phases carried out under the auspices of the IAEA led to an acceptable, detailed design in 2001, underpinned by US$650 million worth of research and development by the "ITER Parties" to establish its practical feasibility. These parties (with the Russian Federation replacing the Soviet Union and with the USA opting out of the project in 1999 and returning in 2003) were joined in negotiations on the future construction, operation and decommissioning of ITER by Canada (who then terminated their participation at the end of 2003), the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea. India officially became part of ITER on 6 December 2005.

On 28 June 2005, it was officially announced that ITER will be built in the European Union in Southern France. The negotiations that led to the decision ended in a compromise between the EU and Japan, in that Japan was promised 20% of the research staff on the French location of ITER, as well as the head of the administrative body of ITER. In addition, another research facility for the project will be built in Japan, and the European Union has agreed to contribute about 50% of the costs of this institution.[22]

On 21 November 2006, an international consortium signed a formal agreement to build the reactor.[23] On 24 September 2007, the People's Republic of China became the seventh party to deposit the ITER Agreement to the IAEA. Finally, on 24 October 2007, the ITER Agreement entered into force and the ITER Organization legally came into existence.

Objectives[edit]

ITER's mission is to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion power, and prove that it can work without negative impact.[24] Specifically, the project aims:

  • To momentarily produce ten times more thermal energy from fusion heating than is supplied by auxiliary heating (a Q value equals 10).
  • To produce a steady-state plasma with a Q value greater than 5.
  • To maintain a fusion pulse for up to 480 seconds.
  • To ignite a 'burning' (self-sustaining) plasma.
  • To develop technologies and processes needed for a fusion power plant — including superconducting magnets and remote handling (maintenance by robot).
  • To verify tritium breeding concepts.
  • To refine neutron shield/heat conversion technology (most of the energy in the D+T fusion reaction is released in the form of fast neutrons).

Timeline and current status[edit]

In 1978, the EC, Japan, USA and USSR joined in the International Tokamak Reactor (INTOR) Workshop, under the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to assess the readiness of magnetic fusion to move forward to the experimental power reactor (EPR) stage, to identify the additional R&D that must be undertaken and to define the characteristics of such an EPR by means of a conceptual design. Hundreds of fusion scientists and engineers in each participating country took part in a detailed assessment of the then present status of the tokamak confinement concept vis-a-vis the requirements of an EPR, identified the required R&D by early 1980 and produced a conceptual design by mid-1981. At the Geneva summit meeting in 1985, Secretary Gorbachev suggested to President Reagan that the two countries jointly undertake the construction of a tokamak EPR as proposed by the INTOR Workshop. The ITER project was initiated in 1988. The history of the INTOR Workshop is documented in "Quest for a Fusion Energy Reactor: An Insider's Account of the INTOR Workshop", Oxford University Press (2010).

Launched in 1985,[25] the ITER project was formally agreed to and funded in 2006 with a cost estimate of €10 billion ($12.8 billion) projecting the start of construction in 2008 and completion a decade later.[11]

However, as of 2013, the project has run into many delays and budget overruns. The facility is now not expected to begin operations until the year 2027 – 11 years after initially anticipated.[8]

In February 2014, The New Yorker magazine published the ITER Management Assessment report, listing 11 essential recommendations, for example: "Create a Project Culture", "Instill a Nuclear Safety Culture", "Develop a realistic ITER Project Schedule" and "Simplify and Reduce the IO Bureaucracy".[26] The US Senate then published in July 2014 a report stating that: "the Committee directs the Department of Energy to work with the Department of State to withdraw from the ITER project".[27]

Timeline
Date Event
2006-11-21 Seven participants formally agreed to fund the creation of a nuclear fusion reactor.[11]
2008 Site preparation start, ITER itinerary start.[28]
2009 Site preparation completion.[28]
2010 Tokamak complex excavation starts.[25]
2013 Tokamak complex construction starts.[28]
2015 Predicted: Tokamak assembly starts.[28]
2019 Predicted: Tokamak assembly completion, torus pumpdown starts.[28]
2020 Predicted: Achievement of first plasma.[28]
2027 Predicted: Start of deuterium-tritium operation.[28]

Reactor overview[edit]

See also: Nuclear fusion

When deuterium and tritium fuse, two nuclei come together to form a helium nucleus (an alpha particle), and a high-energy neutron.

2
1
D
+ 3
1
T
4
2
He
+ 1
0
n
+ 17.6 MeV

While nearly all stable isotopes lighter on the periodic table than iron-56 and nickel-62, which have the highest binding energy per nucleon, will fuse with some other isotope and release energy, deuterium and tritium are by far the most attractive for energy generation as they require the lowest activation energy (thus lowest temperature) to do so, while producing among the most energy per unit weight.

All proto- and mid-life stars radiate enormous amounts of energy generated by fusion processes. Mass for mass, the deuterium-tritium fusion process releases roughly three times as much energy as uranium 235 fission, and millions of times more energy than a chemical reaction such as the burning of coal. It is the goal of a fusion power plant to harness this energy to produce electricity.

Activation energies for fusion reactions are generally high because the protons in each nucleus will tend to strongly repel one another, as they each have the same positive charge. A heuristic for estimating reaction rates is that nuclei must be able to get within 100 femtometer (1 × 10−13 meter) of each other, where the nuclei are increasingly likely to undergo quantum tunneling past the electrostatic barrier and the turning point where the strong nuclear force and the electrostatic force are equally balanced, allowing them to fuse. In ITER, this distance of approach is made possible by high temperatures and magnetic confinement. High temperatures give the nuclei enough energy to overcome their electrostatic repulsion (see Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution). For deuterium and tritium, the optimal reaction rates occur at temperatures on the order of 100,000,000 K. The plasma is heated to a high temperature by ohmic heating (running a current through the plasma). Additional heating is applied using neutral beam injection (which cross magnetic field lines without a net deflection and will not cause a large electromagnetic disruption) and radio frequency (RF) or microwave heating.

At such high temperatures, particles have a vast kinetic energy, and hence velocity. If unconfined, the particles will rapidly escape, taking the energy with them, cooling the plasma to the point where net energy is no longer produced. A successful reactor would need to contain the particles in a small enough volume for a long enough time for much of the plasma to fuse. In ITER and many other magnetic confinement reactors, the plasma, a gas of charged particles, is confined using magnetic fields. A charged particle moving through a magnetic field experiences a force perpendicular to the direction of travel, resulting in centripetal acceleration, thereby confining it to move in a circle.

A solid confinement vessel is also needed, both to shield the magnets and other equipment from high temperatures and energetic photons and particles, and to maintain a near-vacuum for the plasma to populate. The containment vessel is subjected to a barrage of very energetic particles, where electrons, ions, photons, alpha particles, and neutrons constantly bombard it and degrade the structure. The material must be designed to endure this environment so that a powerplant would be economical. Tests of such materials will be carried out both at ITER and at IFMIF (International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility).

Once fusion has begun, high energy neutrons will radiate from the reactive regions of the plasma, crossing magnetic field lines easily due to charge neutrality (see neutron flux). Since it is the neutrons that receive the majority of the energy, they will be ITER's primary source of energy output. Ideally, alpha particles will expend their energy in the plasma, further heating it.

Beyond the inner wall of the containment vessel one of several test blanket modules will be placed. These are designed to slow and absorb neutrons in a reliable and efficient manner, limiting damage to the rest of the structure, and breeding tritium for fuel from lithium and the incoming neutrons. Energy absorbed from the fast neutrons is extracted and passed into the primary coolant. This heat energy would then be used to power an electricity-generating turbine in a real power plant; in ITER this generating system is not of scientific interest, so instead the heat will be extracted and disposed of.

Technical design[edit]

Vacuum vessel[edit]

The vacuum vessel is the central part of the ITER machine: a double walled steel container in which the plasma is contained by means of magnetic fields.

The ITER vacuum vessel will be twice as large and 16 times as heavy as any previously manufactured fusion vessel: each of the nine torus shaped sectors will weigh between 390 and 430 tonnes.[29] When all the shielding and port structures are included, this adds up to a total of 5,116 tonnes. Its external diameter will measure 19.4 metres (64 ft), the internal 6.5 metres (21 ft). Once assembled, the whole structure will be 11.3 metres (37 ft) high.

The primary function of the vacuum vessel is to provide a hermetically sealed plasma container. Its main components are the main vessel, the port structures and the supporting system. The main vessel is a double walled structure with poloidal and toroidal stiffening ribs between 60 millimetres (2.4 in) thick shells to reinforce the vessel structure. These ribs also form the flow passages for the cooling water. The space between the double walls will be filled with shield structures made of stainless steel. The inner surfaces of the vessel will be covered with blanket modules. These modules will provide shielding from the high-energy neutrons produced by the fusion reactions and some will also be used for tritium breeding concepts.

The vacuum vessel has 18 upper, 17 equatorial and 9 lower ports that will be used for remote handling operations, diagnostic systems, neutral beam injections and vacuum pumping.

Magnet system[edit]

The central solenoid coil will use superconducting niobium-tin to carry 46 kA and produce a field of up to 13.5 teslas. The 18 toroidal field coils will also use niobium-tin. At their maximum field strength of 11.8 teslas, they will be able to store 41 gigajoules. They have been tested at a record 80 kA. Other lower field ITER magnets (PF and CC) will use niobium-titanium for their superconducting elements.

Cryostat[edit]

The cryostat is a large 3,800 ton stainless steel structure surrounding the vacuum vessel and the superconducting magnets, in order to provide a super-cool vacuum environment. Its thickness ranging from 50 to 250 mm will allow it to withstand a vacuum pressure of 1×10−4 Pa on a volume of 8,500 cubic meters. The total of 54 modules of the cryostat will be engineered, procured, manufactured and installed by L&T Heavy Engineering.[30][31]

Cooling systems[edit]

The ITER tokamak will use three interconnected cooling systems. Most of the heat will be removed by a primary water cooling loop, itself cooled by water through a heat exchanger within the tokamak building's secondary confinement. The secondary cooling loop will be cooled by a larger complex, comprising a cooling tower, a 5 km pipeline supplying water from Canal de Provence, and basins that allow cooling water to be cooled and tested for chemical contamination and tritium before being released into the Durance River. This system will need to dissipate an average power of 450 MW during the tokamak's operation. A liquid nitrogen system will provide a further 1,300 kW of cooling to 80 Kelvin, and a liquid helium system will provide 75 kW of cooling to 4.5 Kelvin. The liquid helium system will be designed, manufactured, installed and commissioned by Air Liquide.[32][33]

Location[edit]

Location of Cadarache in France

The process of selecting a location for ITER was long and drawn out. The most likely sites were Cadarache in Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur, France, and Rokkasho, Aomori, Japan. Additionally, Canada announced a bid for the site in Clarington in May 2001, but withdrew from the race in 2003. Spain also offered a site at Vandellòs on 17 April 2002, but the EU decided to concentrate its support solely behind the French site in late November 2003. From this point on, the choice was between France and Japan. On 3 May 2005, the EU and Japan agreed to a process which would settle their dispute by July.

At the final meeting in Moscow on 28 June 2005, the participating parties agreed to construct ITER at Cadarache in Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur, France. Construction of the ITER complex began in 2007, while assembly of the tokamak itself is scheduled to begin in 2015.[14]

Fusion for Energy, the EU agency in charge of the European contribution to the project, is located in Barcelona, Spain. Fusion for Energy (F4E) is the European Union's Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy. According to the agency's website:

"F4E is responsible for providing Europe's contribution to ITER, the world's largest scientific partnership that aims to demonstrate fusion as a viable and sustainable source of energy. [...] F4E also supports fusion research and development initiatives [...]"[34]

Participants[edit]

Thirty-five countries participate in the ITER project

Currently there are seven parties participating in the ITER program: the European Union (through the legally distinct organisation EURATOM), India, Japan, People's Republic of China, Russia, South Korea, and the United States.[14] Canada was previously a full member, but has since pulled out due to a lack of funding from the federal government. The lack of funding also resulted in Canada withdrawing from its bid for the ITER site in 2003. The host member of the ITER project, and hence the member contributing most of the costs, is the EU.

In 2007, it was announced that participants in the ITER will consider Kazakhstan's offer to join the program[35] and in March 2009, Switzerland, an associate member of EURATOM since 1979, also ratified the country's accession to the European Domestic Agency Fusion for Energy as a third country member.[36]

ITER's work is supervised by the ITER Council, which has the authority to appoint senior staff, amend regulations, decide on budgeting issues, and allow additional states or organizations to participate in ITER.[37] The present Chairman of the ITER Council is Dr Hideyuki Takatsu [38]

Participating countries

Funding[edit]

As of 13 July 2010, the total price of constructing the experiment is expected to be in excess of €15 billion,[39] an increase of €5 billion from the 2009 estimate.[40] Prior to that, the proposed costs for ITER were €5 billion for the construction and €5 billion for maintenance and the research connected with it during its 35 year lifetime. At the June 2005 conference in Moscow the participating members of the ITER cooperation agreed on the following division of funding contributions: 45% by the hosting member, the European Union, and the rest split between the non-hosting members – China, India, Japan, South Korea, the Russian Federation and the USA. During the operation and deactivation phases, Euratom will contribute to 34% of the total costs.[41]

Although Japan's financial contribution as a non-hosting member is 1/11th of the total, the EU agreed to grant it a special status so that Japan will provide for 2/11ths of the research staff at Cadarache and be awarded 2/11ths of the construction contracts, while the European Union's staff and construction components contributions will be cut from 5/11ths to 4/11ths.

It was reported in December 2010 that the European Parliament had refused to approve a plan by member states to reallocate €1.4 billion from the budget to cover a shortfall in ITER building costs in 2012–13. The closure of the 2010 budget required this financing plan to be revised, and the European Commission (EC) was forced to put forward an ITER budgetary resolution proposal in 2011.[42]

Criticism[edit]

The ITER project confronts numerous technically challenging issues. The French Nobel laureate in physics Pierre-Gilles de Gennes said of nuclear fusion, "We say that we will put the sun into a box. The idea is pretty. The problem is, we don't know how to make the box."[43]

A technical concern is that the 14 MeV neutrons produced by the fusion reactions will damage the materials from which the reactor is built.[44] Research is in progress to determine how and/or if reactor walls can be designed to last long enough to make a commercial power plant economically viable in the presence of the intense neutron bombardment. The damage is primarily caused by high energy neutrons knocking atoms out of their normal position in the crystal lattice. A related problem for a future commercial fusion power plant is that the neutron bombardment will induce radioactivity in the reactor material itself.[45] Maintaining and decommissioning a commercial reactor may thus be difficult and expensive. Another problem is that superconducting magnets are damaged by neutron fluxes. A new special research facility, IFMIF, is planned to investigate this problem.

Another source of concern comes from the recent tokamak parameters database interpolation which says that power load on tokamak divertors will be five times the expected value for ITER and much more for actual electricity-generating reactors. Given that the projected power load on the ITER divertor is already very high, these new findings mean that new divertor designs should be urgently tested.[46] However, the corresponding test facility (Alcator DX) still didn't receive funding and is absent from the international agenda.

A number of fusion researchers working on non-tokamak systems, such as Robert Bussard and Eric Lerner, have been critical of ITER for diverting funding from what they believe could be a potentially more viable and/or cost-effective path to fusion power, such as the polywell reactor.[47][48] Many critics accuse ITER researchers of being unwilling to face up to the technical and economic potential problems posed by Tokamak fusion schemes.[47]

A French association including about 700 anti-nuclear groups, Sortir du nucléaire (Get Out of Nuclear Energy), claimed that ITER was a hazard because scientists did not yet know how to manipulate the high-energy deuterium and tritium hydrogen isotopes used in the fusion process.[49]

Rebecca Harms, Green/EFA member of the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, said: "In the next 50 years, nuclear fusion will neither tackle climate change nor guarantee the security of our energy supply." Arguing that the EU's energy research should be focused elsewhere, she said: "The Green/EFA group demands that these funds be spent instead on energy research that is relevant to the future. A major focus should now be put on renewable sources of energy." French Green party lawmaker Noël Mamère claims that more concrete efforts to fight present-day global warming will be neglected as a result of ITER: "This is not good news for the fight against the greenhouse effect because we're going to put ten billion euros towards a project that has a term of 30–50 years when we're not even sure it will be effective."[50]

Responses to criticism[edit]

Proponents believe that much of the ITER criticism is misleading and inaccurate, in particular the allegations of the experiment's "inherent danger." The stated goals for a commercial fusion power station design are that the amount of radioactive waste produced should be hundreds of times less than that of a fission reactor, and that it should produce no long-lived radioactive waste, and that it is impossible for any such reactor to undergo a large-scale runaway chain reaction. A direct contact of the plasma with ITER inner walls would contaminate it, causing it to cool immediately and stop the fusion process. In addition, the amount of fuel contained in a fusion reactor chamber (one half gram of deuterium/tritium fuel[14]) is only sufficient to sustain the fusion burn pulse from minutes up to an hour at most, whereas a fission reactor usually contains several years worth of fuel.[51] Moreover, some detritiation systems will be implemented, so that at a Fuel Cycle inventory level of about 2 kg, ITER will eventually need to recycle large amounts of tritium and at turnovers orders of magnitude higher than any preceding tritium facility worldwide.[52]

In the case of an accident (or sabotage) it is expected that a fusion reactor might release far less radioactive pollution than would an ordinary fission nuclear plant. Furthermore, ITER's type of fusion power has little in common with nuclear weapons technology, and does not produce the fissile materials necessary for the construction of a weapon. Proponents note that large-scale fusion power would be able to produce reliable electricity on demand, and with virtually zero pollution (no gaseous CO2 / SO2 / NOx by-products are produced).

According to researchers at a demonstration reactor in Japan, a fusion generator should be feasible in the 2030s and no later than the 2050s. Japan is pursuing its own research program with several operational facilities that are exploring several fusion paths.[53]

In the United States alone, electricity accounts for US$210 billion in annual sales.[54] Asia's electricity sector attracted US$93 billion in private investment between 1990 and 1999.[55] These figures take into account only current prices. Proponents of ITER contend that an investment in research now should be viewed as an attempt to earn a far greater future return.[citation needed] Also, worldwide investment of less than US$1 billion per year into ITER is not incompatible with concurrent research into other methods of power generation, which in 2007 totaled US$16.9 billion.[56]

Supporters of ITER emphasize that the only way to test ideas for withstanding the intense neutron flux is to experimentally subject materials to that flux, which is one of the primary missions of ITER and the IFMIF,[14] and both facilities will be vitally important to that effort.[57] The purpose of ITER is to explore the scientific and engineering questions that surround potential fusion power plants. It is nearly impossible to acquire satisfactory data for the properties of materials expected to be subject to an intense neutron flux, and burning plasmas are expected to have quite different properties from externally heated plasmas.[citation needed] Supporters contend that the answer to these questions requires the ITER experiment, especially in the light of the monumental potential benefits.

Furthermore, the main line of research via tokamaks has been developed to the point that it is now possible to undertake the penultimate step in magnetic confinement plasma physics research with a self-sustained reaction. In the tokamak research program, recent advances devoted to controlling the configuration of the plasma have led to the achievement of substantially improved energy and pressure confinement, which reduces the projected cost of electricity from such reactors by a factor of two to a value only about 50% more than the projected cost of electricity from advanced light-water reactors. In addition, progress in the development of advanced, low activation structural materials supports the promise of environmentally benign fusion reactors and research into alternate confinement concepts is yielding the promise of future improvements in confinement.[58] Finally, supporters contend that other potential replacements to the fossil fuels have environmental issues of their own. Solar, wind, and hydroelectric power all have a relatively low power output per square kilometer compared to ITER's successor DEMO which, at 2,000 MW,[59] would have an energy density that exceeds even large fission power plants.[60]

Similar projects[edit]

Precursors to ITER were JET[61] and Tore Supra.[62] Other designs of fusion reactor are DEMO,[63] Wendelstein 7-X,[64] NIF,[65] HiPER,[66] and MAST.[67]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ The ITER project. EFDA, European Fusion Development Agreement (2006).
  2. ^ Amos, Jonathan. (14 October 2010) Key component contract for Iter fusion reactor. Bbc.co.uk. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  3. ^ ITER – Our Contribution. Fusionforenergy.europa.eu. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  4. ^ Lengthy ITER dispute concludes in favour of France. European Commission press release. Cordis.europa.eu (28 June 2005). Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  5. ^ "Key component contract for Iter fusion reactor". BBC NEWS. 14 October 2010. Retrieved 20 October 2010. 
  6. ^ a b "Fusion furore: Soaring construction costs for ITER are jeopardizing alternative fusion projects". Nature. 23 July 2014. 
  7. ^ "ITER - the way to new energy". ITER. 2014. 
  8. ^ a b W Wayt Gibbs (30 December 2013). "Triple-threat method sparks hope for fusion". Nature. 
  9. ^ ITER & Beyond . ITER. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  10. ^ "Fusion fuels". ITER. Retrieved 24 October 2011.
  11. ^ a b c "Green light for nuclear fusion project". New Scientist. 21 November 2006. Retrieved 13 September 2009. 
  12. ^ "Deal finalised on fusion reactor". BBC News. 29 July 2010. 
  13. ^ McGrath, Matt. (29 July 2010) Deal finalised on fusion reactor. Bbc.co.uk. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  14. ^ a b c d e ITER website. Iter.org. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  15. ^ ITER – The World's Largest Tokamak. iter.org
  16. ^ ITER & the Environment. Iter.org. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  17. ^ iter. Latin Dictionary and Grammar Aid. Catholic.archives.nd.edu. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  18. ^ Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science, Inc. (October 1992). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science, Inc. pp. 9–. ISSN 0096-3402. 
  19. ^ a b Braams, C.M. and Stott, P.E. (2010). Nuclear Fusion: Half a Century of Magnetic Confinement Fusion Research. Taylor & Francis. pp. 250–. ISBN 978-0-7503-0705-5. 
  20. ^ Plasma 2010 Committee; Plasma Science Committee; National Research Council (2007). Plasma Science: Advancing Knowledge in the National Interest. National Academies Press. pp. 222–. ISBN 978-0-309-10943-7. 
  21. ^ Joint Soviet-United States Statement on the Summit Meeting in Geneva Ronald Reagan. November 21, 1985
  22. ^ Japan cedes ITER project to France. The Asahi Shimbun, 29 June 2005.
  23. ^ "States sign nuclear energy pact". BBC news. 21 November 2006. Retrieved 5 May 2010. 
  24. ^ "Why ITER?". The ITER Organization. Retrieved 13 September 2009. 
  25. ^ a b "The Geneva Summit". Milestones in the History of the ITER Project. ITER. November 1985. Retrieved 12 September 2012. 
  26. ^ "How to fix ITER". The New Yorker magazine. 28 February 2014. Retrieved 12 August 2014. 
  27. ^ "Senate FY 2015 DOE Office of Science Appropriations Bill". American Institute of Physics. 29 July 2014. Retrieved 12 August 2014. 
  28. ^ a b c d e f g "Approved! Council gives project green light to proceed". ITER & Beyond. The Phases of ITER. ITER. September 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012. 
  29. ^ ITER Vacuum Vessel Assembly – Call for Expression of Interest. ITER. 20 Feb 2009.
  30. ^ "Larsen & Toubro Ltd will manufacture ITER Cryostat". 3 September 2012. Retrieved 2 January 2013. 
  31. ^ "Nuclear fusion win for Larsen & Toubrot". 12 September 2012. Retrieved 2 January 2013. 
  32. ^ "World's largest cryogenic plant to be installed in ITER fusion reactor". Science World Report. Science World Report. December 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2012. 
  33. ^ "EUR 83 million contract signed for Liquid Helium Plant". Retrieved 31 December 2012. 
  34. ^ The EU's Fusion for Energy website. Fusionforenergy.europa.eu (19 April 2007). Retrieved on 2013-05-21.
  35. ^ "Kazakhstan Offers To Join International Fusion Power Project". RIA Novosti. Retrieved 14 July 2007. 
  36. ^ "Switzerland officializes ITER participation". www.iter.org. 29 May 2009. Retrieved 1 May 2014. 
  37. ^ "ITER Council, ITER's top authority". ITER.org. 
  38. ^ "10th ITER Council, the first chaired by Dr. Hideyuki Takatsu of Japan". ITER.org. 
  39. ^ "EU member states agree on Iter funding shortfall", BBC, 13 July 2010.
  40. ^ "Fusion falters under soaring costs", BBC, 17 June 2009 (accessed 18 June 2009).
  41. ^ ITER & Fusion Research press release. Europa.eu, 5 May 2011. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  42. ^ Nuclear fusion finance plan rejected by EU Parliament, BBC, 16 December 2010 (accessed 19 December 2010).
  43. ^ Michio Kaku, Physics of the Impossible, p.46-47
  44. ^ Cambi, G.; Cepraga, D.G.; Frisoni, M.; Carloni, F. (1999). "Neutron irradiation effects on the ITER-EDA and ITER-RC first wall/blanket materials". 18th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering. Symposium Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH37050). p. 330. doi:10.1109/FUSION.1999.849850. ISBN 0-7803-5829-5. 
  45. ^ ITER homepage: Hot Cell. Iter.org. Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  46. ^ Innovation is Key from ITER to DEMO The FIRE Place.
  47. ^ a b Dr. Robert Bussard (lecturer) (9 November 2006). "Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)" (Flash video). Google Tech Talks. Google. Archived from the original on 2007-02-05. Retrieved 23 December 2007. 
  48. ^ Focus Fusion: The Fastest Route to Cheap, Clean Energy. youtube.com
  49. ^ France Wins Nuclear Fusion Plant. Deutsche Welle. Dw-world.de (28 June 2005). Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  50. ^ Mixed reactions to ITER | EurActiv.
  51. ^ Facts and Stats... 1/3 of fuel rods changed every 18 months. STPNOC.com.
  52. ^ "Detritiation Systems at ITER". French Nuclear Safety Authority. 2010. Retrieved 12 August 2014. 
  53. ^ Hiwatari, R.; Okano, K.; Asaoka, Y.; Shinya, K.; Ogawa, Y. (2005). "Demonstration tokamak fusion power plant for early realization of net electric power generation". Nuclear Fusion 45 (2): 96. Bibcode:2005NucFu..45...96H. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/45/2/004. 
  54. ^ DOE/EIA-0623 Challenges of Electric Power Industry Restructuring for Fuel Suppliers. Eia.doe.gov (September 1998). Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  55. ^ Worldwide power|Electric Perspectives|Find Articles at BNET.com[dead link]
  56. ^ "GLOBAL TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT 2008". Retrieved 10 October 2010. 
  57. ^ Nuclear Data for Helium Production in Fusion. (PDF) . Retrieved on 21 May 2013.
  58. ^ Commentaries on criticisms of magnetic fusion, Weston M. Stacey, Georgia Institute of Technology, March 1999
  59. ^ "Demonstration Fusion Reactors". Fusion for Energy. European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy. Retrieved 17 November 2008. 
  60. ^ U.S. Nuclear Statistics. Date of Latest Data: 2008, Report Released: August 2009, eia.doe.gov.
  61. ^ "EFDA-JET". EFDA. 2009. Retrieved 29 May 2009. 
  62. ^ "Tore Supra". CEA. 
  63. ^ "Beyond ITER". iter.org. 
  64. ^ "Wendelstein 7-X". Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik. 3 April 2009. Retrieved 29 May 2009. 
  65. ^ "National Ignition Facility & Photon Science". Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Retrieved 29 May 2009. 
  66. ^ "HiPER". HiPER Project. 2009. Retrieved 29 May 2009. 
  67. ^ "MAST". Mega Ampere Spherical Tokamak. 2010. Archived from the original on 2010-02-13. Retrieved 1 February 2010. 

External links[edit]