Modern Moral Philosophy
The author presents three theses:
"It is not profitable for us at present to do moral philosophy; that should be laid aside at any rate until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology, in which we are conspicuously lacking."
"Concepts of obligation, and duty — moral obligation and moral duty, that is to say — and of what is morally right and wrong, and of the moral sense of "ought," ought to be jettisoned if this is psychologically possible; because they are survivals, or derivatives from survivals, from an earlier conception of ethics which no longer generally survives, and are only harmful without it."
"The differences between the well-known English writers on moral philosophy from Sidgwick to the present day are of little importance."
- Roger Crisp; Michael Slote, eds. (2001). Virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-0-19-875188-5.
- Haldane, John (June 2000). "In Memoriam: G. E. M. Anscombe (1919-2001)". The Review of Metaphysics 53 (4): 1019–1021. Retrieved 24 September 2013.
- Wardle, John (July 1983). "Miss Anscombe on Sidgwick's View of Humility". Philosophy 58 (225): 389–391. doi:10.1017/s0031819100068467. Retrieved 24 September 2013.
- Virtue Ethics, edited by Roger Crisp and Michael Slote, Oxford, 1997. ISBN 0-19-875189-3
- Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, London, 1985 (2nd ed.). ISBN 0-268-00611-3.
- Expository essay discussing the interpretation of "Modern Moral Philosophy"
|This article about ethics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|