Liberal elite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Liberal elite is a political stigma[weasel words] used to describe politically left-leaning people, whose education had traditionally opened the doors to affluence. It is commonly used with the pejorative implication that the people who claim to support the rights of the working class are themselves members of the upper class, or upper middle class, and are therefore out of touch with the real needs of the people they claim to support and protect. The phrase "liberal elite" should not be confused with the term "elite" as used by writers such as Vilfredo Pareto and C. Wright Mills. They use the term to mean those who exercise the most political power.

The label is essentially a rhetorical device with flexible meaning depending on where in the English speaking world it is used. As a polemical term it has been used to refer to political positions as diverse as secularism, environmentalism, feminism, and other positions associated with the left.[citation needed]

The originating usage in the United States is applied with various changes to other English speaking countries and by extension to left-leaning elites in other countries. However, the term "liberal" does not have the same political connotation in all English speaking countries. In Australia it has the opposite connotation to that which it enjoys in the US. It is associated with the Liberal Party, a conservative and powerful party whose name is based on their objective to liberalise the market economy within Australia. In the UK, the Liberal Democrats occupies the political center between the rightist Conservative and the leftist Labour parties.[citation needed]

United States usage[edit]

In the United States, the lifestyle of the liberal elite is often considered noteworthy.[1][2]

Columnist Dave Barry drew attention to these stereotypes when he commented, "Do we truly believe that ALL red-state residents are ignorant racist fascist knuckle-dragging NASCAR-obsessed cousin-marrying roadkill-eating tobacco-juice-dribbling gun-fondling religious fanatic rednecks; or that ALL blue-state residents are godless unpatriotic pierced-nose Volvo-driving France-loving left-wing communist latte-sucking tofu-chomping holistic-wacko neurotic vegan weenie perverts?"[3]

During the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election, Republican candidate John McCain likened Democratic candidate Barack Obama's celebrity appeal to that of pop star Britney Spears and socialite Paris Hilton.[4]

A political ad from the right wing organization Club for Growth attacked the Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean by portraying him as part of the liberal elite: "Howard Dean should take his tax-hiking, government-expanding, latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, body-piercing, Hollywood-loving, left-wing freak show back to Vermont, where it belongs."[5]

Those Americans who equate intellectual pursuits and careers with elitism often point out American intellectuals, most of whom are upper middle class not upper class,[6] are primarily liberal. Approximately 72% of professors identify themselves as liberals. At Ivy League Universities, an even larger majority, 87% of professors identified themselves as liberals.[7] Those with post-graduate degrees are increasingly Democratic.[8][9][10][11]

In Thomas Frank's What's the Matter with Kansas? the idea of a liberal elite is compared to George Orwell's character Emmanuel Goldstein in the book Nineteen Eighty-Four, the fictional hated enemy of the people. Frank argues that anger directed towards this perceived enemy is what keeps the conservative coalition together.[12]

United Kingdom usage[edit]

A Labour Party MP named Emily Thornberry resigned as a member of the shadow cabinet on the 20th of November during the Rochester and Strood by-election, 2014, in which she tweeted a picture of a house draped with England flags and a white van parked outside. Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, commented that her tweet furthers the perception that the Labour Party "has been hijacked by the north London liberal elite".[1]

The term was also regularly used by Nick Griffin, the former leader of the British National Party.[2][3][4]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ The Atlantic Monthly, December 2001
  2. ^ Today's Farmer | May 2002 | Blue vs. Red
  3. ^ http://www.adammessinger.com/2004/12/13/barry-heals-nation
  4. ^ "McCain ad compares Obama to Britney Spears, Paris Hilton - CNN.com". CNN. 30 July 2008. Retrieved 7 May 2010. 
  5. ^ Tierney, John (11 January 2004). "THE 2004 CAMPAIGN; Political Points". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 May 2010. 
  6. ^ Thompson, W. & Hickey, J. (2005). Society in Focus. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Pearson.
  7. ^ "Kurtz, H. (29 March 2005). College Faculties A Most Liberal Lot, Study Finds. The Washington Post.". 29 March 2005. Retrieved 2 July 2007. 
  8. ^ "Election Results 2008". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 May 2010. 
  9. ^ "CNN. (1996). Exit Poll.". Retrieved 11 July 2007. 
  10. ^ "CNN. (2004). Exit Poll.". Retrieved 11 July 2007. 
  11. ^ "CNN. (2008). Exit Poll.". Retrieved 12 October 2008. 
  12. ^ Thomas Frank, What's the Matter with Kansas?, Holt, Henry & Company, ISBN 978-0-8050-7774-2

Further reading[edit]

  • Bartels, Larry M. (2006). "What's the Matter with What's the Matter with Kansas?". Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (2): 201–226. 
  • The Economist staff (November 18, 2004). "The Fear Myth". The Economist.