Indium tin oxide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Indium tin oxide
Physical properties
Melting point 1800–2200 K (1526-1926 °C) (2800–3500 °F)
Density 7120–7160 kg/m3 at 293 K
Color (in powder form) Pale yellow to greenish yellow, depending on SnO2 concentration
Values vary with composition. SI units and STP are used except where noted.
absorption of glass and ITO glass
ITO grains on glass substrates with a few nano-particle impurities

Indium tin oxide (ITO, or tin-doped indium oxide) is a solid solution of indium(III) oxide (In2O3) and tin(IV) oxide (SnO2), typically 90% In2O3, 10% SnO2 by weight. It is transparent and colorless in thin layers while in bulk form it is yellowish to grey. In the infrared region of the spectrum it acts as a metal-like mirror.

Indium tin oxide is one of the most widely used transparent conducting oxides because of its two chief properties, its electrical conductivity and optical transparency, as well as the ease with which it can be deposited as a thin film. As with all transparent conducting films, a compromise must be made between conductivity and transparency, since increasing the thickness and increasing the concentration of charge carriers will increase the material's conductivity, but decrease its transparency.

Thin films of indium tin oxide are most commonly deposited on surfaces by physical vapor deposition. Often used is electron beam evaporation, or a range of sputter deposition techniques.

Common uses[edit]

ITO is often used to make transparent conductive coatings for displays such as liquid crystal displays, flat panel displays, plasma displays, touch panels, and electronic ink applications. Thin films of ITO are also used in organic light-emitting diodes, solar cells, antistatic coatings and EMI shieldings. In organic light-emitting diodes, ITO is used as the anode (hole injection layer).

ITO films deposited on windshields are used for defrosting aircraft windshields.[1] The heat is generated by applying a voltage on the film.

Thin film interference caused by ITO defrosting coating on an Airbus cockpit window. The film thickness is intentionally non-uniform to prevent uneven removal of ice/frost.

ITO is also used for various optical coatings, most notably infrared-reflecting coatings (hot mirrors) for automotive, and sodium vapor lamp glasses. Other uses include gas sensors, antireflection coatings, electrowetting on dielectrics, and Bragg reflectors for VCSEL lasers. ITO is also used as the IR reflector for low-e window panes. ITO was also used as a sensor coating in the later Kodak DCS cameras, starting with the Kodak DCS 520, as a means of increasing blue channel response.[2]

ITO thin film strain gauges can operate at temperatures up to 1400 °C and can be used in harsh environments, such as gas turbines, jet engines, and rocket engines.[3]

Material and spectral properties[edit]

ITO is a heavily-doped n-type semiconductor with a large bandgap of around 4 eV.[4] Because of the bandgap, it is mostly transparent in the visible part of the spectrum. In the ultraviolet, it is opaque because of band-to-band absorption (a UV photon can excite an electron from the valence band to the conduction band). It is also opaque in the near infrared, because of free carrier absorption (an infrared photon can excite an electron from near the bottom of the conduction band to higher within the conduction band).

Alternatives[edit]

Because of high cost and limited supply of indium, the fragility and lack of flexibility of ITO layers, and the costly layer deposition requiring vacuum, alternatives are being sought.[5] Carbon nanotube conductive coatings are a prospective replacement.[6][7] As another carbon-based alternative, films of graphene are flexible and have been shown to allow 90% transparency with a lower electrical resistance than standard ITO.[8] Thin metal films are also seen as a potential replacement material. A hybrid material alternative currently being tested is an electrode made of silver nanowires and covered with graphene. The advantages to such materials include maintaining transparency while simultaneously being electrically conductive and flexible.[9] Inherently conductive polymers (ICPs) are also being developed for some ITO applications.[10] Typically the conductivity is lower for conducting polymers, such as polyaniline and PEDOT:PSS, than inorganic materials, but they are more flexible, less expensive and more environmentally friendly in processing and manufacture. Other, inorganic alternatives include aluminum, gallium or indiumdoped zinc oxide (AZO, GZO or IZO).

In order to reduce indium content, decrease processing difficulty, and improve electrical homogeneity, amorphous transparent conducting oxides have been developed. One such material, amorphous indium-zinc-oxide maintains short-range order even though crystallization is disrupted by the difference in the ratio of oxygen to metal atoms between In2O3 and ZnO. The amorphous structure remains stable even up to 500°C, which allows for important processing steps common in organic solar cells.[5] The improvement in homogeneity significantly enhances the usability of the material in the case of organic solar cells. Areas of poor electrode performance in organic solar cells render a percentage of the cell’s area unusable.[11]

Constraints and trade-offs[edit]

The main concern about ITO is the cost. ITO can be priced several times more highly than aluminium zinc oxide (AZO). AZO is a common choice of transparent conducting oxide (TCO) because of cost and relatively good optical transmission performance in the solar spectrum. However, ITO does consistently defeat AZO in almost every performance category including chemical resistance to moisture. ITO is not affected by moisture and it can survive in a CIGS cell for 25–30 years on a rooftop. While the sputtering target or evaporative material that is used to deposit the ITO is significantly more costly than AZO, consider that the amount of material placed on each cell is quite small. Therefore the cost penalty per cell is quite small too.

Benefits[edit]

Surface morphology changes in Al:ZnO and i-/Al:ZnO upon dump heat (DH) exposure (optical interferometry)[12]

The primary advantage of ITO compared to AZO as a transparent conductor for LCDs is that ITO can be precisely etched into fine patterns.[13] AZO cannot be etched as precisely: It is so sensitive to acid that it tends to get over-etched by an acid treatment.[13]

Another benefit of ITO compared to AZO is that if moisture does penetrate,ITO will degrade less than AZO.[12]

Research examples[edit]

ITO can be used in nanotechnology to provide a path to a new generation of solar cells. Solar cells made with these devices have the potential to provide low-cost, ultra-lightweight, and flexible cells with a wide range of applications. Because of the nanoscale dimensions of the nanorods, quantum-size effects influence their optical properties. By tailoring the size of the rods, they can be made to absorb light within a specific narrow band of colors. By stacking several cells with different sized rods, a broad range of wavelengths across the solar spectrum can be collected and converted to energy. Moreover, the nanoscale volume of the rods leads to a significant reduction in the amount of semiconductor material needed compared to a conventional cell.[14] [15]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Boeing 787 flies with PPG Aerospace transparencies, coatings, sealants". 
  2. ^ KODAK PROFESSIONAL: Technical Information Bulletin: Increasing the Blue Channel Response
  3. ^ Qing Luo. "Indium tin oxide thin film strain gages for use at elevated temperatures". Retrieved 2010-03-18. 
  4. ^ Kim, H.; Gilmore, C. M.; Piqué, A.; Horwitz, J. S.; Mattoussi, H.; Murata, H.; Kafafi, Z. H.; Chrisey, D. B. (1st December 1999). "Electrical, optical, and structural properties of indium–tin–oxide thin films for organic light-emitting devices". Journal of Applied Physics 86 (11): 6451. doi:10.1063/1.371708. Retrieved 29 July 2014. 
  5. ^ a b Fortunato, E.; D. Ginley, H. Hosono and D.C. Paine (March 2007). "Transparent Conducting Oxides for Photovoltaics". MRS Bulletin 32: 242–247. doi:10.1557/mrs2007.29. 
  6. ^ "Researchers find replacement for rare material indium tin oxide" (online). R&D Magazine (Advantage Business Media). 11 April 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011. 
  7. ^ Kyrylyuk, Andriy V.; Hermant, Marie Claire; Schilling, Tanja; Klumperman, Bert; Koning, Cor E.; van der Schoot, Paul (10 April 2011), "Controlling electrical percolation in multicomponent carbon nanotube dispersions", Nature Nanotechnology (Nature Publishing Group), Advance Online Publication, retrieved 11 April 2010 
  8. ^ "Graphene Finally Goes Big". Science Now. AAAS. June 20, 2010. Retrieved 17 March 2011. 
  9. ^ Chen, Ruiyi; Suprem R. Das; Changwook Jeong; Mohammad Ryyan Khan; David B. Janes; Muhammad A. Alam (April 2013). "Co-Percolating Graphene-Wrapped Silver Nanowire Network for High Performance, Highly Stable, Transparent Conducting Electrodes". Advanced Functional Materials. doi:10.1002/adfm.201300124. 
  10. ^ Xia, Yijie; Sun, Kuan; Ouyang, Jianyong (8 May 2012). "Solution-Processed Metallic Conducting Polymer Films as Transparent Electrode of Optoelectronic Devices". Advanced Materials 24 (18): 2436–2440. doi:10.1002/adma.201104795. 
  11. ^ Irwin, Michael D.; Liu, Jun; Leever, Benjamin J.; Servaites, Jonathan D.; Hersam, Mark C.; Durstock, Michael F.; Marks, Tobin J. (16 February 2010). "Consequences of Anode Interfacial Layer Deletion. HCl-Treated ITO in P3HT:PCBM-Based Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Photovoltaic Devices". Langmuir 26 (4): 2584–2591. doi:10.1021/la902879h. 
  12. ^ a b "National Renewable Energy Laboratory". 
  13. ^ a b Handbook of Transparent Conductors, by David S. Ginley, p524, Google books link.
  14. ^ National Nanotechnology Initiative. "Energy Conversion and Storage: New Materials and Processes for Energy Needs". (dead link)
  15. ^ "National Nanotechnologie Initiative Research and Develoopment Supporting the next Industrial Revolution, page 29". 

External links[edit]