Kemal Bokhary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Hon Mr Justice
Kemal Bokhary (包致金)
Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal
Incumbent
Assumed office
2012
Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal
In office
1997–2012
Preceded by New office
Succeeded by Robert Tang
Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal of the High Court
In office
1993–1997
Judge of the Court of First Instance of the High Court
In office
1989–1993
Appointed by Sir David Wilson
Justice of the Peace
In office
1984–1989
Personal details
Born 1947
Hong Kong
Nationality Hong Kong permanent resident (British)[1]
Spouse(s) Verina Bokhary
Relations Amina Mariam Bokhary (niece)
Children (3 daughters)

Syed Kemal Shah Bokhary (Urdu: سید كمال شاه بخاري‎, Chinese: 包致金; born 1947) is a judge in Hong Kong. He was one of three Permanent Judges of Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal from its inception in 1997 until he reached the mandatory retirement age of 65 in October 2012; afterwards, he remained on the bench as a non-permanent judge.[2]

Early life and family[edit]

Bokhary's father is Daoud Bokhary, a native of the North-West Frontier Province in Pakistan who came to Hong Kong with the British Indian Army after the Japanese occupation.[3] His mother's family had been in Hong Kong since the 19th century.[4] Bokhary himself was born in Kowloon, Hong Kong in 1947.[5] He received his early education in the King George V School, Hong Kong and his legal education in London.[6] Bokhary is married to High Court judge Verina Saeeda Bokhary, with whom he has three daughters.[7][8]

Career[edit]

Bokhary was called to the English Bar in 1970 and to the Hong Kong Bar the following year.[6] He went on to establish a successful legal practice in Hong Kong.[citation needed] In 1983, he was appointed Queen's Counsel.[7] The following year, he also became a Justice of the Peace.[citation needed] In 1989, he was appointed a Judge of the High Court. He came to wide public attention in early 1993 for presiding over an inquest into the New Year's Eve stampede at Lan Kwai Fong, in which 21 people were killed. He was promoted to the Court of Appeal later that year.[8][7] In 1997, upon the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to the People's Republic of China, Bokhary was appointed a Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong. He is known for his sense of humour and his talkativeness in court.[6]

In 2001, Bokhary was elected a bencher of London's Middle Temple.[8]

Out of the permanent judges of the Court of Final Appeal, Bokhary holds the record for the number of dissenting opinions he has written. He is also described as the "most hard-working" judge; during his thirteen years of tenure, he has heard 95% (299) of the 313 cases which came before the Court of Final Appeal, a higher proportion than his fellow judges.[9] Bokhary is considered the most liberal of all of the judges on the Court of Appeal, and legal scholars see his frequent dissents as "intellectually superior" to opinions written by the other judges. He thus became known as the "conscience of the court", but as he neared the end of his career, observers saw no clear successor who would play the same role in the Court of Appeals.[10] In March 2012, Robert Tang was named as his successor.[11]

Bokhary retired from his position as Permanent Judge on 24 October 2012 upon reaching the retirement age of 65. In remarks upon the occasion, he warned of "a storm of unprecedented ferocity" which threatened the judicial autonomy of Hong Kong. He will sit as a Non-Permanent Judge going forwards, continuing to hear occasional cases.[12][13]

Quotes[edit]

  • "Humanity is the application." (Lau Kong Yung v. Director of Immigration)
  • 'Human rights are aptly named, being basic to and inherent in humankind. ..."have always existed with the human being ... independently of, and before, the State."' (Secretary for Justice v. Yau Yuk Lung Zigo, citing Ethiopia v South Africa; Liberia v South Africa)[14]
  • "Of the many and varied purposes for which law is made, none is more important than that of declaring, protecting and realising the full potential of human rights." (Secretary for Justice v. Yau Yuk Lung Zigo)[14]
  • "And then I conclude by paying another tribute. It is to the dignity in adversity displayed by all the abode-seekers, including and especially the woman who made every effort to remain composed before ultimately breaking down in tears at the final hearing of this long and sad case. My saying that may only be cold comfort to them. But I consider it right to say it nevertheless." (Ng Siu Tung and others v. Director of Immigration, FACV 1/2001, at para. 55)
  • "What is the true scope of the protection conferred by the presumption of innocence? [...] Just because the presumption of innocence is a key component of our criminal justice system, it does not follow that the protection which it confers is strictly confined to criminal proceedings. Such protection obviously extends at least to include civil matters connected with such proceedings. [...] The law moves forward, especially to provide better protection and enforcement of fundamental rights and freedoms. [...] Indifference to a fundamental right or freedom is more insidious – and in that sense can be even more dangerous – than any open derogation from that right or freedom. [...] Threats to fundamental rights and freedoms can come in unpredictable shapes and sizes. A constitution's protection potential must not be cramped. [...] Article 39 of the Basic Law provides that the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as applied to Hong Kong shall remain in force and be implemented through the laws of Hong Kong." (Yeung Chung Ming v Commissioner of Police, FACV 22/2007, at para. 33, 33, 37, 39, 44, 45, 63)
  • "This Court is here to do justice." (Tang Siu Man v HKSAR, FACC 1/1997, at para. 129)

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1098443/liberal-judge-bokhary-stands-his-dissenting-views: ' "My nationality is British. That does not make me any less a Hong Kong person," the Hong Kong-born judge said. ', ' A British national, Bokhary disagreed with the suggestion that judges of the top court should be Chinese citizens or Hong Kong residents. '
  2. ^ List of Judges and Judicial Officers, Hong Kong Judiciary, 1 January 2010, retrieved 27 January 2010 
  3. ^ "Good life fit for a hero", The Standard, 26 May 2005, retrieved 9 January 2008 
  4. ^ http://cablenews.i-cable.com/webapps/program_video/index.php?video_id=12140714
  5. ^ http://cablenews.i-cable.com/webapps/program_video/index.php?video_id=12140714
  6. ^ a b c "The judges: from Chief Justice through rising star to Commonwealth veteran", South China Morning Post, 21 July 2001, retrieved 28 January 2010 
  7. ^ a b c "Kemal Bokhary", South China Morning Post, 13 June 1997, archived from the original on 23 May 2006, retrieved 9 January 2008 
  8. ^ a b c "包致金女兒曾涉高買", Oriental Daily News, 28 January 2010, retrieved 30 January 2010 
  9. ^ "參與95%案件包致金最勤力", Ming Pao, 6 March 2010, retrieved 18 March 2010 
  10. ^ Gittings, Daniel (2010), "Hong Kong's courts are learning to live with China", Hong Kong Journal 5 (3), retrieved 12 July 2010 
  11. ^ Luk, Eddie (29 March 2012), "I wasn't asked to stay on, says liberal judge", The Standard, retrieved 25 October 2012 
  12. ^ Chan, Candy (25 October 2012), "Parting shots", The Standard, retrieved 25 October 2012 
  13. ^ Chiu, Austin (25 October 2012), "Retiring Court of Final Appeal judge Kemal Bokhary warns of legal turmoil", South China Morning Post, retrieved 25 October 2012 
  14. ^ a b Secretary for Justice v Yau Yuk Lung Zigo and Lee Kam Chuen, FACC 12/2006
Legal offices
New office Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal
1997–2012
With: Henry Litton, Charles Ching (1997–2000)
Patrick Chan, Robert Ribeiro (2000–2012)
Succeeded by
Robert Tang
Order of precedence
Previous:
Michael Hartmann
Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal
Hong Kong order of precedence
Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal
Succeeded by
Patrick Chan
Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal