Inertial electrostatic confinement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Inertial electrostatic confinement (often abbreviated as IEC) is a concept for retaining a plasma using an electrostatic field. The field accelerates charged particles (either ions or electrons) radially inward, usually in a spherical but sometimes in a cylindrical geometry. Ions can be confined with IEC in order to achieve controlled nuclear fusion. One of the earliest proposals for IEC was by Willam C Elmore, et al. in January 1959.[1]

Contents

[edit] Approaches to IEC

Hirsch–Meeks fusor. The two concentric electrodes can be seen in the center of the reaction chamber. From US patent 3,530,497

The best-known IEC device is the Farnsworth-Hirsch Fusor.[2] This system consists largely of two concentric spherical electrical grids inside a vacuum chamber into which a small amount of fusion fuel is introduced. Voltage across the grids causes the fuel to ionize around them, and positively charged ions are accelerated towards the center of the chamber. Those ions may collide and fuse with ions coming from the other direction, may scatter without fusing, or may pass directly through. In the latter two cases, the ions will tend to be stopped by the electric field and re-accelerated toward the center. Fusors can also use ion guns rather than electric grids.

The fusor is popular because simple versions can be built by many people, making it accessible to those that want to explore this field. Even these simple devices can reproducibly and convincingly produce fusion reactions, but no fusor has ever come close to producing a significant amount of fusion power. They can be dangerous if proper care is not taken because they require high voltages and can produce harmful radiation (neutrons, gamma rays and x-rays). The basic IEC device has been developed as a commercial neutron generator for industrial applications: first with the trade name FusionStar and now NSD-Fusion.

Three newer approaches try to solve a problem found in the fusor, which is that some ions collide with the grids. This heats the grids, sprays high-mass ions into the reaction chamber, pollutes the plasma, and cools the fuel. The Polywell uses a magnetic field to trap a quantity of electrons, fuel ions are then accelerated directly into the middle where they are trapped by the electron cloud that forms a "virtual electrode".[3]Another modern approach uses a Penning trap to trap electrons in a system otherwise similar to the Polywell[4]. A third approach, dubbed MARBLE[5], uses electrostatic optics to keep ions on orbits that do not intersect grid wires - the latter also improves the space charge limitations by multiple nesting of ion beams at several energies.

In 2001, a Japanese team was able to directly measure the double well of an IEC machine using laser-induced fluorescence.[6]

[edit] Critique

In his master's thesis, Todd Rider (an MIT graduate student) asserted [7], net energy production is not viable in IEC fusion for fuels other than D-T (deuterium-tritium fusion), D-D (deuterium fusion), and D-He3 (deuterium-helium 3 fusion), and breakeven operation with any fuel except D-T is unlikely. The primary problem that he discusses is the thermalization of ions, allowing them to escape over the top of the electrostatic well more rapidly than they fuse. He considers his paper optimistic because he assumes that core degradation can be countered.

Nevins makes an argument similar to Rider's in [W.M. Nevins, Phys. Plasmas <2> (10), 3804 (October, 1995)], where he shows that the fusion gain (ratio of fusion power produced to the power required to maintain the non-equilibrium ion distribution function) is limited to 0.1 assuming that the device is fueled with a mixture of deuterium and tritium. A fusion gain of about 10 is required for net energy production. Other fusion researchers such as Rostoker and Monkhorst have disagreed with these analyses, claiming their assumptions do not always apply, and proposing nonthermal schemes that they calculate can produce net power,[8] and theorists at LANL have proposed[9] a new electrostatic plasma equilibrium that should mitigate this problem. This concept, called Periodically Oscillating Plasma Sphere (POPS), has been confirmed experimentally.[10] POPS oscillation maintains equilibrium distribution of the ions at all times, which would eliminate any power loss due to Coulomb collisions, resulting in a net energy gain for fusion-power generation. Inertial-Electrostatic-Confinement Fusion. Furthermore, this is probably the only fusion reactor concept that becomes increasingly efficient as the size of the device shrinks. However, very high transparencies (>99.999%) are required for successful operation of the POPS concept. To this end S. Krupakar Murali et al., suggested that carbon nanotubes can be used to construct the cathode grids.[11] This is also the first (suggested) application of carbon nanotubes directly in any fusion reactor.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ WC Elmore et al, "On the Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement of a Plasma" Physics of Fluids 2, 239 (1959); doi:10.1063/1.1705917 (8 pages) [1]
  2. ^ R. Hirsch, "Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement of Ionized Fusion Gases," Journal of Applied Physics 38, 4522 (1967).
  3. ^ R.W. Bussard, "Some Physics Considerations of Magnetic Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement: A New Concept for Spherical Converging-flow Fusion," Fusion Technology 19, 273 (1991).
  4. ^ D.C. Barnes, R.A. Nebel, and L. Turner, "Production and Application of Dense Penning Trap Plasmas," Physics of Fluids B 5, 3651 (1993).
  5. ^ [2]
  6. ^ [3] Current Status of IEC (Inertial Electrostatic Confinement) Fusion Neutron/Proton Source Study
  7. ^ Rider, Todd (1994), A general critique of inertial-electrostatic confinement fusion systems, http://scitation.aip.org/getpdf/servlet/GetPDFServlet?filetype=pdf&id=PHPAEN000002000006001853000001&idtype=cvips&prog=normal 
  8. ^ Science 17 July 1998: Vol. 281. no. 5375, p. 307
  9. ^ R.A. Nebel and D.C. Barnes, “The periodically oscillating plasma sphere,” Fusion Technology 38, 28 (1998).
  10. ^ J. Park et al., “First experimental confirmation of periodically oscillating plasma sphere (POPS) oscillation,” submitted to Physical Review Letters.
  11. ^ S. Krupakar Murali et al.,“Carbon Nanotubes in IEC Fusion Reactors,” ANS 2006 Annual Meeting, June 4-8, Reno, Nevada.

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages