Jeffrey Steele (artist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Jeffrey Steele in his studio, February 2014

Jeffrey Steele (born 3 July 1931) is an abstract painter. In Paris (1959) he encountered the work of artists working in the mode of geometric abstraction, such as Victor Vasarely (1906–97), Max Bill (1908–94) and Josef Albers (1888–1976), and adopted a lifelong abstract approach. For eight years he worked purely in black and white and was identified with the Op-art movement. He incorporated other colours into his work in the 1970s.

His work has been exhibited in London, Paris, New York, Milan, the Venice Biennale (1986), and elsewhere in Europe and the Americas. He has participated in more than 100 group exhibitions and had 17 one-man shows, the first at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London in 1961. His works are in a number of public collections in the UK, including Tate Britain, the British Museum, the Victoria & Albert Museum, the National Museum of Wales in Cardiff, Walker Art Gallery in Liverpool, the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge, the Arts Council and the Department of the Environment, and in other countries. Steele's painting Gespenstische Gestalt (1961–62) was shown in the exhibition "Dynamo, Un Siècle de Lumière et de Mouvement dans l'Art 1913/2013" at the Grand Palais in Paris in 2013.

After he had gained a reputation as a practising artist in the early 1960s Steele was accepted by the college authorities with which he had previously tussled and he began lecturing in fine art in Cardiff, Barry and Newport. He then lectured at Portsmouth Polytechnic from May 1968 until December 1989. He was a member of the Portsmouth Sinfonia experimental orchestra organised by Gavin Bryars and Brian Eno, playing trombone.

Early life to 1960[edit]

He grew up in Cardiff, Wales, the son of a slate fireplace enameller, Arthur, and Enid (née Washer), a Woolworth's salesgirl. He studied at Cardiff and Newport art colleges, but had a series of quarrels with the teaching staff there and did not gain a formal qualification. During the 1950s he maintained a studio in Cardiff and experimented with representational styles.

As a pacifist he was a conscientious objector to National Service.[1]

During the 1950s Steele worked figuratively while being employed as a Rediffusion radio technician and also engaging in a programme of self-education in European languages and philosophy, as well as art. He was particularly influenced by the allegorical style of Stanley Spencer (1891–1959). Steele's painting Christ Carrying the Cross (1952-3, set in Adamsdown) was shown at the Royal Academy in London in summer 1953 and caused controversy in his home town because of its satirical message.[2] Steele took a studio and later a flat in High Street, Cardiff, which became a meeting point for his artistic and intellectual contemporaries in the city. He also lived in London in 1956–57, working as a storeman at the Stoll Theatre until its demolition.

Steele had been studying Cézanne, Cubism and the Abstract Expressionists but said later: "I mistrusted the deliberate bypassing of the thinking part of the mind which gestural painting entails and some love of the philosophical method of Descartes predisposed me towards a rational and austere form."[3]

In 1959 he won a French government scholarship to study in Paris, initially for three months. There he visited the show "Antagonismes" at the musée des Arts décoratifs, and saw the work of Auguste Herbin (1882–1960), Max Bill, Richard Lohse (1902–1988), the Venezuelan Jesús Rafael Soto (1923–2005) and, especially influential for Steele, Vasarely.[4] He determined to start afresh and when he returned to Cardiff he destroyed all figurative work in his possession.

He started with what could not be eliminated while still being an artist making pictures: the two essentials, first a blank white (when primed) canvas, and second, an element (or elements) of one colour, these two (figure and ground) interacting with each other. From this simplest possible binary situation he built up a new practice, beginning with depictions of ovoid forms.

Principles and aims[edit]

Each work is underlaid by its own set of mathematic relationships that, once chosen intuitively, determines the elements depicted to produce a unified, harmonious whole, which is independent of any outside object (as in figurative art) or the artist's emotions (as in Abstract Expressionism). Typically, equal vertical and horizontal divisions of the canvas are cut through with intersecting diagonals, and new lines taken from intersections, to produce a system of superimposed grids or nets. On these are built the shapes, lines, curves, blocks of colour or spatial divisions that form the elements of the picture. The elements are repeated but subject to the effects of incremental changes according to logical progressions. They interact and interpenetrate to allow the viewer to make new, multiple connections and see new patterns. As in a half-tone photograph, the image appears to be more meaningful than the elements that make it up. This effect, says the critic Gloria Carnevali, can be seen as forming "a new third dimension, one that exists between the painting and the observer", even a "new pictorial space".[5] The use in Steele's work of elements in balanced opposition, and the tilted axes arising from the diagonals, produce symmetrical wholes that are not static but dynamic, complex and full of apparent movement, especially rotational, the eye eventually returning to its starting point before beginning a new journey around the picture.

While modern in their pure abstraction, purged of references to the world outside the picture, Steele's works, in their systems of proportion, balance and measurement, in their use of geometric forms (particularly circles and polygons such as triangles and squares), and in their strong contrasts of light and dark (chiaroscuro) in their composition, are prefigured by much older art and architecture, and have a timeless quality.[6] Steele's aim is visual experimentation and investigation, to answer questions such as "what would that look like?", a journey in collaboration with the viewer on the basis of equal status. The result, while being potentially satisfying, interesting and appealing for a viewer, is not primarily intended to provide aesthetic pleasure and sensory enjoyment ("I like that"), or to elicit an emotionally sympathetic response or admiration for the artist's skill or insight ("That's good"), or to satisfy the art market. The artist is kept firmly in the background.[7]

In a statement concerning his work Steele proposes "to abolish as far as possible subjective, contingent and random factors in favour of a principle of necessity; to develop a pictorial context conforming to this principle and to render this principle as intelligible as possible".[8]

Methods[edit]

Steele works without assistants or other collaborators (apart from printmakers) or computers. He works with traditional materials and techniques, making his own paints from pigments and preparing his own canvases, mainly producing flat, two-dimensional works (sometimes standalone, sometimes grouped in series), of three main types:

  1. Oil paintings on supports of primed white linen canvas stretched on wooden frames, painted with traditional brushes;
  2. Drawings on paper with tempera (pigment and gum arabic);
  3. Silk screen printing in limited editions.

He has produced some 150 of each type of work since 1960.

Since 1990 he has also experimented with small models which could give rise to sculptures, as yet unrealised.

Op art in the 1960s[edit]

Steele's painting Baroque Experiment – Fred Maddox (1962/63) featured prominently in a Time magazine article on Op-art, "Pictures that Attack the Eye", in October 1964. It was then shown in "The Responsive Eye", an exhibition of mainly Op-art in the Museum of Modern Art in New York in February–April 1965, organised by William Seitz, which also included work by the British artists Michael Kidner (1917–2009) and Bridget Riley (1931–). Steele spent three weeks in the city, meeting critics and artists such as Josef Albers, Fritz Glarner (1899–1972), Richard Huelsenbeck (1892–1974), Ad Reinhardt (1913–1967) and Andy Warhol (1928–87), visiting galleries and staying in the Chelsea Hotel. He was interviewed by the film-maker Brian De Palma (1940–) for his documentary about the exhibition. He has been identified with the Op-art movement because he has worked in black and white, especially in the 1960s, and his paintings feature clear, hard edges, sharp, even dazzling contrasts, figure-ground ambiguity and kinetic effects. However Steele's aim is not to exploit optical illusions for spectacular effect, such as to produce retinal after-images to cause visual disturbance or interference, reversible perspective (objects that seem to both advance and recede), the illusion of vibration and shimmer – all derided as tricks or gimmicks by some art critics. In Steele's work any such distortions are the side-effects of the underlying systems of his works.[9][10]

Steele was a member of 56 Group Wales from 1963 to 1974, and a life / honorary member since 1974.[11]

Systems group, 1970s[edit]

Steele was a founder member of the Systems group of artists along with Malcolm Hughes (1920–1997) in December 1969. The group included Michael Kidner, Gillian Wise (1936–), Peter Lowe (1938–), Colin Jones (1934–), David Saunders (1936–), Jean Spencer (1942–1998), Richard Allen (1933–99), John Ernest (1922–1994) and others. The group arose through an exhibition of nine artists, "Systeemi-System", organised by Steele and his then wife, the textile designer Arja Nenonen (1936–2011), at the Amos Anderson Museum in Helsinki, capital of Nenonen's native Finland, in 1969. The exhibition was subtitled by Steele "An Exhibition of Syntactic Art from Britain", the word "syntactic" referring to the work "being constructed from a vocabulary of largely geometric forms in accordance with pre-determined and often mathematically-based systems".[12] The Helsinki show was followed by a similar one called "Matrix" at the Arnolfini Gallery in Bristol and the 1972/3 Arts Council touring exhibition "Systems" which opened at the Whitechapel Gallery in London in March 1972. This was followed by "Systems II" at the Polytechnic of Central London in 1973. Individual members showed at the Lucy Milton gallery in Notting Hill, London, up to 1975, and in continental Europe during the 1970s and afterwards. The group ceased to exist in 1976 following political disagreements, but a number of its members remained on friendly terms and exhibited together.[13]

Revival of interest, 2005-8[edit]

The Arts Council of Great Britain put on a touring exhibition of 15 artists called "Constructive Context" in 1978-9, curated by Stephen Bann, which brought together members of the former Systems group, and Wise organised a constructivist section in the 1978 Hayward Annual exhibition, but it was not until 2005, 27 years later, that another similar exhibition was held. This was at Southampton City Art Gallery, called "Elements of Abstraction: Space, Line and Interval in Modern British Art", curated by Professor Brandon Taylor and Dr Alan Fowler of Winchester School of Art. This was followed by "Towards a Rational Aesthetic: Constructive Art in Post-war Britain" at the Osborne Samuel gallery in London in 2007 and "A Rational Aesthetic", a second exhibition at Southampton City Art Gallery in 2008. All of these featured the work of Steele and like-minded artists. The 2008 show also featured the work of Anthony Hill (1930–) and Kenneth Martin (1905–1984), who along with his wife, Mary Martin (1907–69), and Victor Pasmore (1908–98) was a leading figure in the revival of Constructivism in Britain and America in the 1940s, forerunners of the Systems group.

Neglect in the UK, 1980s and 1990s[edit]

Between the two groups of Systems-related exhibitions (in the 1970s and the revival of interest in 2005–2008), Steele and other former members of the group and related artists continued to exhibit widely in continental Europe, eastern Europe and Russia, and had works bought for public collections there.[14] However in the UK the attention of the art world shifted to conceptualism. Steele and his associates may also have suffered from a perception of their art as cold or inscrutable. Furthermore the group has also been associated with the political left and Russian Constructivism of the early Soviet era, and many of its members (including Steele) see a strong affinity between their art and Marxism. But at a time when the Cold War was raging and Thatcherism was in the ascendancy the work of Steele and his contemporaries did not find general favour in UK art circles. Meanwhile it was also distrusted by many on the revolutionary left as allegedly elitist, being not readily appreciated by the masses.[15] He was a leading member of the professional association called "Group Proceedings" that was intended for artists to theorise art practices,[16] also during his time at Portsmouth Fine Art Department. At Portsmouth he led the seminar "Some Questions Concerning Fine Art and the Propagation of Ideas by Means of Images" which became known, due to its Marxist content, (affectionately and otherwise) as the "Ideology Course", from which there are extensive papers, one of the direct and indirect outcomes of this was the theoretical work of Gary Tedman[17] and Iona Singh.[18]

Personal life[edit]

Steele has been married twice and has three children. Both former wives died in 2011. Jeffrey Steele has been interviewed extensively by the researcher Cathy Courtney for the Artists' Lives section of the British Library's National Life Stories project. He lives and works in Southsea, Hampshire.[19]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Blannin, Katrina (n.d.). "Interview with Jeffrey Steele". Turps Banana (11). 
  2. ^ South Wales Echo, 2 April 1953, 1-2–3 May 1953
  3. ^ Quoted in Gloria Carnevali's essay for the exhibition catalogue for "Jeffrey Steele 1960–1990", at the Clare Hall Gallery, Cambridge, October 1992.
  4. ^ Steele to Blannin, op.cit.
  5. ^ Carnevali, op.cit.
  6. ^ Dr Alan Fowler, "The Systems Group and its Constructive Context", in the catalogue for "A Rational Aesthetic" at Southampton City Art Gallery in 2008.
  7. ^ Steele, "What do you Expect from the Viewer?", "A Rational Aesthetic", op. cit.
  8. ^ Steele, text for the exhibition catalogue for "L'ultima avanguardia" at the Palazzo Reale in Milan, 1983.
  9. ^ Walker Gallery website, retrieved 27 January 2014.
  10. ^ Fowler, "Towards a Rational Aesthetic", exhibition catalogue, 2007
  11. ^ Moore, David (2012). A Taste of the Avant-Garde – 56 Group Wales 56 Years. Brecon, Wales: Crooked Window. ISBN 978 0 9563602 1 2. 
  12. ^ Fowler, "The Systems Group and its Constructive Context", op. cit.
  13. ^ Fowler, "Constructive and Systems Art in Britain after the Second World War", in the catalogue for "Elements of Abstraction: Space Space, Line & Interval in Modern British Art", at Southampton City Art Gallery, September 2005.
  14. ^ Fowler, "The Systems Group and its Constructive Context", op.cit.
  15. ^ Fowler, PhD thesis, "Constructivist Art in Britain: 1913–2005, Southampton University, 2006.
  16. ^ "Group Proceedings" archive, private collection, Iona Singh, Gary Tedman, Burgundy, France.
  17. ^ Tedman, G. Aesthetics & Alienation, Zero Books, 2012.
  18. ^ Singh, Iona, Color Facture Art & Design, Artistic Technique and the Precisions of Human Perception, Zero Books, 2012.
  19. ^ British Library, National Life Stories, Review and Accounts, 2011–12, page 3, Retrieved 4 February 2014.

External links[edit]