Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a set of rating systems for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of green buildings, homes and neighborhoods.
Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED is intended to help building owners and operators be environmentally responsible and use resources efficiently. Proposals to modify the LEED standards are offered and publicly reviewed by USGBC's member organizations, which number almost 20,000.
Unlike Model Building Code, such as the International Building Code, only members of the USGBC and specific "in-house" committees may add, subtract or edit the standard, based on an internal review process. Model Building Codes are voted on by members and "in-house" committees, but allow for comments and testimony from the general public during each and every code development cycle at Public Review hearings, generally held multiple times a year.
Since they were created in 1998, LEED standards have been applied to more than 7,000 projects in the United States and 30 countries, covering more than 1.5 billion square feet (140 km²) of development area.
Many U.S. federal agencies and state and local governments require or reward LEED certification. However, four states (Alabama, Georgia, Maine, and Mississippi) have effectively banned the use of LEED in new public buildings, thanks to lobbying by "timber giants and manufacturers of chemical-filled building products".
USGBC's Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI) offers various accreditations to people who demonstrate knowledge of the LEED rating system, including LEED Accredited Professional (LEED AP), LEED Green Associate, and since 2011, LEED Fellows, the highest designation for LEED professionals. GBCI also certifies projects pursuing LEED.
- 1 Rating systems
- 2 LEED Performance
- 3 Professional accreditation
- 4 Benefits and disadvantages
- 5 Incentive programs
- 6 Notable LEED buildings
- 7 See also
- 8 References
LEED has evolved since 1998 to more accurately represent and incorporate emerging green building technologies. The pilot version, LEED New Construction (NC) v1.0, led to LEED NCv2.0, then LEED NCv2.2 in 2005.
LEED was most recently updated in 2009, to LEEDv3. It encompasses nine rating systems for the design, construction and operation of buildings, homes and neighborhoods. Five overarching categories correspond to the specialties available under the LEED Accredited Professional program. That suite currently consists of:
Green Building Design & Construction
- LEED for New Construction
- LEED for Core & Shell
- LEED for Schools
- LEED for Retail: New Construction and Major Renovations
- LEED for Healthcare
Green Interior Design & Construction
- LEED for Commercial Interiors
- LEED for Retail: Commercial Interiors
Green Building Operations & Maintenance
- LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance
Green Neighborhood Development
- LEED for Neighborhood Development
Green Home Design and Construction
- LEED for Homes (The LEED for Homes rating system is different from LEED v3, with different point categories and thresholds that reward efficient residential design.)
LEED also forms the basis for other sustainability rating systems such as the Environmental Protection Agency's Labs21.
To make it easier to follow LEED requirements, in 2009 USGBC helped BuildingGreen develop LEEDuser, a guide to the LEED certification process and applying for LEED credits written by professionals in the field.
After four years of development, aligning credits across all LEED rating systems and weighting credits based on environmental priority, USGBC launched LEED v3, which consists of a new continuous development process, a new version of LEED Online, a revised third-party certification program and a new suite of rating systems known as LEED 2009.
Under LEED 2009, there are 100 possible base points distributed across six credit categories: Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy and Atmosphere, Materials and Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality, Innovation in Design. Four additional points may be received for Regional Priority Credits, and six additional points for Innovation in Design.
Buildings can qualify for four levels of certification:
- Certified: 40–49 points
- Silver: 50–59 points
- Gold: 60–79 points
- Platinum: 80 points and above
Goal of the credit system
The LEED 2009 performance credit system aims to allocate points "based on the potential environmental impacts and human benefits of each credit." These are weighed using the environmental impact categories of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Tools for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI). and the environmental-impact weighting scheme developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
To participate in LEED 2009, a building must comply with environmental laws and regulations, occupancy scenarios, building permanence and pre-rating completion, site boundaries and area-to-site ratios. Its owner must share data on the building's energy and water use for five years after occupancy (for new construction) or date of certification (for existing buildings).
Each of the performance categories also have measures in each category which are mandatory and receive no points.
Credit Weighting Process
The weighting process has three steps:
- A collection of reference buildings are used to estimate the environmental impacts of any building seeking LEED certification in a designated rating scheme.
- NIST weightings are used to judge the relative importance of these impacts in each category.
- Data regarding actual impacts on environmental and human health are used to assign points to individual categories and measures.
This system results in a weighted average for each rating scheme based upon actual impacts and the relative importance of those impacts to human health and environmental quality.
The LEED council also appears to have assigned credit and measure weighting based upon the market implications of point allocation.
From 2010, buildings can use carbon offsets to achieve Green Power Credits for LEED-NC (New Construction Certification) :
LEED for Homes
Additional performance categories in the LEED for Homes rating system are Locations and Linkages (recognizing the importance of transportation access, open space, and physical activity outdoors) and Awareness and Education (recognizing the need for buildings and settlements to educate occupants).
LEED certification is granted by the Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI), which handles the third-party verification of a project's compliance with the LEED requirements.
The certification process for design teams is made up of two consecutive applications: one including design credits, and one including construction credits. All of the LEED credits in each rating system are assigned to either the design application or the construction application. The design credits include those that are the purview of the architect and the engineer, and are documented in the official construction drawings. The construction credits include those that are predominantly under the purview of the contractor, and are documented during the construction and commissioning of the building.
A fee is required to register the building, and to submit the design and construction applications. Total fees are assessed based on building area. Fees range from a minimum of $2,900 to over $1 million for a large project. "Soft" costs, ie, added costs to the building project to be able to quality for LEED certification, range from 1% to 6% of the total project cost. The average cost increase was about 2%, or an extra $3-$5 per square foot.
The application review and certification process is handled on LEED Online, USGBC's web-based service that employs a series of active PDF forms to allow project teams to fill out credit forms and upload supporting documentation online. The GBCI also utilizes LEED Online to conduct their reviews.
LEED energy modeling
Design teams have the option of achieving points under the Optimize Energy Performance credit by building an energy model. This energy model must follow the modeling methodologies outlined in Appendix G of the ASHRAE 90.1 building energy standard. The guidelines in Appendix G require that the team make two energy models: one representing the building as designed, and a second “baseline” building. The baseline building must be modeled in the same location, and have the same geometry and occupancy as the design building. Depending on location (climate) and building size, the standard provides requirements for HVAC system type, and wall and window definitions. The goal of this methodology is to provide a baseline building that can be used as a reference point against which the design building may be compared. It is a way to standardize the baseline, while putting weight on important factors that heavily influence building energy consumption (e.g. location, geometry, and occupancy patterns). The number of points achieved in this credit is correlated with the percent predicted energy savings demonstrated by the difference between the design and baseline energy models.
This method of energy modeling has been criticized for inaccurately predicting actually energy usage of LEED-certified buildings. The USGBC admits that “current information indicates that most buildings do not perform as well as design metrics indicate. As a result, building owners might not obtain the benefits promised.” 
LEED for Homes
The process of the LEED for Homes Rating System, available in both the USA and Canada, is significantly different than the LEED NC rating system. LEED for Homes projects are low rise residential and are required to work with either an American Provider Organization or a Canadian Provider Organization and a Green Rater. A Provider Organization helps the project through the process while overseeing the Green Raters. Green Raters are individuals that conduct the two mandatory LEED for Homes site inspections; the Thermal Bypass Inspection and the Final Inspection. Although LEED for Homes is typically viewed by the construction industry as a simpler rating system especially when compared to LEED NC, LEED NC does not require an on-site inspection. The Provider and the Green Rater do not certify the project, but rather assist in the certification process.
Research papers provide most of what is known about the performance and effectiveness of LEED in two credit category areas – energy and indoor environment quality. LEED certified buildings collectively showed no energy savings compared with non-LEED buildings. IEQ-related studies provide two contrasting results - the first used occupant survey results in 65 LEED buildings and 79 non-LEED buildings and it concluded that occupants of LEED certified buildings have equal satisfaction with the building overall and with the workspace than occupants of non-LEED rated buildings and the second used occupant interviews and physical site measurements at 12 LEED buildings to report superior indoor environment performance compared with similar 12 conventional buildings (non-LEED). Buildings certified under LEED do not have to prove energy or water efficiency in practice to receive LEED certification points, but instead LEED uses modeling software to predict future energy use based on intended use. This has led to criticism of LEED’s ability to accurately determine the efficiency of buildings. The USGBC itself says that, “Buildings have a poor track record for performing as predicted during design.
Energy performance research
On average, LEED-certified buildings use the same source energy and produce equal greenhouse gas emissions as non-LEED-certified buildings. They use between 11 and 39% less site energy than non-LEED buildings on average, although 28-35% use more energy. No correlation was found between the number of LEED points achieved and measured energy savings.
Diamond et al. in 2006 compared modeled and actual building energy performance of 21 LEED-certified buildings (all certified under LEED-NC version 2.0 or 2.1). They found no correlation between the number of LEED energy-efficiency points achieved and actual energy savings demonstrated by post-occupancy data. The authors noted several limitations of the study, including the small sample size, uncertainties in actual floor area, and discrepancies between metered data.
In 2009 Newsham et al. analyzed a database of 100 LEED-certified buildings. In this study, each building was paired with a conventional "twin" building within the Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) database according to building type and occupancy. On average, LEED buildings consumed 18 to 39% less energy than their conventional "twin" building, although 28 to 35% of LEED-certified buildings used more energy than their "twin.” The paper found no correlation between the number of energy points achieved or LEED certification level and measured building performance. The authors noted that the studies were limited by the fact that most LEED buildings are newly constructed and may still be experiencing unexpected problems with systems operations, as well as other characteristics which commonly vary across individual buildings of the same type (plug loads, occupancy hours, construction differences, etc.).
In 2009 Scofield published an article in response to Newsham et al., analyzing the same database of LEED buildings and arriving at different conclusions. In his analysis, Scofield considered source energy (accounting for energy losses during generation and transmission) as well as site energy, and used area-weighted energy use intensities, or EUIs (energy per unit area per year), when comparing LEED and non-LEED buildings to account for the fact that larger buildings tend to have larger EUIs. Scofield concluded that, collectively, the LEED-certified buildings showed no significant source energy consumption savings or greenhouse gas emission reductions when compared to non-LEED buildings, although they did consume 10-17% less site energy. Scofield in 2013 analyzed 21 LEED-certified buildings in New York City. He found that buildings that had achieved LEED Gold used, on average, 20% less source energy than did conventional buildings. Buildings with LEED Silver or LEED Certified ratings actually used 11 to 15% more source energy, on average, than did their conventional counterparts.
Water performance research
IEQ performance research
The Center for Disease Control defines Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) as "the quality of a building’s environment in relation to the health and wellbeing of those who occupy space within it." The USGBC includes the following considerations for attaining IEQ credits; indoor air quality, the level of volatile organic compounds, lighting, thermal comfort, and daylighting and views. Published studies have also included factors such as; acoustics, building cleanliness and maintenance, colors and textures, workstation size, ceiling height, window access and shading, surface finishes, and furniture adjustability and comfort in consideration of the indoor environment quality of a building.
In 2013, a paper published by S. Schiavon and S. Altomonte studied LEED verses non-LEED buildings in relation to occupant IEQ satisfaction. Using occupant surveys from the Center for the Built Environment at Berkeley database, 65 LEED-certified and 79 non-LEED buildings where studied to provide an analysis of 15 IEQ-related factors, including; the overall building, specific workspace, ease of interaction, building cleanliness, comfort of furnishing, amount of light, building maintenance, colors and textures, workplace cleanliness, amount of space, furniture adjustability, visual comfort, air quality, visual privacy, noise, temperature, and sound privacy. The results showed that specific to air quality occupants tend to be slightly more satisfied in LEED buildings, however, they were slightly more dissatisfied with the amount of light. The overall finding was that there was no significant influence of LEED certification on occupant satisfaction in consideration of the overall building and workspace ratings. In the “limitations and further studies” section of the study it states that the data may not be representative of the entire building stock and a randomized approach was not used in the data assessment. Further, an analysis across the various certification types (e.g. NC-new construction, EB-existing buildings, etc.) by version release (e.g. 2.1) is recommended.
G. Newsham et al. published a detailed study on IEQ and LEED buildings in August 2013. Field studies and, specifically, post-occupancy (POE) evaluations were performed in 12 “green” and 12 “conventional” buildings across Canada and the northern United States. On-site, physical measurements of sample 974 workstations were researched and included: thermal conditions, air quality, acoustics, lighting, workstation size, ceiling height, window access and shading, and surface finishes. Responses were positive in the areas of: environmental satisfaction, satisfaction with thermal conditions, satisfaction with view from the outside, aesthetic appearance, less disturbance from heating, ventilation and air-conditioning noise, workplace image, night-time sleep quality, mood, physical symptoms, and reduced number of airborne particulates. The results showed green buildings exhibited superior performance compared with similar conventional buildings.
Sustainable Sites research
Materials and Resources research
Innovation in Design research
A 2003 analysis of the savings from green building found from a review of 60 LEED buildings that the buildings were, on average, 25-30% more energy efficient. However, it also attributed substantial benefits to the increased productivity from the better ventilation, temperature control, lighting control, and reduced indoor air pollution.
As of 2008, LEED (and similar Energy Star) buildings had mostly been evaluated by case studies. From a purely financial perspective, in 2008 several studies found that LEED for-rent office spaces generally charged higher rent and had higher occupancy rates. CoStar collects data on properties. The extra cost for the minimum benefit has been estimated at 3%, with an additional 2.5% for silver. More recent studies have confirmed these earlier findings in that certified buildings achieve significantly higher rents, sale prices and occupancy rates as well as lower capitalization rates potentially reflecting lower investment risk.
LEED focuses on the design of the building and not on its actual energy consumption, and therefore it has suggested that LEED buildings should be tracked to discover whether the potential energy savings from the design are being used in practice.
Directory of LEED-certified projects
The U.S. Green Building Council provides an online directory of U.S. LEED-certified projects.
The Canada Green Building Council provides an online directory of LEED Canada-certified projects.
In 2012 the USGBC launched GBIG, the Green Building Information Gateway, in an effort to connect green building efforts and projects from all over the world. It provides searchable access to a database of activities, buildings, places and collections of green building-related information from many sources and programs, as well as, specifically provides information about LEED projects.
The Green Building Certification Institute describes Professional Accreditation as follows: "LEED Professional Credentials demonstrate current knowledge of green building technologies, best practices, and the rapidly evolving LEED Rating Systems. They show differentiation in a growing and competitive industry, and they allow for varied levels of specialization. A LEED Professional Credential provides employers, policymakers, and other stakeholders with assurances of an individual's level of competence and is the mark of the most qualified, educated, and influential green building professionals in the marketplace." Credentials include the LEED Green Associate and the various types of specialized LEED Accredited Professionals (AP).
Benefits and disadvantages
LEED certified buildings are intended to use resources more efficiently when compared to conventional buildings simply built to code. However, analysis of energy and water use data from New York City shows that LEED certification does not necessarily make a building more energy or water efficient.
Often, when a LEED rating is pursued, the cost of initial design and construction rises. There may be a lack of abundant availability of manufactured building components that meet LEED specifications. Pursuing LEED certification for a project is an added cost in itself as well. This added cost comes in the form of USGBC correspondence, LEED design-aide consultants, and the hiring of the required Commissioning Authority (CxA)—all of which would not necessarily be included in an environmentally responsible project, unless it also sought a LEED rating.
However, these higher initial costs can be effectively mitigated by the savings incurred over time due to the lower-than-industry-standard operational costs typical of a LEED certified building. This Life cycle costing is a method for assessing the total cost of ownership, taking into account all costs of acquiring, owning and operating, and the eventual disposal of a building. Additional economic payback may come in the form of employee productivity gains incurred as a result of working in a healthier environment. Studies have suggested that an initial up-front investment of 2% extra will yield over ten times the initial investment over the life cycle of the building.
In the progression of sustainable design from simply meeting local buildings codes to USGBC LEED (Certified, Silver, Gold and Platinum) to the Architecture 2030 Challenge, the Living Building Challenge is currently the most stringent sustainable design protocol. The LBC sets 20 imperatives which compel building owners, designers, operators and tenants beyond current USGBC LEED rating levels.
LEED is a design tool and not a performance measurement tool. It is also not yet climate-specific, although the newest version hopes to address this weakness partially. Because of this, designers may make materials or design choices that garner a LEED point, even though they may not be the most site- or climate-appropriate choice available. On top of this, LEED is also not energy-specific. Since it only measures the overall performances, builders are free to choose how to achieve points under various categories. A USA TODAY review showed that 7,100 certified commercial building projects targeted easy and cheap green points, such as creating healthy spaces and providing educational displays in the building. Few builders would really adopt renewable energy because the generators for those energy resources, such as solar photovoltaic, are costly. Builders game the rating system and use certain performances to compensate for the others, making energy conservation the weakest part in the overall evaluation.
LEED is a measurement tool for green building in the United States and it is developed and continuously modified by workers in the green building industry, especially in the ten largest metro areas in the U.S.; however, LEED certified buildings have been slower to penetrate small and mid-major markets. Also, some criticism suggests that the LEED rating system is not sensitive and does not vary enough with regard to local environmental conditions. For instance, a building in Maine would receive the same credit as a building in Arizona for water conservation, though the principle is more important in the latter case. Another complaint is that its certification costs require money that could be used to make the building in question even more sustainable. Many critics have noted that compliance and certification costs have grown faster than staff support from the USGBC.
For existing buildings LEED has developed LEED-EB. Research has demonstrated that buildings that can achieve LEED-EB equivalencies can generate a tremendous ROI. In a 2008 white paper by the Leonardo Academy comparing LEED-EB buildings vs. data from BOMA's Experience Exchange Report 2007 demonstrated LEED-EB certified buildings achieved superior operating cost savings in 63% of the buildings surveyed ranging from $4.94 to $15.59 per square foot of floor space, with an average valuation of $6.68 and a median valuation of $6.07.
In addition the overall cost of LEED-EB implementation and certification ranged from $0.00 to $6.46 per square foot of floor space, with an average of $2.43 per square foot demonstrating that implementation is not expensive, especially in comparison to cost savings. These costs should be significantly reduced if automation and technology are integrated into the implementation.
Many federal, state, and local governments and school districts have adopted various types of LEED initiatives and incentives. A full listing of government and school LEED initiatives can be found online and is updated regularly.
Some areas have implemented or are considering incentives for LEED-certified buildings.
The city of Cincinnati, Ohio adopted a measure providing an automatic 100% real property tax exemption of the assessed property value for newly constructed or rehabilitated commercial or residential properties that earn a minimum of LEED Certified.
In the state of Nevada construction materials for a qualifying LEED building are exempt from local taxes. Pieces of construction that are deemed "inseparable" parts, such as concrete or drywall, qualify.
The state of Maryland passed its High Performance Buildings Act in 2008, requiring all new public construction and renovation of buildings greater than 7,500 square feet to meet at least the LEED Silver standard, or two Green Globes. Between 2009 and 2014, the state is required to fund half of the required additional cost for public school construction or renovation to attain that standard.
Many local governments have adopted LEED incentive programs. Program incentives include tax credits, tax breaks, density bonuses, reduced fees, priority or expedited permitting, free or reduced-cost technical assistance, grants and low-interest loans.
Notable LEED buildings
The Philip Merrill Environmental Center is recognized as one of the "greenest" buildings ever constructed in the United States. Sustainability issues ranging from energy use to material selection were given serious consideration throughout design and construction of this facility. It was the first building to receive a Platinum rating through the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED Rating System, version 1.0.
When it opened in 2003, Pittsburgh's 1,500,000-square-foot (140,000 m2) David L. Lawrence Convention Center was the first Gold LEED-certified convention center and largest "green" building in the world. The convention center subsequently became the first convention center to earn Platinum certification in 2012. In October 2011 Apogee Stadium on the campus of the University of North Texas became the first newly built stadium in the country to achieve Platinum-level certification. In Pittsburgh, Phipps Conservatory & Botanical Gardens visitors center has received a Silver certification, its Center for Sustainable Landscapes has received a Platinum certification along with fulfilling the Living Building Challenge for net-zero energy, and its greenhouse production facility has received Platinum certification, the first and only greenhouse to be so certified. Also in Pittsburgh, Sota Construction Services completed construction on its new 7,500 sq. ft. corporate headquarters, which features a super-efficient thermal envelope using cob walls, along with other energy-saving features like a geothermal well, radiant heat flooring, roof-mounted solar panel array, and daylighting features. It earned a LEED Platinum rating in 2012 and received one of the highest scores by percentage of total points earned in any LEED category, making it the "greenest" building in Pennsylvania and in the top ten greenest in the world.
Around 2009–2010, the Empire State Building was undergoing a $550 million renovation, with $120 million spent in an effort to transform the building into a more energy efficient and eco-friendly structure. Receiving a gold LEED rating in September 2011, the Empire State Building was at the time the tallest LEED-certified building in the United States.
The Cashman Equipment building is the first construction equipment dealership to receive LEED certification. It is the largest LEED industrial complex in Nevada. Caterpillar corporate has rewritten their development guidelines for new facilities based on this building.
The Letterman Digital Arts Center in San Francisco's Presidio, the headquarters for various Lucasfilm companies, including visual effects house Industrial Light and Magic, earned a Gold certification. It was built almost entirely from the recycled remains of the building it replaced, the Letterman Army Hospital.
The Cuyahoga County Public Library system is building newer branches so that they could be LEED Certified. In the construction of the Garfield Heights, Ohio new branch, the library used green materials, the lighting of Garfield Heights Branch lightens or dims when there ample light, when it get darker, the lights get brighter. The glass windows have sensors that sense the light which works with lights inside the library. Also the library uses a raised floor and has recyclable carpet tiles.
Opening in September 2012 Siemens' The Crystal became the world's first building to be awarded LEED Platinum and BREEAM Outstanding status. Generating its own energy, using solar power and ground source heat pumps, no fossil fuels are burnt within the building. Its extensive use of KNX technologies to automate the building's environmental controls has set the benchmark for sustainable buildings.
When it received LEED Platinum in 2012, Manitoba Hydro Place in downtown Winnipeg, Manitoba was the most energy efficient office tower in North America and the only office tower in Canada to receive the Platinum rating. The office tower employs south facing winter gardens in order to capture the maximum amount of solar energy during the harsh Manitoba winters as well as extensive use of glass to maximise natural lighting.
- Belko, Mark (May 11, 2012). "Convention center earns highest 'green' cred: platinum LEED rating". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- Plumb, Tierney (October 8, 2009). "1225 Connecticut Avenue gets LEED Platinum". Washington Business Journal. Retrieved June 21, 2010.
- Raulerson, Josh (July 5, 2012). "Phipps Production Greenhouse Attains LEED Platinum". WESA.fm. Retrieved January 24, 2012. First Green Bank opened its LEED Platinum headquarters in Mount Dora, Florida on November 14, 2011.
- Moore, Andrew (May 23, 2012). "Development News: Phipps' Center for Sustainable Landscapes opens today, to be greenest building in the world". Pop City. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- "UT Dallas Building Awarded Highest Green Status". University of Texas at Dallas. February 10, 2011. Retrieved July 3, 2011.
- Staley, Doug. "Shearer's, Fresh Mark, Drummond are success stories". IndeOnline.com. The Independent. Retrieved 13 June 2011.
- "About LEED". USGBC. Retrieved 2013-08-01.
- Law, Steve (October 24, 2013). "Clash of the green giants". Portland, Maine. Portland Herald. Retrieved January 29, 2014.
- "LEED Green Associate Overview".
- "LEED Update December 2009". US Green Building Council. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
- "LEEDv3". US Green Building Council. Retrieved 20 February 2010.
- http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=8868 p. xii.
- "LEED Certification | The CarbonNeutral Company US". Us.carbonneutral.com. Retrieved 2012-08-13.
- Canada Green Building Council: Green Building Rating System[dead link]
- This version was updated and released on June 21, 2010 to LEED Canada NC 2009[dead link]
- "A National Green Building Research Agenda".
- "LEED rating systems | U.S. Green Building Council". Usgbc.org. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
- [dead link]
- "U.S. Green Building Council | U.S. Green Building Council". Usgbc.org. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
- [dead link]
- Scofield, John H. (2013). "Efﬁcacy of LEED-certiﬁcation in reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission for large New York City ofﬁce buildings". Energy and Buildings 67: 517–524. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.032.
- Schiavon, Stefano; Altomonte, Sergio (2013). "Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings". Buildings and Environment 68: 66–76. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- Newsham, Guy R.; Birt, Benjamin J.; Arsenault, Chantal; Thompson, Alexandra J.L.; Veitch, Jennifer A.; Mancini, Sandra; Galasiu, Anca D.; Gover, Bradford N.; Macdonald, lain A.; Burns, Gregory J. (2013). "Do 'green' buildings have better indoor environments? New evidence". Building Research and Information 41 (4): 415–434. doi:10.1080/09613218.2013.789951. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- Scofield, John H. (2009). "Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Not really..". Energy and Buildings 41 (12): 1386–1390. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.006.
- Newsham, Guy R.; Mancini, Sandra; Birt J., Benjamin (2009). "Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but…". Energy and Buildings 41 (8): 897–905. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.03.014.
- Diamond, Rick; Opitz, Mike; Hicks, Tom; Von Neida, Bill; Herrera, Shawn (2006). "Evaluating the Energy Performance of the First Generation of LEED-Certified Commercial Buildings" (PDF). ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Washington DC, USA: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. pp. 3–41–3–52
- "Workplace Safety and Health Topics, Indoor Environment Quality". Center for Disease Control Main Website. CDC. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- Kats, Greg (2003). "Green building costs and financial benefits" (PDF). Massachusetts Technology Collaborative.
- N. Miller, J. Spivey, A. Florance (2008). "Does Green Pay Off?" (PDF). Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management.
- Miller, Norman. "Does Green Still Pay off?" (PDF). Costar.com. Retrieved November 5, 2010.
- Fuerst, Franz; McAllister, Pat (2009). "Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Effects of Environmental Certification on Office Property Values". Papers.ssrn.com. Retrieved November 5, 2010.
- Pivo, Gary; Fisher, Jeffrey D. (2009). "Investment Returns from Responsible Property Investments: Energy Efficient, Transit-oriented and Urban Regeneration Office Properties in the US from 1998-2008" (PDF). Responsibleproperty.net. Retrieved November 5, 2010.
- Fuerst, Franz; McAllister, Pat (2009). "An Investigation of the Effect of Eco-Labeling on Office Occupancy Rates" (PDF). Costar.com. Retrieved November 5, 2010.
- Appelbaum, A. (2010). "Don't LEED Us Astray". New York Times.
- "LEED Projects Directory". US Green Building Council. Retrieved 27 February 2014.
- "Canada Builds Green Directory". Canada Green Building Council. Retrieved 27 November 2013.
- "GBIG Green Building Information Gateway". USGBC.org. Retrieved 2013-11-17.
- "LEED Professional Credentials". GBCI. Retrieved 2012-08-13.
- KMC Controls. "Controls and Green Building Certifications Obtaining your LEED credentials". Retrieved 27 March 2013.
- "Green Building LEED Certification". USA Today. Retrieved 2013-12-08.
- Greg Kats; Leon Alevantis, Adam Berman, Evan Mills, Jeff Perlman (2003). "The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-10-30.
- "The 2030 Challenge". Architecture2030.org.
- "U.S. Green Building Council | U.S. Green Building Council". Usgbc.org. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
- "The 2030 Challenge". Architecture 2030. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
- "usgbc.org". usgbc.org. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
- "In U.S. building industry, is it too easy to be green?".
- Burr, Andrew C. (April 23, 2008). "LEED's Big Market Bias". CoStar Group. Retrieved 2008-04-27.
- "Cost Analysis of LEED-EB" (PDF). Retrieved 2014-02-14.
- "Going Green.... Is it the 800lb Elephant in the Room?". Mybuildingsuccess.com.
- "Tax Deductions and Incentives. The Vinyl Roofing Division of the Chemical Fabrics and Film Association.".
- "LEED Initiatives in Government and Schools".
- "Exemption for LEED Certified Green Buildings".
- "Maryland Enacts Green Building Standards for Public Buildings | Center for Climate and Energy Solutions". C2es.org. 2008-04-24. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- "LEED Tax Credits Coming?".
- "Summary of Government LEED Incentives".
- "Public Policy Search".
- Roberts, Tristan (2013-06-05). "First-in-Country Projects to Get Free LEED Certification". Retrieved 2013-07-30.
- "LEED Earth Rules and Regulations". USGBC. 2013-06-04. Retrieved 2013-07-30.
- "U.S. Green Building Council".
- "Clark Construction".
- Gonchar, Joann (October 2012). "David L. Lawrence Convention Center". Architectural Record (McGraw-Hill). Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- Vito, Brett (2011-10-20). "Apogee Stadium achieves top environmental rating". Denton Record-Chronicle (Denton, Texas). Retrieved 2011-10-20.
- "Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Garden". U.S. Green Building Council. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- "Sota Construction Services, Inc. - Sota Construction Corporate Offices". Sotaconstruction.com. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
- "Sota Construction Office Expansion". U.S. Green Building Council. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
- "2009 ULI Fall Meeting & Urban Land Expo — Green Retrofit: What Is Making This the Wave of the Future?" (PDF). Retrieved October 11, 2010.[dead link]
- Dailey, Jessica (2011-09-14). "Empire State Building Achieves LEED Gold Certification". Inhabitat.com. Retrieved 2013-07-30.
- "Soldier Field earns top building honor". Chicagobears. 2012-05-31. Retrieved 2012-08-13.
- "Cashman Turns Green to Gold". Retrieved December 1, 2009.
- "Letterman Digital Arts Center". Onelettermandrive.com. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
- Boniface, Russell (2008-10-03). "AIArchitect This Week | Lucasfilm’s Letterman Digital Arts Center Achieves LEED Gold". Info.aia.org. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
- LEED Platinum certification for the Crystal
- "Crystal Clear - Inside Siemens' The Crystal". Abtecbt.com. 2013-12-16. Retrieved 2014-02-14.
- "Urban Ecology — Description | CMHC". Cmhc-schl.gc.ca. Retrieved 2014-02-27.
- Green Building Facts [Data file]. (n.d.). US Green Building Council. Retrieved June 27, 2009.
- Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003). The Costs and Financial Benefeits of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force [Report]. U.S. Green Building Council.
- Lucuik, M., Trusty, W., Larsson, N., & Charette, R. (2005). A Business Case for Green Building in Canada: Presented to Industry Canada [Report]. U.S. Green Building Council.
- U.S. Green Building Council. (2006, August). Foundations of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Environmental Rating System, A Tool for Market Transformation [Policy Manual].