Mark Gasson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Mark Gasson
Mark Gasson, Reading UK, May 2009.jpg
Gasson in May 2009
Born Mark N. Gasson
West Sussex, England[citation needed]
Nationality British
Fields
Alma mater University of Reading (BSc, PhD)
Thesis Extending human interaction via invasive neural implants (2005)
Doctoral advisor Kevin Warwick[1]
Website
www.reading.ac.uk/sse/about/staff/m-n-gasson.aspx

Mark N. Gasson[2] is a British scientist and visiting research fellow at the Cybernetics Research Group,[3] University of Reading, UK. He has developed brain–computer interfaces[4]and is active in the research fields of microchip implants for medical devices and digital identity. Gasson has appeared in television documentaries and public lectures including TEDx[5] discussing his work to promote public engagement in science.[6][7]

He is currently based in Los Angeles, California.

Education[edit]

Gasson was educated at the University of Reading where he was awarded a PhD in 2005 for research supervised by Kevin Warwick.[1][8]

Research[edit]

Gasson is known for his experiments in transmitting a computer virus into a human implant, leading to his claim to be the first human infected with a computer virus.[9] He is a proponent of human enhancement using technology implanted into the body, and argues that advanced medical devices have already set a precedent and this evolving technology will inevitably drift to non-medical applications in humans.[10] Gasson argues that as functions of the body are restored or enhanced by implanted devices, the boundaries of the body (the human experience of the body’s delimitation) become increasingly unclear and the separation between man and machine simply becomes theoretical, meaning that the technology becomes perceived by the human as being a part of their body and so should be considered as such.[11]

In 2010 Gasson was the General chair for the IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society 2010 (ISTAS'10).[12]

First human 'infected with computer virus'[edit]

On the 16th March 2009 Gasson had a glass capsule RFID device surgically implanted into his left hand. The implant was used as an identification device for the University of Reading’s intelligent building infrastructure to gain building access. Gasson’s smartphone was also augmented with a reader so that the phone would only function when he was holding it.

In April 2010 following experiments showing the potential vulnerabilities of implantable technology, Gasson's team demonstrated how a computer virus could wirelessly infect his implant and then be transmitted on to other systems.[11] Gasson drew parallels with other implantable devices such as cardiac pacemakers which he asserted were vulnerable because of a tendency of manufacturers to adopt a "security through obscurity" methodology rather than robust security methods. He also argued that as functions of the body are restored or enhanced by implanted devices, the boundaries of the body (the human experience of the body’s delimitation) become increasingly unclear and the separation between man and machine simply becomes theoretical, meaning that the technology becomes perceived by the human as being a part of their body and so should be considered as such. He argues that this development in our traditional notion of what constitutes our body and its boundaries has two notable repercussions: Firstly it becomes possible to talk in terms of a human (albeit a technologically enhanced human) becoming for instance infected by a computer virus or hacked by a third party. This forms the basis of his claim to be the first human infected by a computer virus. Secondly, this development of our concept of the body impacts on human rights, in particular the right to bodily integrity - in most legal systems the right to bodily integrity will be considered a vital fundamental right.[11]

Controversy[edit]

The research attracted criticism from Sophos computer security expert Graham Cluley who stated "Predictions of pacemakers and cochlear implants being hit by virus infections is the very worst kind of scaremongering".[13] Despite this, in 2012 academic Prof Kevin Fu of the University of Massachusetts Amherst disclosed an attack which “would have switched off a heart defibrillator” adding "there are vulnerabilities [in medical devices] but there is a perceived lack of threats".[14] Similarly Barnaby Jack a researcher at security firm McAfee demonstrated an attack on an implantable insulin pump.[15]

Some critics have questioned the need to implant the technology to investigate the issues Gasson is discussing "...it makes no difference if an RFID chip is injected under your skin or stitched into the lining of your jacket...".[13] Gasson argues that many people with implants, including medical devices, consider them to be a part of their body and so it is evident that you cannot simply separate the human and the technology that easily - "actually having something implanted is extremely different to bench testing a piece of hardware because it adds the person and their experiences into the mix. It is seemingly difficult to get across the psychological impact involved in this type of deployment, and this is why I was so keen to test this on myself ... feeling technology to be a part of you is something you probably need to experience to understand".[16]

Human neural implants[edit]

From 2000 until 2005 Gasson headed pioneering academic research to invasively interface the nervous system of a human to a computer. On the 14th March 2002 a microelectrode array was implanted in the median nerve of a healthy human and connected percutaneously to a bespoke processing unit to allow stimulation of nerve fibers to artificially generate sensation perceivable by the subject and recording of local nerve activity to form control commands for wirelessly connected devices.[17]

During clinical evaluation of the implant system the nervous system of the human subject, Kevin Warwick, was connected onto the internet in Columbia University, New York enabling a robot arm, developed by Peter Kyberd, in the University of Reading UK to use the subject's neural signals to mimic the subject's hand movements while allowing the subject to perceive what the robot touched from sensors in the robot's finger tips. Further studies also demonstrated a form of extra sensory input[18] and that it was possible to communicate directly between the nervous systems of two individuals, the first direct and purely electronic communication between the nervous systems of two humans, with a view to ultimately creating a form of telepathy or empathy using the Internet to communicate 'brain-to-brain'.[19] Because of the potentially wide reaching implications for human enhancement of the research discussed by Gasson and his group, the work was dubbed 'Project Cyborg' by the media.

This was the first study[citation needed] in which this type of implant had been used with a human subject and Gasson was subsequently awarded a PhD for this work.[8]

Invasive brain interfaces[edit]

Gasson and his colleagues, together with neurosurgeon Tipu Aziz and his team at John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, and physiologist John Stein of the University of Oxford, have been working towards the next generation of Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease.[20]

In order to improve control of abnormal spontaneous electrical activity in the brains of patients with movement disorders they are developing a combined deep brain recording and stimulating device that will record deep brain signals and from these predict the onset of symptoms such as tremor and dystonic bursts and deliver a short pulse of high frequency stimulation to stop the symptoms before they have even started.[21] It is thought that the shift from continuous stimulation, as currently used, to intermittent bursting stimulation will decrease the power requirements and hence the accumulative costs of subsequent surgery to replace batteries.

The Future of Identity[edit]

From 2004 to 2009 Gasson headed a group of academics and industry professionals drawn from 24 institutions across Europe as part of the European Commission funded FIDIS project[22] targeting various aspects of digital identity and privacy, in particular emerging technologies used for identification and profiling. As well as authoring reports on profiling, Ambient intelligence and ICT implants,[23] Gasson also went public over privacy concerns related to misuse of location information from GPS devices in smartphones,[24][25] and was a contributor to FIDIS's controversial Budapest Declaration on Machine Readable Travel Documents which criticized European governments for forcing their citizens to adopt electronic passports which "decrease security and privacy and increase the risk of identity theft".[26]


References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Mark Gasson at the Mathematics Genealogy Project
  2. ^ Mark Gasson's academic home page
  3. ^ the Cybernetics Research Group, University of Reading
  4. ^ Gasson, M.; Hutt, B.; Goodhew, I.; Kyberd, P.; Warwick, K. (2004). "Invasive neural prosthesis for neural signal detection and nerve stimulation". International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing. doi:10.1002/acs.854. 
  5. ^ Human implants: from invasive to pervasive: Mark Gasson at TEDxGoodenoughCollege on YouTube
  6. ^ Mark Gasson from the Scopus bibliographic database.
  7. ^ An interview with Dr. Mark Gasson on ABC Australia
  8. ^ a b Gasson, Mark (2005). Extending human interaction via invasive neural implants (PhD thesis). University of Reading. 
  9. ^ Cellan-Jones, Rory (27 May 2010). "First human 'infected with computer virus'". BBC News online (BBC). Retrieved 26 May 2010. 
  10. ^ Human ICT Implants: Technical, Legal and Ethical Considerations. Information Technology and Law Series 23. 2012. doi:10.1007/978-90-6704-870-5. ISBN 978-90-6704-869-9. 
  11. ^ a b c Gasson, M. N. (2010). "Human Enhancement: Could you become infected with a computer virus?". 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society. p. 61. doi:10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514651. ISBN 978-1-4244-7777-7. 
  12. ^ https://iibsor.uow.edu.au/conferences/ISTAS/organisingcommittee/index.html
  13. ^ a b http://www.sophos.com/en-us/press-office/press-releases/2010/05/human-virus.aspx Human computer virus experiment is scaremongering, says Sophos
  14. ^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17631838 Medical device hack attacks may kill, researchers warn
  15. ^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17623948 Warning over medical implant attacks
  16. ^ 'Could you be infected by a computer virus?' Research FAQ
  17. ^ Warwick, K.; Gasson, M.; Hutt, B.; Goodhew, I.; Kyberd, P.; Andrews, B.; Teddy, P.; Shad, A. (2003). "The Application of Implant Technology for Cybernetic Systems". Archives of Neurology 60 (10): 1369. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.10.1369. PMID 14568806. 
  18. ^ Warwick, K.; Gasson, M.; Hutt, B.; Goodhew, I. (2005). "An Attempt to Extend Human Sensory Capabilities by Means of Implant Technology". 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2. p. 1663. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2005.1571387. ISBN 0-7803-9298-1. 
  19. ^ Warwick, K.; Gasson, M.; Hutt, B.; Goodhew, I.; Kyberd, P.; Schulzrinne, H.; Wu, X. (2004). "Thought communication and control: A first step using radiotelegraphy". IEE Proceedings - Communications 151 (3): 185. doi:10.1049/ip-com:20040409.  edit
  20. ^ Gasson, M.N., Wang, S.Y., Aziz, T.Z., Stein, J.F. and Warwick, K.: "Towards a Demand Driven Deep-Brain Stimulator for the Treatment of Movement Disorders", 3rd IEE International Seminar on Medical Applications of Signal Processing (MASP 2005), 3–4 November, London, UK, pp. 83-86.
  21. ^ Wu, D.; Warwick, K.; Ma, Z.; Burgess, J. G.; Pan, S.; Aziz, T. Z. (2010). "Prediction of Parkinson's disease tremor onset using radial basis function neural networks". Expert Systems with Applications 37 (4): 2923. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.045. 
  22. ^ http://www.fidis.net
  23. ^ http://www.fidis.net/resources/deliverables/ FIDIS reports
  24. ^ http://www.fidis.net/fileadmin/fidis/press/fidis.press_release.tracking_study.pdf
  25. ^ Scott, Richard (15 May 2009). "Phone firm customers warned over data". BBC News. 
  26. ^ Kosta, E.; Meints, M.; Hansen, M.; Gasson, M. (2007). "An analysis of security and privacy issues relating to RFID enabled e Passports". New Approaches for Security, Privacy and Trust in Complex Environments. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 232. p. 467. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72367-9_42. ISBN 978-0-387-72366-2.