Length measurement is implemented in practice in many ways. The most commonly used approaches are the transit-time methods and the interferometer methods based upon the speed of light. For objects such as crystals and diffraction gratings, diffraction is used with X-rays and electron beams. Measurement techniques for three-dimensional structures very small in every dimension use specialized instruments such as ion microscopy coupled with intensive computer modeling.
For a discussion of astronomical methods for determining cosmological distances, see the article Cosmic distance ladder.
The basic idea behind a transit-time measurement of length is to send a signal from one end of the length to be measured to the other, and back again. The time for the round trip is the transit time Δt, and the length ℓ is then 2ℓ = Δt/v, with v the speed of propagation of the signal, assuming that is the same in both directions. If light is used for the signal, its speed depends upon the medium in which it propagates; in SI units the speed is a defined value c0 in the reference medium of classical vacuum. Thus, when light is used in a transit-time approach, length measurements are not subject to knowledge of the source frequency (apart from possible frequency dependence of the correction to relate the medium to classical vacuum), but are subject to the error in measuring transit times, in particular, errors introduced by the response times of the pulse emission and detection instrumentation. An additional uncertainty is the refractive index correction relating the medium used to the reference vacuum, taken in SI units to be the classical vacuum. A refractive index of the medium larger than one slows the light.
Transit-time measurement underlies most radio navigation systems for boats and aircraft, for example, radar and the nearly obsolete Long Range Aid to Navigation LORAN-C. For example, in one radar system, pulses of electromagnetic radiation are sent out by the vehicle (interrogating pulses) and trigger a response from a responder beacon. The time interval between the sending and the receiving of a pulse is monitored and used to determine a distance. In the global positioning system a code of ones and zeros is emitted at a known time from multiple satellites, and their times of arrival are noted at a receiver along with the time they were sent (encoded in the messages). Assuming the receiver clock can be related to the synchronized clocks on the satellites, the transit time can be found and used to provide the distance to each satellite. Receiver clock error is corrected by combining the data from four satellites.
Such techniques vary in accuracy according to the distances over which they are intended for use. For example, LORAN-C is accurate to about 6 km, GPS about 10 m, enhanced GPS, in which a correction signal is transmitted from terrestrial stations (that is, differential GPS (DGPS)) or via satellites (that is, Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS)) can bring accuracy to a few meters or < 1 meter, or, in specific applications, tens of centimeters. Time-of-flight systems for robotics (for example, Laser Detection and Ranging LADAR and Light Detection and Ranging LIDAR) aim at lengths of 10 - 100 m and have an accuracy of about 5 – 10 mm
In many practical circumstances, and for precision work, measurement of dimension using transit-time measurements is used only as an initial indicator of length and is refined using an interferometer. Generally, transit time measurements are preferred for longer lengths, and interferometers for shorter lengths.
The figure shows schematically how length is determined using a Michelson interferometer: the two panels show a laser source emitting a light beam split by a beam splitter (BS) to travel two paths. The light is recombined by bouncing the two components off a pair of corner cubes (CC) that return the two components to the beam splitter again to be reassembled. The corner cube serves to displace the incident from the reflected beam, which avoids some complications caused by superposing the two beams. The distance between the left-hand corner cube and the beam splitter is compared to that separation on the fixed leg as the left-hand spacing is adjusted to compare the length of the object to be measured.
In the top panel the path is such that the two beams reinforce each other after reassembly, leading to a strong light pattern (sun). The bottom panel shows a path that is made a half wavelength longer by moving the left-hand mirror a quarter wavelength further away, increasing the path difference by a half wavelength. The result is the two beams are in opposition to each other at reassembly, and the recombined light intensity drops to zero (clouds). Thus, as the spacing between the mirrors is adjusted, the observed light intensity cycles between reinforcement and cancellation as the number of wavelengths of path difference changes, and the observed intensity alternately peaks (bright sun) and dims (dark clouds). This behavior is called interference and the machine is called an interferometer. By counting fringes it is found how many wavelengths long the measured path is compared to the fixed leg. In this way, measurements are made in units of wavelengths λ corresponding to a particular atomic transition. The length in wavelengths can be converted to a length in units of metres if the selected transition has a known frequency f. The length as a certain number of wavelengths λ is related to the metre using λ = c0 / f. With c0 a defined value of 299,792,458 m/s, the error in a measured length in wavelengths is increased by this conversion to metres by the error in measuring the frequency of the light source.
This methodology for length determination requires a careful specification of the wavelength of the light used, and is one reason for employing a laser source where the wavelength can be held stable. Regardless of stability, however, the precise frequency of any source has linewidth limitations. Other significant errors are introduced by the interferometer itself; in particular: errors in light beam alignment, collimation and fractional fringe determination. Corrections also are made to account for departures of the medium (for example, air) from the reference medium of classical vacuum. Resolution using wavelengths is in the range of ΔL/L ≈ 10−9 – 10−11 depending upon the length measured, the wavelength and the type of interferometer used.
The measurement also requires careful specification of the medium in which the light propagates. A refractive index correction is made to relate the medium used to the reference vacuum, taken in SI units to be the classical vacuum. These refractive index corrections can be found more accurately by adding frequencies, for example, frequencies at which propagation is sensitive to the presence of water vapor. This way non-ideal contributions to the refractive index can be measured and corrected for at another frequency using established theoretical models.
It may be noted again, by way of contrast, that the transit-time measurement of length is independent of any knowledge of the source frequency, except for a possible dependence of the correction relating the measurement medium to the reference medium of classical vacuum, which may indeed depend on the frequency of the source. Where a pulse train or some other wave-shaping is used, a range of frequencies may be involved.
For small objects, different methods are used that also depend upon determining size in units of wavelengths. For instance, in the case of a crystal, atomic spacings can be determined using X-ray diffraction. The present best value for the lattice parameter of silicon, denoted a, is:
- a = 543.102 0504(89) × 10−12 m,
with V the electrical voltage drop traversed by the electron, me the electron mass, e the elementary charge, and h the Planck constant. This wavelength can be measured in terms of inter-atomic spacing using a crystal diffraction pattern, and related to the metre through an optical measurement of the lattice spacing on the same crystal. This process of extending calibration is called metrological traceability. The use of metrological traceability to connect different regimes of measurement is similar to the idea behind the cosmic distance ladder for different ranges of astronomical length. Both calibrate different methods for length measurement using overlapping ranges of applicability.
Measuring dimensions of localized structures (as opposed to large arrays of atoms like a crystal), as in modern integrated circuits, is done using the scanning electron microscope. This instrument bounces electrons off the object to be measured in a high vacuum enclosure, and the reflected electrons are collected as a photodetector image that is interpreted by a computer. These are not transit-time measurements, but are based upon comparison of Fourier transforms of images with theoretical results from computer modeling. Such elaborate methods are required because the image depends on the three-dimensional geometry of the measured feature, for example, the contour of an edge, and not just upon one- or two-dimensional properties. The underlying limitations are the beam width and the wavelength of the electron beam (determining diffraction), determined, as already discussed, by the electron beam energy. The calibration of these scanning electron microscope measurements is tricky, as results depend upon the material measured and its geometry. A typical wavelength is 0.5 Å, and a typical resolution is about 4 nm.
Other small dimension techniques are the atomic force microscope, the focused ion beam and the helium ion microscope. Calibration is attempted using standard samples measured by transmission electron microscope (TEM).
Other systems of units
In some systems of units, unlike the current SI system, lengths are fundamental units (for example, wavelengths in the older SI units and bohrs in atomic units) and are not defined by times of transit. Even in such units, however, the comparison of two lengths can be made by comparing the two transit times of light along the lengths. Such time-of-flight methodology may or may not be more accurate than the determination of a length as a multiple of the fundamental length unit.
- Ellipsometry#Imaging ellipsometry
- Frequency-modulated continuous-wave radar (FMCW)
- Length scale
- List of length, distance, or range measuring devices
- Low-energy electron microscopy
- Orders of magnitude (length)
- Pulse-Doppler radar
- Range ambiguity resolution
- A brief rundown is found at Donald Clausing (2006). "Receiver clock correction". The Aviator's Guide to Navigation (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0-07-147720-8.
- Robert B Fisher and Kurt Konolige (2008). "§22.1.4: Time-of-flight range sensors". In Bruno Siciliano, Oussama Khatib, eds. Springer handbook of robotics. Springer. pp. 528 ff. ISBN 354023957X.
- For an overview, see for example, Walt Boyes (2008). "Interferometry and transit-time methods". Instrumentation reference book. Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 89. ISBN 0-7506-8308-2.
- An example of a system combining the pulse and interferometer methods is described by Jun Ye (2004). "Absolute measurement of a long, arbitrary distance to less than an optical fringe". Optics Letters 29 (10): 1153. doi:10.1364/ol.29.001153.
- René Schödel (2009). "Chapter 15: Length and size". In Tōru Yoshizawa. Handbook of optical metrology: principles and applications. Volume 10. CRC Press. p. 366. ISBN 0-8493-3760-7.
- The corner cube reflects the incident light in a parallel path that is displaced from the beam incident upon the corner cube. That separation of incident and reflected beams reduces some technical difficulties introduced when the incident and reflected beams are on top of each other. For a discussion of this version of the Michelson interferometer and other types of interferometer, see Joseph Shamir (1999). "§8.7 Using corner cubes". Optical systems and processes. SPIE Press. pp. 176 ff. ISBN 0-8194-3226-1.
- Jesse Zheng (2005). Optical Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) Interferometry. Springer. ISBN 0-387-23009-2.
- SK Roy (2010). "§4.4 Basic principles of electronic distance measurement". Fundamentals of Surveying (2nd ed.). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. pp. 62 ff. ISBN 81-203-4198-8.
- W Whyte, R Paul (1997). "§7.3 Electromagnetic distance measurement". Basic Surveying (4th ed.). Laxton's. pp. 136 ff. ISBN 0-7506-1771-3.
- An atomic transition is affected by disturbances, such as collisions with other atoms and frequency shifts from atomic motion due to the Doppler effect, leading to a range of frequencies for the transition referred to as a linewidth. Corresponding to the uncertainty in frequency is an uncertainty in wavelength. In contrast, the speed of light in ideal vacuum is not dependent upon frequency at all.
- A discussion of interferometer errors is found in the article cited above: Miao Zhu, John L Hall (1997). "Chapter 11: Precise wavelength measurements of tunable lasers". In Thomas Lucatorto et al. eds. Experimental method in the physical sciences. Academic Press. pp. 311 ff. ISBN 0-12-475977-7.
- For example, the index of refraction of air can be found based upon entering a wavelength in vacuum into the calculator provided by NIST: "Refractive index of air calculator". Engineering metrology toolbox. NIST. September 23, 2010. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
- Peter J. Mohr, Barry N. Taylor, David B. Newell; Taylor; Newell (2008). "CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006". Rev Mod Phys 80 (2): 633–730. arXiv:0801.0028. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.633. See section 8: Measurements involving silicon crystals, p. 46.
- "Lattice parameter of silicon". The NIST reference on constants, units and uncertainty. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 2011-04-04.
- A discussion of various types of gratings is found in Abdul Al-Azzawi (2006). "§3.2 Diffraction gratings". Physical optics: principles and practices. CRC Press. pp. 46 ff. ISBN 0-8493-8297-1.
- "Electron wavelength and relativity". High-resolution electron microscopy (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. 2009. p. 16. ISBN 0-19-955275-4.
- See "Metrological traceability". BIPM. Retrieved 2011-04-10.
- Mark H. Jones, Robert J. Lambourne, David John Adams (2004). An introduction to galaxies and cosmology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 88 ff. ISBN 0-521-54623-0.
Relating one step on the distance ladder to another involves a process of calibration, that is, the use of an established method of measurement to give absolute meaning to the relative measurements provided by some other method.
- Michael T. Postek (2005). "Photomask critical dimension metrology in the scanning electron microscope". In Syed Rizvi. Handbook of photomask manufacturing technology. CRC Press. pp. 457 ff. ISBN 0-8247-5374-7. and Harry J. Levinson (2005). "Chapter 9: Metrology". Principles of lithography (2nd ed.). SPIE Press. pp. 313 ff. ISBN 0-8194-5660-8.
- NG Orji et al. (2007). "TEM calibration methods for critical dimension standards". Proc. Of SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXI 6518: 651810. doi:10.1117/12.713368.
This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Metre (unit)", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.