||The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (January 2012)|
A low-flow toilet is a flush toilet that uses significantly less water than a full-flush toilet. Low-flow toilets use 6 liters (1.6 gallons) or less per flush as opposed to 13.2 liters (about 3.5 gallons) as was the norm in the 1980s and prior. They came into use in the United States in the 1990s, in response to water conservation concerns. Low-flow toilets include single-flush models and dual-flush toilets, which typically use 1.6 gpf for the full flush and 1.1 gpf for a reduced flush.
Although technologies have come along way in saving and conserving the world's fresh water supplies, Ultra low-flush toilets such as those constructed by the Swedish company,Wostman Ecology since 1993, are without any doubt the most ecological solution; Eco flush uses only 0.6 liters (0.16 gallons) per average flush, Eco Dry and Eco vac(uum) go even lower than that, down to only 0.3 liters per average flush (0.08 gallons.)
A regular 1.6 gpf toilet use about 30-40% of the water in a residential household, where the optimal toilet would only use 3-4% of the water, if you imagine this technology being implemented on the world population, the average person flush 5 times per day, 18.8 gallons (71.2 liters) where the best diverting toilets would only flush 3 liters. if we consider a future where the best technology is used, 68 liters of water would not be wasted per person every day, 4.5 billion of the world's population have access to working toilets. Seen in one year, 111 trillion liters of water are being wasted. If we also include the cost and electricity of cleaning this water, water level rising, along with water pollution and the many tens of thousands of children who die every day due to lack of water. The solution seem pretty obvious, humanity have to value ecology above all else.
In 1988, Massachusetts became the first state in the U.S.A. to mandate the use of low flow toilets in new construction and remodeling. In 1992, U.S. President George H. W. Bush signed the Energy Policy Act. This law made 1.6 gallons per flush a mandatory federal maximum for new toilets. This law went into effect in January 1, 1994 for residential buildings and January 1, 1997 for commercial buildings. However, now it is mandatory in many countries around Europe to use toilets with no higher than 2.5 liter per average flush (0.6 gallons per flush)
The first generation of low-flow toilets were designed like traditional toilets. A valve would open and the water would passively flow into the bowl. The resulting water pressure was often inadequate to carry away waste. In addition to tank-type toilets that "pull"[clarification needed] waste down, there are also now pressure-assist models, which use water pressure to effectively "push" waste.
The Mendelsohn House apartment complex in San Francisco replaced every 3.5 gallon traditional toilet in their 189 apartment units with 1.0 gallon high efficiency toilets equipped with Flushmate IV pressure vessels. This single apartment complex saved four million gallons of water per year.
The US Environmental Protection Agency's WaterSense program provides certification that toilets meet the goal of using less than 1.6 gallons per flush. Units that meet or exceed this standard can carry the WaterSense sticker. The EPA estimates that the average US home will save $90 per year, and $2,000 over the lifetime of the toilets.e Imagine then using Eco Flush at 0.16 gallons per flush, the average person would save 4,000$ in a life time, the world population would save about 405 billion dollars per year, 18 trillion Us dollar in a life time.
Many people[who?] disliked the early low-flow toilets because they had a generally poor design that often required more than one flush to rid the bowl of solid waste; two flushes of a low-flush toilet would thus use as much water as a single, but more effective, flush of a standard toilet. In response, U.S. Congressman Joe Knollenberg from Michigan tried to get congress to repeal the law but was unsuccessful. The design and performance of low flow and ultra low flow toilets has significantly improved since 1994. However these problems are a thing of the past, now days the low flush toilets and diverting toilets are capable of flushing out equally good to an old regular waste toilet.
In 2011, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that, while low-flow toilets are estimated to have saved the city of San Francisco 20 million gallons of water per year, the reduction in water volume has caused waste sludge to back up in the city sewer pipes that were designed expecting a higher ratio of water to solids. The city is attempting to solve this by adding chlorine bleach to the pipes, a proposal that has raised environmental objections. In house drain system design, smaller diameter drain pipes are being used to improve flow by forcing waste to run higher in the pipe and therefore have less tendency to settle along the pipe.
- Jenkins, Matt. "A Brief History of Water Conservation in America and Europe" (web). Rate My Toilet. Retrieved November 10, 2014.
- "Evaluation of Water Use Reduction Achieved Through Residential Toilet Fixture Replacements". Flushmate. Retrieved 23 December 2012.
- "WaterSense An EPA Partnership Program". US EPA. Retrieved 23 December 2012.
- Ross, Andrew (February 28, 2011). "Low-flow toilets cause a stink in SF" (web). San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved December 10, 2012.
- "benefits of using a low flush toilet infographic", the toilet keeper.