Italic languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Italic
Geographic
distribution:
Originally Italy, today mainly southern Europe, maximum extent world-wide intermittent
Genetic
classification
:
Indo-European
 Italic
Subdivisions:
Osco-Umbrian, formerly Sabellic
ISO 639-5: itc
Iron Age Italy.svg

Approximate distribution of languages in Iron Age Italy during the sixth century BC.

Indo-European topics

Indo-European languages (list)
Albanian · Armenian · Baltic
Celtic · Germanic · Greek
Indo-Iranian (Indo-Aryan, Iranian)
Italic · Slavic  

extinct: Anatolian · Paleo-Balkans (Dacian,
Phrygian, Thracian) · Tocharian

Indo-European peoples
Albanians · Armenians
Balts · Celts · Germanic peoples
Greeks · Indo-Aryans
Iranians · Latins · Slavs

historical: Anatolians (Hittites, Luwians)
Celts (Galatians, Gauls) · Germanic tribes
Illyrians · Italics  · Cimmerians · Sarmatians
Scythians  · Thracians (Dacians)  · Tocharians
Indo-Iranians (Rigvedic tribes, Iranian tribes) 

Proto-Indo-Europeans
Language · Society · Religion
 
Urheimat hypotheses
Kurgan hypothesis
Anatolia · Armenia · India · PCT
 
Indo-European studies

The Italic subfamily is a member of the Indo-European language family. It includes the Romance languages derived from Latin (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Romanian, etc.), and a number of extinct languages of the Italian Peninsula, including Umbrian, Oscan, Faliscan, and Latin itself.

In the past various definitions of "Italic" have prevailed. This article uses the classification presented by the Linguist List:[1] Italic includes the Latin subgroup (Latin and the Romance languages) as well as the ancient Italic languages (Faliscan, Osco-Umbrian and two unclassified Italic languages, Aequian and Vestinian). Venetic (the language of ancient Venice), however, is regarded as unclassified Indo-European, despite its influence on the modern Italian of the region.

In the extreme view, Italic did not exist, but the different groups descended directly from Indo-European and converged because of geographic contiguity. This view stems in part from the difficulty in identifying a common Italic homeland in prehistory.[2]

In the intermediate view, the Italic languages are one of the ten or eleven major subgroups of the Indo-European language family and might therefore have had an ancestor, common Italic or proto-Italic, from which its daughter languages descend. Moreover, there are similarities between major groups, although how these similarities are to be interpreted is one of the major debatable issues in the historical linguistics of Indo-European. The linguist, Calvert Watkins, went so far as to suggest, among ten major groups, a four-way division of East, West, North and South Indo-European. These he considered "dialectical divisions within Proto-Indo-European which go back to a period long before the speakers arrived in their historical areas of attestation."[3] This is not to be considered a nodular grouping; in other words, there was not necessarily any common west Indo-European serving as a node from which the subgroups branched. The West Indo-European dialects are Celtic, Italic and Tocharian. By the time of any written language, Tocharian was geographically remote from the other two.

Contents

[edit] Proto-Italic

In the comparative method of historical linguistics language families descended from proto-languages.

[edit] Phonetics

A partial list of regular phonetic changes from Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Italic:

  • Palatovelars merged with plain velars
    • k
    • ɡʲʱɡʱ
    • ɡʲɡ
  • Voiced labiovelars unround or lenite
    • ɡʱʷɡʱ
    • ɡʷɡ or w
  • Voiced aspirates become first unvoiced, then fricativize
    • ɸf
    • θ
    • ɡʱx
  • sθ before r; unchanged elsewhere
  • p before in following syllable (e.g. Latin quinque 'five' from PIE *penkʷe); unchanged elsewhere
  • Resonants and remaining stops (m n l r w b d ɡ p t k kʷ) unchanged

Further changes occurred during the evolution of the individual Italic languages, in Latin for example f, θb, d between vowels and θf at the beginning of a word.

[edit] Branches

The Italic family has two known branches and two unclassified languages:

The ancient Venetic language, as revealed by its inscriptions (including complete sentences), was also closely related to the Italic languages and is sometimes even classified as Italic. However, since it also shares similarities with other Western Indo-European branches (particularly Germanic), some linguists prefer to consider it an independent Indo-European language.

The Italic languages are first attested in writing from Umbrian and Faliscan inscriptions dating to the 7th century BC. The alphabets used are based on the Old Italic alphabet, which is itself based on the Greek alphabet. The Italic languages themselves show minor influence from the Etruscan and somewhat more from the Ancient Greek languages.

As Rome extended its political dominion over the whole of the Italian Peninsula, Latin became dominant over the other Italic languages, which ceased to be spoken perhaps sometime in the 1st century AD. From Vulgar Latin the Romance languages emerged.

[edit] References

  1. ^ See under External links below.
  2. ^ Silvestri 1998, pp. 322-323.
  3. ^ Watkins 1998, pp. 31-33

[edit] Bibliography

  • Pulgram, Ernst (1958). Tongues of Italy, Prehistory and History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 
  • Rix, Helmut (2003), "Ausgliederung und Aufgliederung der italischen Sprachen", in Bammesburger, Alfred; Vennemann, Theo (in German), Languages in Prehistoric Europe, Indogermanische Bibliothek 3, Heidelberg: Winter, pp. 147-172, ISBN 3-8253-1449-9 
  • Silvestri, Domenico (1998), "The Italic Languages", in Ramat, Anna Giacalone; Ramat, Paolo, The Indo-European languages, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 322-344 .
  • Watkins, Calvert (1998), "Proto-Indo-European: Comparison and Reconstruction", in Ramat, Anna Giacalone; Ramat, Paolo, The Indo-European languages, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 25-73 .

[edit] See also

[edit] External links