||This article possibly contains original research. (January 2014)|
||This article may contain improper references to self-published sources. (January 2014)|
- For other meanings see kettle.
Kettling (also known as containment or corralling) is a police tactic for controlling large crowds during demonstrations or protests. It involves the formation of large cordons of police officers who then move to contain a crowd within a limited area. Protesters are left only one choice of exit controlled by the police – or are completely prevented from leaving, with the effect of denying the protesters access to food, water and toilet facilities for an arbitrary period determined by the police forces.
The tactic has proved controversial, not least because it has resulted in the detention of ordinary bystanders as well as protestors. In March 2012 kettling was ruled lawful by the European Court of Human Rights following a legal challenge.
- 1 Tactics
- 2 Canada
- 3 Denmark
- 4 Finland
- 5 France
- 6 Germany
- 7 Spain
- 8 United Kingdom
- 9 United States
- 10 See also
- 11 References
- 12 External links
The term "kettle" is a metaphor, likening the containment of protestors to the containment of heat and steam within a domestic kettle. Its modern English usage may come from "kessel" – literally a cauldron, or kettle in German – that describes an encircled army about to be annihilated by a superior force. A cauldron is expected to be "boiling" with combat activity, the large enemy forces still quite able to offer "hot" resistance in the initial stages of encirclement, and so are to be contained, but not engaged directly.
To avoid allusions to military confrontation, kettling is sometimes described as "corralling," likening the tactic to the enclosure of livestock. Although large groups are difficult to control, this can be done by concentrations of police. The tactic prevents the large group breaking into smaller splinters that have to be individually chased down, thus requiring the policing to break into multiple groups. Once the kettle has been formed, the cordon is tightened, which may include the use of baton charges to restrict the territory occupied by the protesters. The cordon is then maintained for a number of hours: the ostensible aim is to leave would-be "violent" protesters too tired to do anything but want to go home.
Kettling has been criticized for being an indiscriminate tactic which leads to the detention of law-abiding citizens and innocent bystanders. In some cases protesters are reported to have been denied access to food, water and toilet facilities for long periods. Further criticism has been made that in some instances the tactic has been used to foment disorder with the aim of changing the focus of public debate. In some countries the tactic has led to legal challenges on the grounds of human rights violations.
On June 27, 2010, 200 persons, including protesters, bystanders and news reporters, were kettled in Toronto at the intersection of Queen St. and Spadina Ave. during the G20 summit. Several hundred people were also kettled outside of the Novotel Hotel on the Esplanade and arrested. The following year the Toronto Police Department swore to never use kettling again.
On March 15, 2011, 250–300 protesters in Montreal were kettled on St-Denis just north of Mont Royal during the Annual March Against Police Brutality. Police used stun grenades, riot gear, and horses to kettle the crowd.
On March 15, 2013, at the annual police brutality march, the police kettled a group of protesters on Ste-Catherine street in Montreal after the march was declared illegal for not presenting an itinerary before the protest. After almost two hours of attempting to break up the groups protesting the police closed in and arrested anyone caught in the kettle. At the end of the evening police have stated that there were around 250 arrests, 2 injured police officers and one protester that was unwell.
Between 250 and 1000 non-violent protestors at the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen were kettled by police. A police spokesman said that the detainment was necessary to avoid disorder.
Finnish anarchist demonstration Smash Asem was prevented from taking place when 200 riot police and hundreds of other police and Finnish Border Guard personnel kettled around 300 to 500 demonstrators and bystanders in front of Kiasma in downtown Helsinki for over 3 hours on 9 September 2006.
On the Guillotière bridge In Lyon, on the 20 October 2010, a few hundred protestors were kettled for several hours. The next day in Place Bellecour, about 500 citizens and protestors defending public pension were kettled for six hours without food or water by both the police and the military. They were prevented from marching, and tear gas and water cannons were used.
An early example of kettling was by German police in 1986. During a demonstration by anti-nuclear protestors at Heiligengeistfeld, Hamburg on 8 May, Hamburg Police cordoned approximately 800 people into a "kettle" for several hours. German kettling tactics distinguish a stationary form of detention (Polizeikessel) and a mobile form, in which protestors are enclosed by a mobile police cordon while they march (Wanderkessel). These types of police cordon were also regularly used in the UK before the tactic got refined at the N30 protest (see below), and dubbed a kettle.
Kettling has been challenged in the German courts on several occasions. The 1986 Hamburger Kessel was ruled unlawful by the administrative court of Hamburg. The district court found German police guilty of wrongful deprivation of personal liberty.
Following an anti-nuclear protest in 2002 in Hitzacker, Lower Saxony, a protestor took a case to court because she had been denied access to toilets when she was held within a police kettle. The district court found that she had been handled inhumanely and that the police had acted unlawfully.
On 16 May 2012, Acampada Sol called for a cacerolazo because the Spanish risk premium exceeded 500 points that day. The demonstrators were marching through Calle Alcalá, in Madrid, when police forces surrounded them for more than 30 minutes; after the kettled protestors asked for solidarity through the Internet, several additional hundred people gathered outside of the kettle. Around 500 demonstrators waited seated on the pavement until the police forces finally removed the blockade, allowing them to leave the area and return to Puerta del Sol.
Parliament Square Disability Rights Demonstration,1995
The kettling tactic was used in the UK against disabled people during a Disability Rights Demonstration in Parliament Square, London October 1995. 
N30 anti-WTO demonstration, 1999
The kettling tactic was used in the UK at the N30 anti-WTO protest at Euston station, London (parallel to the shut-down of the meeting in Seattle) on November 30, 1999. It was a development of previously used police cordoning tactics - the difference was the long length of time, constant impermeability and the small size of the kettle.
May Day 2001
The tactic was used in the UK by the London Metropolitan Police during the May Day riots of 2001 to contain demonstrators. However, the action also resulted in large numbers of bystanders as well as peaceful demonstrators being detained in Oxford Circus.
G8 summit, 2005
Kettling was used once again during the 2009 G-20 London summit protests outside the Bank of England, as part of the police Territorial Support Group's "Operation Glencoe". When police started to allow protesters to leave the kettle, they were photographed by Forward Intelligence Teams and told to give their names and addresses (which they are legally not required to do). Some refused to do so and were forced back into the kettle by police. A number of complaints over the tactic were subsequently made to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. Bob Broadhurst, the commanding officer during the protests, said that, "kettling was the best option" to counter the potential of widespread disruption by protesters".
On April 15, 2009, Scotland Yard ordered a review of these tactics. Criticism of the policing of demonstrations has been increasing, and amateur video footage which recorded two incidents of violent police behaviour, notably the death of Ian Tomlinson, brought police tactics into the media spotlight. The incidents were said by Sir Paul Stephenson, Metropolitan Police Commissioner, to be "clearly disturbing", and Stephenson ordered the review to consider whether the tactic is "appropriate and proportionate". The video footage also showed that police officers were concealing their shoulder identification numbers whilst on duty.
An inquiry was held by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) into an incident during the G20 protests, in which a woman held in a kettle suffered injuries from police action and subsequently experienced a suspected miscarriage. The inquiry concluded in August 2009 that the Metropolitan Police should review its crowd control methods, including the tactic of kettling.
Denis O'Connor, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary, said in a report concerning the policing of the G20 protests that some police commanders did not understand the House of Lords' ruling (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmhaff/418/41807.htm) regarding kettling. He also stated that containing protestors in a kettle was "inadequate" and belonged to a "different era" of policing. He did not suggest that kettling should be abandoned however, but said that the methods must be adapted so that peaceful protesters and bystanders are able to leave the kettle. The report also commissioned a survey, conducted by MORI which found that the majority of the UK public do feel that the use of kettling is appropriate in some situations. Depending on the circumstances, between 10% and 20% of those questioned feel that it is never appropriate to contain people in this way.
In April 2011, the High Court of Justice ruled that kettling on that occasion was illegal, and it set out new guidelines as to when police were permitted to kettle protesters. This means that the police "may only take such preventive action as a last resort catering for situations about to descend into violence". Police would still legally be allowed to kettle if they had reason to believe that violence would break out.[original research?]
Student protests, 2010
Kettling was used during the 24 November 2010 student protest in London and in various other locations around the country. Guardian blogger Dave Hill thought the kettling was in retrospect "probably inevitable", after the protest two weeks before had led to damage at the Conservative party headquarters. In July 2011 three school children challenged the use of kettling of children at this protest. They sought a Judicial Review in the High Court, arguing it broke the laws of the European Convention on Human Rights, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Children Act 2004, mainly the right to protest and the safety of children.
Kettling was used to contain student protesters in Parliament Square on 9 December 2010 and thereafter on Westminster Bridge. Protesters were trapped in Trafalgar Square and other landmarks for up to nine hours. An anaesthetist from Aberdeen Royal Infirmary working as part of a field hospital said that there was a serious health and safety risk to people trapped in the kettle and some suffered crush injuries whilst others were nearly pushed off Westminster Bridge into the freezing Thames, likening it to the Hillsborough disaster.
Anti-Cuts protests, 2011
Kettling was again used at the March 2011 anti-cuts protest in London. Activists were given assurances by Metropolitan police that they would be shown to safety after the protest, which was described as non-violent and sensible. Once outside, the protesters were kettled, handcuffed and taken into custody.
In 2012, kettling was deemed lawful, overturning a previous High Court ruling. The ruling was immediately criticised by protesters and their lawyers, who plan to take the matter to the Supreme Court.
Following the use of "kettling" during the May Day protest in 2001, two people who had been corralled by the police at Oxford Circus sued the Metropolitan Police for wrongful detention, alleging that it was in breach of the European Convention of Human Rights, and that they had been held without access to food, water or toilets. The pair lost their court action in 2005, and their appeal failed in 2007 when the Court of Appeal backed the High Court ruling.
In 2009, Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, a ruling by the House of Lords, decided that the High Court was entitled to take into consideration the "purpose" of the deprivation of liberty before deciding if human rights laws applied at all. Summing up, Lord Hope said:
There is room, even in the case of fundamental rights as to whose application no restriction or limitation is permitted by the Convention, for a pragmatic approach which takes full account of all the circumstances.
A plaintiff from the 2001 protest, along with three non-protesting members of the public who had been kettled by police, took an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights, claiming that kettling violated Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to liberty and security. It was reported:
Austin, who the court accepted was a lawful and peaceful demonstrator prevented by her detention from collecting her child, is to take her case to the European Court of Human Rights. It is to be hoped the ECHR will look again at the question of whether the "balance" and "public safety" is all on the side of allowing the police to carry out long containments or whether such imprisonment does not after all breach fundamental rights.
In March 2012 the Court ruled that kettling was lawful and that the Metropolitan Police were entitled to detain groups of people as "the least intrusive and most effective means to protect the public from violence". On the issues related to the European Convention on Human Rights, the court ruled:
Article 5 did not have to be construed in such a way as to make it impracticable for the police to fulfil their duties of maintaining order and protecting the public.
— Grand Chamber, European Court of Human Rights , Ruling, March 2012
Republican National Convention, New York City, 2004
Occupy Wall Street, 2011
- 2009 G-20 London summit protests
- Crowd control
- False imprisonment
- Forward Intelligence Team
- Pincer movement
- Riot control
- Snatch squad
- Territorial Support Group
- Davenport, Justin (3 April 2009). "Police defend 'corralling' thousands of protesters for eight hours in City". Evening Standard. Retrieved 2009-04-20.
- Joyce, Julian (16 April 2009). "Police 'kettle' tactic feels the heat". BBC News. Retrieved 18 April 2009.
- "European court says 'kettling' tactics in 2001 lawful". BBC News. 15 March 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2012.
- Joyce, Julian (9 December 2010). "Police 'kettle' tactic feels the heat". BBC.
- Campbell, Duncan (3 April 2009). "Did the handling of the G20 protests reveal the future of policing?". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 6 April 2009.
- Whipple, Tom (April 3, 2009). [dead link] "Why did the police punish bystanders?". The Times (London: News International). Retrieved 6 April 2009.
- Laville, Sandra; Campbell, Duncan (3 April 2009). "Baton charges and kettling". London: Guardian. Retrieved 6 April 2009.
- Hudson, Alastair (20 January 2011). "Defeated by violence and silence". London: TSL Education.
- Poisson, Jayme (29 June 2010). "‘Kettling’ police tactic controversial everywhere it was used". The Toronto Star. Retrieved 1 July 2010.
- Poisson, Jaume (22 June 2011). "Exclusive: Toronto police swear off G20 kettling tactic". The Toronto Star. Retrieved 15 August 2011.
- Poisson, Dario Ayala (15 March 2011). "‘Video: The annual Montreal demonstration against police brutality'". The Montreal Gazette. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
- "'Police kettle Montreal student protesters, arresting 518' url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/05/24/montreal-arrests-kettling.html?cmp=rss".
- Rawlinson, Kevin; Ben Ferguson (12 December 2009). "Anti-corporate demonstrators arrested". London: The Independent. Retrieved 13 December 2009.
- "Smash Asem" (in Finnish).
- "Témoignages sur la prison à ciel ouvert" (in French). rebellyon.info. 2010-10-22.
- "Hamburg Heiligengeistfeld 8. Juni 1986" (in German). Nadir. Retrieved 2009-04-19. "Polizeiterror gegen AKW-Gegner/innen - 800 Menschen einen Tag eingekesselt (Police terror against anti-nuclear activists - 800 people kettled in one day)"
- See also Hamburger Kessel (Geman Wikipedia)
- See also Polizeikessel and Wanderkessel (Geman Wikipedia)
- "Gericht: Klo-Verbot ist menschenunwürdig (Court: Toilet ban is inhumane)". castor.de (in German) (Elbe-Jeetzel-Zeitung). 2004-10-23. Retrieved 2009-04-19. "Castor-Ankunft 2002: Frau musste Notdurft im Polizeikessel verrichten - Urteil: Polizei handelte rechtswidrig (Castor protest 2002: woman had to answer call of nature in police cordon - Judgement: Police acted unlawfully)"
- "La cacerolada del 15-M, atrapada una hora entre antidisturbios en Alcalá Parliament Square (in Spanish)". elpais.es.
- "Disability Rights Demonstration - Parliament Square, London October 1995". flickr.com.
- "A brief history of "kettling"". Indymedia.org.uk. 2010-11-27. Retrieved 2010-12-13.
- THE CARNIVAL CONTINUES... Lydia Molyneaux
- Campbell, Duncan (April 2, 2009). "G20: Did police containment cause more trouble than it prevented?". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 20 April 2009.
- Gill, Charlotte; Sears, Neil (2009-04-16). "Watchdog receives 145 complaints over G20 police as protester struck by officer demands compensation | Mail Online". London: Dailymail.co.uk. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
- "'Training concern' for G20 police". BBC News. 2009-05-19. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
- Murphy, Megan (Wednesday 15 April 2009)Police to review ‘kettling’ tactics The Financial Times. Retrieved 16 April 2009.
- Bishopsgate police officer refuses to give ID number The Guardian Retrieved 9 May 2009
- Fresco, Adam (2009-08-06). "Police must change protest tactics after suspected G20 miscarriage". London: The Times. Retrieved 2009-08-06.
- Lewis, Paul (7 July 2009). "G20 police chiefs were unclear on kettling law, report finds". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
- O'Connor, Denis, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary (7 July 2009). "Adapting to Protest". Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
- "Moos & Anor, R (on the application of) v Police of the Metropolis  EWHC 957 (Admin) (14 April 2011)". Bailii.org. 2011-03-24. Retrieved 2011-04-14.
- "UK court rules that kettling was illegal". Boing Boing. Retrieved 2011-04-14.
- Hill, Dave (25 November 2010). "Kettling questions". London: Guardian. Retrieved 2010-12-13.
- "Kettling of children at tuition fees protest challenged". BBC London. 7 June 2011. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- Julian Joyce, (December 9, 2010) Police 'kettle' tactic feels the heat BBC
- Townsend, Mark; Malik, Shiv (19 December 2010). "Kettle tactics risk Hillsborough-style tragedy". London: Guardian. Retrieved 2011-04-10.
- Shiv Malik, (March 2011) Cuts protesters claim police tricked them into mass arrest The Guardian
- Owen Bowcott (19 January 2012). "Kettling protesters is lawful, appeal court rules". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
- "Police sued over May Day protest". BBC News. 2002-04-28. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
- "Pair lose protest damages claim". BBC News. 2005-03-23. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
- "Pair lose May Day protest claim". BBC News. 2007-10-15. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
-  UKHL 5
- "Judgments - Austin (FC) (Appellant) & another v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent)". House of Lords Appellate Committee. 2009-01-28. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
- Christian, Louise (Thursday 2 April 2009) G20: Questions need to be asked about 'kettling' Guardian. Retrieved 13 April 2009.
- Wells, Matt (25 September 2011). "Police crack down on 'Occupy Wall Street' protests". The Guardian (London).
|Look up kettling in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|