In mathematics, the matrix exponential is a matrix function on square matrices analogous to the ordinary exponential function. Abstractly, the matrix exponential gives the connection between a matrix Lie algebra and the corresponding Lie group.
The above series always converges, so the exponential of X is well-defined. Note that if X is a 1×1 matrix the matrix exponential of X is a 1×1 matrix whose single element is the ordinary exponential of the single element of X.
- 1 Properties
- 2 Computing the matrix exponential
- 3 Illustrations
- 4 Applications
- 5 See also
- 6 References
- 7 External links
Let X and Y be n×n complex matrices and let a and b be arbitrary complex numbers. We denote the n×n identity matrix by I and the zero matrix by 0. The matrix exponential satisfies the following properties:
- e0 = I
- eaXebX = e(a + b)X
- eXe−X = I
- If XY = YX then eXeY = eYeX = e(X + Y).
- If Y is invertible then eYXY−1 = YeXY−1.
- exp(XT) = (exp X)T, where XT denotes the transpose of X. It follows that if X is symmetric then eX is also symmetric, and that if X is skew-symmetric then eX is orthogonal.
- exp(X∗) = (exp X)∗, where X∗ denotes the conjugate transpose of X. It follows that if X is Hermitian then eX is also Hermitian, and that if X is skew-Hermitian then eX is unitary.
Linear differential equation systems
One of the reasons for the importance of the matrix exponential is that it can be used to solve systems of linear ordinary differential equations. The solution of
where A is a constant matrix, is given by
The matrix exponential can also be used to solve the inhomogeneous equation
See the section on applications below for examples.
There is no closed-form solution for differential equations of the form
where A is not constant, but the Magnus series gives the solution as an infinite sum.
The exponential of sums
For any real numbers (scalars) x and y we know that the exponential function satisfies ex+y = ex ey. The same is true for commuting matrices, if the matrices X and Y commute (meaning that XY = YX), then
However, for matrices that do not commute the above equality does not necessarily hold. In this case the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula can be used to calculate eX+Y.
The converse is not true in general. The equation eX+Y = eX eY does not imply that X and Y commute.
If A and H are Hermitian matrices, then
Note that there is no requirement of commutativity. There are counterexamples to show that the Golden–Thompson inequality cannot be extended to three matrices−−and, in any event, tr(exp(A)exp(B)exp(C)) is not guaranteed to be real for Hermitian A , B, C. However, the next theorem accomplishes this in a way.
The exponential map
Note that the exponential of a matrix is always an invertible matrix. The inverse matrix of eX is given by e−X. This is analogous to the fact that the exponential of a complex number is always nonzero. The matrix exponential then gives us a map
from the space of all n×n matrices to the general linear group of degree n, i.e. the group of all n×n invertible matrices. In fact, this map is surjective which means that every invertible matrix can be written as the exponential of some other matrix (for this, it is essential to consider the field C of complex numbers and not R).
For any two matrices X and Y,
defines a smooth curve in the general linear group which passes through the identity element at t = 0.
In fact, this gives a one-parameter subgroup of the general linear group since
The derivative of this curve (or tangent vector) at a point t is given by
The derivative at t = 0 is just the matrix X, which is to say that X generates this one-parameter subgroup.
More generally, for a generic t-dependent exponent, X(t),
Taking the above expression eX(t) outside the integral sign and expanding the integrand with the help of the Hadamard lemma one can obtain the following useful expression for the derivative of the matrix exponent,
The determinant of the matrix exponential
In addition to providing a computational tool, this formula demonstrates that a matrix exponential is always an invertible matrix. This follows from the fact that the right hand side of the above equation is always non-zero, and so det(eA)≠ 0, which means that eA must be invertible.
In the real-valued case, the formula also exhibits the map
to not be surjective, in contrast to the complex case mentioned earlier. This follows from the fact that, for real-valued matrices, the right-hand side of the formula is always positive, while there exist invertible matrices with a negative determinant.
Computing the matrix exponential
Finding reliable and accurate methods to compute the matrix exponential is difficult, and this is still a topic of considerable current research in mathematics and numerical analysis. Both Matlab and GNU Octave use Padé approximant. Several methods are listed below.
If a matrix is diagonal:
then its exponential can be obtained by just exponentiating every entry on the main diagonal:
This also allows one to exponentiate diagonalizable matrices. If A = UDU−1 and D is diagonal, then eA = UeDU−1. Application of Sylvester's formula yields the same result. The proof behind this is that multiplication between diagonal matrices is equivalent to element wise multiplication; in particular, the "one-dimensional" exponentiation is felt element wise for the diagonal case.
If the matrix under question is a projection matrix (idempotent), then the matrix exponential of it is eP = I + (e − 1)P, which is easy to show upon expansion of the definition of the exponential,
A matrix N is nilpotent if Nq = 0 for some integer q. In this case, the matrix exponential eN can be computed directly from the series expansion, as the series terminates after a finite number of terms:
When the minimal polynomial of a matrix X can be factored into a product of first degree polynomials, it can be expressed as a sum
- A is diagonalizable
- N is nilpotent
- A commutes with N (i.e. AN = NA)
This is the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition.
This means that we can compute the exponential of X by reducing to the previous two cases:
Note that we need the commutativity of A and N for the last step to work.
Therefore, we need only know how to compute the matrix exponential of a Jordan block. But each Jordan block is of the form
where N is a special nilpotent matrix. The matrix exponential of this block is given by
Evaluation by Laurent series
By virtue of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem the matrix exponential is expressible as a polynomial of order n−1.
If P and Qt are nonzero polynomials in one variable, such that P(A) = 0, and if the meromorphic function
is entire, then
To prove this, multiply the first of the two above equalities by P(z) and replace z by A.
Such a polynomial Qt(z) can be found as follows−−see Sylvester's formula. Letting a be a root of P, Qa,t(z) is solved from the product of P by the principal part of the Laurent series of f at a: It is proportional to the relevant Frobenius covariant. Then the sum St of the Qa,t, where a runs over all the roots of P, can be taken as a particular Qt. All the other Qt will be obtained by adding a multiple of P to St(z). In particular, St(z), the Lagrange-Sylvester polynomial, is the only Qt whose degree is less than that of P.
Example: Consider the case of an arbitrary 2-by-2 matrix,
The exponential matrix etA, by virtue of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, must be of the form
(For any complex number z and any C-algebra B, we denote again by z the product of z by the unit of B.) Let α and β be the roots of the characteristic polynomial of A,
Then we have
if α ≠ β; while, if α = β,
where sin(qt)/q is 0 if t = 0, and t if q = 0. Thus,
Thus, as indicated above, the matrix A having decomposed into the sum of two mutually commuting pieces, the traceful piece and the traceless piece,
the matrix exponential reduces to a plain product of the exponentials of the two respective pieces. This is a formula often used in physics, as it amounts to the analog of Euler's formula for Pauli spin matrices, that is rotations of the doublet representation of the group SU(2).
The polynomial St can also be given the following "interpolation" characterization. Define et(z) ≡ etz, and n ≡ degP. Then St(z) is the unique degree < n polynomial which satisfies St(k)(a) = et(k)(a) whenever k is less than the multiplicity of a as a root of P. We assume, as we obviously can, that P is the minimal polynomial of A. We further assume that A is a diagonalizable matrix. In particular, the roots of P are simple, and the "interpolation" characterization indicates that St is given by the Lagrange interpolation formula, so it is the Lagrange−Sylvester polynomial .
At the other extreme, if P = (z−a)n, then
The simplest case not covered by the above observations is when with a ≠ b, which yields
Evaluation by implementation of Sylvester's formula
A practical, expedited computation of the above reduces to the following rapid steps. Recall from above that an n-by-n matrix exp(tA) amounts to a linear combination of the first n−1 powers of A by the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. For diagonalizable matrices, as illustrated above, e.g. in the 2 by 2 case, Sylvester's formula yields exp(tA) = Bα exp(tα)+Bβ exp(tβ), where the Bs are the Frobenius covariants of A.
It is easiest, however, to simply solve for these Bs directly, by evaluating this expression and its first derivative at t=0, in terms of A and I, to find the same answer as above.
But this simple procedure also works for defective matrices, in a generalization due to Buchheim. This is illustrated here for a 4-by-4 example of a matrix which is not diagonalizable, and the Bs are not projection matrices.
with eigenvalues λ1=3/4 and λ2=1, each with a multiplicity of two.
Consider the exponential of each eigenvalue multiplied by t, exp(λit). Multiply each such by the corresponding undetermined coefficient matrix Bi. If the eigenvalues have an algebraic multiplicity greater than 1, then repeat the process, but now multiplying by an extra factor of t for each repetition, to ensure linear independence. (If one eigenvalue had a multiplicity of three, then there would be the three terms: . By contrast, when all eigenvalues are distinct, the Bs are just the Frobenius covariants, and solving for them as below just amounts to the inversion of the Vandermonde matrix of these 4 eigenvalues.)
Sum all such terms, here four such:
To solve for all of the unknown matrices B in terms of the first three powers of A and the identity, we need four equations, the above one providing one such at t =0. Further, differentiate it with respect to t,
and once more,
(In the general case, n−1 derivatives need be taken.)
Setting t=0 in these four equations, the four coefficient matrices Bs may be solved for,
Substituting with the value for A yields the coefficient matrices
so the final answer is
The procedure is quite shorter than Putzer's algorithm sometimes utilized in such cases.
Suppose that we want to compute the exponential of
Its Jordan form is
where the matrix P is given by
Let us first calculate exp(J). We have
The exponential of a 1×1 matrix is just the exponential of the one entry of the matrix, so exp(J1(4)) = [e4]. The exponential of J2(16) can be calculated by the formula e(λI + N) = eλ eN mentioned above; this yields
Therefore, the exponential of the original matrix B is
Linear differential equations
The matrix exponential has applications to systems of linear differential equations. (See also matrix differential equation.) Recall from earlier in this article that a homogeneous differential equation of the form
has solution eAt y(0). If we consider the vector
we can express a system of inhomogeneous coupled linear differential equations as
If we make an ansatz to use an integrating factor of e−At and multiply throughout, we obtain
The second step is possible due to the fact that, if AB = BA, then eAtB = BeAt. So, calculating eAt leads to the solution to the system, by simply integrating the third step in ts.
Consider the system
We have the associated matrix
The matrix exponential is
so the general solution of the homogeneous system is
Consider now the inhomogeneous system
We again have
From before, we already have the general solution to the homogeneous equation. Since the sum of the homogeneous and particular solutions give the general solution to the inhomogeneous problem, we now only need find the particular solution.
We have, by above,
which could be further simplified to get the requisite particular solution determined through variation of parameters. Note c = yp(0). For more rigor, see the following generalization.
Inhomogeneous case generalization: variation of parameters
For yp to be a solution,
where c is determined by the initial conditions of the problem.
More precisely, consider the equation
with the initial condition Y(t0) = Y0, where A is an n by n complex matrix,
F is a continuous function from some open interval I to ℂn,
is a point of I, and
is a vector of ℂn.
Left-multiplying the above displayed equality by e−tA yields
We claim that the solution to the equation
with the initial conditions for 0 ≤ k < n is
where the notation is as follows:
is a monic polynomial of degree n > 0,
f is a continuous complex valued function defined on some open interval I,
is a point of I,
is a complex number, and
sk(t) is the coefficient of in the polynomial denoted by in Subsection Evaluation by Laurent series above.
To justify this claim, we transform our order n scalar equation into an order one vector equation by the usual reduction to a first order system. Our vector equation takes the form
In the case n = 2 we get the following statement. The solution to
where the functions s0 and s1 are as in Subsection Evaluation by Laurent series above.
- Bhatia, R. (1997). Matrix Analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 169. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-94846-1.
- E. H. Lieb (1973). "Convex trace functions and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson conjecture". Adv. Math. 11 (3): 267–288. doi:10.1016/0001-8708(73)90011-X. H. Epstein (1973). "Remarks on two theorems of E. Lieb". Commun Math. Phys. 31 (4): 317–325. doi:10.1007/BF01646492.
- R. M. Wilcox (1967). "Exponential Operators and Parameter Differentiation in Quantum Physics". Journal of Mathematical Physics 8 (4): 962–982. doi:10.1063/1.1705306.
- "Matrix exponential - MATLAB expm - MathWorks Deutschland". Mathworks.de. 2011-04-30. Retrieved 2013-06-05.
- "GNU Octave - Functions of a Matrix". Network-theory.co.uk. 2007-01-11. Retrieved 2013-06-05.
- Rinehart, R. F. (1955). "The equivalence of definitions of a matric function". The American Mathematical Monthly, 62 (6), 395-414.
- This can be generalized; in general, the exponential of Jn(a) is an upper triangular matrix with ea/0! on the main diagonal, ea/1! on the one above, ea/2! on the next one, and so on.
- Horn, Roger A.; Johnson, Charles R. (1991). Topics in Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-46713-1..
- Moler, Cleve; Van Loan, Charles F. (2003). "Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years Later". SIAM Review 45 (1): 3–49. doi:10.1137/S00361445024180. ISSN 1095-7200..
- Curtright, T L; Fairlie, D B; Zachos, C K (2014). "A compact formula for rotations as spin matrix polynomials". SIGMA 10: 084. doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2014.084.