Knowledge sharing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Knowledge Sharing is an activity through which knowledge (i.e., information, skills, or expertise) is exchanged among people, friends, families, communities (e.g., Wikipedia), or organizations.[1][2]

Organizations have recognized that knowledge constitutes a valuable intangible asset for creating and sustaining competitive advantages.[3] Knowledge sharing activities are generally supported by knowledge management systems.[4] However, technology constitutes only one of the many factors that affect the sharing of knowledge in organizations, such as organizational culture, trust, and incentives.[5] The sharing of knowledge constitutes a major challenge in the field of knowledge management because some employees tend to resist sharing their knowledge with the rest of the organization.[6][7]

Contents

Knowledge Flow [edit]

Although knowledge is commonly treated as an object, Snowden has argued it is more appropriate to teach it as both a flow and a thing.[8] Knowledge as a flow

Explicit Knowledge Sharing [edit]

Explicit knowledge sharing occurs when explicit knowledge is made available to be shared between entities.[9] Explicit knowledge sharing can happen successfully when the following criteria are met:

  • Articulation: the knowledge provider can describe the information.[1][9]
  • Awareness: the recipient must be aware that knowledge is available.[1][9]
  • Access: the knowledge recipient can access the knowledge provider.[1][9]
  • Guidance: the body of knowledge must be defined and differentiated into different topics or domains so as to avoid information overload, and to provide easy access to appropriate material.[9] Knowledge managers are often considered key figures in the creation of an effective knowledge sharing system.[1][9][10]
  • Completeness: the holistic approach to knowledge sharing in the form of both centrally managed and self-published knowledge.[9]

Tacit Knowledge Sharing [edit]

Tacit knowledge sharing occurs through different types of socialization.[9] Although tacit knowledge is difficult to identify and codify, relevant factors that influence tacit knowledge sharing include:

  • Informal networks such as daily interactions between people within a defined environment (work, school, home, etc.).[9] These networks span hierarchies and functions.[9][10]
  • The provision of space where people can engage in unstructured or unmonitored discussions, thereby fostering informal networks.[9][10]
  • Unstructured, less-structured or experimental work practices that encourage creative problem solving, and the development of social networks.[9][10]

Embedded Knowledge Sharing [edit]

Embedded knowledge sharing occurs when knowledge is shared through clearly delineated products, processes, routines, etc.[9] This knowledge can be shared in different ways, such as:

  • Scenario planning and debriefing: providing a structured space to create possible scenarios, followed by a discussion of what happened, and how it could have been different.[9][11]
  • Management training.[9]
  • Knowledge transfer: deliberately integrating systems, processes, routines, etc., to combine and share relevant knowledge.[9]

Importance of Knowledge Sharing in Organizations [edit]

Knowledge constitutes a valuable, intangible asset for creating and sustaining competitive advantages within organizations.[3] Several factors affect knowledge sharing in organizations, such as organizational culture, trust, incentives, and technology.[12] Knowledge sharing activities are commonly supported by knowledge management systems, a form of information technology (IT) that facilitates and organizes information within a company or organization.[13]

Challenges in Knowledge Sharing [edit]

Knowledge sharing can sometimes constitute a major challenge in the field of knowledge management.[14][15] The difficulty of knowledge sharing resides in the transference of knowledge from one entity to another.[16][17] Some employees tend to resist sharing their knowledge[15][14] because of the notion that knowledge is property; ownership, therefore, becomes very important.[18] In order to counteract this, individuals must be reassured that they will receive some type of incentive for what they create.[18] However, Dalkir (2005) demonstrated that individuals are most commonly rewarded for what they know, not what they share.[18] Negative consequences, such as isolation and resistance to ideas, occur when knowledge sharing is impeded.[13] To promote knowledge sharing and remove knowledge sharing obstacles, the organizational culture of an entity should encourage discovery and innovation.[18]

The Role of IT Systems in Knowledge Sharing [edit]

IT systems are common tools that help facilitate knowledge sharing and knowledge management.[9][13][19] The main role of IT systems is to help people share knowledge through common platforms and electronic storage to help make access simpler, encouraging economic reuse of knowledge.[19] IT systems can provide codification, personalization, electronic repositories for information and can help people locate each other to communicate directly.[19] With appropriate training and education, IT systems can make it easier for organizations to acquire, store or disseminate knowledge.[13][19]

See also [edit]

External links [edit]

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e Bukowitz, Wendi R.; Williams, Ruth L. (1999). The Knowledge Management Fieldbook. FT Press. ISBN 978-0273638827. 
  2. ^ Serban, Andreea M.; Luan, Jing (2002). "An Overview of Knowledge Management". University of Kentucky. Retrieved 17 April 2013. 
  3. ^ a b Miller, D.; Shamsie, J. (1996). "The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965". Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 519–543. doi:10.2307/256654. JSTOR 256654. 
  4. ^ "Bloomfire". CrunchBase. Retrieved 17 April 2013. 
  5. ^ Cabrera, A.; Cabrera, E. F. (2002). "Knowledge-sharing Dilemmas". Organization Studies 23 (5): 687–710. doi:10.1177/0170840602235001. 
  6. ^ Ciborra, C.U.; Patriota, G. (1998). "Groupware and teamwork in R&D: limits to learning and innovation". R&D Management 28 (1): 1–10. 
  7. ^ Bock, G. W.; Kim, Y. G. (2002). "Breaking the myths of rewards". Information Resources Management Journal 15 (2): 14–21. 
  8. ^ Snowden, D. (2002). "Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness". Journal of Knowledge Management 6 (2): 100–111. doi:10.1108/13673270210424639. 
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Frost, Alan. "Knowledge Sharing". KMT. Retrieved 17 April 2013. 
  10. ^ a b c d Prusak, Lawrence; Davenport, Thomas H. (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 1-57851-301-4. 
  11. ^ Serban, Andreea M.; Luan, Jing (2002). "Corporate Strategy Model: Scenario Planning". University of Kentucky. Retrieved 17 April 2013. 
  12. ^ Cabrera, A.; Cabrera, C. (2002). "Knowledge-sharing Dilemmas". Organization Studies 23 (5): 687–710. doi:10.1177/0170840602235001. 
  13. ^ a b c d Gurteen, David (February 1999). "Creating a knowledge sharing culture". Knowledge Management Magazine 2 (5). 
  14. ^ a b Bock, G.; Kim, Y.G. (2002). "Breaking the myths of rewards". Information Resources Management Journal 15 (2): 14–21. 
  15. ^ a b Nonaka, I. (1994). "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation". Organization Science 5 (1): 14–37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14. JSTOR 2635068. 
  16. ^ Argote, L.; Ingram, P. (2000). "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1): 150–169. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893. 
  17. ^ Fan, Y. (1998). "The Transfer of Western Management to China: Context, Content and Constraints". Management Learning 29 (2): 201–221. doi:10.1177/1350507698292005 
  18. ^ a b c d Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management In Theory And Practice. Oxford: Elsevier Inc: Jordan Hill. pp. 132–133. 
  19. ^ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named 14AKFT (see the help page).