Miluk language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Miluk
Lower Coquille
Pronunciation míluk
Region Oregon
Ethnicity Miluk people
Extinct 1939 (last functional speaker 1961)
Coosan
  • Miluk
Language codes
ISO 639-3 iml
Linguist list
iml
Glottolog milu1241[1]

Miluk, also known as Lower Coquille from its location, is one of two Coosan languages. It shares more than half of its vocabulary with Coos proper (Hanis), though these are not always obvious, and grammatical differences cause the two languages to look quite different. Miluk started being displaced by Athabascan in the late 18th century, and many Miluk shifted to Athabascan and Hanis.

Miluk was spoken around the lower Coquille River and the South Slough of Coos Bay. The name míluk is the endonym, derived from a village name. The last fully fluent speaker of Miluk was Annie Miner Peterson, who died in 1939. She knew both Miluk and Hanis, and made a number of recordings.[2][3] Laura Hodgkiss Metcalf, who died in 1961, was the last functional speaker (her mother was Miluk), and was an informant to Morris Swadesh for his Penutian Vocabulary Survey.

Phonology[edit]

The phonological description of Miluk is somewhat inconsistent. The following proposed inventory is one attempt to explain the data:[4]

Bilabial Alveolar Lateral Palato-
(alveolar)
Velar Labio-velar Uvular Labio-uvular Glottal
Pulmonic occlusive p t    t͜s t͜ɬ t͜ʃ k q ʔ
Ejective occlusive tʼ    t͜sʼ t͜ɬʼ t͜ʃʼ kʷʼ qʷʼ
Fricative s ɬ ʃ x χ    ɣ χʷ h?   hʷ?
Resonant m n l j w
Glottalized resonant

Stops are tenuis in syllable onsets before a vowel, and aspirated in syllable codas and before another consonant. It is not clear if [h] and [hʷ] are phonemic; they may be allophones of /x/ and /xʷ/.[4]

The vowels in Milluk are /i, u, ə, ɛ, ɑ/.

Vowel harmony occurs in Miluk, although sporadic. The most common occurrence of vowel harmony in Miluk is the harmonization of /ɛ/ in roots with /ɑ/ in suffixes.[4]

Morphology[edit]

In Miluk, the possessive noun phrase precedes what is possessed. The possessed noun takes no article but instead is marked with the oblique [tə]. Miluk has an inclusive and exclusive distinction when it comes to the dual possessive. In the first person dual inclusive, the words receive the circumfix s=nə-, while the first person dual exclusive receives the prefix nə-.[4]

There are two articles in Miluk, kʷə and ʎə. ʎə is used with nouns that are closer to the speaker, while kʷə is used for nouns which are more distant. These articles do not reflect a gender of a noun and both articles have been found in use for the same noun in discourse.[4] Verbs have intransitive, imperfect, and perfect marker. Verbs which are intransitive take the -u suffix, while the imperfect tense takes the -ʔi suffix and the perfect tense takes the -t suffix.[4]

Gender, Number, Person[edit]

Miluk does not have a masculine/feminine gender distinction, but it does have reflexives of an old gender system. The language reflects this old system in two instances: with a suffix that follows articles (-č) and in lexical items for male and female people throughout life.[4] The suffix -č has been seen to be optional but occurs in three instances: (i) following a feminine noun, (ii) referring to a young person, and (the most common) (iii) referring to elders.[4] The second place where Miluk holds on to an older gender system is when referring to males or females. Words for males often begin with /t/, while the female words often begin with /hu/ and /w/.[4]

Miluk has no third person arguments.[4] Presentational fronting occurs whenever a new argument is introduced.[4]

The table below shows pronominal prefixes.

Singular Dual Plural
1 w(ə)- s- (inc) / nə- (excl) ɬ-
2 nə- is- čil-
3 Ø ič- iɬ-

[4]

Space, Time, Modality[edit]

There are two morphemes which can be added to a verb to mark tense. The morpheme han indicates the prospective tense, which describes that an event is going to occur.[4] The other morpheme that can be added to a verb is hanƛ, which marks the future tense. The future tense is distinguished from the prospective tense and has appeared irrealis marker a ̆x. The order in which the morphemes appear are the pronominal clitics, followed by mood, tense and then aspect.[4]

In the following examples, "han" indicates that an event is going to occur.[5]


Tsú han t’ámi tɬə də- t’ím

Cu han t’aami ʎə tə- t’im

NR PRSP carry ART 3s.Pos Pack

“Now she was going to pack her load” [5]


Tsú han áyu ġɛlts

Cu han aayu qelc

NR PRSP indeed cross

“And then she was going to cross on it indeed” [5]

Case[edit]

Miluk has an ergative–absolutive distinction.[4]

The suffix -x denotes the ergative case in Miluk.

In the following examples, the ergative argument comes before the absolutive argument.

áyu ás-d-a tłə-x hú'mik' tłə də-dím sin
indeed decorate-T[clarification needed]-30[clarification needed] ART-ERG old.woman ART 3sg-POSS grandson
"Indeed the old woman decorated her grandson." [4]

Miluk allows for the opposite to occur, as we see the absolutive argument precede the ergative argument.

gasíya du galam tłə máqt'ł tłə-x gwɛis
almost HAB grab ART cow ART-ERG girl
"The girl almost caught the cow."

Predicates & Arguments[edit]

Similar to Salish languages, Miluk predicates have a tendency to be clause initial.[4] Arguments are expressed with noun phrases and often the arguments follow the verb.[4] Absolutive and ergative arguments can be interchangeable.[4]

The following example shows the ergative argument before the absolutive argument.

|áyu ||ás-d-a ||tłə-x ||hú'mik'|| tłə ||də-dím ||sin |- |indeed ||decorate-T-3Obj|| ART-ERG ||old.woman|| ART ||3sg-POSS ||grandson |}

"Indeed the old woman decorated her grandson." [4]

However, in the next example, the absolutive argument precedes the ergative argument.


Tsú wɛn ilduwa {tɬə dí hímɛ} {tɬɛ -x t’smíxwən}

Cu wen illtwa {ʎə tə- hiime} {ʎə -x c’miixwən}

NR thus say Art 3.sPos children Art Erg Trickster

“Then this is what the trickster told his children”

Obliques[edit]

The morpheme tə marks an oblique or possessive, which occurs throughout the Salish language family. The following two example reveals -tə acting as the oblique marker.


Tsú k’wɛn wus- ú’s -u tɬə də- ‘úmnatt’ɬ -ədja

cu k’ween wus- wus -u ʎə te- umnaaʎ -əča

now news REDUP go.home Intrans.Perf Art 3s.Pos grandmother Loc

“He returned with news to his grandmother”


tsú má gɛ’ yáhwi tɬə də yɛis -ədja

cu ma qee yahwi ʎə te yeis -əča

now Cont there rub Art 3s.Pos mouth loc

“And he kept rubbing it on her mouth”

Complements[edit]

Arguments are often fronted in Miluk and uses presentational construction.[5] This is used while telling stories, to bring attention to the subject of the story.[5] The following examples are of the presentational construction, with the presented construction bolded.


gwɛis gus mín du kwí alam yúgwa

kweis kuus min tu kwi alam yugwa

girl all time Hab Est myrtle.nut gather

“There was a girl who was always picking myrtle nuts”


Tit’sɛwəs tsú ha dlúqws -əm

Tic’eewəs cu ha ʎuqws -əm

Young.girl now Rec.Pft get.up Intrs

“A girl who had just passed her first menses had just now arisen.”

Endangerment[edit]

The Miluk dialect of the Coosan langauge is now extinct. The last speakers were two sisters, Lolly Hotchkiss and Daisy Woosan Codding. The two worked with a linguist in 1953 to record words from the language bu the two were not fluent in adulthood, and had trouble remembering words.[6][6] The last fluent speaker was Annie Miner Peterson, who knew both the Miluk and Hanis dialect.[6] Annie Peterson's first language was Miluk, and in 1930, Annie Miner Peterson began working with Melville Jacobs and the two produced two volumes of texts in both dialects of Coos.[6] Coos Narrative and Ethnographic Texts and Coos Myth Texts were the two publications were published, but the two publications did not have any linguistic analysis. The books only provided English translations to the texts.[5]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Nordhoff, Sebastian; Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "Miluk". Glottolog 2.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 
  2. ^ Whereat, Patty (2001-06). "The Milluk Language - Ghaala". Retrieved 2014-04-06. 
  3. ^ Macnaughtan, Don (1995). "OLA Quarterly Article" 1 (No. 2). Retrieved 2014-04-06. 
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Doty, Christopher S (2012-06). "A Reassessment of the Genetic Classification of Miluk Coos: A dissertation presented to the Department of Linguistics and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon ...". Retrieved 2014-04-06. 
  5. ^ a b c d e f http://www.csdoty.com/resources/Doty-Dissertation.pdf
  6. ^ a b c d http://ctclusi.org/sites/default/files/Milluk%20Language%20(Secure)-1.pdf
  • Wurm, Mühlhäusler, & Tryon, 1996. Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas, p. 1148.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Jacobs, Melville. (1939). Coos narrative and ethnologic texts. University of Washington publications in anthropology (Vol. 8, No. 1). Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
  • Jacobs, Melville. (1940). Coos myth texts. University of Washington publications in anthropology (Vol. 8, No. 2). Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
  • Anderson, Troy. (1990). Miluk Dictionary. Stanford Library. Green Library Stacks. PM961 .A53 1990

External links[edit]