Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben
Book cover (2nd edition)
LIV, 2nd edition
Author Helmut Rix, Martin Kümmel et al.
Country Germany
Language German
Subject Proto-Indo-European verb
Publisher Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag
Publication date
1998, 2001
Pages 754 (1st edition),
823 (2nd edition)
ISBN 3-89500-219-4
OCLC 47295102
415/.03 21
LC Class P572 .L58 2001

The Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben (LIV, "Lexicon of the Indo-European Verbs") is an etymological dictionary of the Proto-Indo-European verb. The first edition appeared in 1998, edited by Helmut Rix. A second edition followed in 2001. The book may be seen as a segmental update to the Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (IEW) by Julius Pokorny. It was the first dictionary fully utilizing the modern three-laryngeal theory with reconstructions of Indo-European verbal roots.

The LIV's hypothesis about aspect[edit]

The authors of the LIV assume a dichotomy between telic verbs (terminated: for example, *leh₂p- "to light up") and atelic verbs (ongoing: for example, *bʰeh₂- "to shine") in early stages of Proto-Indo-European. Before the daughter languages split off, aspect emerged as a new grammatical category.

Telic verbs were interpreted as aorist forms, and the missing present was formed with various suffixes (for example, *leh₂p-: *l̥h₂p-sḱé-) and the nasal infix (*l̥h₂--p-), all of which are supposed to come from old grammatical forms of uncertain meaning.

Atelic verbs were interpreted as present forms, and the missing aorist was formed with the suffix -s-, yielding the sigmatic aorist.

This hypothesis is used to explain various phenomena:

  • Some verbs in Indo-European languages form root presents (Latin dūcō "I pull, I lead", from PIE *deuk-, *duk-) and derived sigmatic aorists (perfect forms in Latin: dūxī "I have pulled, I have led", pronounced dūksī, from *déuk-s-).
  • Other verbs form root aorists (Latin vīcī "I have won", pronounced vīkī, from *weik-, *wik-) and derived present forms (vin "I win", from *wi-n-k-, with nasal infix).
  • For many PIE verbs, various present forms can be reconstructed without discernible differences in meaning (like *l̥h₂--p- and *l̥h₂p-sḱé- above, both forms have attested reflexes in IE languages: Greek λάμπω "I shine" and Proto-Celtic *laske- "to shine, burn" > Scottish Gaelic loisg "to burn", respectively).

In addition to the present and the aorist, the following aspects are assumed:

Lemmata[edit]

The lexical part contains for each verbal root

  • the conjectured meaning,
  • reconstructed stems with their reflexes in the daughter languages,
  • extensive footnotes (with references, remarks on alternative and dubious reconstructions, etc.),
  • the page number of the corresponding IEW entry.

Indices[edit]

The book includes

  • a regressive root index,
  • an index of reconstructed primary stems, sorted by aspect and formation rule,
  • an index of reflexes in the daughter languages, sorted by language.

Reception and criticism[edit]

  • Seebold[1] claims insufficient evidence for roots reconstructed from a single daughter language. Helmut Rix insists in the preface to the second edition that the assessment of the evidence should be left to the reader.[2]
  • Seebold also criticises some of the conjectured meanings. Rix calls this criticism basically legitimate.[3]
  • Meier-Brügger[4] tentatively calls the LIV's aspect hypothesis adequate and capable of consensus ("adäquat und konsensfähig"), without agreeing on all of the details of the analysis.
  • Fortson[5] calls the LIV "[v]ery useful and up-to-date – though in various places controversial", but does not elaborate on the controversial places.
  • Ringe[6] states that the theories in Rix (what he terms the "Cowgill-Rix verb") largely reflect current consensus, but implies that some of his phonological reconstructions may go beyond the consensus (in terms of being insufficiently "conservative").

See also[edit]

Other PIE dictionaries and grammars[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Seebold, E (1999). IF (104): pp. 287–295.
  2. ^ Rix, H. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben (2 ed.). p. 34. 
  3. ^ Rix, H. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben (2 ed.). p. 35. 
  4. ^ Meier-Brügger, Michael. Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft (7 ed.). p. F103. 
  5. ^ Fortson, BW (2004). Indo-European Language and Culture. Blackwell. p. 99. 
  6. ^ Ringe, Don (2006). From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-955229-0. 

External links[edit]

  • Pokorny PIE Data (University of Texas)
  • Indogermanisches Wörterbuch by Gerhard Köbler (German) (based on the IEW and including laryngeal-based reconstructions, but only as alternative lemmas with cross references to the pre-laryngeal ones)
  • A Lexikon der indogermanischen Nomina (German) (LIN, "Lexicon of the Indo-European Nouns") was intended, but the project has been cancelled due to cutting of funds. The book was eventually published anyway under the title Nomina im indogermanischen Lexikon (NIL, "Nouns in the Indo-European Lexicon"), but only including a limited selection of roots.