Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
|
|
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
|
|
|
This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. The following WikiProjects or Portals may be able to help recruit one:
|
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Division C of Pub.L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-546, enacted September 30, 1996 (often referred to as "i-RAI-ruh" by federal appellate law clerks, and sometimes abbreviated as "IIRAIRA" or "IIRIRA") vastly changed the immigration laws of the United States.
This act states that immigrants unlawfully present in the United States for 180 days but less than 365 days must remain outside the United States for three years unless they obtain a pardon. If they are in the United States for 365 days or more, they must stay outside the United States for ten years unless they obtain a waiver. If they return to the United States without the pardon, thet may not apply for a waiver for a period of ten years.
Contents |
[edit] Constitutional issues within the law
Previously, immediate deportation was triggered only for offenses that could lead to five years or more in jail. Under the Act, minor offenses such as shoplifting may make individuals eligible for deportation. When IIRIRA was passed in 1996, it was applied retroactively to all those convicted of deportable offenses.
However, in 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that Congress did not intend IIRIRA to be applied retroactively to those who pleaded guilty to a crime prior to the enactment of IIRIRA if they would not have been deportable at the time that they pleaded guilty in (INS v. St. Cyr).
IIRIRA's mandatory detention provisions have also been repeatedly challenged, with less success.
[edit] Deportation issues
Deportees may be held in jail for months, even as much as two years, before being brought before an immigration board, at which defendants need to pay for their own legal representation. In 2001, the Supreme Court curtailed the Immigration Service's ability to hold deportees indefinitely in Zadvydas v. Davis.
The Act has been applied much more vigorously since 9/11. At least 1000 British citizens were affected by the law in 2003.
[edit] Section 287(g) and relations between federal and lower levels of government
IIRIRA addressed the relationship between the federal government and local governments. Section 287(g) is a program of the act that permits the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to enter into agreements with state and local law enforcement agencies, permitting designated officers to perform immigration law enforcement functions, pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement. This section does not simply deputize state and local law enforcement personnel to enforce immigration matters.[1]
This provision was implemented by local and state authorities in five states: California, Arizona, Alabama, Florida and North Carolina by the end of 2006.[2]
[edit] See also
- Gallegly amendment, a rejected amendment to this bill
- Cambodian American Repatriation
- DREAM Act
- Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act
[edit] References
- ^ http://www.ice.gov/doclib/pi/news/factsheets/060816dc287gfactsheet.pdf
- ^ Katie Zezima, "Massachusetts Set for Its Officers to Enforce Immigration Law," "New York Times," December 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/13/us/13romney.html?ex=1187582400&en=26f4c2bb4c5c983c&ei=5070
[edit] External links
- Text of IIRIRA (See pg. 547 in this document).
- USCIS Factsheet, March 1997
- INS v. St. Cyr
- Zadvydas v. Davis
- USCIS Summary of the Act