|Part of a series on|
The Sanskrit term kshatriya is used in the context of Vedic society wherein members organized themselves into three classes: Brahmin, Kshatriya, and Vaishya. Traditionally, the kshatriya constituted the ruling and military elite. Their role was to protect society by fighting in wartime and governing in peacetime.
Early Rigvedic tribal chiefdom
The administrative machinery in the Rig Vedic period functioned with a tribal chief called Rajan whose position was not hereditary. The king was elected in a tribal assembly, which included women, called Samiti. The Rajan protected the tribe and cattle; was assisted by a priest; and did not maintain a standing army, though in the later period the rulership appears to have risen as a class. The concept of fourfold varna system was non-existent.
Later Vedic period
The later addition of the hymn Purusha Sukta to the Rig-veda describes the mythical origins of the four Varna. Some scholars consider the Purusha Sukta to be a late interpolation into the Rig-veda based on the neological character of the composition, as compared to the more archaic style of the vedic literature. Since the vedic society was not organized based on varna, the Purusha Sukta was supposedly composed in order to secure vedic sanction for the heredity caste scheme. An alternate explanation is that the word 'Shudra' does not occur anywhere else in the Rig-veda except the Purusha Sukta, leading some scholars to believe the Purusha Sukta was a composition of the later Rig-vedic period itself to denote, legitimise and sanctify an oppressive and exploitative class structure that had already come into existence then.
Although the Purusha Sukta uses the term rajanya, not kshatriya, it is considered the first instance where four social classes are mentioned for the first time together. Usage of the term Rajanya possibly indicates the 'kinsmen of the rajan' (i.e., kinsmen of the ruler) had emerged as a distinct social group then, such that by the end of the vedic period, the term rajanya was replaced by kshatriya; where rajanya stresses kinship with the rajan and kshatriya denotes power over a specific domain. The term rajanya unlike the word kshatriya essentially denoted the status within a lineage. Whereas kshatra, means "ruling; one of the ruling order".
Jaiswal points out the term Brahman rarely occurs in the Rig-veda with the exception of the Purusha Sukta and may not have been used for the priestly class. Based on the authority of Panini, Patanjali, Katyayana and the Mahabharata, Jayaswal believes that Rajanya was the name of a political people and that the Rajanyas were, therefore, a democracy (with an elected ruler). Some examples were the Andhaka and Vrsni Rajanyas who followed the system of elected rulers. Ram Sharan Sharma details how the central chief was elected by various clan chiefs or lineage chiefs with increasing polarization between the rajanya (aristocracy helping the ruler) and the vis (peasants) leading to a distinction between the chiefs as a separate class (raja, rajanya, kshatra, kshatriya) on one hand and vis (clan peasantry) on the other hand.
The term kshatriya comes from kshatra and implies temporal authority and power which was based less on being a successful leader in battle and more on the tangible power of laying claim to sovereignty over a territory, and symbolizing ownership over clan lands. This later gave rise to the idea of kingship.
The later books find some reference to the word Rajanya though it was used to denote specific tribe or political authority, and the word Kshatriya was popular and denoted the ruling class. Later in the Aitareya Brahmana of the Rig Veda there is a mention of a Rajanya requesting a place in a sacrifice from a Kshatriya, suggesting that they were by then lower in status. By Brahminical standards, Kshatirya is superior to Vedic Rajanya. It was a Brahmin authority that decided the status of the two.
In the period of the Brahmanas there was ambiguity in the position of the varna. In the Panchavimsha Brahmana (13,4,7), the Rajanya are placed first, followed by Brahmana then Vaishya. In Shatapatha Brahmana 22.214.171.124, the Kshatriya are placed second. In Shatapatha Brahmana 126.96.36.199 the order is—Brahmana, Vaishya, Rajanya, Shudra. The order of the brahmanical tradition—Brahmana, Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra—became fixed from the time of dharmasutras.
There are other lineages, such as the Agnivanshi, of lesser myth in which an eponymous ancestor rises out of Agni (fire), and Nagavanshi (snake-born), claiming descent from the Nāgas. The Nagavanshi, not attested in the Itihasa-Purana tradition, were Naga tribes whose origin can be found in folk stories. Amongst the Naga tribes, the king was the ruler as well as the religious-head of his tribe; a system in contrast to the varna system wherein four varnas are separate from each other. There existed Nagavanshi rulers, such as the Chotanagpur Maharaja, originally said to be of Munda origin. The clan holds snakes to be sacred and had marital relations with Rajputs for over centuries.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Kshatriya.|
- Bujor Avari (2007). India: The Ancient Past: A History of the Indian Sub-Continent from c. 7000 BC to AD 1200, p.74
- Sharma, Ram Sharan (2005). India's ancient past. the University of Michigan: Oxford University Press. pp. 110–112. ISBN 9780195667141.
- David Kean (2007). Caste-based Discrimination in International Human Rights Law, p.26. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
- Jayantanuja Bandyopadhyaya (2007). Class and Religion in Ancient India, pp.37-47. Anthem Press.
- Kumkum Roy (2011). Insights and Interventions: Essays in Honour of Uma Chakravarti, p.148. Primus Books.
- Turner, Sir Ralph Lilley; Dorothy Rivers Turner (January 2006) . A Comparative Dictionary of the Indo-Aryan Languages. (Accompanied by three supplementary volumes: indexes, compiled by Dorothy Rivers Turner: 1969. – Phonetic analysis: 1971. – Addenda et corrigenda: 1985. ed.). London: Oxford University Press,. pp. 189–190. Retrieved 23 October 2011.
- Radhakrishna Choudhary (1964). The Vrātyas in Ancient India, Volume 38 of Chowkhamba Sanskrit studies, p.125. Sanskrit Series Office.
- Ram Sharan Sharma (1991). Aspects of Political Ideas and Institutions in Ancient India, p.172. Motilal Banarsidass Publications.
- Reddy (2005). General Studies History 4 Upsc. Tata McGraw-Hill Education,. pp. 78,79,33,80,27,123. ISBN 9780070604476.
- Upinder Singh (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century, p.202. Pearson Education India.
- Brian K. Smith. Reflections on Resemblance, Ritual, and Religion, Motilal Banarsidass Publishe, 1998
- Indian History: Ancient and medieval, p.22. Volume 1 of Indian History, Encyclopaedia Brittanica (India) Pvt. Ltd, 2003.
- Omacanda Hāṇḍā. Naga Cults and Traditions in the Western Himalaya, p.251. 
- Viyogi, Naval and Ansar. History Of The Later Harappans And Silpakara Movement, p.198 
- Pranab Chandra Roy Choudhury, (1968). Folk Tales of Bihar, p.63. Sahitya Akademi
- Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. History and Culture of Indian People, The Vedic Age. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1996. pp. 313–314