Litton Industries bombing
In October, 1982, three members of the Direct Action "urban guerrilla" group acted upon "their wish to end the arms race" and filled a stolen pick-up truck with 550 kg of dynamite and drove from Vancouver to Toronto, planting the bomb outside Litton Industries, a manufacturer of American cruise missile components many feared would increase the risk of nuclear war. Although the militants had phoned to evacuate the building, the bomb was accidentally detonated several minutes before its announced deadline, injuring several bomb squad police officers and civilians in the vicinity.
Due to the pressure exerted by protesters following the bombing, Litton Industries lost their government contract to build the weapons.
Litton Industries' role
Litton Industries was conceived as a radio-engineering firm in 1934, but was purchased by Charles Bates Thornton, a Pentagon official with "all the right connections in the government and military", in 1956. Litton transformed into a military producer, building entire naval ships in their private shipyards and installing their privately produced equipment including communications and navigation systems.
Described as "the best known economic link between Canada and the nuclear arms race", the Rexdale, Ontario plant of Litton Industries was announced in October 1978 as one of two locations in the world that would be responsible for the manufacture of the TERCOM guidance systems of the American nuclear-tipped Tomahawk cruise missile. The Canadian federal government had given Litton a $26.4 million grant, in addition to a $22.5-million interest-free loan specifically to allow them to bid competitively for the contract, drawing complaints from some members of the public for using federal funds to further the arms race. The American contract called for approximately 407 cruise missiles to be fitted with navigation systems by Litton Canada,
On April 10, 1981, the Canadian government sent Jean Jacques Blais to oversee the proud presentation of the first Canadian-produced cruise missile guidance system to Rear Admiral Walter M. Locke.
The cruise missiles were being developed with the intention of testing them in Western Canada, to much controversy.
|“||I believe that this moral obligation far overrides our obligation to obey man-made laws. ...I felt that it was necessary to begin the development of a resistance movement that could carry out sabotage and expropriations...||”|
—Hansen, in her closing words at trial
On the night of July 27, 1982, a British Columbia Department of Highways explosives storehouse north of Squamish was entered, and 38.5 cases of dynamite were stolen. On September 13, a local hunter came upon two wooden structures that had been built in the forests of Garibaldi, near the site of the theft. One contained four reels of detonating cord and three boxes of electric blasting caps, and the other building held 28.5 cases of dynamite, as well as explosive gelatins. This indicates that ten crates of dynamite were not stored in the wooden structures, to which Taylor and Hansen held keys.
On the morning of October 14, just hours before the bombing, the Ontario Court of Appeals ruled that five Litton executives from the plant could not be called to testify by the defence counsel of 22 anti-nuclear activists who had been arrested for trespassing one year earlier.
Execution of the bombing
The bomb was detonated on October 14, 1982, and was intended to cause only property destruction. The van was parked in full view of corporate security, with an elaborate "warning box" duct taped to the hood, displaying a message, a digital clock counting down, and a single stick of dynamite to draw attention to the danger.
DANGER EXPLOSIVES - Inside this van are 550 lbs. of commercial dynamite which will explode anytime from within 15 minutes to 25 minutes after the van was parked here. The dynamite will be set off by two completely separate detonating systems. Do not enter or move the van - it will explode. Phone the police immediately and have them block off Highway 27, Cityview Drive, Dixon Road and other roads surrounding the Litton plants and have the workers inside the plants moved to protected areas. Nearby hotels and factories should also be notified so that no one will be hurt by the blast. On top of this box is an authentic sample stick of the dynamite contained inside the van. This is to confirm that this is a real bomb.—The message atop the box
Belmas called the security desk and warned them that a dynamite bomb was placed in a van outside the building, and that it would detonate "in 15 to 20 minutes". She also told the guards to evacuate the plant, phone the local hotels to warn guests to stay away from windows to avoid injury and to have police close down passing roadways to limit the damage to Litton Industries.
...and it will explode in 15 to 20 minutes. Do not enter or move the van because it will explode. This is no prank. We have left for you on the lawn beside the van a box, which is not dangerous. Taped to the box are further instructions and a stick of the same dynamite that we have used in the bomb. This should be ample evidence in confirming to you the severity of our attack.
Act immediately to phone the police and have them block off traffic from Cityview drive, Highway 27, Dixon Road and other surrounding areas. Move all the workers from all of your plants to protected areas and notify the surrounding hotels to have people stay away from all windows.
I want to be sure that you understand what I just said. Could you repeat the crucial information to me?—Belmas' phone call, when the security guard began recording it
However, the security guard either suspected the warning was a hoax, or simply failed to understand the instructions, and did not evacuate the building as advised.
The bomb detonated 12 minutes after the phone call, three minutes earlier than warned, although the bomb squad later suggested that it could have been their own radio communications that accidentally triggered the explosion. The explosion injured three members of the police bomb squad, three passing motorists driving on the highway which had not been shut down despite Belmas' advice, and five Litton employees who had also not been evacuated despite Belmas' advice. All injuries were listed as "not critical".
The bomb damaged two periphery buildings, and blew out a 50' section of wall on the main two-storey plant, indicating that the storagerooms of raw materiel bore the brunt of the damage, as well as the offices above and around the storage area. The cost of damages was described by police as being "in the millions"  Damages were estimated anywhere from $3.87 million to $50 million. By comparison, the Litton contract for the cruise missiles was estimated to have been $80 million.
On October 19, a 9-page communique was mailed to various organisations and media outlets. The first six pages were titled "Direct Action" and explained the philosophy of the group's actions and their opposition to society's ills - and the remaining three pages were titled "Statement regarding the October 14 Litton Bombing" and included an explanation of the purpose of the bombing, and apologised, citing that both the bombers and the inept security response contributed to the unforeseen injuries.
Although Litton Industries indicated that the bombing had not slowed production by more than a week, the bombing was hailed as a "massive success" by the anarchist movement who saw it as "an act of sabotage" against the American military machine. Although there was not wide public support for the bombing, Ann Hansen later pointed to the fact that 15,000 people attended a "Refuse the Cruise" demonstration two weeks after the bombing as evidence it had forced the public to confront Canada's role in the Military-Industrial Complex. Others have concurred that the bombing did galvanise the population, who viewed the bombing as controversial or unnecessary, but took to the streets in greatly strengthened numbers to protest Canada complicity in the production of instruments of war. A month after the bombing, 700 people showed up at the Litton Industries plant to engage in "civil disobedience" despite police warnings.
Ronald Keating, the president of Litton Industries, released a statement following the event, stating that "Bombing is madness", a statement ridiculed as hypocritical for a man "overseeing the very profitable construction of U.S. bombs". Following the bombing, Litton increased their security budget by $2 million, money that Keating said "was money which could be put into our business to help make us more competitive".
The day after the bombing, an anonymous male telephoned Garrett Manufacturing, a subsidiary of Litton housed several blocks away in the same Toronto neighbourhood, to report that a bomb had been placed in the building; leading to an evacuation of the 15 personnel on-shift.
Sgt. William Deconkey, of the Toronto Police, was put in charge of the investigation; and was said to have accepted offers from the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency to help "hunt [the] terrorists".
In the days following the bombing, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police obtained approval for a 90-day Level IV operation against the Cruise Missile Conversion Project, intended to determine the level of influence among known "subversives". The telephones of CMPC members, including Ken Hancock, were wiretapped for "some considerable time" according to Roy McMurtry, the Attorney General of Ontario. Hancock was also the subject of a police raid that seized four bags of documents, after his name surfaced in the diary of Ivan LeCouvie, another man who was arrested and then released by police.
Taylor, hailed as the "intellectual leader of the group" due to having written about the philosophy of guerrilla tactics and revolution, was sentenced to 9 years for the Litton bombing, to be served concurrently with the 22-year sentence he received for his role robbing an armoured bank truck. Hansen, pleading guilty, was sentenced to 12 years for the Litton bombing, to be served concurrently with her life sentence for conspiracy to rob the bank truck, her six years for the bombing of the power station and several other mixed sentences for the firebombing of the pornography stores in Vancouver. Gerry Hannah and Doug Stewart, although sentenced to six and ten years respectively for other Direct Action activities, were not convicted of playing any role in the Litton bombing.
Some defenders of the group have suggested that the accused plead guilty to ensure the trial was not about who committed the action, but "to turn the trials into a political showcase, trotting out the evils of nuclear power, pornography and cruise missiles for all to see".
The judge ruled that Hansen's life sentence was merited because "[her] only remorse or regret is for the injury you caused the ten Litton Systems victims" and that she did not apologise for any of the group's property damage.
In arriving at the sentencing for the group, the judge declared "I have no doubt that all of these people are well-motivated people working, if not struggling, against unfavourable odds to promote their respective causes...[but] the message must be crystal clear. Our Canadian way of life will not tolerate the use of fire, explosive substances or weapons as a means to furthering even worthy objectives".
- Stark, T. James. "Cold War Blues: The Operation Dismantle Story", 1991. p. 203
- Antliff, Allan (2004). Only a Beginning: An Anarchist Anthology. Arsenal Pulp Press. pp. 75, 225. ISBN 1-55152-167-9. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
- Best, Steven. "Igniting a Revolution", p. 246
- Litton Industries, Company History
- Rosenblum, Simon. "Misguided Missiles: Canada, the Cruise and Star Wars", p. 147-148,
- Ottawa Citizen, "Litton Canada, a high technology company creating jobs as it creates world markets for its products", April 15, 1981
- The Evening Independent. "Bomb blast rips Toronto plant that makes U.S. missile systems", 10/15/1982 p. 3-A
- Sherbrooke Forum, "Police arrest missile protestors", November 20, 1981
- Canadian Press, "Pleas for peace accompany tributes on Remembrance Day", November 12, 1981
- Financial Post, "Defence contracts offer lucrative targets", October 24, 1981
- Windsor Star, "US intervenes in deal for new fighter airplanes", Nov. 7, 1979
- MacNiven, Don. "Creative Morality", p. 223
- British Columbia Court of Appeal, R. v Belmas, 27 C.C.C. (3d) 142, 1986 CarswellBC 642
- Windsor Star, "Tip to Police", October 15, 1982
- Tri-City Herald", October 15, 1982, "Toronto Missile Parts Plant bombed"
- "Police radio may have set off Litton bomb", November 4, 1982, Ottawa Citizen
- Tri-City Herald, "Police Seek Clues in Plant Bombing", 10/16/1982. pp. B7"
- Durant Daily Democrat, "Bomb blast does not stop factory", 17 Oct. 1982
- Lodi News-Sentinel, Oct. 16, 1982. 'Bomb blast rips missile parts plant'.
- MBJ Brister, The Viability of the Canadian Anti and Counter Terrorist Response
- International Task Force on Prevention of Nuclear Terrorism, "Preventing Nuclear Terrorism", 1987.pp. 131
- Faith, Karlene. "13 Women: Parables from Prison", p. 234
- Desroches, Leonard. "Allow the Water", p. 254
- Hansen, Ann. "Direct Action", p. 469
- "FBI, CIA offer to hunt bombers", Reading Eagle, October 17, 1982
- Curts, Raymond J. "Building a Global Information Assurance Program", 2002. p. 61-62
- Clearwater, John. "Just Dummies: Cruise Missile Testing in Canada", p. 105
- December 16, 1982. "Ottawa Citizen", 'Documents taken in Litton bomb probe by police'
- Maximumrocknroll, Volume 15, 1984
- Dementlieu, Punk Archive: The Vancouver 5