Least squares support vector machine
||This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. (November 2010)|
Least squares support vector machines (LS-SVM) are least squares versions of support vector machines (SVM), which are a set of related supervised learning methods that analyze data and recognize patterns, and which are used for classification and regression analysis. In this version one finds the solution by solving a set of linear equations instead of a convex quadratic programming (QP) problem for classical SVMs. Least squares SVM classifiers, were proposed by Suykens and Vandewalle. LS-SVMs are a class of kernel-based learning methods.
From support vector machine to least squares support vector machine 
Which is equivalent to
where is the nonlinear map from original space to the high (and possibly infinite) dimensional space.
Inseparable data 
In case of such separating hyperplane does not exist, we introduce a so-called slack variable such that
According to the structural risk minimization principle, the risk bound is minimized by the following minimization problem:
By substituting w by its expression in the Lagrangian formed from the appropriate objective and constraints, we will get the following quadratic programming problem:
Least squares SVM formulation 
The least squares version of the SVM classifier is obtained by reformulating the minimization problem as:
subject to the equality constraints:
The least squares SVM (LS-SVM) classifier formulation above implicitly corresponds to a regression interpretation with binary targets .
Using , we have
Hence the LS-SVM classifier formulation is equivalent to
Both and should be considered as hyperparamters to tune the amount of regularization versus the sum squared error. The solution does only depend on the ratio , therefore the original formulation uses only as tuning parameter. We use both and as parameters in order to provide a Bayesian interpretation to LS-SVM.
The solution of LS-SVM regressor will be obtained after we construct the Lagrangian function:
where are the Lagrange multipliers. The conditions for optimality are
with , and . Here, is an identity matrix, and is the kernel matrix defined by .
Kernel function K 
For the kernel function K(•, •) one typically has the following choices:
where , , , and are constants. Notice that the Mercer condition holds for all and values in the polynomial and RBF case, but not for all possible choices of and in the MLP case. The scale parameters , and determine the scaling of the inputs in the polynomial, RBF and MLP kernel function. This scaling is related to the bandwidth of the kernel in statistics, where it is shown that the bandwidth is an important parameter of the generalization behavior of a kernel method.
Bayesian interpretation for LS-SVM 
A Bayesian interpretation of the SVM has been proposed by Smola et al. They showed that the use of different kernels in SVM can be regarded as defining different prior probability distributions on the functional space, as . Here is a constant and is the regularization operator corresponding to the selected kernel.
A general Bayesian evidence framework was developed by MacKay, and MacKay has used it to the problem of regression, forward neural network and classification network. Provided data set , a model with parameter vector and a so-called hyperparameter or regularization parameter , Bayesian inference is constructed with 3 levels of inference:
- In level 1, for a given value of , the first level of inference infers the posterior distribution of by Bayesian rule
- The second level of inference determines the value of , by maximizing
- The third level of inference in the evidence framework ranks different models by examining their posterior probabilities
We can see that Bayesian evidence framework is a unified theory for learning the model and model selection. Kwok used the Bayesian evidence framework to interpret the formulation of SVM and model selection. And he also applied Bayesian evidence framework to support vector regression.
Now, given the data points and the hyperparameters and of the model , the model parameters and are estimated by maximizing the posterior . Applying Bayes’ rule, we obtain:
Where is a normalizing constant such the integral over all possible and is equal to 1. We assume and are independent of the hyperparameter , and are conditional independent, i.e., we assume
When , the distribution of will approximate a uniform distribution. Furthermore, we assume and are Gaussian distribution, so we obtain the a priori distribution of and with to be:
Here is the dimensionality of the feature space, same as the dimensionality of .
The probability of is assumed to depend only on and . We assume that the data points are independently identically distributed (i.i.d.), so that:
In order to obtain the least square cost function, it is assumed that the probability of a data point is proportional to:
A Gaussian distribution is taken for the errors as:
It is assumed that the and are determined in such a way that the class centers and are mapped onto the target -1 and +1, respectively. The projections of the class elements follow a multivariate Gaussian distribution, which have variance .
Combining the preceding expressions, and neglecting all constants, Bayes’ rule becomes
The maximum posterior density estimates and are then be obtained by minimizing the negative logarithm of (26), so we arrive (10).
- Suykens, J.A.K.; Vandewalle, J. (1999) "Least squares support vector machine classifiers", Neural Processing Letters, 9 (3), 293-300.
- Vapnik, V. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995
- MacKay, D.J.C. Bayesian Interpolation. Neural Computation, 4(3): 415-447, May 1992.
- MacKay, D.J.C. A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks. Neural Computation, 4(3): 448-472, May 1992.
- MacKay, D.J.C. The evidence framework applied to classification networks. Neural Computation, 4(5): 720-736, Sept. 1992.
- J. A. K. Suykens, T. Van Gestel, J. De Brabanter, B. De Moor, J. Vandewalle, Least Squares Support Vector Machines, World Scientific Pub. Co., Singapore, 2002. ISBN 981-238-151-1
- Suykens J.A.K., Vandewalle J., Least squares support vector machine classifiers, Neural Processing Letters, vol. 9, no. 3, Jun. 1999, pp. 293–300.
- Vladimir Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, 1995. ISBN 0-387-98780-0
- MacKay, D. J. C., Probable networks and plausible predictions—A review of practical Bayesian methods for supervised neural networks. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, vol. 6, 1995, pp. 469–505.
- www.esat.kuleuven.be/sista/lssvmlab/ "Least squares support vector machine Lab (LS-SVMlab) toolbox contains Matlab/C implementations for a number of LS-SVM algorithms."
- www.kernel-machines.org "Support Vector Machines and Kernel based methods (Smola & Schölkopf)."
- www.gaussianprocess.org "Gaussian Processes: Data modeling using Gaussian Process priors over functions for regression and classification (MacKay, Williams)"
- www.support-vector.net "Support Vector Machines and kernel based methods (Cristianini)"
- dlib: Contains a least-squares SVM implementation for large-scale datasets.