# Lehmer's conjecture

For Lehmer's conjecture about the non-vanishing of τ(n), see Ramanjuan's tau function.
For Lehmer's conjecture about Euler's totient function, see Lehmer's totient problem.

Lehmer's conjecture, also known as the Lehmer's Mahler measure problem, is a problem in number theory raised by Derrick Henry Lehmer.[1] The conjecture asserts that there is an absolute constant $\mu>1$ such that every polynomial with integer coefficients $P(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$ satisfies one of the following properties:

• The Mahler measure $\mathcal{M}(P(x))$ of $P(x)$ is greater than or equal to $\mu$.
• $P(x)$ is an integral multiple of a product of cyclotomic polynomials or the monomial $x$, in which case $\mathcal{M}(P(x))=1$. (Equivalently, every complex root of $P(x)$ is a root of unity or zero.)

There are a number of definitions of the Mahler measure, one of which is to factor $P(x)$ over $\mathbb{C}$ as

$P(x)=a_0 (x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)\cdots(x-\alpha_D),$

and then set

$\mathcal{M}(P(x)) = |a_0| \prod_{i=1}^{D} \max(1,|\alpha_i|).$

The smallest known Mahler measure (greater than 1) is for "Lehmer's polynomial"

$P(x)= x^{10}+x^9-x^7-x^6-x^5-x^4-x^3+x+1 \,,$

for which the Mahler measure is the Salem number[2]

$\mathcal{M}(P(x))=1.176280818\dots \ .$

It is widely believed that this example represents the true minimal value: that is, $\mu=1.176280818\dots$ in Lehmer's conjecture.[3][4]

## Partial results

Let $P(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$ be an irreducible monic polynomial of degree $D$.

Smyth [5] proved that Lehmer's conjecture is true for all polynomials that are not reciprocal, i.e., all polynomials satisfying $x^DP(x^{-1})\ne P(x)$.

Blanksby and Montgomery[6] and Stewart[7] independently proved that there is an absolute constant $C>1$ such that either $\mathcal{M}(P(x))=1$ or[8]

$\log\mathcal{M}(P(x))\ge \frac{C}{D\log D}.$

Dobrowolski [9] improved this to

$\log\mathcal{M}(P(x))\ge C\left(\frac{\log\log D}{\log D}\right)^3.$

Dobrowolski obtained the value C ≥ 1/1200 and asymptotically C > 1-ε for all sufficiently large D. Voutier obtained C ≥ 1/4 for D ≥ 2.[10]

## Elliptic analogues

Let $E/K$ be an elliptic curve defined over a number field $K$, and let $\hat{h}_E:E(\bar{K})\to\mathbb{R}$ be the canonical height function. The canonical height is the analogue for elliptic curves of the function $(\deg P)^{-1}\log\mathcal{M}(P(x))$. It has the property that $\hat{h}_E(Q)=0$ if and only if $Q$ is a torsion point in $E(\bar{K})$. The elliptic Lehmer conjecture asserts that there is a constant $C(E/K)>0$ such that

$\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge \frac{C(E/K)}{D}$ for all non-torsion points $Q\in E(\bar{K})$,

where $D=[K(Q):K]$. If the elliptic curve E has complex multiplication, then the analogue of Dobrowolski's result holds:

$\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge \frac{C(E/K)}{D} \left(\frac{\log\log D}{\log D}\right)^3 ,$

due to Laurent.[11] For arbitrary elliptic curves, the best known result is[11]

$\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge \frac{C(E/K)}{D^3(\log D)^2},$

due to Masser.[12] For elliptic curves with non-integral j-invariant, this has been improved to[11]

$\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge \frac{C(E/K)}{D^2(\log D)^2},$

by Hindry and Silverman.[13]

## Restricted results

Stronger results are known for restricted classes of polynomials or algebraic numbers.

If P(x) is not reciprocal then

$M(P) \ge M(x^3 -x - 1) \approx 1.3247$

and this is clearly best possible.[14] If further all the coefficients of P are odd then[15]

$M(P) \ge M(x^2 -x - 1) \approx 1.618 .$

If the field Q(α) is a Galois extension of Q then Lehmer's conjecture holds.[15]

## References

1. ^ Lehmer, D.H. (1933). "Factorization of certain cyclotomic functions". Ann. Math. (2) 34: 461–479. doi:10.2307/1968172. ISSN 0003-486X. Zbl 0007.19904.
2. ^ Borwein, Peter (2002). Computational Excursions in Analysis and Number Theory. CMS Books in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag. p. 16. ISBN 0-387-95444-9. Zbl 1020.12001.
3. ^ Smyth (2008) p.324
4. ^ Everest, Graham; van der Poorten, Alf; Shparlinski, Igor; Ward, Thomas (2003). Recurrence sequences. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 104. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. p. 30. ISBN 0-8218-3387-1. Zbl 1033.11006.
5. ^ Smyth, C. J. (1971). "On the product of the conjugates outside the unit circle of an algebraic integer". Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 3: 169–175. doi:10.1112/blms/3.2.169. Zbl 1139.11002.
6. ^ Blanksby, P. E.; Montgomery, H. L. (1971). "Algebraic integers near the unit circle". Acta Arith. 18: 355–369. Zbl 0221.12003.
7. ^ Stewart, C. L. (1978). "Algebraic integers whose conjugates lie near the unit circle". Bull. Soc. Math. France 106: 169–176.
8. ^ Smyth (2008) p.325
9. ^ Dobrowolski, E. (1979). "On a question of Lehmer and the number of irreducible factors of a polynomial". Acta Arith. 34: 391–401.
10. ^ Smyth (2008) p.326
11. ^ a b c Smyth (2008) p.327
12. ^ Masser, D.W. (1989). "Counting points of small height on elliptic curves". Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 117 (2): 247–265. Zbl 0723.14026.
13. ^ Hindry, Marc; Silverman, Joseph H. (1990). "On Lehmer's conjecture for elliptic curves". In Goldstein, Catherine. Sémin. Théor. Nombres, Paris/Fr. 1988-89. Prog. Math. 91. pp. 103–116. ISBN 0-8176-3493-2. Zbl 0741.14013.
14. ^ Smyth (2008) p.328
15. ^ a b Smyth (2008) p.329
• Smyth, Chris (2008). "The Mahler measure of algebraic numbers: a survey". In McKee, James; Smyth, Chris. Number Theory and Polynomials. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 352. Cambridge University Press. pp. 322–349. ISBN 978-0-521-71467-9.