Maria Pia de Saxe-Coburgo e Bragança
|Maria Pia de Saxe-Coburgo e Bragança|
March 13, 1907|
|Died||May 6, 1995
|Last monarch||Manuel II|
|Connection with||Alleged bastard half sister|
|Mother||Maria Amelia Laredó e Murça|
|Spouse||Francesco Javier Bilbao,
Giuseppe Manlio Blais,
António João da Costa Amado-Noivo
|1 Self styled Duchess of Braganza
2 Claimed Carlos I of Portugal
Maria Pia de Saxe-Coburgo e Bragança, also known as María Pía de Sajonia Coburgo-Braganza de Laredo; and as Hilda Toledano (March 13, 1907 – May 6, 1995) was a woman who claimed to be an out-of-wedlock child of King Carlos I of Portugal. She also claimed that King Carlos I had recognized her as his daughter and given her the same rights and honours as legitimately-born princes of Portugal. From 1957 she claimed the right to use the royal title Duchess of Braganza and made an active claim to be the rightful Queen of Portugal. In 1983 a Portuguese court declared that she had failed to present sufficient evidence to establish King Carlos I as her father.
- 1 Birth and baptism
- 2 Marriages and children
- 3 Literary career
- 4 Active claim to the Portuguese throne
- 5 Legal case about the baptismal certificate
- 6 Legal case about property in Portugal
- 7 Transfer of rights to Rosario Poidimani
- 8 Death
- 9 Analysis
- 10 Further reading
- 11 See also
- 12 References
- 13 External links
Birth and baptism
Maria Pia was born in Portugal to Maria Amélia Laredó e Murça, the daughter of a wealthy Brazilian couple who had moved to Europe. Maria Amélia's parents are sometimes given the title "baron", but they did not actually hold any noble title; their wealth, however, may have allowed them to use such a title unquestioned.
Maria Amélia was not married at the time she gave birth to her daughter on March 13, 1907. Maria Pia claimed that, shortly thereafter, she was taken by her mother and grandparents to Madrid, Spain. There, she said, she was baptised in the Church of Saint Fermin dos Navarros on April 15, 1907 and that the baptism was registered at the Church of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Mount Carmel and Saint Aloysius. She claimed that her baptismal registration recorded that her father was "D. Carlos de Sassonia-Coburgo y Savoya de la Casa de Braganza de Portugal". This clearly refers to King Carlos I of Portugal, who at the time was married to another woman, Princess Amélie of Orléans.
It has been suggested that Maria Pia was, in fact, one Hilda Toledano, a girl of modest birth adopted by a Brazilian family.
The original baptismal registers of the Church of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Mount Carmel and Saint Aloysius were destroyed during the Spanish Civil War, and no original birth record of Maria Pia has ever been made public. In 1939 the Vicar-General of the Diocese of Madrid-Alcalas issued a baptismal certificate to Maria Pia with information provided to him at that time by Don Antonio Goicoechea y Cusculluela, a member of the Spanish parliament and the Governor of the Bank of Spain, who had reportedly been present at the baptism. Subsequently Maria Pia used this baptismal certificate as evidence for her claim to be the recognised daughter of King Carlos.
Maria Pia also claimed that in the archives of the Diocese of Madrid-Alcala there was a copy of a document signed by King Carlos March 14, 1907 in which he recognised Maria Pia as his daughter and that "she may be called by my name and enjoy from now on the use of this name with the honours, prerogatives, rank, obligations and advantages of the princes of the House of Braganza of Portugal". Like the baptismal certificate, the original of this document did not survive.
Marriages and children
In 1925 at the age of eighteen Maria Pia married Francesco Javier Bilbao y Batista, a Cuban playboy twenty years her senior. He came from a rich family of cattle breeders. Since Bilbao was divorced, the marriage was a civil one only and took place in the Cuban embassy in Paris. They had one daughter, Fátima Francisca Xaviera Iris Bilbao de Saxe-Coburgo Gotha e Bragança, in 1932, but she was reportedly developmentally disabled.
Maria Pia lived briefly with Bilbao in Cuba, before returning to Spain. Bilbao died November 15, 1935. Francisca died unmarried in 1982.
To escape the Spanish Civil War, Maria Pia moved with her mother to Rome. In 1939 she married Giuseppe Manlio Blais, a general in the Italian carabinieri. At the time, members of the carabinieri were forbidden from marrying foreigners. The marriage was, therefore, celebrated clandestinely, and was not registered civilly until August 5, 1946. The union proved much happier and together they had a daughter, Maria da Glória Cristina Amélia Valéria Antónia Blais de Saxe-Coburgo Gotha e Bragança, born in 1946. Maria Cristina married the Spanish sculptor Miguel Ortíz y Berrocal (1933–2006) and together they lived in Verona and had two sons: Carlos Miguel Berrocal de Saxe-Coburgo Gotha e Bragança (born 1976) and Beltrão José Berrocal de Saxe-Coburgo Gotha e Bragança (born 1978).
Blais died in 1983. In 1985, Maria Pia married António João da Costa Amado-Noivo (January 28, 1952 - December 29, 1996). At the time of the wedding, Maria Pia was 78, Amado-Noivo 33.
In 1937, Maria Pia wrote her first book La hora de Alfonso XIII (The Hour of Alfonso XIII) published in Havana, Cuba, by Ucar, Garcia y Companía. This work, written in Spanish and published under the name "Hilda de Toledano", is a defence of King Alfonso XIII of Spain, who was living in exile at the time.
In 1954, Maria Pia wrote Un beso y ... nada más: confidencia consciente de una pecadora inconsciente (A Kiss and ... Nothing More: Conscious Confidences of an Unconscious Sinner) published in Madrid by Plenitud. This work was also written in Spanish and published under the name "Hilda de Toledano". It is a novel, but one which clearly draws heavily upon certain incidents in the life of the author.
In 1957, Maria Pia wrote Mémoires d'une infante vivante (Memoirs of a Living Infanta) published in Paris by Del Duca. This work, written in French and published under the name "Maria Pia de Saxe-Cobourg Bragance", is an autobiography. It marks the first attempt of Maria Pia to receive widespread public recognition for her claim that she was the bastard daughter of King Carlos I of Portugal. In the book, however, Maria Pia makes no claim to any dynastic rights. The book closes with the sentence, "I claim no sceptre but my pen, no crown but that bequeathed by my father and mother: my dignity." Instead, Maria Pia suggests that the rightful heir to the Portuguese throne should be Princess Isabelle d’Orléans, eldest child of Henri, comte de Paris.
Active claim to the Portuguese throne
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2009)|
For at least several decades Maria Pia had claimed to be the bastard daughter of King Carlos I, and even to be entitled to the style "Her Royal Highness" and the title "Infanta". It was not, however, until 1957 that she claimed to be the rightful queen of Portugal in succession to Manuel II, the son of Carlos I (and the purported half-brother of Maria Pia) who had died childless in 1932.
On July 15, 1957 a group of ten Portuguese monarchists published a petition asking Maria Pia to claim the throne. In 1958 she went to Portugal where she was received by the President Francisco Craveiro Lopes; the Prime Minister, António de Oliveira Salazar, however, refused to meet her. In the presidential elections that year Maria Pia supported the failed candidacy of Humberto Delgado. She continued to support Delgado after he went into exile in Brazil.
From this point forward Maria Pia used the title "Duchess of Braganza". She attracted the support of a small minority of monarchists who were actively opposed to Salazar. Maria Pia played on the rivalry in monarchist circles between the Miguelists and the constitutionalists, presenting herself as the "constitutional" (i.e. liberal) candidate. The support given to Salazar by Miguel's heir at the time, Duarte Nuno, in the 1950s enabled Maria Pia even more to represent herself as the liberal and democratic claimant to the Portuguese throne.
Maria Pia was very active in her claim to the Portuguese throne. Articles about her appeared in Italian and Portuguese newspapers. In February 1965, she went to Portugal to visit the tomb of King Carlos. As she was leaving Portugal and returning to Spain, she was arrested and held in custody overnight. She was released without charge at the request of the Italian embassy. In 1976, she infamously checked out of a hotel in Lisbon, where she had stayed for several weeks, without paying the bill, claiming simply that as the Duchess of Braganza she was not obligated to pay for her lodging.
Maria Pia mixed frequently with the jet set idle rich. She claimed that for many years she maintained an ongoing friendship with the exiled King Alfonso XIII of Spain and his son Infante Jaime, Duke of Segovia, but this is strongly denied by the first wife of the latter, Emmanuela de Dampierre. Much correspondence exists between Maria and members of European royal families recording her efforts to gain legitimacy within royal circles, but most of the replies were merely polite but unsupportive.
Legal case about the baptismal certificate
In October 1966 Duarte Nuno petitioned an ecclesiastical court of the Diocese of Madrid-Alcala to remove the name of King Carlos from the baptismal certificate of Maria Pia. Duarte Nuno claimed that there was no evidence that King Carlos was the father of Maria Pia. It is unusual for a baptismal registration to record the father of a bastard child. The Roman Ritual instructs the officiating priest only to record the father’s name if the father himself requests it or if he is known to be the father from some public authentic document (Titulus XII, caput II). Clearly King Carlos was not present at Maria Pia's baptism, but Maria Pia claimed that the copy of the document purportedly signed by Carlos granting her the rights of the princes of Portugal was sufficient justification in ecclesiastical law for Carlos to be named her father on her baptismal certificate.
In February 1972 the case between Duarte Nuno and Maria Pia moved up to the Sacred Roman Rota, the normal appeal court for the Roman Catholic Church. On December 6, 1972 the court found against Duarte Nuno on the grounds that he did not have legal standing in the case, being only the second cousin twice removed of King Carlos. The court did not address the primary question of whether there was sufficient evidence for Carlos being Maria Pia’s father and thus named as such on the baptismal certificate. It did, however, question the necessity of changing a certificate which was over sixty years old.
Had the Roman Rota found in favour of Duarte Nuno, his supporters could have said that the court had determined that Carlos was not Maria Pia’s father. Since the court found against Duarte Nuno, the supporters of Maria Pia were able to say that the court had affirmed the validity of her baptismal certificate and therefore the validity of her claimed parentage – neither of which in fact actually occurred. The court found only that Duarte Nuno did not have the legal standing to bring such a case: "Patres Auditores de Turno ... decreverunt negative, seu non constare de legitimatione actoris ad causam".
Legal case about property in Portugal
In 1982 Maria Pia filed a claim for the restitution of the private real property of the Royal House of Portugal. It was rejected by the Supreme Tribunal of Justice at Lisbon on 14 April 1983. The Court found that Maria Pia had not established the identity of her father, despite the presentation of the same baptismal certificate presented to the court at the Vatican.
Transfer of rights to Rosario Poidimani
|This section relies largely or entirely upon a single source. (August 2009)|
Rosario Poidimani (born Syracuse, August 25, 1946) is an Italian businessman of humble origins, who claims descent from an ancient Sicilian noble family, descending from Gombaldo de Podio, baron of Cugno, Governor of the Castle of Syracuse, in 1299. Luciano Pelliccioni di Poli, a self-proclaimed genealogist, has said that the name "Poidimani" is created from the names of Poggio and Manni. The Poggio or Podio are descended in an almost straight line from Boson, King of Provence, the husband of Ermengard of Italy, a great-great-granddaughter of Charlemagne. In 1979, Rosario Poidimani founded in Pordenone — between Venice and Trieste — the "International Institute of Diplomatic Relations". A few diplomats signed the founding documents of that Institute.
On December 2, 1985, Maria Pia signed a document purporting to amend the Portuguese Monarchic Constitution of 1838, and recognising Rosario Poidimani as her eventual heir. On February 19, 1986 she signed a second document affirming that there was a blood relationship between her and Rosario Poidimani – but not stating exactly what this relationship was.
On April 3, 1987, Maria Pia signed a document abdicating her "claim" to the Portuguese throne and transferring her claimed rights to Rosario Poidimani. Several weeks after the document was signed, Maria Pia and Rosario Poidimani held a ceremony in Portugal confirming the abdication. In the abdication document she stated that the reason for her action in favour of Rosario Poidimani was that she has been "totally deprived of the support of my descent".
Since 1987, Rosario Poidimani has styled himself "H.R.H. Dom Rosario of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha Braganza, 22nd Duke of Braganza", and has been active in promoting his claims. He maintains an office in Vicenza, Italy where he lives, but also reportedly visits Portugal regularly. He claims to be a descendant of Luis I of Portugal  and a male-line descendant of the Holy Roman Emperor Louis the Blind.
In December 2003, Rosario Poidimani brought a libel suit in Italy against Guy Stair Sainty on account of his published analysis of the claims of Maria Pia and Rosario Poidimani, A Brief Response to Statements Made by the Supporters of the late Maria Pia de Saxe-Coburg-Bragança, her Grandson Carlos Miguel Berrocal y Blais, and her Alleged Cognate Rosario Poidimani in Respect of their Claims to the Throne of Portugal. In August 2010 Rosario Poidimani won a decision, being appealed, against historian Guy Stair Sainty and the Italian Court of Vicenza condemned Sainty to pay twenty thousand euro for defamation in this article. .
In 2007 Poidimani was arrested on the charge of fraud in connection with the supposed sale of diplomatic passports who he claimed to be able to release as head of the Royal House of Portugal and president of the IIRD . The Court of Busto Arsizio in the first instance sentenced him to 5 years in prison in January 2011, has already asked the same appeal Appeal sure of his innocence. On April 15, 2013, the Court of Appeal of Milan has definitely fulfilled the pretender Rosario Poidimani by the various charges above because the crime does not exist, the offense is not, not having committed the crime, because the fact is not required by law as a crime and in one case for prescription to which the same Poidimani has already said he would appeal before the Court of Cassation to get the full absolution on the merits and the right compensation for damage suffered. Poidimani has also initiated a number of complaints and lawsuits against Duarte Pio and Portuguese government officials. 
Maria Pia died in Verona in 1995. She was buried with her second husband General Blais in the Cimitero Monumentale of Verona.
Maria Pia's claims, and those of Rosario Poidimani, hinge upon the truth or falsehood of the following:
- that she was the daughter of King Carlos I;
- that Carlos I had the power to grant succession rights to the Portuguese throne;
- that Carlos I in fact gave her succession rights to the Portuguese throne, despite her birth out of wedlock from an adulterine union;
- that Maria Pia, a female, could attain a place in the succession despite Salic Law favoring males (agnatic succession);
- that Maria Pia, based on Cortes de Lamego, was the rightful Queen of Portugal, being half-sister of Manuel II;
- that Maria Pia, supposedly heir-princess, could marry a foreigner (which she did twice);
- that she adopted Rosario Poidimani according to Italian laws comparable to those of Portugal;
- that her daughter Maria da Glória refused her supposed succession rights;
- that she could alter the succession line in favour of Rosario Poidimani, a foreigner and adopted son unrelated to her by blood.
There are no original documents which might support the first and third claims. Maria Pia's baptismal certificate from 1907 was destroyed and there is only a copy of the document in which Carlos I supposedly granted succession rights to Maria Pia. Anyway, there are some records about the relationship between Maria Pia's mother Maria Amelia Laredó e Murça and King Carlos I. For example, a new biography of Infanta Eulalia of Spain was recently published that reveals some letters of the Portuguese King and also reveals the existence of Maria Pia as King Carlos I's bastard daughter. King Alfonso XIII of Spain and his son Infante Jaime, Duke of Segovia seem to have had an ongoing friendship with Maria Pia; her supporters have interpreted this relationship as an affirmation on the part of Alfonso and Jaime that they recognised Maria Pia as Carlos' bastard daughter. In fact, most of the letters cited by Maria Pia in support of her claim were simply courteous replies by royals to her numerous queries and salutations.
Traditionally, the only way in which a bastard child of a Portuguese monarch could have been made legitimate and take his or her place in the line of succession was if his or her parents subsequently were married. At the time of Maria Pia's birth, Carlos was married to Queen Amelie and had two sons with her. Children born of adultery were specifically excluded from the line of succession. However, based in one decision of the Cortes de Lamego, Maria Pia claimed to be the rightful Queen of Portugal.
Carlos I was the constitutional king of Portugal. He did not claim autocratic power, but instead ruled according to the Constitutional Charter of 1826 which stated that the succession to the throne passed only to legitimate descendants. The Constitution, including all matters of succession, could only be amended by the Cortes. Even if Carlos had signed a document granting succession rights to Maria Pia, it would have had no legal value at all.
Just as Carlos could not unilaterally change the Constitutional Charter and grant Maria Pia succession rights, neither could Maria Pia (even if she were rightful queen of Portugal) unilaterally change the Constitution and grant succession rights to Rosario Poidimani above her daughter and grandsons.
Under scrutiny, the claims of Maria Pia (or Hilda) are similar to those of several Europeans born outside marriage who entertain the idea, or fantasy, of descent from royalty; Enrico Vigo, who claims the Byzantine Crown, is another example.
- Maria Pia de Saxe-Cobourg Bragance; Mémoires d'une infante vivante. Paris: Del Duca, 1957. Maria Pia's own account of the first half of her life.
- Humberto Delgado; Memórias (Colecção "Compasso do tempo"). Lisbon, 1974, pp. 233–234.
- Manuel de Bettencourt e Galvão; Ao Serviço d'El-Rei (Cadernos Políticos), Lisbon: Gama, 1949, pp. 123–129.
- A.H. de Oliveira Marques; História de Portugal - Vol. III'. Lisbon, 1982.
- Jean Pailler; Maria Pia: A Mulher que Queria Ser Rainha de Portugal. Lisbon: Bertrand, 2006. The standard biography of Maria Pia of Braganza (currently only available in Portuguese) written by a man who also wrote a biography of King Carlos I.
- Mariano Robles Romero Robledo & José António Novais; Humberto Delgado : assassinato de um herói. Lisbon, 197-.
- Fernando Luso Soares; Maria Pia, Duquesa de Bragança contra D. Duarte Pio, o senhor de Santar. Lisbon: Minerva, 1983. A defence of Maria Pia's claims.
- Mário Soares; Portugal amordaçado: depoimento sobre os anos do fascismo. Lisbon: Arcádia, 1974, pp. 274–278.
- Francisco de Sousa Tavares; O caso de Maria Pia de Bragança (13/5/83), in Escritos Políticos I, Porto, Mário Figuerinhas, 1996, pp. 246–251.
- According to her supposed birth certificate
- Jean Pailler; Maria Pia of Braganza: The Pretender. New York: ProjectedLetters, 2006.
- Jean Pailler; Maria Pia: A Mulher que Queria Ser Rainha de Portugal. Lisbon: Bertrand, 2006, pp. 17.
- Jean Pailler; Maria Pia: A Mulher que Queria Ser Rainha de Portugal. Lisbon: Bertrand, 2006, pp. 18.
- A Brief Response to Statements Made by the Supporters of the late Maria Pia de Saxe-Coburg-Bragança, her Grandson Carlos Miguel Berrocal y Blais, and her Alleged Cognate Rosario Poidimani in Respect of their Claims to the Throne of Portugal
- Il Giornale di Vicenza.it - Home - Cronaca
- Maria Pia's older daughter Francisca had already died without issue before Maria Pia attempted to alter the succession.
- Zavala, José María; La Infanta Republicana: Eulalia de Borbón, la oveja negra de la Dinastía. Madrid, Plaza & Janés: 2008 This Spanish biography of Infanta Eulalia of Spain states: «Ambos fueron infieles a sus cónyuges, empezando por el propio Carlos, que dejó por el mundo una hija ilegítima, María Pía de Sajonia-Coburgo Braganza, nacida menos de un año antes de su asesinato, el 13 de marzo de 1907, y fallecida el 6 de mayo de 1995. Conocida también por Hilda de Toledano, la hija bastarda de Carlos I de Portugal contrajo matrimonio en tres ocasiones: la primera, con Francisco Javier Bilbao Batista, un cubano fallecido en 1932; a continuación, con el italiano Giuseppe Manlio Blais, muerto en 1983, y finalmente con el portugués Antonio da Costa Amado-Noivo, cuarenta y cinco años más joven que ella.»
- The Portuguese Cortes de Lamego had declared: «se el Rey falecer sem filhos, em caso que tenha irmão, possuirá o Reyno em sua vida».
- Maria Pia of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha Braganza. Maria Pia's interviews and other appearances on television.
- A Brief Response to Statements Made by the Supporters of the late Maria Pia de Saxe-Coburg-Bragança, Her Grandson Carlos Miguel Berrocal y Blais, and Her Alleged Cognate Rosario Poidimani in Respect of Their Claims to the Throne of Portugal. A critique by Guy Stair Sainty, a well-known writer on royal genealogy and heraldry. In August 2010 the Tribunal of Vicenza (Italy) found against Stair Sainty for defamation in this article in favour of the Rosario. Sainty is appealing the decision.