Lam Bun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Lam Bun
Lam Bun.jpg
Lam Bun
Chinese name 林彬
Pinyin Lín Bīn (Mandarin)
Jyutping Lam4 Ban1 (Cantonese)
Born (1929-09-24)24 September 1929
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Died 25 August 1967(1967-08-25) (aged 37)
British Hong Kong

Lam Bun (25 September 1929 – 25 August 1967) was a radio commentator at Commercial Radio Hong Kong who was fiercely critical of leftists. He was assassinated during the Hong Kong 1967 riots,[1] and has become an icon for free speech in Hong Kong.

Biography[edit]

Born in 1929, Lam was a radio commentator at Commercial Radio Hong Kong that in the 1960s who was fiercely critical of leftists. During the 1967 riots, he criticised the leftist agitators on his own radio programmes. He created a programme called "Can't Stop Striking" (欲罷不能) to satirise the leftist agitators. Some leftist newspapers at the time labelled him an anti-China spy.[2]

Death[edit]

On 24 August 1967, whilst on his way to work, men posing as road maintenance workers stopped his vehicle at the end of the street where he lived. They blocked his car doors and doused Lam and his cousin with petrol.[3][4] They were both then set on fire and burned alive.[1] Lam died later that day in a hospital; his cousin died several days later. A leftist group reportedly claimed responsibility for the assassination.[2] No one was ever arrested, although it was believed that 1967 riot leader, Yeung Kwong (楊光), then chairman of the Federation of Trade Unions and director of the All Circles Anti-Persecution Struggle Committee, ordered the murder. However, Pro-Beijing politicians said in 2010 that leftists should not be blamed for Lam's death.[5]

Immediately after Lam Bun's death, most of the Chinese and English newspapers in Hong Kong condemned the brutal murdering of Lam Bun and many other Chinese and non-Chinese innocent victims by the leftist extremists as despicable and inhuman. On the other hand, the pro-communist leftist newspaper, Ta Kung Pao (大公報), published several articles, condemning Lam Bun but not the murderers. For example, one of the articles titled "地下突擊隊鋤奸, 敗類林彬受重傷", which may be translated as "An underground special tactic unit had crushed the villain. The antagonist, Lam Bun, was seriously wounded" in English. Another article in the same newspaper published on the same day described the brutal murdering as a punishment that Lam Bun had deserved ("突擊隊懲戒林彬").[6] After the incident, leftist newspapers in Hong Kong, instead of accusing the leftist murderers, praised and endorsed the murdering of a righteous Hong Kong citizen, the husband of an innocent wife and the father of an innocent son, as if it were a heroic and patriotic action.

The Lam Bun assassination angered the people of Hong Kong, eventually leading the government of Hong Kong to suppress the riots. Lam became an icon of free speech.[7] The police offered a reward of HK$50,000, on top of which his employers added $10,000, making it the highest reward ever posted in the colony. Commercial Radio created the program "18/F, Block C" in his memory.

With the help of Commercial Radio and some Hong Kong citizens, his wife and his 3 daughters fled to Taiwan.

2001 GBM controversy[edit]

In 2001, Yeung Kwong was awarded the highest honour Grand Bauhinia Medal by Tung Chee Hwa. Critics in Hong Kong felt that it was inappropriate to award a riot leader responsible for Lam's murder.

2010 Commercial Radio controversy[edit]

In May 2010, after the pro-Beijing Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong had sponsored a political radio programme on Commercial Radio, pro-democracy activists protested outside the station with images of Lam, complaining that the station had desecrated the memory of Lam, and all the station had stood for. Activists said they had requested an interview to talk about Lam's death. The station later said it respected freedom of speech; the DAB said the shows were about livelihood issues, and denied they promoted a political stance.[7]

Two DAB lawmakers stepped into the row: Chan Kam-lam said: "During the '67 riots, it was not just Lam Bun who died. There were very many ordinary citizens who, we don't know for what reason, died ..." Wong Ting-kwong also said leftists should not be held responsible. Pro-democracy lawmaker Lee Cheuk-yan said the DAB were revisionists who "would rather people not talk about their inglorious past."[2] Wong later clarified his comments, saying he had been misunderstood because the phrase 'leftist camp' had different definitions. He said that there was no evidence that Yeung Kwong or the FTU killed Lam Bun. He blamed the media for sensationalising his comments ahead of the 16 May by-election.[5]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Shimakawa, Karen. [2001] (2001). Orientations: Mapping Studies in the Asian Diaspora. Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-2739-2.
  2. ^ a b c Wong, Albert (13 May 2010). "Radio commentator's murder dragged up in sponsorship row", South China Morning Post
  3. ^ Carroll, John M. [2007] (2007). A Concise History of Hong Kong. Rowman & Littlefield publishing. ISBN 0-7425-3422-7.
  4. ^ "死亡真相 林彬送院喊:左仔害死我 Facts: Lam Bun shouts on the way to hospital 'Lefties are responsible'" Apple Daily, 13 May 2010 (Chinese)
  5. ^ a b Fung, Fanny (14 May 2010). "Media misusing riot comments: lawmaker", South China Morning Post
  6. ^ Ta Kung Pao (大公報). 25 August 1967 (1967年8月25日). 
  7. ^ a b Chan, Kobi (16 May 2010). "Activists held after attack on DAB-sponsored show", South China Morning Post