Logging in the Sierra Nevada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Map of Sierra Nevada.

Logging in the Californian Sierra Nevada arose from the need to support growing communities throughout California. The Gold Rush created a high demand for timber in housing construction, mining procedures, and building railroads. In the early days, harvesting of forests were unregulated and within the first 20 years after the gold rush, a third of the timber in the Sierra Nevada was logged.[1] Concern for the forests rose and created a movement towards conservation at the turn of the 19th century, leading to the creation of state and national parks (Yosemite, Sequoia and Grant Grove) and forest reserves, bringing forest land under regulation. Between 1900 and 1940, agencies like the U.S. Forest Service and The National Park Service regulated the use of the Sierra Nevada’s resources.[1] The economy boom after World War II dramatically increased timber production in the Sierras using clear-cutting as the dominant form of logging.[1] In addition, the California Forest Practice Act, or the Z'Berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act was enacted in 1973 to regulate private timberland holdings.


Logging on privately owned and state-managed timberland in California is restricted to silvicultural techniques defined within by the California Forest Practice Rules. These including: single tree selection, seed tree, shelterwood, group selection, variable retention, and clear-cutting management techniques.[2]

  • clear-cutting involves removal of all trees from a tract of land within a 20 acre area followed by replanting if the new ingrowth of seedlings does not meet stocking levels outlined by the Forest Practice Rules. This can result in disturbances in the Sierra Nevada environment by creating patches of densely packed, single-species, same-aged, tree plantations, but may also benefit the forest stand by removing large pockets of pest or fungal infection and improving forest health over the stand as a whole.
  • Single Tree Selection involves removal of individual trees in a prescribed fashion. Usually this is done across the size distribution of trees in a stand and mimics to some degree the natural mortality pattern and rate within a stand.

Low-impact logging meets current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. This typically means smaller periodic harvests and removing the worst trees to eliminate danger to high value trees. Forest management, concerning harvest rate, reforestation, erosion control, and stream protection, is key to limiting environmental degradation from timber harvesting and to protect future resources

Logging on federal timberland in California follow national regulations.

Logging Industry[edit]

Northern Spotted Owl

Although very significant in certain local economies, the overall economic impact of the forest industry in California in the 21st century is fairly modest[citation needed]. The total timber harvest in 2000 was some 2 billion board feet (4,700,000 m3) of wood, with a harvest value of $909 million.[3] Sierra Pacific Industries, based in Redding, California, owns and manages roughly 1.4 million acres (5,700 km2) of forestland in California, making it the largest private forest owner in the state.

Environmental Concerns[edit]

Logging practices have altered a large portion of native forests, transforming them into simplified forests of same-aged trees with a reduced ecological resilience.[4] These disturbed stands are especially prone to catastrophic fire and mortality due to beetle infestation and disease.[4] It has also caused fragmentation and increased edge effect, along with releasing pesticides and chemicals into the water and land.

Regulation mandates protective measures to address the risk effecting a wide variety of biotic and abiotic factors. The California Spotted Owl, a North American endangered species, may depend on large tracts of old-growth coniferous forests and its protection has been a major wildlife and forest management issue.[5]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c Beesley, David (1996). "Reconstructing the Landscape: An Environmental History, 1820–1960". Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: final report to Congress (PDF). 
  2. ^ "Forest Practice". Cal Fire. Retrieved 2014-02-21. 
  3. ^ Laaksonen-Craig, S.; Goldman G.E.; McKillop W. (2003). Forestry, Forest Industry, and Forest Products Consumption in California (PDF) (Technical report). University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Publication 8070. 
  4. ^ a b McKelvey, Kevin S.; Johnston, James D. (1992). Chapter 11: Historical perspectives on forests of the Sierra Nevada and the Transverse Ranges of southern California: forest conditions at the turn of the century (PDF) (Technical report). USDA Forest Service. p. 241. PSW-GTR-133. 
  5. ^ Call, D.R.; Gutierrez, R.J; Verner J (November 1992). "Foraging Habitat and Home-range Characteristics of California Spotted Owls in the Sierra-Nevada". CONDOR 94 (4): 880–888. doi:10.2307/1369285. JSTOR 1369285. 
  • Jensen, Deborah B.; Torn, Margaret S.; Harte, John (1993). In Our Own Hands: A Strategy for Conserving California’s Biological Diversity. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-08015-7.