|Locale||Portland, Oregon to
|Maintained by||ODOT, WSDOT|
|ID number||01377, 07333|
|Design||Dual truss with vertical lifts|
|Total length||3,538 ft (1,078 m)|
|Width||Northbound span 38 ft (12 m);
southbound span 39 ft (12 m)
|Height||Approx. 230 ft (70 m)|
|Longest span||531 ft (161.8 m)|
|Clearance below||72 ft (21.9 m) at highest fixed span;
176 ft (53.6 m) at open lift span
Portland–Vancouver Highway Bridge
|Architect:||Harrington, Howard & Ash|
|Governing body:||state (Oregon and Washington)|
|MPS:||Historic Bridges/Tunnels in Washington State TR|
|Added to NRHP:||July 16, 1982|
|Daily traffic||130,000 (2006)|
The Interstate Bridge (also Columbia River Interstate Bridge, I-5 Bridge, Portland-Vancouver Interstate Bridge, Vancouver-Portland Bridge) is a pair of nearly identical steel vertical-lift, through-truss bridges that carry Interstate 5 traffic over the Columbia River between Vancouver, Washington, and Portland, Oregon, in the United States.
The bridge opened to traffic in 1917 as a single bridge carrying two-way traffic. A second, twin bridge opened in 1958 with each bridge carrying one-way traffic. The original 1917 structure is the northbound bridge. As of 2006, the bridge pair handles around 130,000 vehicles daily. The green structure, which is over 3,500 feet (1,067 m) long, carries traffic over three northbound lanes and three southbound lanes. It was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1982, as the "Portland–Vancouver Highway Bridge".
Since 2005, proposals for replacing the bridge have been produced and debated. The bridge is considered responsible for traffic congestion of road vehicles and river traffic. Height changes may affect two nearby airports. Changes to the river channel may affect a nearby railroad bridge. If a replacement decision is made, construction would commence no sooner than 2013, take five to seven years, and cost in excess of $4 billion, including changes to affected roadways. Delays are due to questions about potential environmental impacts of construction and the completed bridge, Vancouver and Clark County politics, potential for urban sprawl, and uncertainty whether to include light rail and bus lanes.
First bridge 
The bridge was built to replace an overcrowded ferry system operated by Pacific Railway, Light & Power Co. Construction on the bridge began in March 1915, following the sale of bonds. The first bridge was opened on February 14, 1917 at a cost of $1.75 million (equivalent to $31 million in 2013), which was shared between Clark County and Multnomah County. Clark County paid $500,000 and Multnomah County $1,250,000.
The first bridge has a total of 13 steel spans, with three measuring 275 feet (84 m) in length and the remaining ten spans 265 ft (81 m) each. Piers sit atop pile caps on wooden pilings approximately 70 feet deep. One of the 275-foot (84 m) spans is the lift span for allowing river traffic under the bridge. The lift span is capable of moving 136 ft (41 m) vertically, and provides 176 ft (53.6 m) of clearance below when fully raised. The towers are 190 ft (57.9 m) tall, above the roadway.
The original paved roadway was 38 ft (11.6 m) wide and had a 5 ft (1.52 m) wide sidewalk. It was the first automobile bridge across the river between Washington and Oregon, and the second to span the river at all, after the Wenatchee Bridge of 1908. It was originally a toll bridge costing 5¢ per vehicle or per horse and rider, equivalent to $0.9 in 2013. In 1928 the states of Washington and Oregon jointly purchased the bridge from the counties and discontinued tolling the following year.
Electric streetcars operated across the bridge from opening day in 1917 until 1940. The bridge's deck carried dual-gauge track, to accommodate both Vancouver's standard gauge cars and Portland's narrow gauge cars. Before the bridge, Portland had a Vancouver streetcar line since 1893, but it ran only to Hayden Island, where passengers transferred to a ferry owned by the street railway company to continue across the river to Vancouver. Streetcar service across the Interstate Bridge ended on September 3, 1940.
In 1958, a $14.5 million ($115.4 million in 2013 dollars)) upgrade created a southbound span and doubled the capacity of the bridge. The new bridge was built with a "humpback" that provides 72 ft (21.9 m) of vertical clearance and minimizes bridge openings. At the time the new bridge was opened, the old one was temporarily closed for rebuilding to give it a matching humpback section. When both bridges were first open concurrently, in 1960, each bridge became one-way, and tolls were reinstated at $0.20 for cars, $0.40 for light trucks, and $0.60 for heavy trucks and buses, until removed in 1966 after the construction expenses were paid off. A $3 million ($5.3 million in 2013 dollars) upgrade to the lift cables, expansion joints, and a deck repaving was completed in 1990. The diesel generator used to power the lift was replaced in 1995 at a cost of $150,000. In 1999, the bridge was repainted at a cost of $17 million. A $10.8 million electrical upgrade was completed in mid-May 2005.
The bridge is 3,538 feet (1,078 m) long with a main span of 531 feet (162 m). The vertical lift provides 176 feet (53.6 m) of river clearance when fully opened. Openings last about ten minutes and occur between 10 and 20 times per month.
The bridge is frequently a bottleneck which impacts both traffic on the freeway, as well as on the river. The Oregon and Washington transportation departments are jointly studying how to replace the bridge. Initially, the estimated cost for a replacement bridge was around $2 billion, but that number has climbed steadily to around $3.4 billion. An independent study in 2010 estimated the full cost to be closer to $10 billion.
Design of a replacement (especially a fixed-span bridge) is complicated by the existence of a railroad drawbridge crossing the Columbia a short distance downriver (on the Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge 9.6), which constrains the location of the shipping channel; and by approach paths to Portland International Airport in Portland and to Pearson Field in Vancouver, which limit the height of any new structure. Some have proposed replacing the bridge in a different location. There were originally 12 transportation plans that were being studied to improve and expand the Interstate 5 crossing of the Columbia River. In late 2006, four of these plans were selected for a final proposal, along with a fifth no-build option. The Columbia River Crossing project's six local partner agencies selected a replacement I-5 bridge and light rail extension to Clark College as the project's Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) in 2008.
There is also a longstanding debate as to whether or not a new bridge would include a MAX Light Rail line, express buses, or bus rapid transit. During his 2007 "State of the City" address, Vancouver mayor Royce Pollard stated
|“||I've said it before, but it bears repeating – Vancouver and Clark County residents have the cheapest buy-in to one of the most successful light-rail systems in the world, the MAX system. There is over $5 billion invested in light rail across the river. We can tap into that system at a very minimal cost. We’d be foolish not to. The bi-state Columbia River Crossing initiative is making plans for the future of our community for 50 years and beyond. This project should not happen without integrating light rail that comes into downtown Vancouver. If the final alternative doesn’t have a light rail component, I will not support it.||”|
In 2008, as fuel prices increased and project cost estimates soared, many in the area began questioning whether the project is worth the costs. In addition, many on the Portland side of the river fear that a 12-lane highway bridge to Vancouver, which many also believe has virtually no land use restrictions, will encourage suburban sprawl and development north of the river.
Further concerns over the 12-lane "Columbia River Crossing" (CRC) proposal include its failure to examine critical environmental impacts, such as damage to Clark County's drinking water supply, endangered fish habitat in the Columbia, and air pollution in North Portland.
In 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency found that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the CRC had failed to adequately cover these issues, as well as the potential induced demand for suburban sprawl. In a letter to CRC planners, the EPA wrote that "There was no indication (in the CRC environmental impact statement) of how these vulnerable populations might be impacted by air pollution, noise, diesel construction vehicles and increased traffic", referring to minority communities in North Portland.
- Wood Wortman, Sharon; Wortman, Ed (2006). The Portland Bridge Book (3rd Edition). Urban Adventure Press. pp. 107–112. ISBN 0-9787365-1-6.
- "Columbia Span Is Formally Opened: Dream of Half Century Is Realized (subheadlines: Traffic Starts With Brilliant Ceremony on Bridge; Thousands Attend Affair)". (February 15, 1917). The Morning Oregonian, p. 1.
- "Oregon National Register List" (PDF). Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. June 6, 2011. p. 39. Retrieved July 13, 2011.
- "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. 2008-04-15.
- Bottenberg, Ray (2007). Bridges of Portland. Arcadia Publishing. pp. 78, 80. ISBN 978-0-7385-4876-0.
- Holstine, Craig E. (2005). Spanning Washington : Historic Highway Bridges of the Evergreen State. Washington State University Press. pp. 103–104. ISBN 0-87422-281-8.
- Staff. Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–2012. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Retrieved March 31, 2013.
- Wood, Sharon (2001). The Portland Bridge Book. Oregon Historical Society. pp. 73–78. ISBN 0-87595-211-9.
- Horner, John B. (1919). "Oregon: Her History, Her Great Men, Her Literature". The J.K. Gill Co.: Portland.
- "Seismic Vulnerability" (HTML). Project Information. Columbia River Crossing. Retrieved March 19, 2013.
- Dorpat, Paul; Genevieve McCoy (1998). Building Washington: A History of Washington State Public Works. Tartu Publications. pp. 111–112. ISBN 0-9614357-9-8.
- Thompson, Richard H. (2010). Portland's Streetcar Lines, pp. 72–73, 77. Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7385-8126-2.
- Dylan Rivera (August 9, 2008). "I-5 bridge tolls divide Portland, Vancouver". The Oregonian. Retrieved July 13, 2011.
- "Interstate Bridges Electrical Upgrade". Oregon Department of Transportation. Retrieved July 13, 2011.
- Smith, Dwight A.; Norman, James B.; Dykman, Pieter T. (1989). Historic Highway Bridges of Oregon. Oregon Historical Society Press. p. 209. ISBN 0-87595-205-4.
- I-5 Partnership. Regional Economic Effects of the I-5 Corridor: Columbia River Crossing Transportation Choke Points (PDF). Retrieved 2009-03-04.[dead link]
- Albrecht, Bob (2 June 2011). "High river levels prompt bridge lifts". The Columbian. Retrieved 24 January 2013.
- "Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Columbia River, Vancouver, WA". Federal Register. Retrieved 24 January 2013.
- Mayer, James (November 22, 2006). "Columbia bridge advice: Scrap the old, build new". The Oregonian.
- Rivera, Dylan (May 28, 2008). "Charge tolls first, then maybe build a bridge, Metro councilors say". The Oregonian.
- Rose, Joseph (15 October 2010). "New study warns Columbia River Crossing could cost $10 billion". The Oregonian. Retrieved 24 January 2013.
- "Preliminary Alternative Packages". Columbia River Crossing. Retrieved 2006-11-05.
- Columbia River Crossing: Project Alternatives
- Columbia River Crossing: Locally Preferred Alternative
- "State of the City". City of Vancouver. January 23, 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-25.
- McCall, William (December 4, 2007). "Ore.: Governor urges new bridge". Houston Chronicle. Associated Press.
- "Bridge to Disaster". The Portland Mercury. March 19, 2008.
- Reed, Len (July 10, 2008). "I-5 bridge impacts on pollution, growth unexamined". The Oregonian. Retrieved July 13, 2011.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Interstate Bridge|
- WSDOT:Interstate Bridge
- Columbia River Crossing: Home page of ODOT/WSDOT project to replace the Interstate Bridge