Japan–Korea Treaty of 1910
|Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty|
The Japan–Korea Treaty of 1910, also known as the Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty, was made by representatives of the Empire of Japan and the Korean Empire on August 22, 1910. In this treaty. Japan formally annexed Korea following the Japan–Korea Treaty of 1905 by which Korea became the protectorate of Japan and Japan–Korea Treaty of 1907 by which Korea was deprived of the administration of internal affairs. 
The treaty was proclaimed to the public (and became effective) on August 29, 1910, officially starting the period of Japanese rule in Korea. The treaty had eight articles, the first being: "His Majesty the Emperor of Korea makes the complete and permanent cession to His Majesty the Emperor of Japan of all rights of sovereignty over the whole of Korea".
Gojong of the Korean Empire later called the treaty a "neugyak (늑약 勒約)." The alternative term used in lieu of "joyak (조약 條約)" implies the treaty was coerced to Koreans by Japanese. "Gyeongsul Gukchi (경술국치 庚戌國恥)" and "Gukchi-il (국치일 國恥日)" are alternative terms for the year and date the treaty was signed, respectively. The terms indicate the humiliation the treaty gave to Koreans.[clarification needed]
Role of the American government
||This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, controversies or matters relative to the article subject as a whole. (August 2013)|
The role of the American government under President Theodore Roosevelt in facilitating and agreeing to the Japanese annexation of Korea as well as the ethnic biases that underpinned that annexation receive serious consideration and documentation in The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War by James Bradley. In the book, Bradley describes how then Korean King Gojong had accepted a U.S.–Korea Treaty in 1882 which, in part, read [i]f a third power acted unjustly or oppressively with either country, the United States or Korea promised to exert their "good offices, on being informed of the case, to bring about an amicable arrangement, thus showing their friendly feelings". A similar conclusion was reached by Homer B. Hulbert in his book, The Passing of Korea; Hulbert had been sent by Emperor Sunjong as his ambassador to Washington, D.C. and The Hague to protest the Japanese annexation in 1910. Roosevelt had, in fact, left office in March 1909.
All the while Roosevelt had said "I should like to see Japan have Korea". Bradley maintains that the Korean government labored under the misunderstanding, which the Americans fostered, that the country had the support of the Americans when, in fact, their fate had already been sealed. American acquiescence of the Japanese annexation of Korea had already been secured through the Taft-Katsura Agreement at the Treaty of Portsmouth when the US agreed to recognize Japanese propinquity in Korea.
Role of the British government
Britain had already acquiesced to the annexation, via their connection to Japan via the Anglo-Japanese Alliance of 1902.
The legality of the Treaty was disputed by the exiled Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea as well as the South Korean government. While the treaty was affixed with the national seal of the Korean Empire, Emperor Sunjong of Korea refused to sign the treaty as required under Korean law. The treaty was instead signed by Prime Minister Lee Wan-Yong of the Korean Empire, and Resident General Count Terauchi Masatake of the Empire of Japan.
This issue caused considerable difficulty in negotiating the establishment of basic diplomatic relations between the countries. Korea insisted to include a chapter stipulating "The treaty was null and void". A compromise was reached in language of Article II of the 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations:
"It is confirmed that all treaties or agreements concluded between the Empire of Japan and the Empire of Korea on or before August 22, 1910 are already null and void." 
Conference to discuss legality of the treaty
In 2001, an academic research of the legality for Korea's annexation by Japan from 1910 to 1945 which was titled A reconsideration of Japanese Annexation of Korea from the Historical and International Law Perspectives was held at Harvard University with a support of Korea Foundation. The conference was held 3 times, namely on January, April and November and related scholars of history and international law participated from the South Korea, North Korea, Japan, the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Canada.
James Crawford, a Professor of Cambridge University and a specialist in international law, challenged the Korean claim. He said that in the international community at the time, international law applied only to the relationship between the civilized countries. It did not apply to the non-civilized counties. When a civilized country colonizes a non-civilized country, even the form of treaty was unnecessary. Rather, what was important in those days was how the relationship between these civilized and non-civilized countries was perceived by the other civilized countries. In that sense, by the fact that the annexation of Korea by Japan was admitted by the Western powers, it cannot be illegal even if how big procedural defect existed or how much it was against the will of the government ruler of non-civilized country. To sum it up, at the time of the annexation, it was not rare for one country to assume control of another if the latter could not survive on its own, from the perspective of preserving international order and the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty was not illegal in terms of international law.
Anthony Carty, a Professor of the University of Derby stated "During the height of the imperialism, it is difficult to find an international law sufficient to determine the legality/illegality of a particular treaty."
Alexis Dudden, a Professor of University of Connecticut discussed about the Nitobe Inazō's science of colonial policy. She is known as an author of a book "Japan's Colonization of Korea: Discourse and Power" in which she discusses how Japanese policymakers carefully studied and then invoked international law to annex Korea legally.
According to Kan Kimura, the bottom line of this conference is that the Korean claim "The annexation was illegal" was totally unaccepted by the participated Western scholars, among others by those specialized in international law.
On August 28, 2007, regarding the General Power of Attorney by Sunjong, Korean news paper Dong-a Ilbo reported that Korean monarchs did not sign in the official documents with their real names traditionally. But, the Korean Emperor was forced by Japan to follow a new custom to sign with his real name, which originated from the western hemisphere. It mentioned Sunjong's signature may be compulsory.
On July 28, 2010, approximately 1000 people in Korea and Japan petitioned to the Japanese Prime Minister that the Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty be originally nullified and demanded an apology led by the Japanese spokesperson, Haruki Wada.
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|
- Japan–Korea Treaty of 1907
- History of Japan–Korea relations
- Japan–Korea Treaty of 1905
- Korea under Japanese rule
- Index of Korea-related articles
- Unequal treaty
- The Ruling Elite: The Zionist Seizure of World Power. Trafford Publishing. 2012. ISBN 1466918594.
- Hook, Glenn D. (2001). Japan's International Relations: Politics, Economics, and Security, p. 491. "It is confirmed that all treaties or agreements concluded between the Empire of Japan and the Empire of Korea on or before August 22, 1910 are already null and void.", p. 491, at Google Books
- Kim, Chasu (17 October 1995). "한일합방조약 원천무효". The Dong-a Ilbo. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- Choi, Soyoung (29 August 1997). "'경술국치' 이후 87년 구석구석 파고든 '왜색옷에 왜색춤'". Kyunghyang Shinmun. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- James Bradley. The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War. New York, Little Brown & Company. p. 155.
- James Bradley. The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War. New York, Little Brown & Company. p. 309.
- Tōgō, Kazuhiko (2010). Japan's Foreign Policy, 1945-2009: The Quest for a Proactive Policy. BRILL. p. 159. ISBN 9004185011.
- "A Reconsideration of the Japanese Annexation of Korea, Conference at Harvard University". Korea Foundation.
- Kimura, Kan (June 2002). "第3回韓国併合再検討国際会議 : 「合法・違法」を超えて" [Final Conference of "A Reconsideration of the Annexation of Korea": Transcend the "Legality / Illegality"].
- Furuta, Hiroshi (2005). 東アジア「反日」トライアングル [East Asia "Anti-Japan" Triangle]. Bungeishunjū. p. 106. ISBN 4166604678.
- Dudden, Alexis (2006). Japan's Colonization of Korea: Discourse and Power. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 082483139X.
- "네이버 뉴스". Naver.
- 김 (Kim), 승욱 (Seung-uk) (2010-06-23). ""한일병합 무효"..의원75명, 日총리에 건의 ("Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty Is Invalid".. Suggesting To The Japanese PM By 75 Congressmen)". Yonhap News (in Korean). Retrieved 2010-06-23.
- 이 (Lee), 충원 (Chung-weon) (2010-07-06). "한.일 진보 기독교인 "한국 합병 부당" (Korean and Japanese Progressive Christians "Annexing Korea Was Unjustified")". Yonhap News (in Korean). Retrieved 2010-07-13.
- 이 (Lee), 충원 (Chung-weon) (2010-07-28). "韓日 지식인 1천명 "한국강제병합 원천무효" (1000 Korean and Japanese Scholars "Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty Is Originally Invalid")". Yonhap News (in Korean). Retrieved 2010-08-02.
- Beasley, W.G. (1991). Japanese Imperialism 1894-1945. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-822168-1.
- Duus, Peter (1998). The Abacus and the Sword: The Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1895-1910. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-21361-0.
- Korean Mission to the Conference on the Limitation of Armament, Washington, D.C., 1921-1922. (1922). Korea's Appeal to the Conference on Limitation of Armament. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. OCLC 12923609
- United States. Dept. of State. (1919). Catalogue of treaties: 1814-1918. Washington: Government Printing Office. OCLC 3830508
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty.|
- "The annexation of Korea" (editorial) Japan Times, August 29, 2010
- "Historic declaration by Japanese and Korean intellectuals is a step towards reconciliation" Asia News, May 20, 2010