J integral
| Continuum mechanics |
|---|
The J-integral represents a way to calculate the strain energy release rate, or work (energy) per unit fracture surface area, in a material.[1] The theoretical concept of J-integral was developed in 1967 by Cherepanov[2] and in 1968 by Jim Rice[3] independently, who showed that an energetic contour path integral (called J) was independent of the path around a crack.
Later, experimental methods were developed, which allowed measurement of critical fracture properties using laboratory-scale specimens for materials in which sample sizes are too small and for which the assumptions of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) do not hold, and to infer a critical value of fracture energy
. The quantity
defines the point at which large-scale plastic yielding during propagation takes place under mode one loading.[1] [4]
The J-integral is equal to the strain energy release rate for a crack in a body subjected to monotonic loading.[5] This is true, under quasistatic conditions, both for linear elastic materials and for materials that experience small-scale yielding at the crack tip.
Contents |
[edit] Two-dimensional J-integral
The two-dimensional J-integral was originally defined as[3] (see Figure 1 for an illustration)
where
is the strain energy density,
are the coordinate directions,
is the surface traction vector,
is the normal to the curve
,
is the Cauchy stress tensor, and
is the displacement vector. The strain energy density is given by
The J-Integral around a crack tip is frequently expressed in a more general form (and in index notation) as
where
is the component of the J-integral for crack opening in the
direction and
is a small region around the crack tip. Using Green's theorem we can show that this integral is zero when the boundary
is closed and encloses a region that contains no singularities and is simply connected. If the faces of the crack do not have any surface tractions on them then the J-integral is also path independent.
Rice also showed that the value of the J-integral represents the energy release rate for planar crack growth. The J-integral was developed because of the difficulties involved in computing the stress close to a crack in a nonlinear elastic or elastic-plastic material. Rice showed that if monotonic loading was assumed (without any plastic unloading) then the J-integral could be used to compute the energy release rate of plastic materials too.
-
Proof that the J-integral is zero over a closed path To show the path independence of the J-integral, we first have to show that the value of
is zero over a closed contour in a simply connected domain. Let us just consider the expression for
which is
We can write this as
From Green's theorem (or the two-dimensional divergence theorem) we have
Using this result we can express
aswhere
is the area enclosed by the contour
. Now, if there are no body forces present, equilibrium (conservation of linear momentum) requires thatAlso,
Therefore,
From the balance of angular momentum we have
. Hence,The J-integral may then be written as
Now, for an elastic material the stress can be derived from the stored energy function
usingThen, using the chain rule of differentiation,
Therefore we have
for a closed contour enclosing a simply connected region without any stress singularities.
-
Proof that the J-integral is path-independent Consider the contour
. Since this contour is closed and encloses a simply connected region, the J-integral around the contour is zero, i.e.assuming that counterclockwise integrals around the crack tip have positive sign. Now, since the crack surfaces are parallel to the
axis, the normal component
on these surfaces. Also, since the crack surfaces are traction free,
. Therefore,Therefore,
and the J-integral is path independent.
[edit] J-integral and fracture toughness
For isotropic, perfectly brittle, linear elastic materials, the J-integral can be directly related to the fracture toughness if the crack extends straight ahead with respect to its original orientation. [5]
For plane strain, under Mode I loading conditions, this relation is
where
is the critical strain energy release rate,
is the fracture toughness in Mode I loading,
is the Poisson's ratio, and E is the Young's modulus of the material.
For Mode II loading, the relation between the J-integral and the mode II fracture toughness (
) is
For Mode III loading, the relation is
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ a b Van Vliet, Krystyn J. (2006); "3.032 Mechanical Behavior of Materials", [1]
- ^ G. P. Cherepanov, The propagation of cracks in a continuous medium, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 31(3), 1967, pp. 503-512.
- ^ a b J. R. Rice, A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35, 1968, pp. 379-386.
- ^ Meyers and Chawla (1999): "Mechanical Behavior of Materials," 445-448.
- ^ a b Yoda, M., 1980, The J-integral fracture toughness for Mode II, Int. J. of Fracture, 16(4), pp. R175-R178.
[edit] External links
- J. R. Rice, "A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks", Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35, 1968, pp. 379-386.
- Van Vliet, Krystyn J. (2006); "3.032 Mechanical Behavior of Materials", [2]
- Fracture Mechanics Notes by Prof. Alan Zehnder (from Cornell University)
- Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics Notes by Prof. John Hutchinson (from Harvard University)
- Notes on Fracture of Thin Films and Multilayers by Prof. John Hutchinson (from Harvard University)
- Mixed mode cracking in layered materials by Profs. John Hutchinson and Zhigang Suo (from Harvard University)
- Fracture Mechanics by Prof. Piet Schreurs (from TU Eindhoven, Netherlands)
- Introduction to Fracture Mechanics by Dr. C. H. Wang (DSTO - Australia)
- Fracture mechanics course notes by Prof. Rui Huang (from Univ. of Texas at Austin)

![W = \int_0^\epsilon \boldsymbol{\sigma}:d\boldsymbol{\epsilon} ~;~~
\boldsymbol{\epsilon} = \tfrac{1}{2}\left[\boldsymbol{\nabla}\mathbf{u}+(\boldsymbol{\nabla}\mathbf{u})^T\right] ~.](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/2/b/c/2bc8782d0efc31dc29999b24ee01373e.png)

is zero over a closed contour in a simply connected domain. Let us just consider the expression for
which is



![\begin{align}
J_1 & = \int_{A} \cfrac{\partial}{\partial x_j}\left(W \delta_{1j} - \sigma_{jk}~\cfrac{\partial u_k}{\partial x_1}\right) dA \\
& = \int_A \left[\cfrac{\partial W}{\partial x_1} -
\cfrac{\partial\sigma_{jk}}{\partial x_j}~\cfrac{\partial u_k}{\partial x_1} -
\sigma_{jk}~\cfrac{\partial^2 u_k}{\partial x_1 \partial x_j}\right]~dA
\end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/8/f/d/8fd53a298c780eb6d70753c2cd9d9b7c.png)
is the area enclosed by the contour 
![\boldsymbol{\epsilon} = \tfrac{1}{2}\left[\boldsymbol{\nabla}\mathbf{u}+(\boldsymbol{\nabla}\mathbf{u})^T\right]
\qquad \implies \qquad
\epsilon_{jk} = \tfrac{1}{2}\left(\cfrac{\partial u_k}{\partial x_j} + \cfrac{\partial u_j}{\partial x_k}\right) ~.](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/5/7/0/5700690f9b0cd74281a1a840c91a827a.png)

. Hence,
![J_1 = \int_A \left[\cfrac{\partial W}{\partial x_1} -
\sigma_{jk}~\cfrac{\partial\epsilon_{jk}}{\partial x_1}\right]~dA](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/2/2/3/2238db88f38f08ac9129731f880dc12f.png)
using

for a closed contour enclosing a simply connected region without any stress singularities.
. Since this contour is closed and encloses a simply connected region, the J-integral around the contour is zero, i.e.
axis, the normal component
on these surfaces. Also, since the crack surfaces are traction free,
. Therefore,


![J_{\rm IIc} = G_{\rm IIc} = K_{\rm IIc}^2 \left[\frac{1-\nu^2}{E}\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/8/b/a/8ba2b7d737c46c14b46bb8b3f63d6a35.png)
