(Lev Nikolayevich Oigenstein)
|Răutu's official photograph|
|Head of Agitprop|
|Succeeded by||Dumitru Popescu-Dumnezeu|
February 28, 1910|
|Died||1993 (aged 83)
|Political party||Romanian Communist Party|
|Religion||none (lapsed Jewish)|
Leonte Răutu (until 1945 Lev Nikolayevich (Nicolaievici) Oigenstein; February 28, 1910 – 1993) was a Bessarabian-born Romanian communist activist and propagandist. He was chief ideologist of the Romanian Communist Party ("Workers' Party") during the rule of Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, and one of his country's few high-ranking communists to have studied Marxism from the source. His adventurous youth, with two prison terms served for illegal political activity, culminated in his self-exile to the Soviet Union, where he spent the larger part of World War II. Specializing in agitprop and becoming friends with communist militant Ana Pauker, Răutu made his way back to Romania during the communization process of the late 1940s, and became a feared potentate of the Romanian communist regime. As head of the Communist Party's new Agitprop Section, he devised some of the most controversial cultural policies, and managed to survive Pauker's downfall in 1952.
As Gheorghiu-Dej's assistant, Răutu played a leading part in all the successive avatars of Romanian communism: he was a Stalinist and Zhdanovist before 1955, an anti-revisionist until 1958, and a national communist since. During this long transition, he instigated (and gave a Marxist backing to) the successive campaigns against Gheorghiu-Dej's political adversaries, selectively purged academia of suspected anti-communists, and deposed some of his own supporters. He became widely hated for his perceived lack of scruples, depicted by disgraced communist writers as "the perfect acrobat" or "Malvolio".
Răutu preserved some of his influence after his national communist friend Nicolae Ceaușescu took over the party leadership. He lost his Agitprop prerogatives, but became instead rector of the party's own Ștefan Gheorghiu Academy, and still played a part in defining the official dogmas. He was eventually deposed in 1981, as punishment for his daughter's decision to emigrate. He spent the rest of his life in relative obscurity, witnessing the fall of communism in 1989.
Rătu's birthplace was Bălți (Byeltsi), a city in the Bessarabia Governorate, Russian Empire, where his father, Nikolai Ivanovich Oigenstein (or Nicolai Ivanovici Oighenstein), worked as a pharmacist. The Oigensteins were Russian-educated Jews, and did not speak Romanian until ca. 1920. Some communist sources suggest that Răutu was born in Romania proper, at Fălticeni, but this account is either misled or misleading. Lev Nikolayevich (later Leonte or Leonea) was the eldest of three brothers; Dan (later Dan Răutu) was the second-born; the third brother, Mikhail, would later take the name of Mihail "Mișa" Oișteanu.
Lev witnessed the birth of Greater Romania from Bălți, where he remained until his high-school graduation. He later relocated to the Bukovina region, and, in 1928, was in Bucharest, the national capital. The future ideologist entered the University of Bucharest to study mathematics, but never graduated. (He may also have spent a while at the Bucharest Medical School.) He entered the Communist Youth in 1929 and the party itself in 1931, contributing to its propaganda activities. In the years when the Romanian Communist Party (PCR, later "Workers' Party", or PMR) was banned, he was editor of the party organ Scînteia and worked with Ștefan Foriș, Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu, Valter Roman, Sorin Toma, Mircea Bălănescu and Tatiana Leapis (later Bulan). Leapis was Răutu's first wife, but left him for Foriș.
Characterized as intelligent, ironic and well-informed, Răutu preferred to read Russian and Soviet literature. Although lacking a thorough training in philosophy, he was one of the few PCR activists with a certain knowledge of Marxist and even non-Marxist theory, but despised most forms of continental philosophy and modernism. Political scientist Vladimir Tismăneanu describes Răutu as comparable with some other Eastern European dogmatic Stalinists, from Jakub Berman and József Révai to Kurt Hager. In this definition, Răutu was a "self-hating intellectual".
Historian Lucian Boia believes that, in adopting communism, Răut forfeited his Jewishness and "became abstract", an "ideological soldier". Tismăneanu also notes that Răutu separated from his Jewish roots very early in life, growing up into Russian culture, condemning all expression of Jewish nationalism, and becoming classifiable as a "non-Jewish Jew". Likewise, historian Lucian Nastasă describes Răutu as one of the Romanian communists who were "less dominated by the obsession of ethnic affiliation (the religious one being entirely excluded by the aggressive atheism promoted in the Soviet Union)"; Răutu and others were instead animated by their "obedience to the Soviet Union."
Răutu was first tried for sedition while still in the Communist Youth, and sentenced to a one-year prison term by the authorities of the Kingdom of Romania. He was for a while held in Chișinău jail, then moved to Doftana prison, in the company of other PCR militants, becoming acquainted with many of Romania's future political bosses. Shortly after being released, in 1932, he was again on trial: until 1934, he was again in prison, first at the penitentiary facility of Cernăuți and then at Jilava prison. Upon release, he became an activist for the communist committee in Bucharest. After his breakup with Tatiana Leapis, the young activist met his future wife Natalia "Niunia" Redel, herself Jewish and Russian-educated.
Answering a call for repatriation, Răutu and Natalia emigrated to the Soviet Union following the 1940 occupation of Bessarabia. Before leaving, he entrusted his documents to Foriș' lover and secretary, Victoria Sârbu. Although Jewish, he was not dissuaded by the interval of Nazi–Soviet cooperation: once relocated to the Moldavian SSR, he was made co-editor of Pămînt Sovietic ("Soviet Land"), a propaganda magazine. He may have also been an ideological instructor for the Bessarabian Communist Party.
Lev and Natalia were married in the Soviet Union. Little is known about the couple in the months that followed the Nazi and Romanian attack on the Soviet Union. They escaped Bessarabia, and fled further inland: Răutu is said to have been a mere laborer at a sand quarry and a kolkhoz. He and Natalia had two children, both of whom died, probably of hunger, during the months of Soviet retreat. At some point (perhaps in 1943), Răutu became head of the Radio Moscow Romanian-language division, making him a favorite of exile faction leader Ana Pauker's, together with Valter Roman and Petre Borilă. This assignment placed Răutu in direct contact with some of Pauker's colleagues in the Comintern: he replaced Basil Spiru, of Marx University fame, and was supervised by Rudolf Slánský. His other job was as book editor for the Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Răutu returned to Romania in 1945 at Pauker's request and was immediately catapulted to the top of the party's propaganda section, as Iosif Chișinevschi's deputy, joining the editorial team of the revived Scînteia, and becoming one of the most active contributors to Contemporanul monthly. His Scînteia articles were noted for their bitter irony and for the vehemence of the insults they addressed to political enemies, in particular the National Peasants' Party and its organ Dreptatea. He was among the fiercest critics of multiparty, pluralist democracy, together with Silviu Brucan, Ștefan Voicu, Sorin Toma, Nestor Ignat, Nicolae Moraru, Miron Radu Paraschivescu and Traian Șelmaru. Răutu later recruited the core of the PMR's ideologists from his group.
In his other important capacity, Răutu helped set up and guide the PCR's Agitprop, or "Political Education", Section. It came into existence just months before the kingdom was replaced with a communist state, officially at the request of communist-controlled trade unions, and was led by Răutu from 1948 to 1965. The Agitprop Section embodied the PMR's control over the Education and Culture ministries, the Romanian Academy, the Radio Broadcasting Committee and cinema studios, the AGERPRES agency, the Writers' Union and the Artists' Union, and even sporting associations and clubs.
Already in 1947, Răutu organized Agitprop's unified offensive against the nearly dissolved "reactionary" forces: the National Peasants' Party, framed during the Tămădău Affair; the National Liberal Party-Tătărescu, which Ana Pauker had pushed out of the coalition government; and the dissident Social Democrats, who had refused to be absorbed into the Communist-led "Workers' Party". His orders were for communist propaganda to focus on condemning the Western Allies and their Marshall Plan (see Vin americanii!), and on supporting the supposed growth in industrial production from homegrown socialist sources. Additionally, Răutu joined Pauker in combating the spread of Zionism, signing the party's 1948 Resolution on the National Issue, which assured the Romanian Jews that their national identity would not be jeopardized under Marxist rule.
The other Oigensteins and the Redels also moved to Romania. The Romanian-sounding surname of Răutu, picked out after a Romanianization policy was imposed by the PCR doctrinaires, may have been borrowed from the novels of Lev's one favorite Romanian author, Constantin Stere. Lev and Natalia had two daughters: Anca, born 1947, and Elena ("Lena"), born 1951. The family was integrated into the nomenklatura and lived in villas located near the political epicenter that was the Primăverii compound: Londra Street, then Turgheniev Street.
Formally acknowledged as Chișinevschi's closest collaborator, a member of the central committee from 1948, and head of the Agitprop from 1956, Leonte Răutu is widely regarded as the dictator of Romanian cultural life until the death of party leader Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej. His credentials came from the communist essay Împotriva cosmopolitismului și obiectivismului burghez în științele sociale ("Against Cosmopolitanism and Bourgeois Objectivism in Social Science"), published by the party press and Lupta de Clasă journal in 1949. This work introduced Romanians to historical materialism and a partiinost' analysis of cultural or scientific matters, borrowing Soviet criticism of "bourgeois pseudoscience": against genetics, neo-Malthusianism, Indeterminism, and in large part against "cosmopolitan" social thinkers (Ernest Bevin, Léon Blum, Harold Laski). The two centuries of Romanian philosophy, from the advocates of Westernization (Titu Maiorescu) to the radical nativists (Nae Ionescu), were dismissed as irrelevant to the real priorities of Romanian workers, with Răutu firmly rooting Romania's past in Slavic Europe. Likewise, the right-wing historian Gheorghe I. Brătianu was depicted as both a "Hitlerite" and a puppet of "American imperialism". Răutu's text is regarded by Tismăneanu as an "embarrassing" contribution to the field, and described by historian Leonard Ciocan as the origin of "manichean" methodology and "typically Stalinist" discourse in Romanian social science.
His inspiration for such texts was Soviet culture boss Andrei Zhdanov, whose anti-formalist and anti-individualist campaigns he would try to replicate in Sovietized Romania. Since 1948, he had been preoccupied with eradicating "decadent" literature and art, including urban-themed modernism, but also informed his subordinates not to allow a resurgence of ruralizing traditionalism. He declared Zhdanov's "bitter criticism" of composer Dmitri Shostakovich to be a "profound" positive example: "Take the gloves off, let's start criticizing [as well]. Here too we can learn from the Soviets." Also then, he ordered a selection of publishing houses and literary magazines that followed a "just line", and set aside funds for financing writers who had internalized the Workers' Party principles and "stepped down from the ivory tower".
A notorious experiment approved by Răutu, and brought to life by Sorin Toma, was the campaign against celebrated poet Tudor Arghezi, attacked as a "decadent" and subsequently banned for a number of years. Looking back on the events in 1949, the Agitprop chief told his subordinates: "[Writers] who are still enemies must be stomped upon without mercy. Arghezi, who has not changed, not even today, I have fulminated." Other targets were literary critics Șerban Cioculescu and Vladimir Streinu, both depicted as ill-adapted to the spirit of socialist patriotism. In 1949, when Răutu began his purge of academia, one of the first to fall was literary historian George Călinescu, a professor at the University of Bucharest, who, although left-wing, was not considered a true communist. As such figures were sidelined, Răutu himself was given the Chair of Marxism-Leninism at Bucharest University, which he kept from March 1949 to May 1952.
Pauker's fall and "processing" campaign
Navigating his course between the warring PMR groups of Pauker and Gheorghiu-Dej, Răutu established his reputation during the fall of a third faction, Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu's "Secretariat" group. Already in Împotriva cosmopolitismului..., Răutu called his rival an "enemy of the working class", and a defamer of Marxist values. As noted by Tismăneanu, he applied "his proverbial zeal" to condemning Pătrășcanu's entire political activity. With the Tito–Stalin split, Răutu also became involved in exposing supposed "Titoist" infiltrations in Romania, ordering a tight monitoring of Tanjug propaganda, and then a Romanian Agitprop project focused on vilifying Yugoslavia. In parallel, he took over supervision of the nominally independent left-wing daily Adevărul, overseeing its liquidation in 1951.
Răutu first impressed critics of the regime by being able to survive Pauker's downfall (1952), and was one of the very few of the wartime exiles not to be designated a "Right deviationist". Together with Miron Constantinescu, the other PMR intellectual, he initiated the campaign to purge all other supposed inner-party oppositionists, drafting the PMR resolution on prelucrări ("processing", a euphemism for "interrogations"). In his speeches to the PMR sections, Răutu described the cadre verification policy as inspired by the 19th CPSU Congress and its talk of "ideological work" being paramount in the consolidation of socialism. He declared Pauker a saboteur of collectivization and her associate Vasile Luca guilty of "criminal activity".
In large part, "processing" meant a clampdown on writers with supposed (and supposedly concealed) "fascist" sympathies. A communist-turned-dissident poet, Nina Cassian, recalls: "Leonte Răutu [...] dominated these scatty, vulnerable, terrified and confused beings—the artists and the writers, producing tragedies and comedies, stagings glories and stigmatization, paralyzing one's morality, activating another's immorality". Cassian was targeted as a critic of the regime, and kept under surveillance for her "negative influence" on other literary figures, including her lover of the time, Marin Preda. One author to escape from Răutu's campaigns was modernist left-winger Geo Dumitrescu, whom poet Eugen Jebeleanu defended, at the last moment, against claims that he had been working for far-right newspapers during the war years. Senior writers George Călinescu and Victor Eftimiu were accused of concealing Social Democratic sympathies.
Meanwhile, historian Constantin Daicoviciu, a former member of the Iron Guard fascist movement, was found to be an embarrassment for the communist-run peace committees and banned from politics. Paradoxically, other areas under Răutu's control escaped such purges, and former far-right affiliates such as Octav Onicescu and Ion Barbu pursued their scientific careers with little standing in their way.
Răutu built himself a new power base comprising noted Agitprop figures, some of whom were also writers and journalists. The prominent ones were Moraru, Șelmaru, Savin Bratu, Ovid Crohmălniceanu, Paul Georgescu, Nicolae Tertulian and Ion Vitner. Over the years, his deputies included Mihail Roller (who had also returned from the Soviet Union), Ofelia Manole, Paul Niculescu-Mizil, Nicolae Goldberger (a member of the politburo since the 1930s), Manea Mănescu (in charge of science), Cornel Onescu and Pavel Țugui (later expelled from the party for having concealed his youthful sympathy for the Iron Guard). Some of his other favorites, including Constantin Ionescu Gulian (recovered from an initial put-down for his "cosmopolitan" discourse) and Ernő Gáll, became the official interpreters of Marxist philosophy.
Before and after 1952, Răutu's program was rigidly and thoroughly Stalinist. As such, Tismăneanu writes, he spearheaded the most damaging campaigns in the cultural field, "designed to terrorize Romania's intellectual class": "the destruction of Romanian Academy research institutes, the [Academy's own] mutilation, the forced Sovietization [...] the gaudy kowtowing at Russian culture (as it had been defined under the Stalinist canon) [...] the promotion of fanatics, of the ideologically possessed, impostors and dilettantes, to high cultural offices". Răutu's monopoly on the humanities is also credited with having incapacitated the development of independent ideas in Romanian philosophy and sociology, as well as with the near-complete elimination of psychology as a credible academic subject. Instructed by Gheorghiu-Dej, the Agitprop chief even targeted Romania's pre-communist Marxist current as the school of "Menshevism"—announcing, in 1951, that Constantin Dobrogeanu-Gherea, the father of Romanian social democracy, was worthy of condemnation. Conversely, he and Ionescu Gulian attacked the conservative opinion-maker and Gherea's rival, Titu Maiorescu, as the icon of bourgeois conformity.
The neotraditionalist philosopher Lucian Blaga, a contemporary of Răutu's, was also vilified. Blaga was the target of ominous commentary in the communist newspapers, singled out for revenge by the communist poet Mihai Beniuc, and ultimately derided in public by Răutu. Other main targets of Răutu's communist censorship were Tudor Vianu, Liviu Rusu (depicted as too idealistic) and Blaga's in-law Teodor Bugnariu. A young scholar at the time, Mihai Șora described Răutu as the object of a fearful myth: "a censor with such keen eyes, that one will find it impossible to slip by [and] a very cultivated man, finding great pleasure in reading bourgeois, Western etc. literature, the very same one he will publicly condemn." Pursuing his ideological condemnation of philology, Răutu arrived at imposing Joseph Stalin's own Marxism and Problems of Linguistics. Marxist linguists who were not keen on adopting Stalin's perspective, including Alexandru Rosetti, Alexandru Graur and Iorgu Iordan, were investigated for "enemy-like activity" and left virtually unemployed until 1954.
The young communist activist Nicolae Ceaușescu was reporting to Răutu in matters of sport. Their activity included a 1953 investigation of the Central Army Club, suspected of "caste-like" factionalism and of "placing [its] interests above the interests of national sport."
Răutu was still unchallenged as cultural policymaker even as Stalin died, although the Romanian regime contemplated structural changes. After 1956, essentially his only superior within the party was Gheorghiu-Dej, who cared little for cultural intrigues. At the VIIth party congress in December 1955, Răutu became an alternate member of the politburo. Shortly after, he began an investigation into the activities of Nicolae Labiș, the disillusioned Marxist poet. Răutu signaled Labiș's fall into disgrace, declaring his piece "Murdered Albatross" to be pessimistic and unworthy of "building-sites that construct socialism."
The tensions between Gheorghiu-Dej and Soviet ruler Nikita Khrushchev were highlighted during the Hungarian revolution of 1956. Romania participated in the punitive expedition against Hungary. Răutu himself reported that the general public felt that Romania suffered "because of the terrible boners made by the Soviets in Hungary." Documenting the reorientation of the mid-1950s, scholar Ken Jowitt included Răutu and Gheorghiu-Dej's economic adviser, Alexandru Bârlădeanu, among the PMR "regime figures" who mediated "between the progressives and the Stalinists." When Gheorghiu-Dej, who played the two factions against each other, decided to overturn some of the Zhdanovist measures adopted in the 1950s, he even described Răutu and Mihail Roller as responsible for the PMR's frail relationship with the Romanian intellectuals.
Răutu had another close call at the Party Plenary of June 1957: Chișinevschi and Constantinescu were both attacked by Gheorghiu-Dej as "liberal socialists" and "revisionists", then expelled from the party's inner core. Even though he was one of Chișinevschi's confidants (and Natalia Răutu was Chișinevschi's secretary), Răutu managed to survive the incident and preserved his standing. He expressed full support for Gheorghiu-Dej, and was even tasked by the communist leader with redacting the Plenary documents for public view. He collaborated on this project with Ceaușescu, who was one of Gheorghiu-Dej's trusted men.
His only potential rival was Grigore Preoteasa, who joined the central committee's secretariat in charge of ideology shortly after Chișinevschi was sidelined. As Tismăneanu notes, this was a chance for Romanian culture to be revisited "with a modicum of decency". However, Preoteasa's death that November allowed Răutu undisputed control over culture. Răutu himself was injured in the Vnukovo Airfield accident that killed Preoteasa. His recovery in hospital brought an unexpected relaxation of censorship, which notably allowed ethnologists to write about the traditional Romanian dwellings (a theme that Răutu would have otherwise proscribed) and translators to focus on contemporary literature.
Upon returning, the PMR ideologist heralded an all-out anti-revisionist campaign: his May 1958 speech began with attacks on the anti-Soviet Internationalist Communist Union, Hungarian revolutionaries and "liberal theories"; went on to criticize Stalinist "dogmatism" and the "personality cult"; and eventually listed Romanian philosophers and artists who had deviated into one field or the other. Răutu reassessed his own political positioning, depicting Chișinevschi as a morbid Stalinist and himself as a balanced figure. During June 1958, he and Gheorghiu-Dej produced a case against the PMR veteran Constantin Doncea, who had been tempted to question Gheorghiu-Dej's claims of revolutionary primacy. Răutu labeled Doncea a Titoist, then came up with claims that Doncea had followers in the cultural sphere—a pretext for the verification of writers who still harbored modernist ideas. This happened even as Răutu drafted a confidential note about improving relations with Yugoslavia and toning down anti-Titoist propaganda.
The PMR cultural activists, Răutu included, masterminded the show trial of philosopher Constantin Noica, writer Dinu Pillat and other literary dissidents, all of them brutalized by the Securitate secret police. He preserved much of his great influence, from directing the censorship apparatus (officially placed under Iosif Ardeleanu) to putting out Scînteia (approving each issue before it went into printing).
Transition to national communism
While the regime veered into Stalinized national communism, Răutu engineered some of the newer campaigns to quash alternative culture, indicating suspects to the Securitate: communist writers Alexandru Jar and Gábor Gaál, attacked for having demanded de-Stalinization; modernist sculptor Milița Petrașcu, "unmasked" as an opponent of the regime in a humiliating public session; and classical composer Mihail Andricu, castigated for having revealed his appreciation for the West. Historian Stefano Bottoni argues that, in Jar's case, Răutu may have set a trap for a former friend, by inviting Jar to state openly his critique of the PMR line.
Răutu also refused to reinstate the modernist poet-translator Ion Vinea, calling him artistically irrelevant and an agent of British Intelligence. In 1960, he returned to the George Călinescu issue, accusing him of deviating from the PMR program. Răutu's men suggested that, as a novelist, Călinescu had portrayed the Iron Guard in too light tones; Călinescu made a personal appeal to Gheorghiu-Dej, who treated him with noted sympathy. Later the same year, Călinescu was allowed to lecture at the University, but still not reinstated as professor.
Tasked by the politburo with controlling the Romanian Jewish community, Leonte Răutu became a denouncer of the "Ioanid Gang". This name was applied to a cell of Jewish anti-communists who managed to rob the National Bank of Romania; captured, they were also accused of having plotted Răutu's murder. Such issues troubled the cultural ideologist: Răutu looked on as the Jews, discriminated against by the PMR's antisemitic lobby, registered for mass emigration to Israel. Răutu asked the party leaders not to strip all those who applied of their Romanian citizenship, and, responding to Gheorghiu-Dej's antisemitic comments, concluded that Romanian communism had failed at integrating the Jewish minority.
Eventually, Răutu resigned himself to adopting Gheorghiu-Dej's view. He is purported as the author of a Jewish self-hatred catchphrase, taken up by the (predominantly Romanian PMR) leaders: "Jews should lose their habit of controlling things". As the party began expelling significant numbers of its Jewish members, a confidential note circulated at the top confirmed that, even in 1958, Răutu was expressing strongly antisemitic feelings. According to one eyewitness account, Răutu attacked artist Iosif Molnár for having illustrated the Romanian edition of Anne Frank's Diary with a stylized yellow badge. Instead of seeing this as a symbol of the Holocaust, Răutu accused Molnár of promoting Zionism, then ordered him to attend a "self-criticism" session.
Similarly, Răutu was among those sent in to pacify the Hungarian Romanian minority, and (Bottoni writes) played "the role of a nationalist", airbrushing Romanianization measures, demanding action against the "hostile elements" supporting Hungarian nationalism, and participating in the disestablishment of Bolyai University. From September 1959, controlling the spread of "bourgeois nationalism" among the Hungarians was a permanent task, assigned to a PMR committee presided over by Ceaușescu and Răutu—its other job, of promoting minority interests, was entirely ceremonial.
Speaking at a 1962 short course session, Răutu boasted that the 40,000 Agitprop Section activists had educated 1.4 million young Romanians, all of them inspired by the "party leaders' exigence" in the project to build a socialist society. Some liberalization measures were nevertheless being unveiled, and Răutu, officially introduced as a member of the Great National Assembly, found himself included in Gheorghiu-Dej's official delegation to the United States. He was notoriously silent as his former colleagues and favorites were pushed into retirement (Moraru, Țugui, Vitner) or trapped in "unmasking" sessions. Beniuc and Socialist Realist artist Constantin Baraschi both kept a grudge against Răutu, who did not defend them when the national communists made them bear the blame.
After having sidelined Sorin Toma, Răutu revised his stance on the "decadent" poets, welcoming back into the spotlight modernists like Arghezi and Ion Barbu, and even describing himself as a protector of artistic autonomy. In 1962, he tacitly approved of the PMR's policy of politically (re)integrating some of Romania's more popular traditionalist intellectuals. However, Răutu and other PMR leaders also singled out the Writers' Union chief, novelist Zaharia Stancu, as a political suspect. According to literary historian Cornel Ungureanu, Răutu stated the point discreetly, "without aggravating the Great Chief [that is, Gheorghiu-Dej, who believed Stancu to be an earnest fellow communist]". By then, Răutu was receiving letters from politically suspect writers such as Păstorel Teodoreanu and George Mărgărit, who asked to be reinstated, as reeducated but starving men. Răutu still silenced critiques of Stalinism, but only by proxy. In 1963, on Răutu's orders, Romania became, with Albania, the only Eastern Bloc country not to publish a vernacular translation of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's Ivan Denisovich.
By 1964, when Gheorghiu-Dej signaled Romania's detachment from the de-Stalinized Soviet Union, Răutu was again called upon for ideological maneuvering. Gheorghiu-Dej sided with Red China in the Sino-Soviet divorce, and Răutu helped redact the "April Theses" recognizing "the sovereign rights of each socialist state". He was afterward heard stating his disgust for past Sovietization, sending a shock-wave through academia when he spoke about those "who have shamefully kowtowed at even the most insignificant Soviet creation", and praised "national values" in the scientific field. He enabled Gheorghiu-Dej's anti-Hungarian rhetoric by sending him a report on the nationalistic statements made by various Hungarian authors and tolerated by the Hungarian communist government. Răutu also looked on as the regime allowed a partial recovery of his philosophical bugbears (Dobrogeanu-Gherea, then Maiorescu) and a controlled familiarization with Western literature or modernism.
As Ceaușescu's aide
Despite his concessions to localism, the Bessarabian communist still looked to the Soviet hardliners for inspiration, and was considered to be a Stalinist survivor à la Mikhail Suslov. Răutu is said to have been thankful that Chișinevschi was out of politics altogether, but was embarrassed by Miron Constantinescu's re-admittance into the nomenklatura; in front of other party figures, the two men acted like good friends. The party even selected Răutu to inform his nominal enemy that he had been widowed, Sulamita Constantinescu having been stabbed by her own daughter. Historian Andrei Oțetea, who had been successful in toppling Roller from his position of Marxist historiographer, is said to have described Răutu as "the most intelligent of the communist leaders, but a bastard".
Conflicted by his own social and ethnic origins, Răutu sought good relations with Gheorghiu-Dej's successor Nicolae Ceaușescu, a relationship strengthened due to the friendship between Răutu's wife Natalia and Elena Ceaușescu. His cordial rapport with the Ceaușescu couple, developed during the Gheorghiu-Dej era, together with (historians suggest) his chameleon-like persona, helps account for his longevity in public life. Holding approximately equal party ranks, the two men and their families were also recipients of a luxury trip to France, arranged by Gheorghiu-Dej and with television presenter Tudor Vornicu as their guide. During the game of wits that followed the news of Gheorghiu-Dej's terminal illness, the cultural ideologist made sure to back Ceaușescu for the PMR chairmanship. Răutu managed to impress Ceaușescu, even though the latter was not just fearful of the PMR prison elite, but also a nationalist with antisemitic reactions.
Leonte Răutu authored Gheorghiu-Dej's official obituary, as published by Scînteia, and oversaw the funeral ceremony. After Ceaușescu's ascent in 1965, Răutu's positions included membership on the central committee secretariat and the executive committee, deputy prime minister supervising education (1969 to 1972) and, from 1974 to 1981, rector of the Ștefan Gheorghiu Academy. When the new leader decided to reformulate Communist Party historiography, Răutu was among those tasked with compiling the short course in such a way as to describe the various ideological slips under Gheorghiu-Dej. Researched during 1965, the book was never completed.
Despite the protection he enjoyed, Răutu found that his advancement within the party was curbed, with Ceaușescu informing him that theirs was not an equal partnership. 1966 was thus a low point in Răutu's career, as he was only tasked with supervising the interior commerce department and the Communist Youth's Pioneer branch. According to Tismăneanu, Răutu spent much of the interval reading up on political literature, including Neo-Marxist authors frowned upon by the regime (Herbert Marcuse). Saving face, Răutu showed personal initiative in interpreting the party line and even anticipated Ceaușescu's ideological permutations. After the July Theses of 1971 put a stop to liberalization and introduced the more repressive phase of national communism, he welcomed Ceaușescu's commands as "a model in Marxist-Leninist analysis" and the subjugation of culture to political economy as "an active, revolutionary, attitude"; he also informed the party that the time had come for himself to reexamine his past and determine his own "mistakes". At the lavishly furnished and overbudgeted Gheorghiu Academy, he set up a "Laboratory for Research into Contemporary Historical Progress", dedicated to defending communist dogma against "the illusion of technocracy". Tismăneanu argues that this think tank was merely "bizarre"; he describes Răutu's theories as "clichés" or "platitudes".
As rector, Răutu presented the communist leader with a Ph. D. in Politics on Ceaușescu's 60th birthday in January 1978. At the XIIth Party Congress in 1979, he issued a spontaneous and violent attack against fellow PCR veteran Constantin Pîrvulescu, who had taken the floor to ad-lib about Ceaușescu's separation from Marxism. In a February 1980 speech that saw print in Scînteia, he gave his retouched version of communist history: claiming to have been one of the first communists to take note of young Ceaușescu's "exceptional courage and brilliant intelligence", he extended his gratitude to "my beloved Comrade Nicolae Ceaușescu" for taking on the role of ideological guide in the eyes of "each and all party activists". In March, Răutu was assigned to the central committee's commission on Ideology, Politics, Cultural and Socialist Education; in May, he returned as vice president of the Higher Council of Education. Also that year, he received two of Communist Romania's major distinctions: the Star of the Socialist Republic, 1st Class (granted, on his 70th birthday, for merits "in constructing the multilaterally developed socialist society"), and the 25th Anniversary of the Motherland's Liberation Medal.
Downfall and final years
From the mid-1970s, Răutu was practically a widower. Natalia Răutu, plagued by episodic migraines since the 1940s, was diagnosed with viral encephalitis after slipping into a coma; she was kept under specialized care at Elias Hospital but never recovered. The former head of Agitprop began noticing that the relatives of various communist potentates were using their relative freedom of travel and defecting to the West. Knowing that his own family had little appreciation for Ceaușescu, he expressed fears that, should the same happen to him, the central committee would never pardon it. In 1981, his son-in-law Andrei Coler and his daughter Lena applied for emigration to the United States. In retribution for this move, but also accused of not having fulfilled his political tasks, Răutu was made to present his resignation from the party's central committee; he was also made to renounce his rectorate.
This left the former ideologist entirely isolated, a recluse on the Romanian political scene. In his report for the exile station Radio Free Europe, Noël Bernard assessed: "Nobody is going to shed tears over the fall of Leonte Răutu." Bernard also derided the communists' hypocrisy: Răutu, he noted, had been forced out because his daughter emigrated; Miron Constantinescu advanced steadily, his own daughter a mentally disturbed matricide. Tismăneanu adds: "The 'perfect acrobat' [fell] victim to the very dialectical-Balkanic mechanism that he so decisively helped generate [...] Răutu had been thrown into the grim anonymity that had consumed the last years of his so many associates in youthful daydreaming." Răutu moved out into a regular house of protocol, and worked for the party's own History Institute.
Răutu's last years were marked by panic and confusion: although it gave him pleasure to see Ceaușescu executed during the Romanian Revolution of 1989, that event saw the formal destruction of a political and symbolic structure to which he had dedicated his life. An unverifiable rumor even places Răutu among the dejected old-generation communists who prepared their return under a "Constantin Dăscălescu Government". Reportedly fearing anti-communist repression, he supported Ion Iliescu, a former PMR man and his former employee at the Agitprop Section, whom the Revolution had propelled to the rank of President. Iliescu later acknowledged that he felt respect for Răutu.
The post-revolutionary republic did not impinge on the privileges Leonte Răutu had gained, as an old communist militant, under Gheorghiu-Dej. Legally included in a category of "antifascist combatants", he continued to receive a large pension and was eligible for special medical care. Răutu gave his only in-depth interview to Pierre du Bois, a Swiss political scientist, acknowledging that the communist system had produced tens of thousands of victims but expressing no remorse. He died shortly after, and was cremated at Cenușa furnace, to the tune of The Internationale.
According to Vladimir Tismăneanu and Cristian Vasile, who cite various other authors, Răutu was not just responsible for cultural repression, but also for the characteristically "ill-adapted", "dull", and "anti-intellectual" essence of Romanian communist propaganda at all times between 1950 and 1989. According to poet-journalist Radu Cosașu (himself a figure in 1950s literature), Răutu is personally responsible for a slip of the wooden tongue, allowing the notion of Eastern Bloc to be rendered in Romanian as lagărul socialist—which can also be read as "socialist concentration camp".
A renegade Stalinist and a defector, Petru Dumitriu, satirized Leonte Răutu (as "Malvolio") and Gheorghiu-Dej (as "Amon Ra") in political novels he wrote abroad. As Dumitriu's anti-hero, Răutu goes from fiery intellectual to corrupt and surfeited bureaucrat. The mid to late 1960s ignited a bookish flare of indignation at home, when some of the intellectuals harmed by Răutu's Stalinist policies took their literary revenge. In 1965, Writers' Union president Zaharia Stancu publicly asked Ceaușescu to let Răutu follow in the trail of Chișinevschi, identifying the former as a Stalinist mastermind. According to Stancu, Chișinevschi had been more of a "dilettante" pawn. After personal tragedy led him to reconsider Stalinism (and possibly communism altogether), poet Eugen Jebeleanu also turned on Răutu. The notion of "perfect acrobat", used by Tismăneanu to qualify Răutu's record as a political survivor, was originally the title of a Jebeleanu piece:
Perfectul acrobat este acela
A perfect acrobat is that man
Marxist dissident Alexandru Ivasiuc portrayed Răutu (as "Valeriu Trotușeanu") in the novel Cunoaștere de noapte ("Nightly Knowledge"): the fictional cat-like Răutu spins a web of arguments, admitting his minor errors to divert focus from his crimes. Critic Nicolae Dragoș, who was in the process of moving from Stalinism to nationalism, made a point of saluting Ivasiuc's book: his own editorial for the review România Literară carried the unsettling title Te recunosc, domnule Trotușeanu ("I Recognize You, Mr. Trotușeanu"). A more nationalistic indictment of 1950s policies is found in Dinu Săraru's novel Dragostea și revoluția ("Love and Revolution"), where the antagonist, a politico by the name of "Anghel Tocsobie", is probably based on Răutu. Presumably, the national communists allowed such works to see print because they helped remind Răutu that he was always under their scrutiny.
Although Ceaușescu countersigned Răutu's downfall and allowed a condemnation of Răutu's erstwhile proteges, little was published on the ideologist's own career, and almost no negative reinvestigation saw print before 1989. Researchers such as Ileana Vrancea and Ion Cristoiu, who tackled the more delicate subjects of Stalinist culture and were condemned by the communist press as borderline dissidents, refrained from even mentioning Răutu by name. Benefiting from his seniority in the communist movement, academician Iorgu Iordan made at least one reference to Răutu's problematic decision-making, even before Răutu had been sidelined: Iordan's version of events is preserved in his 1979 memoirs.
Răutu's contribution as a propagandist was entirely absent from official reference works such as the 1978 biographical dictionary of Romanian historiography. Although highly decorated and commended as a positive example, the Agitprop Section founder was generally introduced as a dedicated "party activist", a communist powerhouse rather than a national instructor: while honoring him with the Star of the Socialist Republic, Ceaușescu made sure to remind the audience that Răutu's history had its share of "minuses and unfulfilled chapters".
A controversial perspective on Răutu's public role and legacy was taken up from the late 1980s, with roots in the 1960s, by journalists and critics such as Eugen Barbu and Mihai Ungheanu. Such authors, criticized in turn as xenophobic and even antisemitic, suggest that there was a Jewish-and-communist conspiracy against the very spirit of Romanian culture. This lobby, associated for a while with the journal Luceafărul, was tolerated by Ceaușescu as the radical facet of his national communism: Barbu and fellow novelist Ion Lăncrănjan, who had debuted as orthodox Stalinists and had won Răutu's approval, became proponents of the neotraditionalist revival. In contrast to theirs, largely positive assessments of Răutu survive in memoirs and interviews by Iliescu and by his Agitprop Section successor, Dumitru Popescu-Dumnezeu.
Răutu's daughter Anca Oroveanu and her husband Mihai Oroveanu stayed behind in Romania after the Colers left for America, and continued to visit Răutu. Anca Oroveanu is an art historian, known for her studies in postmodern art. Mihai Oroveanu, a noted art photographer, is a co-founder of the National Museum of Contemporary Art. Răutu's nephews are anthropologist Andrei Oișteanu and poet Valery Oisteanu; the latter directly challenged his uncle by promoting the literary avant-garde in the 1960s.
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.61-62
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.61
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.62–63, 123–124
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.22, 23
- (Romanian) Biografiile nomenklaturii, at the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile site; accessed 12 May 2012
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.23, 63
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.63
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.18, 39, 444
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.63–64
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.18–20, 22, 23, 33, 57–58, 82–86
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.15, 21, 73, 131–132
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.58
- Boia, p.295
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.18, 51, 68–69, 76, 82–86
- Nastasă, pp.18–19
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.24, 39, 65, 71, 97
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.39
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.62, 63–64
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.24, 65
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.65
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.24, 39, 65
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.64
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.66
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.69
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.25, 29–30, 32, 39, 65–72, 445
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.25, 66–67
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.32, 39, 40
- Boia, p.292
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.30, 72–76, 86–88, 92–93, 96–97, 111, 143–144
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.43-45
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.166–167, 170–173, 177
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.167, 171, 173–177
- (Romanian) Florin Mihai, "PCR și evreii din România", in Jurnalul Național, March 25, 2008
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.62–63, 70, 123–124
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.71, 76
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.70, 92–93
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.27–34, 38–39, 44–45, 109–111, 115, 445
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.216–224, 230
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.236–245
- Ciocan, p.304
- Ciocan, p.304; Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.241
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.26, 30–31
- Ciocan, pp.303–304
- Pleșa, p.168; Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.20–21, 30–31, 33, 38–39, 41, 69, 113, 126–127, 179, 226–232, 444
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.178–179
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.179
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.180–182
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.26, 41–42, 101–102
- Boia, p.305; Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.42
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.30, 117, 243, 319
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.45, 252–253
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.45, 123
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.239–240
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.26
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.261–265
- (Romanian) G. Brătescu, "Uniunea Ziariștilor Profesioniști, 1919–2009. Compendiu aniversar", in Mesagerul de Bistrița-Năsăud, December 11, 2009
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.16, 32–33, 70
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.32
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.267-270
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.275–276, 281
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.49
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.316–318
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.116
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.318–319
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.281
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.117
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.20, 25–26, 111, 142–146
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.45, 76–81, 92–95, 103–108, 323–327
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.19, 110–112, 150–151, 248–250
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.16–17
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.17, 19, 28, 30–31
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.19-20, 26, 112
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.111–113, 237
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.17, 30, 35
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.30, 35, 42, 95–96
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.137
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.47–48
- (Romanian) Octavian Cojocaru, "Ceaușescu: 'E adevărat că am făcut o prostie când am distrus Flacăra Ploiești' ", in Evenimentul Zilei, July 18, 2008
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.44, 109, 445
- (Romanian) Mircea Coloșenco, "Poetul comunist – stigmatizat de comuniști", in Observator Cultural, Nr. 556-557, December 2010
- Verona, p.108
- Ken Jowitt, Revolutionary Breakthroughs and National Development: The Case of Romania, 1944–1965, University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles, 1971, pp.215–216. ISBN 0-520-01762-5
- Pleșa, p.174
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.16, 28, 71–72, 111, 121
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.18, 32
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.16, 97–98, 111, 121
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.35
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.35, 44, 96, 104–105, 147
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.137–140
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.349–380
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.27
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.49–51, 106–107
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.344–346
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.17, 102–103, 110
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.115
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.17, 35, 50–51, 103–104
- Bottoni, p.207
- (Romanian) Sanda Cordoș, "Ion Vinea în timpul totalitarismelor (II)", in Transilvania, Nr. 3/2012, pp.18, 20
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.91-92, 110
- (Romanian) Ștefan Cazimir, "Întîlnire G. Călinescu – Gh. Gheorghiu-Dej", in România Literară, Nr. 41/2000
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.23, 103
- Bottoni, p.273
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.51
- "Lista documentelor/List of Documents", in Andreea Andreescu, Lucian Nastasă, Andrea Varga (eds.), Minorități etnoculturale. Mărturii documentare. Evreii din România (1945–1965), Ethnocultural Diversity Resource Center, Cluj-Napoca, 2003, pp.62, 80. ISBN 973-85738-4-X
- (Romanian) Magdalena Stroe, "Aș dori să nu existe niciun fel de discriminări etnice, rasiale, iar omul să fie judecat strict prin ceea ce este el ca valoare umană", in Smaranda Vultur, Adrian Onică (eds.), Memoria salvată II, West University of Timișoara Interdisciplinary Center for Regional Studies, Timișoara, 2009, pp.67–68. ISBN 978-973-125-265-0
- Bottoni, p.284, 286
- Nastasă, pp.22–23, 65
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.381, 383, 393
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.18
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.27, 113–115
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.33, 42, 99, 101–102, 116–117
- (Romanian) Cornel Ungureanu, "Zaharia Stancu, în luptele cu 'înalta societate' ", in România Literară, Nr. 15/2007
- (Romanian) Florina Pîrjol, "Destinul unui formator de gusturi. De la savoarea 'pastilei' gastronomice la gustul fad al compromisului", in Transilvania, Nr. 12/2011, pp.21–22
- (Romanian) Iulian Marcel Ciubotaru, "Un document de arhivă inedit: autobiografia poetului George Mărgărit", in Convorbiri Literare, September 2011
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.122123
- (Romanian) Elis Neagoe-Pleșa, "Rolul lui Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej în elaborarea politicii externe și în direcționarea relațiilor româno-sovietice (1960–1965)", in the December 1 University of Alba Iulia's Series Historica, 9/I, 2005, pp.231240
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.28, 114
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.439-442
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.112–113, 114, 117, 118–119
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.33, 39, 99–100
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.28, 33, 121
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.121
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.43
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.16-17, 28–30, 32–33, 97–101
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.98
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.28
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.81-82. See also Verona, p.189
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.28-29, 34, 53, 101, 445
- (Romanian) Lavinia Betea, "Cum a obținut Ceaușescu diplomele de Bacalaureat și licență în științe economice", in Adevărul, April 25, 2012
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.98-99, 121–122
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.121-123
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.99-101
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.54
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.34
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.29, 161
- (Romanian) Mircea Mihăieș, "Să ne prefacem că nici n-am auzit", in România Literară, Nr. 43/2006; Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.29, 48–49, 53–54, 127–128
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.55
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.53
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.53, 54–55, 128, 162
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.69-70
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.56
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.56, 128–129
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.56–57, 128–129, 446–447
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.15, 444
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.57, 447–448
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.29
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.129
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.36, 129
- (Romanian) Mihaela Grancea, "A comemora sau a celebra? Ambiguitățile istoriei recente și ale autopercepțiilor legate de Revoluția din Decembrie 1989 (II)", in Cultura, Nr. 306, January 2011
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.36, 52, 106, 129–130
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.36
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.160
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, pp.37, 42–43, 129
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.37
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.57-59
- (Romanian) Radu Cosașu, "Către un inexistent colonel pensionar", in Dilema Veche, Nr. 320, January 2010
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.18, 22, 71, 146–147
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.98-99
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.120
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.34-35, 48, 49, 57, 115–116
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.34, 48, 116
- Angelo Mitchievici, "Tangouri celebre: Dragostea și revoluția", in Paul Cernat, Angelo Mitchievici, Ioan Stanomir, Explorări în comunismul românesc, Polirom, Iași, 2008, p.175. ISBN 973-681-794-6
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.48-49
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.31-32
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.17, 31, 45–46, 48
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.20-21, 117–119, 130
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.102, 118–119
- Tismăneanu & Vasile, p.36-37, 51–52, 130
- (Romanian) Adelina Morcov, "Istoria artei. Anca Oroveanu, Rememorare și uitare", in Observator Cultural, Nr. 272, June 2005
- (Romanian) Rodica Palade, Mihai Oroveanu, "Arta de a selecționa și de a compune", in Revista 22, Nr. 664, December 2002
- (Romanian) Dan C. Mihăilescu, "Arta descoaserii (II)", in Ziarul Financiar, January 13, 2006 (republished by România Culturală); Peter Sragher, "Cum dispare Valery Oișteanu în sunetele vocii sale", in Ziarul Financiar, July 1, 2010
- Lucian Boia, Capcanele istoriei. Elita intelectuală românească între 1930 și 1950, Humanitas, Bucharest, 2012. ISBN 978-973-50-3533-4
- (Romanian) Stefano Bottoni, Transilvania roșie. Comunismul român și problema națională 1944–1965, Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities & Editura Kriterion, Cluj-Napoca, 2010. ISBN 978-606-92512-0-1
- (Romanian) Leonard Ciocan, "Revista Lupta de Clasă și problematica istoriografiei staliniste", in the Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series Historica, Nr. II, 2005, p. 301-307
- (Romanian) Lucian Nastasă, "Studiu introductiv", in Andreea Andreescu, Lucian Nastasă, Andrea Varga (eds.), Minorități etnoculturale. Mărturii documentare. Maghiarii din România (1956–1968), Ethnocultural Diversity Resource Center, Cluj-Napoca, 2003, p. 11-67. ISBN 973-86239-2-8
- (Romanian) Liviu Pleșa, "Mihail Roller și 'stalinizarea' istoriografiei românești", in the December 1 University of Alba Iulia's Series Historica, 10/I, 2006, p. 165-177
- Vladimir Tismăneanu, Cristian Vasile, Perfectul acrobat. Leonte Răutu, măștile răului, Humanitas, Bucharest, 2008. ISBN 978-973-50-2238-9
- Sergiu Verona, Military Occupation and Diplomacy: Soviet Troops in Romania, 1944–1958, Duke University Press, Durham, 1992. ISBN 0-8223-1171-2