Irreducible polynomial
In mathematics, a polynomial is said to be irreducible if it cannot be factored into the product of two or more non-trivial polynomials whose coefficients are of a specified type. Thus in the common context of polynomials with rational coefficients, a polynomial is irreducible if it cannot be expressed as the product of two or more such polynomials, each of them having a lower degree than the original one. For example, while x2 − 1 = (x − 1)(x + 1) is reducible over the rationals, x2 + 1 is not.
For any field F, the ring of polynomials with coefficients in F is denoted by F[x]. A polynomial p(x) in F[x] is called irreducible over F if it is non-constant and cannot be represented as the product of two or more non-constant polynomials from F[x]. The property of irreducibility depends on the field F; a polynomial may be irreducible over some fields but reducible over others. Some simple examples are discussed below.
Galois theory studies the relationship between a field, its Galois group, and its irreducible polynomials in depth. Interesting and non-trivial applications can be found in the study of finite fields.
It is helpful to compare irreducible polynomials to prime numbers: prime numbers (together with the corresponding negative numbers of equal magnitude) are the irreducible integers. They exhibit many of the general properties of the concept of 'irreducibility' that equally apply to irreducible polynomials, such as the essentially unique factorization into prime or irreducible factors:
Every polynomial p(x) in F[x] can be factorized into polynomials that are irreducible over F. This factorization is unique up to permutation of the factors and the multiplication of the factors by nonzero constants from F (because the ring of polynomials over a field is a unique factorization domain whose units are the nonzero constant polynomials).
The set of roots (in an extension field) of any polynomial over F must either contain no roots of a given irreducible polynomial p, or contain all such roots; this is Abel's irreducibility theorem.
Contents |
[edit] Simple examples
The following five polynomials demonstrate some elementary properties of reducible and irreducible polynomials:
,
,
,
,
.
Over the ring
of integers, the first two polynomials are reducible, the last two are irreducible. (The third, of course, is not a polynomial over the integers.)
Over the field
of rational numbers, the first three polynomials are reducible, but the other two polynomials are irreducible.
Over the field
of real numbers, the first four polynomials are reducible, but p5(x) is still irreducible.
Over the field
of complex numbers, all five polynomials are reducible. In fact, every nonzero polynomial p(x) over
can be factored as
where n is the degree, a the leading coefficient and
the zeros of p(x). Thus, the only non-constant irreducible polynomials over
are linear polynomials. This is the Fundamental theorem of algebra.
The existence of irreducible polynomials of degree greater than one (without zeros in the original field) historically motivated the extension of that original number field so that even these polynomials can be reduced into linear factors: from rational numbers (
), to the real subset of the algebraic numbers (
), and finally to the algebraic subset of the complex numbers (
). After the invention of calculus those latter two subsets were later extended to all real numbers (
) and all complex numbers (
).
For algebraic purposes, the extension from rational numbers to real numbers is too "radical": it introduces transcendental numbers, which are not the solutions of algebraic equations with rational coefficients. These numbers are not needed for the algebraic purpose of factorizing polynomials (but they are necessary for the use of real numbers in analysis). The set of algebraic numbers (
) is the algebraic closure of the rationals, and contains the roots of all polynomials (including i for instance). This is a countable field and is strictly contained in the complex numbers – the difference being that this field (
) is "algebraically complete" (as are the complexes,
) but not analytically complete since it lacks the aforementioned transcendentals.
The above paragraph generalizes in that there is a purely algebraic process to extend a given field F with a given polynomial p(x) to a larger field where this polynomial p(x) can be reduced into linear factors. The study of such extensions is the starting point of Galois theory.
[edit] Real and complex numbers
As shown in the examples above, only linear polynomials are irreducible over the field of complex numbers (this is a consequence of the fundamental theorem of algebra). Since the complex roots of a real polynomial are in conjugate pairs, the irreducible polynomials over the field of real numbers are the linear polynomials and the quadratic polynomials with no real roots. For example, x4 + 1 factors over the real numbers as 
[edit] Generalization
If R is an integral domain, an element f of R which is neither zero nor a unit is called irreducible if there are no non-units g and h with f = gh. One can show that every prime element is irreducible;[1] the converse is not true in general but holds in unique factorization domains. The polynomial ring F[x] over a field F (or any unique-factorization domain) is again a unique factorization domain. Inductively, this means that the polynomial ring in n indeterminants (over a ring R) is a unique factorization domain if the same is true for R.
[edit] Finite fields
Factorization over a finite field behaves similarly to factorization over the rational or the complex field. However, polynomials with integer coefficients that are irreducible over the field
can be reducible over a finite field. For example, the polynomial x2 + 1 is irreducible over
but reducible over the field
of two elements. Indeed, over
, we have
- (x2 + 1) = (x + 1)2
The irreducibility of a polynomial over the integers
is related to that over the field
of p elements (for a prime p). Namely, if a polynomial over
with leading coefficient 1 is reducible over
then it is reducible over
for any prime p. The converse, however, is not true.[2]
[edit] See also
- Gauss's lemma (polynomial)
- Rational root theorem, a method of finding whether a polynomial has a linear factor with rational coefficients
- Eisenstein's criterion
- Hilbert's irreducibility theorem
- Cohn's irreducibility criterion
- Irreducible component of a topological space
- Factorization of polynomial over finite field and irreducibility tests
- Quartic function#Factorization into quadratics
- Cubic function#Factorization
- Casus irreducibilis, the irreducible cubic with three real roots
- Quadratic equation#Quadratic factorization
[edit] References
- Menezes, Alfred J.; Van Oorschot, Paul C.; Vanstone, Scott A. (1997), Handbook of applied cryptography, CRC Press, ISBN 978-0-84-938523-0, pp. 154.
- Lidl, Rudolf; Niederreiter, Harald (1997), Finite fields (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-52-139231-0, pp. 91.
[edit] External links
- Weisstein, Eric W., "Irreducible Polynomial" from MathWorld.
- Irreducible Polynomial at PlanetMath.
- Information on Primitive and Irreducible Polynomials, The (Combinatorial) Object Server.
[edit] Notes
- ^ Consider p a prime that is reducible: p=ab. Then p | ab => p | a or p | b. Say p | a => a = pc, then we have: p=ab=pcb => p(1-cb)=0. Because R is a domain we have: cb=1. So b is a unit and p is irreducible
- ^ David Dummit; Richard Foote (2004). "chapter 9, Proposition 12". Abtract Algebra. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. p. 309. ISBN 0471433349.
,
,
,
,
.